predestination vs freewill

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

GRACE_ambassador

Well-known member
Feb 22, 2021
3,191
1,598
113
Midwest
We live in a world where true holiness is a rarity.
I did meet a man once who claimed he was in "true holiness." I asked him what
if he was "angry with his wife"? Oh, he said "that's just a mistake.

When I went to visit his assembly, there was one who was dancing and jumping
around in "true holiness"{?}, and the congregation was excited "he's GOT IT, he's
GOT IT!" Not sure what "he had," but then THE LIGHTS WENT OUT! It was
TIME for me to RUN - AND RUN I did :cry:
 

OIC1965

Well-known member
Sep 19, 2020
2,754
1,016
113
And if you can speak, read, and write, Koine Greek FLUENTLY, as if its your 1st Language, then you would be that person.
If you can't then you are pretending to be a Greek authority, which is dishonest.
You’re a funny chap.
 

OIC1965

Well-known member
Sep 19, 2020
2,754
1,016
113
The Grace that delivers from Sin, is not God causing you to do anything.....but rather its God providing the Power to Live Holy.
This is why Paul says...>"it is not I, but Christ who Lives in Me"..
So, that is a born again person, existing in the correct understanding of God's Grace as the Gift of Salvation, that produces in the born again, the Holiness that is perfected Discipleship.

The Born again are told by Paul to " put on the Whole Armor of God".
He does not, as the heretics teach, say that God puts it on you.
See, you have to do it, and that "armor" is found not in self effort, but in God's Grace as this...>"Christ always gives me the Victory".
You need more than power to live holy. It is God who works in us BOTH to will and to do His good pleasure.

You need a new heart before you can exercise the power God gives you.

I will not need to reply to the rest of your post, as you are bringing up things I have not said. I never said we don’t need to put on the armor, for instance. But notice it’s God who provides it all. All of it.
 

awelight

Well-known member
Aug 10, 2020
1,629
490
83
69
you are not right, God does not see sin in us, He sees Christ. Our sins have been remitted, our struggle is not with sin.

Our struggle is for faith, for eyes to SEE what Christ has accomplished for us at the cross in putting away our sins and to learn to walk in obedience to this good news.

Paul's message concerning sin in the believer is "put to death that which is earthly in you". Sin shall not inherit the kingdom.

We are never addressed as sinners in the NT but as saints or holy brethren.

You say "ah but we backslide" yes we do but that is because we are not walking according to the truth.
Either you did not fully read my post, a common problem in this chat, or you missed my point entirely.

I am only speaking as it relates to the verses under discussion. Not to the whole subject of sin as it relates to Soteriology. There is no disagreement, between you and I on the basic aspects of sin and forgiveness; as they pertain to Redemption.

The discussion is related only to whether in Rom. 7:17-24, was Paul referring to his present state or his past state.

I do take exception with your statement about: God does not see our sins. God does not see the sins of the Elect, in a legal sense, they are covered by Christ's Righteousness. So therefore, the sins of the Elect are not imputed to their accounts.

However, one cannot say that God does not see the sin, when one of the Elect sins. Can not the Holy Spirit be "grieved" by our actions? Is not Christ, right now, doing his intercessory work, on our behalf, before the Father? If God saw none of the sins, of His own being committed, then why is Christ interceding?

1Jn_2:1 My little children, these things write I unto you that ye may not sin. And if any man sin, we have an Advocate with the Father, Jesus Christ the righteous:
 

Evmur

Well-known member
Feb 28, 2021
5,219
2,618
113
London
christianchat.com
Either you did not fully read my post, a common problem in this chat, or you missed my point entirely.

I am only speaking as it relates to the verses under discussion. Not to the whole subject of sin as it relates to Soteriology. There is no disagreement, between you and I on the basic aspects of sin and forgiveness; as they pertain to Redemption.

The discussion is related only to whether in Rom. 7:17-24, was Paul referring to his present state or his past state.

I do take exception with your statement about: God does not see our sins. God does not see the sins of the Elect, in a legal sense, they are covered by Christ's Righteousness. So therefore, the sins of the Elect are not imputed to their accounts.

However, one cannot say that God does not see the sin, when one of the Elect sins. Can not the Holy Spirit be "grieved" by our actions? Is not Christ, right now, doing his intercessory work, on our behalf, before the Father? If God saw none of the sins, of His own being committed, then why is Christ interceding?

1Jn_2:1 My little children, these things write I unto you that ye may not sin. And if any man sin, we have an Advocate with the Father, Jesus Christ the righteous:
Yes I was speaking about the legal sense and what I said was clumsy God does see our sins and does not pass them by.

I understand your viewpoint on Romans 7 but disagree, it is true any christian trying to live the Christ life by obeying the commandments will struggle as did the man who I say is Saul of Tarsus before he was saved .
 

GRACE_ambassador

Well-known member
Feb 22, 2021
3,191
1,598
113
Midwest
We live in a world where true holiness is a rarity.
I did meet a man once who claimed he was in "true holiness." I asked him what
if he got "angry with his wife"? he replied: "Oh, that would just be a mistake."

When I went to visit his assembly, there was one who was dancing and jumping
around in "true holiness"{?}, and the congregation was excited "he's GOT IT, he's
GOT IT!" Not sure what "he GOT," but then THE LIGHTS WENT OUT! It was
TIME for me to RUN - AND RUN I did :cry:
 

awelight

Well-known member
Aug 10, 2020
1,629
490
83
69
Your not butting in and no problem at all, awelight - I really appreciate your input to my question .

Anyway, I'll attempt to respond to the points you've raised and see if my responses can hold water:

"Rom 2:12 For as many as have sinned without law shall also perish without the law: and as many as have sinned under the law shall be judged by the law;"

I think we may have different concepts of law in mind. I'll cover that difference in my reply to Rom 2:14 following

"Rom 2:14 (for when Gentiles that have not the law do by nature the things of the law, these, not having the law, are the law unto themselves;
Rom 2:15 in that they show the work of the law written in their hearts, their conscience bearing witness therewith, and their thoughts one with another accusing or else excusing them);"


What I think Rom 2:14 implies, is that there are multiple sets of laws, each set inherent to different groups of people -- Jews, Gentiles, and one that applies to everyone. What that demonstrates ( to me), is that the law the Jews were under, and the law gentiles were under, were/are tied together beneath a parent law, that parent law being the apex of law itself. It is actually law in concept. I'll call it the law of law -- I think the Bible may refer to it as the law of sin and death. Anyway, the law of law is the one I had referred to in my post but I should have made that distinction clear then.

Anyway, I think that Rom 2:14 & 15 substantiates the existence of a law of law when it says "work of the law written in their hearts". For the work of law to exist, a law has to exist - one cannot exist independent of the other. Yet, the verse tells us they had no law. But, if the gentiles did the things of the law by nature, then in their nature must there also have been a law, or what would have driven them to desire the works of law? So, the law of law must have been that which had been "written" into their hearts, since, in the case of the gentiles, there was no other law. As for the Jews, the law of law was manifested in their hearts, demonstrated by their desire to achieve the works of the law.

[Rom 9:31-32 KJV]
31 But Israel, which followed after the law of righteousness, hath not attained to the law of righteousness.
32 Wherefore? Because [they sought it] not by faith, but as it were by the works of the law. For they stumbled at that stumblingstone;

"Rom 5:13 for until the law sin was in the world; but sin is not imputed when there is no law. But without Law, sin was not legally imputed to anyone's account."

Actually Rom 5:13 is the crux of my point-- that without law sin could not be imputed; without sin imputed there could be
no judgement; without judgement, there could be no penalty.

And I should clarify this too - that I believe Rom 5:13 is referring to the time before Adam and Eve ate of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. Sin was not possible for them until eating which brought law - the law of law. At that moment, they were placed under it along with everyone who would ever be born. Because of it, we all, by our nature, pursue the work of the law . That, I believe, is why God is justified in finding guilt in everyone ever born who has not been placed under the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus.


"Rom 5:18 So then as through one trespass the judgment came unto all men to condemnation; even so through one act of righteousness the free gift came unto all men to justification of life.
Thus, when the Law came in, sin was brought to light but sin already had life. (Rom. 5:13 above)"

I don't think it did have life - at least not as far as Adam and Eve (and the rest of us) were concerned - it couldn't have been imputed to anyone without the presence of law. How can sin be imputed if no law was broken? For sure sin was present, but, without law, sin couldn't be imputed. Until Adam and Eve ate, they, and we, were free of it. Rom 5:13 says that sin was present in the world but it doesn't say that it had been or could be imputed - the verses says only that it was present. That is why God warned them not to eat or even touch the fruit of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil.

[1Co 15:56 KJV] 56 The sting of death [is] sin; and the strength of sin [is] the law.

Having read this, you'll probably want to call 9-1-1 on me - if so, I'll understand.

I know I didn't cover everything and I'm not sure I actually understand it all myself, and what I did cover is probably lacking
and doesn't make a lot of sense, but I thought I'd give it a shot anyway. Also as I reread, I'll probably need to revise it somewhat.
If I can clarify anything, of if you find errors, please let me know.
Thanks for reading.
Thank you for your gracious words.

I think I see what you are trying to get at but there are a few points I would like you to consider. Let me see if I can dissect them in your post.

As to the law written in the heart, of Rom. 2:14,15, it is a law that God has placed in every person's heart. This goes back to Rom. 1:19, and should be understood as, every person has a basic knowledge of right and wrong. Everyone knows it is wrong to murder another or to steal from another, for example. You don't need a published law to understand this principle. However, these guiding principles are not the Law of God. Some of the Gentile principles of law might conform to God's Laws but others did not. As such, they were a law unto themselves and not God's designated receivers of the Law.

As to the subject of sin, Rom. 5:13, the verse clearly states that "sin" was in the world. The principle of sin or the nature of sin was at work, but without The Law (read Ten Commandments - God's Holy Eternal Law), sin was not being recognized or imputed as sin. We know "imputation" is a legal term, so no ones sin was being legally counted unto the them.

As far as judgement is concerned, without Law, a person was not being judged for breaking the Law but for their complicit association in Adam's fall. Adam stood as mankind's Federal Head - whatever he would do, we all would do.

Before the Flood, Scripture says, that everyone was doing what was right in their own eyes. The consequence of there being no Divine Standard. However, because of their fallen nature and their actions grieving the Holiness of God, the world was Judged. Except Noah and the seven with him - God's chosen remnant. The eight safely rode above the judgement of God upon the earth, in the Ark of Safety. (This should remind the believer, of the promise of the "Rapture" of Christ's church, which will ride safely above the Judgement in Heaven.)

Now as to when did this sin principle enter into the world? Some say at the time of the Earth's renewal for man because the Devil and his fallen angels were present when God recreated the Earth. Others would say, that it began with Adam and Eve. But that is a discussion for another time. What we know for sure is, that Adam was created in an "upright" condition before God and Adam walked with God in the Garden. A close knit intimate relationship with God.

But Adam and Eve were not without Law. There was one Law laid down before the eyes and ears of Adam:

Gen 2:16 And Jehovah God commanded the man, saying, Of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat:
Gen 2:17 but of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.
Adam passed this on to Eve, as she did not exist at the time.

We know that Eve sinned first because she was beguiled by the Serpent. Then she was the agent of Adam's sin. Then when Adam fell, all of mankind fell in him. They broke the only Law God had given them. Law = Commandment = Ordinance = Law. Any breach of God's will for man is the same as breaking the Law. Their sin was made manifest, by the breach of this Commandment and they hid themselves from God. Convicted in their own consciences and now fallen from their original uprightness. They feared God's presents and possible retribution. Now, instead of being clothed in naked purity and uprightness (Gen, 2:25), they were naked and ashamed. God had to impart to them a new righteousness. A symbol and foreshadowing of Christ's Person and Work. (Gen. 3:21)

Therefore sin was in the world but was not recognized or imputed as sin until the Law came in along side. The principle of Sin is a mysterious and dark thing. It was very much alive in the Tempter, that ole' Serpent and spread to man. What was Lucifer's sinful desire - to be like God. What was man's sinful desire - to be like God. In both cases, neither was satisfied with their created station. Does this sound familiar to you? Does it remind you of those who say, they have the right to choose Christ if they so desire, even if it is against their nature or the ones who believe that God never interferes with man's free will? Are they not setting themselves up as equals to God? So you see, we come full circle, right back to the Garden of Eden.

Thanks again for your kind words. May God keep you and bless you.
 

awelight

Well-known member
Aug 10, 2020
1,629
490
83
69
Yes I was speaking about the legal sense and what I said was clumsy God does see our sins and does not pass them by.

I understand your viewpoint on Romans 7 but disagree, it is true any christian trying to live the Christ life by obeying the commandments will struggle as did the man who I say is Saul of Tarsus before he was saved .
Good enough. I leave you to your views on Roman's 7, for I can really say no more than I have already said.
 

OIC1965

Well-known member
Sep 19, 2020
2,754
1,016
113
Thank you for your gracious words.

I think I see what you are trying to get at but there are a few points I would like you to consider. Let me see if I can dissect them in your post.

As to the law written in the heart, of Rom. 2:14,15, it is a law that God has placed in every person's heart. This goes back to Rom. 1:19, and should be understood as, every person has a basic knowledge of right and wrong. Everyone knows it is wrong to murder another or to steal from another, for example. You don't need a published law to understand this principle. However, these guiding principles are not the Law of God. Some of the Gentile principles of law might conform to God's Laws but others did not. As such, they were a law unto themselves and not God's designated receivers of the Law.

As to the subject of sin, Rom. 5:13, the verse clearly states that "sin" was in the world. The principle of sin or the nature of sin was at work, but without The Law (read Ten Commandments - God's Holy Eternal Law), sin was not being recognized or imputed as sin. We know "imputation" is a legal term, so no ones sin was being legally counted unto the them.

As far as judgement is concerned, without Law, a person was not being judged for breaking the Law but for their complicit association in Adam's fall. Adam stood as mankind's Federal Head - whatever he would do, we all would do.

Before the Flood, Scripture says, that everyone was doing what was right in their own eyes. The consequence of there being no Divine Standard. However, because of their fallen nature and their actions grieving the Holiness of God, the world was Judged. Except Noah and the seven with him - God's chosen remnant. The eight safely rode above the judgement of God upon the earth, in the Ark of Safety. (This should remind the believer, of the promise of the "Rapture" of Christ's church, which will ride safely above the Judgement in Heaven.)

Now as to when did this sin principle enter into the world? Some say at the time of the Earth's renewal for man because the Devil and his fallen angels were present when God recreated the Earth. Others would say, that it began with Adam and Eve. But that is a discussion for another time. What we know for sure is, that Adam was created in an "upright" condition before God and Adam walked with God in the Garden. A close knit intimate relationship with God.

But Adam and Eve were not without Law. There was one Law laid down before the eyes and ears of Adam:

Gen 2:16 And Jehovah God commanded the man, saying, Of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat:
Gen 2:17 but of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.
Adam passed this on to Eve, as she did not exist at the time.

We know that Eve sinned first because she was beguiled by the Serpent. Then she was the agent of Adam's sin. Then when Adam fell, all of mankind fell in him. They broke the only Law God had given them. Law = Commandment = Ordinance = Law. Any breach of God's will for man is the same as breaking the Law. Their sin was made manifest, by the breach of this Commandment and they hid themselves from God. Convicted in their own consciences and now fallen from their original uprightness. They feared God's presents and possible retribution. Now, instead of being clothed in naked purity and uprightness (Gen, 2:25), they were naked and ashamed. God had to impart to them a new righteousness. A symbol and foreshadowing of Christ's Person and Work. (Gen. 3:21)

Therefore sin was in the world but was not recognized or imputed as sin until the Law came in along side. The principle of Sin is a mysterious and dark thing. It was very much alive in the Tempter, that ole' Serpent and spread to man. What was Lucifer's sinful desire - to be like God. What was man's sinful desire - to be like God. In both cases, neither was satisfied with their created station. Does this sound familiar to you? Does it remind you of those who say, they have the right to choose Christ if they so desire, even if it is against their nature or the ones who believe that God never interferes with man's free will? Are they not setting themselves up as equals to God? So you see, we come full circle, right back to the Garden of Eden.

Thanks again for your kind words. May God keep you and bless you.
Correct. To say that God never interferes with Man’s free will ignores Jonah, the Tower of Babel, the passage about “hedging the way with thorns, etc.
 

awelight

Well-known member
Aug 10, 2020
1,629
490
83
69
I did meet a man once who claimed he was in "true holiness." I asked him what
if he got "angry with his wife"? he replied: "Oh, that would just be a mistake."

When I went to visit his assembly, there was one who was dancing and jumping
around in "true holiness"{?}, and the congregation was excited "he's GOT IT, he's
GOT IT!" Not sure what "he GOT," but then THE LIGHTS WENT OUT! It was
TIME for me to RUN - AND RUN I did :cry:
Sad - is it not?
 

OIC1965

Well-known member
Sep 19, 2020
2,754
1,016
113
It has been said “It’s not how high you jump but how straight you walk when your feet are on the floor. “

We all need to pray for one another because all of us certainly need straighter walks. I am not ashamed to say I need the prayers of y’all.
 

awelight

Well-known member
Aug 10, 2020
1,629
490
83
69
Correct. To say that God never interferes with Man’s free will ignores Jonah, the Tower of Babel, the passage about “hedging the way with thorns, etc.
I don't see how you get around these two areas of Scripture alone, unless your totally blind. God does act upon people, whether they asked for it or not. Agree?

Rom_9:17 For the scripture says unto Pharaoh, For this very purpose did I raise thee up, that I might show in thee my power, and that my name might be published abroad in all the earth.

2Th 2:10 and with all deceit of unrighteousness for them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved.
2Th_2:11 And for this cause God is sending them a working of error, that they should believe a lie:
 

awelight

Well-known member
Aug 10, 2020
1,629
490
83
69
It has been said “It’s not how high you jump but how straight you walk when your feet are on the floor. “

We all need to pray for one another because all of us certainly need straighter walks. I am not ashamed to say I need the prayers of y’all.
Amen and Amen.

Yes sir, I too have found myself in the ditch on more than a few occasions. When you are fighting for the Truth of the Gospel, the world can surely wear you down and stumble you. But thanks be to God, Our Lord picks us up and makes it possible to stand, each and every time.
 

rogerg

Well-known member
Jul 13, 2021
3,632
562
113
I think I see what you are trying to get at but there are a few points I would like you to consider. Let me see if I can dissect them in your post.
Thank for your reply, awelight. I'll digest your post, and if appropriate, get back to you
 

GRACE_ambassador

Well-known member
Feb 22, 2021
3,191
1,598
113
Midwest
I am not ashamed to say I need the prayers of y’all.
Excellent, as we are "members one of another," In The Body Of CHRIST, and
prayers for God's Helping GRACE For each other, is Very Much Preferable to:

"biting and Devouring" one another, Amen?
 

Evmur

Well-known member
Feb 28, 2021
5,219
2,618
113
London
christianchat.com
I did meet a man once who claimed he was in "true holiness." I asked him what
if he got "angry with his wife"? he replied: "Oh, that would just be a mistake."

When I went to visit his assembly, there was one who was dancing and jumping
around in "true holiness"{?}, and the congregation was excited "he's GOT IT, he's
GOT IT!" Not sure what "he GOT," but then THE LIGHTS WENT OUT! It was
TIME for me to RUN - AND RUN I did :cry:
I was saved [and baptised in the Holy Ghost] in my own home and I jumped and ran around the room and clapped and hollered "hooray Jesus, hooray Jesus"

that was more than 40 years ago.
 

OIC1965

Well-known member
Sep 19, 2020
2,754
1,016
113
Excellent, as we are "members one of another," In The Body Of CHRIST, and
prayers for God's Helping GRACE For each other, is Very Much Preferable to:

"biting and Devouring" one another, Amen?
AMEN!
 

OIC1965

Well-known member
Sep 19, 2020
2,754
1,016
113
And if you can speak, read, and write, Koine Greek FLUENTLY, as if its your 1st Language, then you would be that person.
If you can't then you are pretending to be a Greek authority, which is dishonest.
So you have to speak Greek fluently to know the difference between Hades and Gehenna? :LOL:

Not.
 

ForestGreenCook

Well-known member
Jul 8, 2018
8,441
1,213
113
Thank you, Billy, for that CRYSTAL CLEAR explanation. You're the man! :p
I believe that you are right on by claiming that our eternal deliverance is by God's mercy and grace and that mankind has no choice in the matter, however I believe that Paul's explanation of his fleshly nature being at war with his spiritual nature is after he has been born again with the indwelling of the Holy Spirit.

Before a person has been born again, they do not have this warfare because they do not have the indwelling of the Holy Spirit. Those of us that have been born again will be subjected to this warfare until we go to our graves. We do not leave our fleshly nature behind when we are born again. Satan preys upon our fleshly nature to persuade us sin. When we sin, we lose our relationship with God, temporary, until we repent.