No trust in Creation...no trust in Genesis....no trust in Scriptures...

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Is creation a "salvation issue"

  • Yes it's vital to mans need for salvation

    Votes: 14 53.8%
  • No creation is unconnected to salvation

    Votes: 10 38.5%
  • Never considered any connection

    Votes: 2 7.7%

  • Total voters
    26
  • Poll closed .
Jun 5, 2014
1,750
6
0
Jack H: Some words of advice.

Thanks but no thanks, with respect to any advice from you.

I did notice that you extended the 6,000 years to possibly 20,000.

Isn't that sacrilege for a YEC?

I mean, the 6,000 year date was in the KJV for several hundred years.

So a 6,000 year old world must be right, right?
 
Jun 5, 2014
1,750
6
0
You seem to 'copy and paste' from the many websites on evolution.
I never copied and pasted from ANY website.

Show me one instance where I did.

You, on the other hand, repeatedly copy and paste from Answers in Genesis and Institute for Creation Research, which in some cases appears to be a copyright violation.

I'm going to have to call you a liar. Bearing false witness is a sin you know.

Show me some evidence where I copy and pasted, and I will apologize, and do penance.

In fact, if you can show such evidence, I will leave this site forever.

Then you can copy and paste at will, and nobody will call you out on it.
 
P

Pottyone

Guest
Hi Jack....if you look back to the original posting of this thread you will see that my reason for initiating the thread at all was more to do with the effects of picking and choosing which scriptures/ interpretation of scriptures, that this will have on the veracity of God's word as a whole and therefore the much more important issue of possibly misrepresenting The Lord and our need for salvation. How do you reconcile your view of scripture with Jesus's obvious references to a global flood during Noah's lifetime, resulting in the death of all those animals, and Noah's saving of a selection. Also how do we reconcile the aspect of death being a feature in an "old earth" prior to man's fall and sin's effect on creation. Christ obviously believed that his death would restore the earth back to its pre fall situation, where death would be no more.....the inference surely being that pre fall and sin, there was no death......
One of the YEC clones posted a lengthy blurb today (see post #600) that was copied word-for-word from Institute for Creation Research. One might believe, since he gave no attribution or acknowledgement pertaining to the source of the information, that he thought it up all by himself. Snicker.

And a bunch of YECs "Liked" his post.

Are any of you YECs smarter than a 5th grader? I haven't seen any evidence that you are.

Some 5th graders know more about geology, physics, astronomy, biology, and other sciences, based upon your insistence that the world is 6,000 years old, than any of you do
I have said it before...and sadly I find myself saying it again but JackH, why do you have the need to be so disrespectful to other posters. "YEC CLONES" seriously jack we are YEC's clones and yet OEC's you think of as some form of higher being. Have you ever considered loving your neighbour and at least showing a little respect.
 
May 4, 2014
288
2
0
Sheesh... Over six hundred posts? This turned into one hell of a thread.
 
P

Pottyone

Guest
Hi Jack....if you look back to the original posting of this thread you will see that my reason for initiating the thread at all was more to do with the effects of picking and choosing which scriptures/ interpretation of scriptures, that this will have on the veracity of God's word as a whole and therefore the much more important issue of possibly misrepresenting The Lord and our need for salvation. How do you reconcile your view of scripture with Jesus's obvious references to a global flood during Noah's lifetime, resulting in the death of all those animals, and Noah's saving of a selection. Also how do we reconcile the aspect of death being a feature in an "old earth" prior to man's fall and sin's effect on creation. Christ obviously believed that his death would restore the earth back to its pre fall situation, where death would be no more.....the inference surely being that pre fall and sin, there was no death......
As for the aspect of not saying much about abiogenesis, there's not really very much to say, you see in the study of molecular cell biology we in the real world of research deal with testable hypothesis, and I'm afraid to say that very little of what people like Craig Venter and Jack Szostak suggest has any true validity. One of he great problems from a purely chemo thesis point of view is that the very chemical reactions required to produce peptides necessary for and precursors that might be required for polymerisation and needed therefore in potential "protocell" cell membrane production, are thermodynamically out of equilibrium to begin with and therefore have not actually been demonstrated to be possible, even in a contrived laboratory environment. This is of course only one of the many obstacles to any hypothesis that involves the so called "protocell" which is in fact actually only a fairy tale itself. There is also the other slight problem of cell complexity and organisation let alone the issue of that all important missing item......life itself.
Sorry Jack but before you go on as if science has all the answers you have to have a credible starting position to be going on with and you just don't have one yet.
Dont get me wrong i know hat day by day science is discovering little bits more about the scientific processes of how God spoke life into existence but this idea of abiogenesis is just not it.
 
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
One of the YEC clones posted a lengthy blurb today (see post #600) that was copied word-for-word from Institute for Creation Research. One might believe, since he gave no attribution or acknowledgement pertaining to the source of the information, that he thought it up all by himself. Snicker.

And a bunch of YECs "Liked" his post
.
And why wouldn't they like what they believe is true?

Are any of you YECs smarter than a 5th grader? I haven't seen any evidence that you are.

Some 5th graders know more about geology, physics, astronomy, biology, and other sciences, based upon your insistence that the world is 6,000 years old, than any of you do
To be precise, they believe more about the theories they are taught.

And I've never understood why who composed it is more important than the truth of it.

The truth of it is what is important. . .making the composer of it more important

is just an effort to distract from and neutralize the truth of it.
 
Last edited:
T

Tintin

Guest
Paul warned us about people that will come in the last days and would reject supernatural Christianity, especially literal creationism. Although these are widely diverse in structure and purpose, they all share one vital feature in common: They reject supernatural Christianity, especially literal creationism. Many liberal preachers give nominal allegiance to the teachings of Christ and the Bible, but they invariably deny the mighty power of God in special creation, as well as the great worldwide miracles of the Bible—the Flood, the dispersion, etc.

Included in Paul’s graphic description of the “perilous” characteristics of the “last days” (not the church age, since the prophesied last days were still future when he wrote of them in his last epistle, 2 Timothy 3:1-3) is this warning concerning the religious leaders of the last days. They would observe the outward form (church buildings, sacraments, religious services, etc.) of “godliness” (that is, “religion”), but would reject its supernatural aspects. They would desire the trappings of religious professionalism since they would be “lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God”.

Such specifications aptly describe the modern world of scientism and liberal theology, which pervades practically all religious denominations and overlaps with all kinds of liberal social movements (women’s liberation, gay rights, “New Age” pantheism, and others).

This prophecy is not given in Scripture simply as a matter of information. It contains a warning urgently needed by Bible-believing Christians who are under pressure today to compromise with humanistic liberals on this great doctrine of God’s creative power. Many have accepted the evolutionary system of “ages geology,” and this is tragic and dangerous. Instead of compromising with evolutionary naturalists and religious liberals, as many evangelicals today are inclined to do, Paul warns: “From such turn away!” HMM
Wait just a moment. I agree with this post but it's beginning to look awfully familiar. Yesterday I received an email from ICR and it read just like this. Fishbait, I agree with you, mate but copying and pasting text isn't legal or wise.
 

superdave5221

Senior Member
Jul 28, 2009
1,409
31
48
Thanks but no thanks, with respect to any advice from you.

I did notice that you extended the 6,000 years to possibly 20,000.

Isn't that sacrilege for a YEC?

I mean, the 6,000 year date was in the KJV for several hundred years.

So a 6,000 year old world must be right, right?
MY words of advice.

They were straight from the Bible. I guess this is proof enough that you do not consider the bible to be authoritative.
That's too bad.

Since Proverbs are wisdom sayings, and you reject them, I guess that means you aren't too wise. But I think that most of us on this site have already figured that out.

Here's a couple more verses from the Bible, not my words:

2Th 2:11 For this reason God will send upon them a deluding influence so that they will believe what is false,
2Th 2:12 in order that they all may be judged who did not believe the truth, but took pleasure in wickedness.
 
May 14, 2014
611
4
0
Originally posted by JackH
I ask you the same question I just asked Pottyone.
Mans idea that life spontaneously arose and evolved without the work of an outside Entity of superior intelligence is adverse (or satanic) toward God.

Originally posted by JackH
And your source for this statement is?
The belief itself. Don't automatically believe what you're told. Look at the hypothesis. Do you believe it's responsible science to say iron preserves 60 million year old tissue. Sixty million years? You've believed dinosaurs are millions of years old for so long, that when science discovers true evidence to the contrary, you've already been so brain washed you'll believe a silly reason why real evidence should be ignored. Jack, do you know why T-rex remains are 60 million years old? It's because you've been told they're 60 million years old. Nothing more.

Originally posted by JackH
You are implying that fraud or some such thing was committed. Was anyone charged with a crime or sued? For example, like Ken Ham was sued by Creation Ministries International for defamation (as per Tintin in post #500).
Fraud goes on everywhere and the scientific community isn't exempt. This isn't a secret.


Originally posted by JackH
I don’t see what, exactly, this has to do with your statement that, “Anyone who professes faith in Jesus should oppose the satanic believe in evolution.”
I was anticipating an answer more along the lines of that evolutionary theory caused the Holocaust.
Jack, look at the real Title of your heros book:
"On The Origin Of Species By Means Of Natural Selection, Or The Preservation Of Favoured Races In The Struggle For Life"
Do I have to quote the racist views of Charles Darwin? Do I really have to point out that Adolf Hitler believed Jews, blacks, etc. were inferior races? Evolution demands "survival of the fittest." Wake up Jack.
 
Mar 4, 2013
7,761
107
0
Genesis 2:2 hasn't happened yet, and won't happen until Jesus Christ returns to end the Tribulation and begin the Millenium.
In other words, we are STILL in the 6th Day of Creation, which has lasted for MANY millions of years.
To believe that the universe is ONLY 6,000 years old, is ignorant nonsense.
God created the universe and He can take as long as He likes to make it evolve.

BTW - Genesis 2:2 states - ... and on the 7th Day, God rested.
If that is the case, why in the world would the writer of Hebrews say that God/Jesus being the creator of all things, rested, and ceased from His work on the 7th day, speaking in "past tense?"
Hebrews 4:9-10
9 There remaineth therefore a rest to the people of God.
10 For he that is entered into his rest, he also hath ceased from his own works, as God did from his.

Moses evidently thought it was past also.
Genesis 2:2 And on the seventh day God ended his work which he had made ; and he rested on the seventh day from all his work which he had made .

If the 7th day isn't past, there would never have been written this warning.

Hebrews 4:1 Let us therefore fear , lest, a promise being left us of entering into his rest, any of you should seem to come short of it .

Mark 2:27 And he said unto them, The sabbath was made for man, and not man for the sabbath:

The Sabbath was instigated for us, for there is rest in Christ. If the 7th day isn't past, there no rest.
 
Last edited:
Mar 4, 2013
7,761
107
0
Give it a rest! Why should we wrest with it?

2 Peter 3:16 As also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest , as they do also the other scriptures, unto their own destruction.
 
Mar 4, 2013
7,761
107
0
יִּשְׁבֹּת בַּיּוֹם הַשְּׁבִיעִי, מִכָּל = Rested on the seventh day from all

מְלַאכְתּוֹ אֲשֶׁר עָשָׂה = His work which He had done

השביעי = Seventh

השביע = Satisfied (past tense)

Original Hebrew from Genesis 2:2

"rested" Strong's Concordance
7673 shabath shaw-bath' a primitive root; to repose, i.e. desist from exertion; used in many implied relations (causative, figurative or specific):--(cause to, let, make to) cease, celebrate, cause (make) to fail, keep (sabbath), suffer to be lacking, leave, put away (down), (make to) rest, rid, still, take away.
 
Last edited:
Jun 5, 2014
1,750
6
0
Sixty million years? You've believed dinosaurs are millions of years old for so long, that when science discovers true evidence to the contrary, you've already been so brain washed you'll believe a silly reason why real evidence should be ignored. Jack, do you know why T-rex remains are 60 million years old? It's because you've been told they're 60 million years old. Nothing more.

Wake up Jack.
I have now have woken up and I believe everything you and these other YECs have said is true about dinosaurs. I mean, if you read it on the internet it must be true. Incidentally, I'm a French model. Bon jour.

Not only do you YECs have me now convinced that dinosaurs coexisted with man 4,000 years ago, I am absolutely certain that dinosaurs still exist.

The Loch Ness Monster is a Scottish plesiosauras. What other explanation could there be?
 
Feb 16, 2014
903
2
0
I have now have woken up and I believe everything you and these other YECs have said is true about dinosaurs. I mean, if you read it on the internet it must be true. Incidentally, I'm a French model. Bon jour.

Not only do you YECs have me now convinced that dinosaurs coexisted with man 4,000 years ago, I am absolutely certain that dinosaurs still exist.

The Loch Ness Monster is a Scottish plesiosauras. What other explanation could there be?
All the evidence for evolution is wrong. I don't know how it's wrong, but it's wrong because it contradicts the Bible.

And because all the evidence that contradicts the Bible is wrong by default, there's no explanation for how we came to exist.

Because I can't explain how we came to exist, it must have been God who created everything as is.

This logical argument is an example of creation science.

Flawless.
 
Last edited:
P

Pottyone

Guest
Hi Jack....if you look back to the original posting of this thread you will see that my reason for initiating the thread at all was more to do with the effects of picking and choosing which scriptures/ interpretation of scriptures, that this will have on the veracity of God's word as a whole and therefore the much more important issue of possibly misrepresenting The Lord and our need for salvation. How do you reconcile your view of scripture with Jesus's obvious references to a global flood during Noah's lifetime, resulting in the death of all those animals, and Noah's saving of a selection. Also how do we reconcile the aspect of death being a feature in an "old earth" prior to man's fall and sin's effect on creation. Christ obviously believed that his death would restore the earth back to its pre fall situation, where death would be no more.....the inference surely being that pre fall and sin, there was no death......
I have now have woken up and I believe everything you and these other YECs have said is true about dinosaurs. I mean, if you read it on the internet it must be true. Incidentally, I'm a French model. Bon jour.

Not only do you YECs have me now convinced that dinosaurs coexisted with man 4,000 years ago, I am absolutely certain that dinosaurs still exist.

The Loch Ness Monster is a Scottish plesiosauras. What other explanation could there be?
Jack, you are a silly man and I don't just mean your false scientific beliefs sadly I also mean your rather poor derisory attitude. We all make mistakes and we are all ignorant of God's ways, this side of eternity at least but a word of caution for us all comes from Galatians 6:7 "Do not be deceived, God is not mocked; for whatever a man sows, this he will also reap."
None of us holds all the truth and perhaps none of us should consider ourselves more highly than we ought. Many of us are prepared to seek out the truth as best we can find it but we contradict and misinterpret the words of Scripture at our peril.
 
Jun 5, 2014
1,750
6
0
Jack, look at the real Title of your heros book:
"On The Origin Of Species By Means Of Natural Selection, Or The Preservation Of Favoured Races In The Struggle For Life"
Do I have to quote the racist views of Charles Darwin? Do I really have to point out that Adolf Hitler believed Jews, blacks, etc. were inferior races? Evolution demands "survival of the fittest." Wake up Jack.
Evolution caused the Holocaust.

It's not just the Jews who believe that.

Now YECs like you have me talked into it.

I can really see how the earth is 6,000 years old. Most anything is "possible." I mean, you have heard of the talking horse, Mr. Ed, right?
 
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
jdbear said:
Jack, look at the real Title of your heros book:
"On The Origin Of Species By Means Of Natural Selection, Or The Preservation Of
Favoured Races In The Struggle For Life." Do I have to quote the
racist views of Charles Darwin? Do I really have to point out that
Adolf Hitler believed Jews, blacks, etc. were inferior races?
Evolution demands "survival of the fittest." Wake up Jack.
Evolution caused the Holocaust.
Strawman. . .
 
S

StoneThrower

Guest
Evolution caused the Holocaust.

It's not just the Jews who believe that.

Now YECs like you have me talked into it.

I can really see how the earth is 6,000 years old. Most anything is "possible." I mean, you have heard of the talking horse, Mr. Ed, right?
Aaaa gee ya Wilbur..... who would ever believe in a talking horse? Connie will think your crazy.

[video=youtube;H2sVCCqfUFI]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H2sVCCqfUFI[/video]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
May 14, 2014
611
4
0
Originally posted by JackH
I have now have woken up and I believe everything you and these other YECs have said is true about dinosaurs. I mean, if you read it on the internet it must be true. Incidentally, I'm a French model. Bon jour.
You missed my the point of my post. Don't believe either side without pondering what is actually being said.

Originally posted by JackH
Not only do you YECs have me now convinced that dinosaurs coexisted with man 4,000 years ago, I am absolutely certain that dinosaurs still exist.
The Loch Ness Monster is a Scottish plesiosauras. What other explanation could there be?
Maybe somebody wanted to get rich writing a book. Maybe someone bought a row boat and opened up a business floating tourists around. Who knows.

Originally posted by JackH
Evolution caused the Holocaust. It's not just the Jews who believe that. Now YECs like you have me talked into it.
Many factors cause mans inhumanity to man and the idea that one race is inferior to another (which is what Darwin taught and Hitler believed) was a such a factor in the Holocaust.
Originally posted by JackH
I can really see how the earth is 6,000 years old. Most anything is "possible." I mean, you have heard of the talking horse, Mr. Ed, right?
Yes, I've heard of Mr. Ed. Your mentioning a ridiculous old TV show in connection with biblical beliefs is where your error begins. Just curious Jack, but do you think there's any truth to the story of Jesus rising from the dead?
 
May 14, 2014
611
4
0
Originally posted by Percepi
All the evidence for evolution is wrong. I don't know how it's wrong, but it's wrong because it contradicts the Bible.
You can leave the Bible completely out of the conversation if you wish. Simply look at what you're being told by science for how we came to be.

Originally posted by Percepi
And because all the evidence that contradicts the Bible is wrong by default, there's no explanation for how we came to exist.
Because I can't explain how we came to exist, it must have been God who created everything as is.
This logical argument is an example of creation science.
Flawless.
Here's an even better one. Observation teaches us that life doesn't just begin. Therefore, life must somehow have always existed. Isn't that true my friend?