to trace the doctrine of justification by faith alone, the development of the system whereby man atones for his own sins must be considered first. Then it will be seen how the doctrine of justification by faith alone would rise in response to such a corrupt system. This corrupt system starts growing while the Apostles are still alive. Consider Paul's response to the initial corruption of the atoning work of Christ.
Paul defends the basis for the forgiveness of sin (c. 55)
Paul started a church in Galatia, where the teaching of justification by faith alone was clearly proclaimed and accepted. He taught one's only basis for the forgiveness of sins is faith in the merits of Christ's sacrificial death. After a time Paul received word this church had departed from its initial foundation. He was amazed at the early believers departure from the truth, and sent them a letter in an attempt to guide them back to the truth they initially received. This Paul states in the opening of his letter to the Galatians.
- I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel... (Gal 1:6)
This young church was being agitated by Judizers. These Judizers were actively trying to bring the Gentile Christians back under the law and into the fold of Judaism, and it appears they were successful. The Judizers were teaching that faith in Christ was needed for the forgiveness of sins, but it was not enough. They were teaching that circumcision was also needed. Paul proves the error of this false doctrine by showing God has never changed His method for forgiving sins. He uses the example of Abraham, whose faith was credited to him as righteousness. Paul references Genesis 15:6 when he writes the following.
- Even as Abraham believed God, and it was accounted to him for righteousness. (Gal 3:6)
Paul was emphasizing that a person's only basis for salvation is in the merits of Christ. If one wants to add circumcision, almsgiving, baptism or anything else, Paul says Christ will then be of no profit to that person, and "he is a debtor to do the whole law," (Gal 5:3)
One may consider this a minor error to add things concerning righteousness to the gospel, but history shows this not to be the case. The problem is, once something is added room for something else can always be found. Paul knew of this danger and warns the Galatians by saying, "a little leaven leaveneth the whole lump." (Gal 5:9) That is, accepting doctrinal error concerning how one is justified will cause one's whole doctrinal system to collapse. The doctrine of justification by faith alone gets so corrupted in the next few hundred years, it is essentially unrecognizable by 250 A.D. The shift started after the apostles. While some of the Apostolic Fathers give evidence they understood the doctrine of justification by faith alone, they certainly did not understand the need to fight for its purity.
Certainly this is one view.
There is also another additional idea. Paul talks of love in the believer fulfilling the law.
He thought this fulfilled Jesus's statement of saying He did not come to destroy the law but fulfil it.
This has always been an odd concept. Was the atoning sacrifice for the forgiveness of sins without the
ability to walk righteously?
The reducing of the idea of sin and its consequences and the raising of morality of a human gave
rise to Preterism. This denies the problem of communion with God is the only thing that keeps
us whole and pure. And without God there is not ultimate purity.
God declared in the Holy Spirit, in abiding in Him can we fulfil walking like Jesus.
Jesus opened the door, but the fulfilment is in walking the path. Salvation is the walk,
that continues eternally.
As a kid I wondered why I agreed with Gods law, like it was something within me that asks of
God whether this was right. When God declares He has written on the hearts of His people His
law, it seems He was not kidding.
So because we are bound to the law of the Spirit, as slaves, there has never been an idea of
earning salvation, like it is external to who we are, rather it is who we are, one in Christ, bound
to the Holy one, desiring to find and walk in the Fathers will in all we do.
It is partly why theoretical models built on individual verses fail, because unless one is in the
Kingdom the words do not describe who one is, or even echo in ones life. Scripture is so odd,
it speaks at every level of our experience with Him, because it is living and is His word to us.