I don't understand the support for that observation. Is it only one person here who is allowed to call people stupid? Do two wrongs make a right? PS is wrong for calling people names, so too is DC.
Is one able to teach that calling people names is wrong when they call people names? Can people who do not like name calling side with one who does this, and condemn another who does this also?
I would hope you'd be concerned for what you shall meet as consequence of your actions, rather than gain satisfaction in thinking others shall according to your judgment of them.
It is false to imply I have ever called evil good. What is wrong behavior is that which resorts to evil while defending it as good and like unto Christ.
Proverbs 8:13
The fear of the Lord is hatred of evil. Pride and arrogance and the way of evil and perverted speech I hate.
International Standard Bible Encyclopedia:
Evil
ēv´'l, ē´vil רע,
ra‛; πονηρός,
ponērós, κακός,
kakós, κακόν,
kakón): In the Bible it is represented as moral and physical. We choose to discuss the subject under these heads. Many of the evils that come upon men have not been intended by those who suffer for them. Disease, individual and national calamity, drought, scarcity of food, may not always be charged to the account of intentional wrong. Many times the innocent suffer with, and even for, the guilty. In such cases, only physical evil is apparent. Even when the suffering has been occasioned by sin or dereliction of duty, whether the wrong is active or passive, many, perhaps the majority of those who are injured, are not accountable in any way for the ills which come upon them. Neither is God the author of moral evil. “God cannot be tempted with evil, and he himself tempteth no man” (
Jas 1:13). See TEMPTATION.
[More reading: Physical and Moral Evil]
Guilt by association:[One would wonder then about the tale of Jesus associating with drunks in the Book of Matthew chapter 11. Does Jesus answer for what was judged there as guilt by association?]
A drunk man who smelled like beer sat down on a subway seat next to a priest. The man's tie was stained, his face was plastered with red lipstick, and a half empty bottle of gin was sticking out of his torn coat pocket. He opened his newspaper and began reading. After a few minutes the man turned to the priest and asked, "Say, Father, what causes arthritis?"
"My Son, it's caused by loose living, being with cheap, wicked women, too much alcohol and contempt for your fellow man."
"Well, I'll be darned," the drunk muttered, returning to his paper.
The priest, thinking about what he had said, nudged the man and apologized.
"I'm very sorry. I didn't mean to come on so strong. How long have you had arthritis?"
"Oh, I don't have it," the man said. "But I was just reading here that the Pope does."
Preaching magazine September/October 1998
I will not respond to more of this kind of posting. This thread is way off topic. And look at what is talked about and condemned; false teachers, teachings/doctrine, and what we are now doing and saying to one another as we assert our respective views. What is that topic leading us to do and say to one another? Dear Lord, we even have people acting as if they're taking sides. Has false doctrine lead us to graduate unto this kind of behaviors? Appears so.