Once saved always saved ?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

VW

Banned
Dec 22, 2009
4,579
9
0
Yes! And I am reminded of a parable Jesus said, if one sheep leave, he will leave the rest of them, and go GET the other and bring him back.
It moves me, the way He explained that He lays down His life for the sheep. And He is very adamant that no one took His life away from Him, but He lays it down on His own initiative. Even more, that He has this commandment from His Father, that He lay down His life, and take it up again, all for us.

One might, just might, turn his back on God, but God will not turn His back on us. Ther is nothing we can do to cause Him to deny us, to condemn us, except for hardening our hearts towards Him. No sin, no power, nothing that has come, and nothing that will come, can separate us from the love of God in Jesus Christ. Nothing.

In Christ
 
Jan 14, 2010
1,010
5
0
So let's take the verse in context. Jesus is talking about His sheep, and that He would lay down His life for them, of His own free will. He later gives a description of His sheep that most Christians ignore because it is too subjective. He says that His sheep hear His voice. He goes on with other attributes of His sheep, but hearing His voice is first in the list. Most pastors won't teach on this, and if they mention it, they gloss over it. But Jesus said it, so it should be important to us. In fact, it is much more important than any have given it credence for.

Earlier, Jesus was speaking, and He said that the hour was coming and now was that the dead would hear the voice of the Son, and that those who heard would live. What was one of the other attributes Jesus pointed out about His sheep? That He gives them eternal life. Why? Because they hear His voice.

If you hear His voice and have received the Holy Spirit and are reconciled back to God so that you are in fellowship with Him, then no one and no thing will ever take you out of His hand.

In Christ
i know. and i completely agree.
we have to look back at vv.26-27 to understand what Christ is talking about.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
It moves me, the way He explained that He lays down His life for the sheep. And He is very adamant that no one took His life away from Him, but He lays it down on His own initiative. Even more, that He has this commandment from His Father, that He lay down His life, and take it up again, all for us.

One might, just might, turn his back on God, but God will not turn His back on us. Ther is nothing we can do to cause Him to deny us, to condemn us, except for hardening our hearts towards Him. No sin, no power, nothing that has come, and nothing that will come, can separate us from the love of God in Jesus Christ. Nothing.

In Christ
Again I am reminded of another passage. "If we are faithless, he is faithfull, for he can not deny himself.

It is he who chose to die, as you said. no one killed him (well my sin killed him), He voluntarily died in my place so I could be set free. And he made primises all through his ministry that if I trust him, he will give me eternal life and I will never parish. even if I am faithless and fall in sin. He is faithful to his promise. For to take away the gift he gave me, and promising i would never die. If I died again, he lied. and he deny's his own words, and death.


 

VW

Banned
Dec 22, 2009
4,579
9
0
Again I am reminded of another passage. "If we are faithless, he is faithfull, for he can not deny himself.

It is he who chose to die, as you said. no one killed him (well my sin killed him), He voluntarily died in my place so I could be set free. And he made primises all through his ministry that if I trust him, he will give me eternal life and I will never parish. even if I am faithless and fall in sin. He is faithful to his promise. For to take away the gift he gave me, and promising i would never die. If I died again, he lied. and he deny's his own words, and death.


When He was speaking at the death of Lazarus, He said that He is the resurrection and the life; that everyone who believes in Him shall live, even if they die; and that everyone who lives and believes in Him shall never die. When I finally understood this saying, I was blown away.

In Christ,
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
When He was speaking at the death of Lazarus, He said that He is the resurrection and the life; that everyone who believes in Him shall live, even if they die; and that everyone who lives and believes in Him shall never die. When I finally understood this saying, I was blown away.

In Christ,
YES!, Grace in its finest hour
 
V

VRJ

Guest
John 10:28,29,30; " And I give unto them eternal life; and they shall never perish, neither shall any man pluck them out of my hand. (29) My Father, which gave them me, is greater than all; and no man is able to pluck them out of my Father's hand." (30) I and my Father are one.

This verse is speaking not of loosing ones salvation. It is saying that when you die you will have eternal life. You have eternal life at death and never perish(where?)...which is hell.

Jesus died to give us eternal life:

John 10:10; "The thief cometh not, but for to steal, and to kill, and to destroy: I am come that they might have life, and that they might have it more abundantly."

THIEF:

How would a thief steal? Making the scriptures say something which they were not intended for.
How would a thief kill? By twisting the scriptures so to crush its true meaning.
How would a thief destroy? Satan's one goal to to use scriptures to hide God's Truth. Truth destroyed.

I would say that pretty well sums up what I have seen here.
 
S

SantoSubito

Guest
A work is something we do. Faith does not take work, it is a trust in the work of someone else. Not the same! Not to mention. The work is the cross. That is what our faith is based on. Christ did this work.
Thats the thing though trusting is a mental and often physical action and is therefore according to your own definition a work. Look at the bold faced part of your quote above. That is what baptism is, it is us trusting that God can save us and cleanse us.

Where as if our faith is in our being baptized, where we do some of the work. And our priest or pastor does the rest of the work. Our faith is not in Christ. and the cross is taken out of the equation.
You seem to think people are in a sense equating their baptism with God. Like I said before God does all the work in baptism.


Why? because your your not depending on God washing you by your faith in the cross. Your making his washing dependent on you do something in order for this washing to take place. If a person has faith in God today, yet can not be baptized for a month, or even a week. Your saying God can not wash you until you can be baptized. Think of the problems with this. Someone could place faith in Christ today, die tomorrow and spend eternity in hell because he was never washed.
And thus we have come to the major difference between you and I. God can indeed cleanse a man without baptism if he so desires, and he does in extraordinary situations, but for the rest of us average folk he has ordained a sacrament and a way in which he desires to cleanse us, popularly known as Baptism. "Someone could place faith in Christ today, die tomorrow and spend eternity in hell because he was never washed." No this is not true, God knows our circumstances if someone dies before being baptized but had the intent to be baptized then he receives what is called a Baptism of desire. If a man who has not been baptized is martyred for Christ, then he receives a Baptism of blood.

I have an aversion to people placing their eternity based on ritual and placing themselves under law. Which is basically saying the cross was insufficient.
Saying that baptism cleanses us of our sins is in no way denying the sufficiency of the Cross; for it is only by the grace poured out upon the Cross that we are able to be cleansed in the waters of baptism

As for ritual. I was baptized. I take communion. I celebrate our lords birth and death. I celebrate and practice alot of ritual. I just do not do these things in order to be saved. I do them because I was saved. And because God commanded me as his child to do these things in remembrance of him.
This is another point at which protestants and the rest of the Christian world differ. To us salvation is not an event, but a process, culminating in our death.
 

VW

Banned
Dec 22, 2009
4,579
9
0
Salvation is both an event and a process, so to speak. We are saved when we receive the Holy Spirit. We are being saved as we grow into the stature of Christ, as we grow closer to God.

I expect that we will grow closer to Him from now on, if we love Him.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
Thats the thing though trusting is a mental and often physical action and is therefore according to your own definition a work. Look at the bold faced part of your quote above. That is what baptism is, it is us trusting that God can save us and cleanse us.
My friend your trying to make an act of you going to get baptized (which takes physical work) to a trust in the work of someone else. There is a huge difference.

baptism is not trusting God alone, It is trusting God and doing something in order to get it. Which means your trying to earn salvation by doing something. This is a work.

Holy Spirit Baptism is God working to wash us (rom 6) and place us into the body of Christ.

Water Baptism is merely a man placing you in water. A huge difference.



You seem to think people are in a sense equating their baptism with God. Like I said before God does all the work in baptism.
Yeah he does. In spiritual baptism. But not in water. The man baptising you does work. And you have to "go" to the place to be baptized. this is work. God does not carry you to the water, and baptize you in the water. God baptizes you with the holy water (Holy Spirit)


And thus we have come to the major difference between you and I. God can indeed cleanse a man without baptism if he so desires, and he does in extraordinary situations,

Ah but here we go. Paul makes it clear there is one Gospel. You here are saying God saves some people one way, and others another. That is two gospels.


but for the rest of us average folk he has ordained a sacrament

Yes God has commanded that we all be baptized, in the name of the father, son and Holy Spirit. Yet more amazing is John the Baptist prophesied that Jesus WOULD baptise with the HS, Jesus himself promised we WOULD BE baptized with the Holy Spirit. Peter witness the Baptism of the HS


A baptism by God is not the same as a Baptism in the name of God These are two separate baptisms. Paul makes it clear there is only One Baptism that saves. Not two.

lastly. Can you show where Paul used the word sacrament for these religious rites and obligations?


and a way in which he desires to cleanse us, popularly known as Baptism. "Someone could place faith in Christ today, die tomorrow and spend eternity in hell because he was never washed." No this is not true, God knows our circumstances if someone dies before being baptized but had the intent to be baptized then he receives what is called a Baptism of desire. If a man who has not been baptized is martyred for Christ, then he receives a Baptism of blood.
And this is found in scripture where?

Saying that baptism cleanses us of our sins is in no way denying the sufficiency of the Cross; for it is only by the grace poured out upon the Cross that we are able to be cleansed in the waters of


Well thanks. But I chose the spiritual baptism performed By God himself. Not a physical baptism where I get wet and thats it. I was baptized By God, And I followed this baptism by allowing my pastor to baptize me in water after I openly confessed my faith to my church.


This is another point at which protestants and the rest of the Christian world differ. To us salvation is not an event, but a process, culminating in our death.

Yet Jesus said we can HAVE eterrnal life. Paul said over and over we have it (present tense) might not have it. If we do not have it. Jesus and Paul are both liars. If one thinks about it. The only way salvation can be assured only at the time of death is if someone is working for it. For one must ask. Did I do enough to earn Gods grace? or have I not. This is works based. John made it clear. we can KNOW we have (not might have) eternal life. And this is the hope of which our faith is based in "In the hope of eternal life, which God, who can not lie, promised before time began" If we can not "know we have it" until after we die. We have no hope..
 
Jan 14, 2010
1,010
5
0
the interesting is, Jesus Christ Himself said "he who endures to the end shall be saved"...
we're not saved unless we endure
 

VW

Banned
Dec 22, 2009
4,579
9
0
the interesting is, Jesus Christ Himself said "he who endures to the end shall be saved"...
we're not saved unless we endure
Your quote is out of context. Jesus said that everyone who lives and believes in Him shall never die. In this, He was speaking about those who found life in His resurrection life. When He said that those who endure to the end would be saved, He was teaching about the end times.

In Christ,
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
the interesting is, Jesus Christ Himself said "he who endures to the end shall be saved"...
we're not saved unless we endure

He is talking about end times here. The time of "Great Tribulation" where people who chose to believe in Christ will be martyred in massive numbers. Where Gods wrath is poured out on the Earth. Where this Earth we live in sees such a catastrophic time period not seen since the flood. Where Jesus himself states it will be so bad that mankind is close to exterminating itself:


Matthew 24:22
"Unless those days had been cut short, no life would have been saved; but for the sake of the elect those days will be cut short.

We see here the context of the passage is Physical life not Spiritual life. Thus it is not saying one has to endure to be saved eternally. But saved from tribulation, until the time of Christ's return.
 
Jun 24, 2010
3,822
19
0
By the looks of these recent posts it's easy to apply the scriptures in the wrong way and come out with the wrong understanding. It happens an awful lot when people quote from the book of Hebrews especially the passage in (Heb 6:4-6)...

KJV 4 For it is impossible for those who were once enlightened, and have tasted of the heavenly gift, and were made partakers of the Holy Ghost,
5 And have tasted the good word of God, and the powers of the world to come,
6 If they shall fall away, to renew them again unto repentance; seeing they crucify to themselves the Son of God afresh, and put him to an open shame.

AV 4 For it is impossible [to restore and bring again to repentance] those who have been once for all enlightened, who have consciously tasted the heavenly gift and have become sharers of the Holy Spirit,
5 And have felt how good the Word of God is and the mighty powers of the age and world to come,
6 If they then deviate from the faith and turn away from their allegiance--[it is impossible] to bring them back to repentance, for (because, while, as long as) they nail upon the cross the Son of God afresh [as far as they are concerned] and are holding [Him] up to contempt and shame and public disgrace.

Are we to assume or infer that this is speaking of those who were saved and cleansed from their sin or those that have been partakers of being drawn to Christ through the Holy Spirit and then fall away from that drawing?

What does being 'enlightened', 'tasted' and made a 'partaker' mean in the context of this passage?

Is this passage speaking to the Jews who this book was written, and is their an application to the Gentiles concerning the gospel of Christ as well?

Are those that deviate or fall away speaking of those that have been established in the faith or were being drawn to it?

Had they already repented or were they being drawn to repentance and if they fell away from that drawing would it be impossible to renew them unto that drawing of repentance?

Is this passage speaking of the Jews that nailed Christ to the cross, yet the Holy spirit through the word was drawing them to salvation through repentance of their unbelief or is this passage speaking to those that were saved, that is they fell away it would be impossible to renew them unto repentance?
 
S

SantoSubito

Guest
My friend your trying to make an act of you going to get baptized (which takes physical work) to a trust in the work of someone else. There is a huge difference.
I don'r know how many times I can say this, but without God's grace baptism is just "getting wet" as some Protestants would call it. Thats what I'm trying to get across we can do nothing of our own accord in baptism to save ourselves. Calvinism and later Evangelicalism is largely the cause of the modern Protestant belief that there are two baptisms that occur at two different times, with the exception of Lutherans and Anglicans of course. Likely because of the two aforementioned groups aversion to anything that can be in any way possible construed to be a work.

Holy Spirit Baptism is God working to wash us (rom 6) and place us into the body of Christ.
Which is what water baptism does.

Water Baptism is merely a man placing you in water. A huge difference.
Or it is God washing us with the waters of life.

Yeah he does. In spiritual baptism. But not in water. The man baptising you does work. And you have to "go" to the place to be baptized. this is work. God does not carry you to the water, and baptize you in the water. God baptizes you with the holy water (Holy Spirit)
Since I haven't read the whole thread I'm going to have to assume that your're a Calvinist. God calling us and us responding to that call is not a work.

Ah but here we go. Paul makes it clear there is one Gospel. You here are saying God saves some people one way, and others another. That is two gospels.
No it's not. They are all saved by the Christ which is the Gospel, and they were all still washed in baptism, they were just washed in a different manner than usual. This isn't two Gospels, two Gospels would be me saying that God saves Christians one way and Muslims another way.

Yes God has commanded that we all be baptized, in the name of the father, son and Holy Spirit. Yet more amazing is John the Baptist prophesied that Jesus WOULD baptise with the HS, Jesus himself promised we WOULD BE baptized with the Holy Spirit. Peter witness the Baptism of the HS
You know how the HS descended upon Christ at his baptism? That's what we believe happens when we are baptized, God cleanses us from our sin and the HS comes to dwell within us.

A baptism by God is not the same as a Baptism in the name of God These are two separate baptisms. Paul makes it clear there is only One Baptism that saves. Not two.
Really the issue you raise is a non-issue for me since I believe that the two baptism that you differentiate between are one.

lastly. Can you show where Paul used the word sacrament for these religious rites and obligations?
For one I wouldn't expect Paul to use Latin when he was writing in Greek. Sacrament comes from the Latin word "sacer" which means "holy" or "sacred". The English word "Sacrament" comes from the Nominative form of "sacer" which is "sacramentum". Which means "That which is holy"



And this is found in scripture where?
In order for you to accept the reasoning behind the theology of that paragraph you would first have to accept baptismal regeneration



Well thanks. But I chose the spiritual baptism performed By God himself. Not a physical baptism where I get wet and thats it. I was baptized By God, And I followed this baptism by allowing my pastor to baptize me in water after I openly confessed my faith to my church.
Like I said before the majority of Christians do not believe there are two different baptism that take place at two different times. We believe that both of the baptisms you describe are indeed one and the same baptism.


Yet Jesus said we can HAVE eterrnal life. Paul said over and over we have it (present tense) might not have it. If we do not have it. Jesus and Paul are both liars. If one thinks about it. The only way salvation can be assured only at the time of death is if someone is working for it. For one must ask. Did I do enough to earn Gods grace? or have I not. This is works based. John made it clear. we can KNOW we have (not might have) eternal life. And this is the hope of which our faith is based in "In the hope of eternal life, which God, who can not lie, promised before time began" If we can not "know we have it" until after we die. We have no hope..
Do understand the concept of "State of Grace" If so then what I said makes sense. When we are baptized God gives us what we call our "Initial Justification", and we can fall out of our "Initial Justification" through committing mortal sin, and to be restored to my Justified state I must repent. At any given time I can know what state my soul is in by examining my own conscious. So I can know at any given time whether I am "saved" or not, but I can not presume to know what state my soul will be in a day or a week from now. Some of the ECF's even described presuming such knowledge to be one of the most heinous sins of pride. That is why Catholics say "I'm being saved" and not "I'm saved".
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
I don'r know how many times I can say this, but without God's grace baptism is just "getting wet"
You can say it 100 Times, But it is not of Grace if it has to be earned. Grace is free, Saying one must "do something" in order to recieve Grace is not grace but a work.

s some Protestants would call it. Thats what I'm trying to get across we can do nothing of our own accord in baptism to save ourselves.
Yet as I have showed you, You have to do quite a few things. Sit where you are. Do not move the moment you have faith. And have a person come baptize you without you moving a muscle, And I would believe it is not a work. But this is not the case. You have to go to where the water is, and the man who will baptize you.

Yet the Baptism which is performed By God, You do not have to do anything. The moment your faith becomes real God baptizes you. This is Gods work. And what truly saves.


Calvinism and later Evangelicalism is largely the cause of the modern Protestant belief that there are two baptisms that occur at two different times, with the exception of Lutherans and Anglicans of course. Likely because of the two aforementioned groups aversion to anything that can be in any way possible construed to be a work.

No, Actually it was Peter, Who witnessed people baptized By the Holy Spirit, Proven by the fact they were Anointed by the Spirit which gave them gifts of the Spirit (this can not happen without the washing performed By God. Then commanding that they all be baptized in water. No where in scripture is it said that Baptism of the HS and Baptism in water are one in the same.

Or it is God washing us with the waters of life.

The waters of Life is the HS. John 4. It is not natural water which just gets us wet.


Since I haven't read the whole thread I'm going to have to assume that your're a Calvinist. God calling us and us responding to that call is not a work.
Well you would be wrong. I do not follow Calvin or Armenian. I follow the word of God, and I disagree with both Calvin and Armenian

Jesus said in John 6, it is the work of God that we believe. Believe is not our work, It is Gods work. Because out the work he performed on the cross. And the work he performs in our salvation (justification, Sanctification, Baptism, Circumcision, and many other things) we woul dhave nothing to have faith in.



No it's not. They are all saved by the Christ which is the Gospel, and they were all still washed in baptism, they were just washed in a different manner than usual. This isn't two Gospels, two Gospels would be me saying that God saves Christians one way and Muslims another way.
No. Another Gospel is just what Paul said it was. Paul said in Galations.

Galatians 1:6–7 (NKJV)
6 I marvel that you are turning away so soon from Him who called you in the grace of Christ, to a different gospel, 7 which is not another; but there are some who trouble you and want to pervert the gospel of Christ.

Different is the English translation of the greek word heteros. Which means "different but of like type"

This word would be used if there were two different ways to get to the same place. Either way is adequate to get you where you want to be. Paul is saying this other gospel is not another way to get to where we want to be (heaven, or eternal life)

The words "Not another" is another greek word Allo, which means a different kind altogether.

Paul also states that this is a perverted gospel. Pervert is the Greek word Metestrepsai, which means to change or alter.

The jews who were in the church were "perverting" the gospel by adding works of the law, Like Circumcision, Living righteous lives and other things" And this in fact became another "Allo" Gospel. Paul was saying that this "other gospel" was not another "heteros" Gospel. It will not lead us to the place we want to be (heaven or eternal life)

Islam is not a different gospel at all. For there is no aspect of Gods gospel in Islam. It is not a perverted Gospel at all. Paul is speaking of a true gospel being perverted by adding things to the true gospel which makes it a different gospel.
You know how the HS descended upon Christ at his baptism?



Yeah I do. And we can look to the OT priesthood to see what this signifies, Arron is the example. First he was washed (Moses baptized him in the river Jordan) then he was anointed with the Holy Oil, The Oil represented the HS coming on, or in Christ.,

Acts 10:38
"You know of Jesus of Nazareth, how God anointed Him with the Holy Spirit and with power, and how He went about doing good and healing all who were oppressed by the devil, for God was with Him.

And then the sacrifice was given, The animal sacrificed was a symbol of our new high priest sacrificing himself


But notice Aaron's sons. (which represent all of Gods children) First they were washed (baptized) then the sacrifices were given, this is represented by the act of the HS washing us by baptising us into the literal death and burial of Christ (rom 6 and titus 3:5) Then they were anointed. Which represents the HS coming on or in us.


2 Corinthians 1:21
Now He who establishes us with you in Christ and anointed us is God,

See also 1 John 2: 20 and 27.




That's what we believe happens when we are baptized, God cleanses us from our sin and the HS comes to dwell within us.
Well this belief has totally left out the baptism of the Spirit. and replaced it with physical baptism. The annointing of the HS is not the same as the Baptism of the spirit. (see above)


Really the issue you raise is a non-issue for me since I believe that the two baptism that you differentiate between are one.
Yet God says there are two

For one I wouldn't expect Paul to use Latin when he was writing in Greek. Sacrament comes from the Latin word "sacer" which means "holy" or "sacred". The English word "Sacrament" comes from the Nominative form of "sacer" which is "sacramentum". Which means "That which is holy"
No, But he would have to speak of something which is holy which must be added to faith in order for salvation to take place. Which he never did.



In order for you to accept the reasoning behind the theology of that paragraph you would first have to accept baptismal regeneration
Well, Your right about this. That is a good reason for that paragraph, Unfortunately I asked you to suport thatparagraph with scripture. Can you?

Like I said before the majority of Christians do not believe there are two different baptism that take place at two different times. We believe that both of the baptisms you describe are indeed one and the same baptism.
John the baptist spoke of three (water HS and Fire) Jesus spoke of two (water. holy spirit) do I believe them or do I believe a church which says all these men are wrong, and make it one? And it is proven that they do not happen at the same time, If they were one, they would always happen the same time, yet this is not the case. showing there is two
Do understand the concept of "State of Grace"
Yeah. A man who is alive and has not been taken out because he has sinned, but is shown mercy so he has a chance to repent is in a state of grace, because he does not deserve to live, or be given the opportunity to even be saved. Nothing any man will ever recieve is deserved, this includes life. So the moment we were born, we were in a "state of Grace"

No, I do not believe in some churches interpretation of what this means.


[/quote] If so then what I said makes sense. When we are baptized God gives us what we call our "Initial Justification", and we can fall out of our "Initial Justification" through committing mortal sin, and to be restored to my Justified state I must repent. At any given time I can know what state my soul is in by examining my own conscious. So I can know at any given time whether I am "saved" or not, but I can not presume to know what state my soul will be in a day or a week from now. Some of the ECF's even described presuming such knowledge to be one of the most heinous sins of pride. That is why Catholics say "I'm being saved" and not "I'm saved".[/quote]

Wow, that is alot of works one must do in order to hopefully get saved. Yet you claim you do not teach a salvation of works?
 
Jan 14, 2010
1,010
5
0
Your quote is out of context. Jesus said that everyone who lives and believes in Him shall never die. In this, He was speaking about those who found life in His resurrection life. When He said that those who endure to the end would be saved, He was teaching about the end times.

In Christ,
then i have a question for you, vw: what will happen to you if you dont endure in holiness and abstinence of sin to the end?
 
Mar 22, 2011
386
1
0
yes. ONCE SAVED . ALWAYS. CAUSE YOUR SEALED TIL YOUR DAY OF REDEMPTION
 
Jan 14, 2010
1,010
5
0
And yet the bible also says to not grieve that seal...
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
then i have a question for you, vw: what will happen to you if you dont endure in holiness and abstinence of sin to the end?
Scripture says you won't, so I guess we are all doomed and no one will make it.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
And yet the bible also says to not grieve that seal...
Did you ever grieve your earthly father? Did he kick you out of his family because you made him sad because of your sin?

Why do you think God would do this?