Question

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
iamsoandso

iamsoandso

Senior Member
#61
Oct 6, 2011
8,048
1,609
113
#61
oldhermit said:
Of course questions will be asked. I just do not want the study to descend into an all-out brawl that accomplishes nothing for anyone. I simply ask for the participants to conduct themselves in a professional manner. I certainly do not think this will be a problem for you. In the event of a sharp disagreement on a particular point, I would be perfectly willing to discuss the matter one-on-one on another thread. It could be a point that I have never considered and I may have to rethink the matter. It happens.
Click to expand...

I agree and I hope you will consider my original question in your thread.
 
H

HighPremise

Member
#62
Mar 18, 2021
90
16
8
#62
oldhermit said:
Of course questions will be asked. I just do not want the study to descend into an all-out brawl that accomplishes nothing for anyone. I simply ask for the participants to conduct themselves in a professional manner. I certainly do not think this will be a problem for you. In the event of a sharp disagreement on a particular point, I would be perfectly willing to discuss the matter one-on-one on another thread. It could be a point that I have never considered and I may have to rethink the matter. It happens.
Click to expand...
I'd like to see a discussion on the one and only time Paul mentioned Hades (Hell) and why the translators did not place the word "Hell" there like they did every other time in the NT where Hades was used.
Then discuss it in it's context.
 
oldhermit

oldhermit

Senior Member
#66
Jul 28, 2012
9,145
616
113
70
Alabama
#66
CherieR said:
What is that? Please explain
Click to expand...
It is the oposite of the millenial view. As another member once suggested on this site, the historical view offers a platform against which prophecies can be examined.

"Futurism promotes fanciful projections of prophecy into a future that can't be examined against anything. One is based on historical witness...." (Quoted from member HeRoseFromTheDead.)
 
notuptome

notuptome

Senior Member
#67
May 17, 2013
15,050
2,538
113
#67
oldhermit said:
It is the oposite of the millenial view. As another member once suggested on this site, the historical view offers a platform against which prophecies can be examined.

"Futurism promotes fanciful projections of prophecy into a future that can't be examined against anything. One is based on historical witness...." (Quoted from member HeRoseFromTheDead.)
Click to expand...
The future is only history for the One who is eternal. Beginning to smell like Preterism sneaking into a bible discussion as a wolf is sheep's clothing.

Any teaching that cannot stand disagreement is not teaching but an attempt to indoctrinate.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
 
oldhermit

oldhermit

Senior Member
#68
Jul 28, 2012
9,145
616
113
70
Alabama
#68
notuptome said:
The future is only history for the One who is eternal. Beginning to smell like Preterism sneaking into a bible discussion as a wolf is sheep's clothing.

Any teaching that cannot stand disagreement is not teaching but an attempt to indoctrinate.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
Click to expand...
I used to favor the millennialist view but in the end, the millinnal theories simply could not stand the weight of examination. But there are also many preterist theories with which I take issue.
 
L

Live4Him

Guest
#69
#69
oldhermit said:
I used to favor the millennialist view but in the end, the millinnal theories simply could not stand the weight of examination. But there are also many preterist theories with which I take issue.
Click to expand...
Would you mind sharing one Millennial theory which cannot stand the weight of examination?
 
oldhermit

oldhermit

Senior Member
#70
Jul 28, 2012
9,145
616
113
70
Alabama
#70
Live4Him said:
Would you mind sharing one Millennial theory which cannot stand the weight of examination?
Click to expand...
I do not want to start chasing rabbits through an endless maze of trails, but I will say this. The prophecies of Daniel represent an impressive outline of human history, not some set of futuristic speculations. This is one thing I would like to examine.
 
Magenta

Magenta

Senior Member
#71
Jul 3, 2015
61,157
30,306
113
#71
oldhermit said:
"Futurism promotes fanciful projections of prophecy into a future that can't be examined against anything. One is based on historical witness...." (Quoted from member HeRoseFromTheDead.)
Click to expand...
I miss him :(
 
Lucy-Pevensie

Lucy-Pevensie

Senior Member
#74
Dec 20, 2017
9,388
5,729
113
#74
oldhermit said:
I used to favor the millennialist view but in the end, the millinnal theories simply could not stand the weight of examination. But there are also many preterist theories with which I take issue.
Click to expand...
It sounds like you are undecided, so you want to keep studying. Isn't that what a discussion forum should be best suited for?
We really should be able to discuss without every thread descending into argument shouldn't we?
I hope this one works out.
 
oldhermit

oldhermit

Senior Member
#75
Jul 28, 2012
9,145
616
113
70
Alabama
#75
Lucy-Pevensie said:
It sounds like you are undecided, so you want to keep studying. Isn't that what a discussion forum should be best suited for?
We really should be able to discuss without every thread descending into argument shouldn't we?
I hope this one works out.
Click to expand...
I am certainly not undecided. Having been on both sides of the issue, I no longer have any doubts about which is the stronger view.
 
H

HighPremise

Member
#77
Mar 18, 2021
90
16
8
#77
Lucy-Pevensie said:
It sounds like you are undecided, so you want to keep studying. Isn't that what a discussion forum should be best suited for?
We really should be able to discuss without every thread descending into argument shouldn't we?
I hope this one works out.
Click to expand...
Thus II Peter 3:16 They wrestle with the scriptures unto their own destruction.
 
oldhermit

oldhermit

Senior Member
#78
Jul 28, 2012
9,145
616
113
70
Alabama
#78
It is interesting that I was accused earlier of dismissing anyone who does not agree with me. I have demonstrated no such attitude on this thread, but more than one person has already stood in judgment of me because I do not accept the millenial view of Rev. LOL
 
posthuman

posthuman

Senior Member
#79
Jul 31, 2013
37,969
13,625
113
#79
oldhermit said:
It is interesting that I was accused earlier of dismissing anyone who does not agree with me. I have demonstrated no such attitude on this thread, but more than one person has already stood in judgment of me because I do not accept the millenial view of Rev. LOL
Click to expand...
People are very often guilty of exactly the things they accuse others of.

I tend to reject the historical view, but I'd love to hear you present it. I'm not entirely decided on eschatology I think it's 'too high for me'
I trust you know I wouldn't be very disruptive; please add me if you do go ahead and do this :)
 
Nehemiah6

Nehemiah6

Senior Member
#80
Jul 18, 2017
26,074
13,778
113
#80
HighPremise said:
Sounds like you have the full grasp of Revelation then -
Tell me, why do those that try to teach Revelation ignore 1:3 and 22:10 "THESE THINGS ARE AT HAND"?
Click to expand...
Because there is another verse (v 19) which balances things out: Write the things which thou hast seen, and the things which are, and the things which shall be hereafter;

1. THE THINGS WHICH THOU HAST SEEN: ALL THE VISIONS IN REVELATION

2. THE THINGS WHICH ARE: THE PRESENT CONDITION OF THE CHURCHES AND THE LETTERS TO THEM

3. THE THINGS WHICH SHALL BE HEREAFTER: THE BULK OF THE REVELATION PROPHECIES.

One of those things which shall be hereafter is the Millennial reign of Christ and his saints. To ignore that, or to dismiss it, means a lack of appreciation for the things which shall be hereafter.

So what did Jesus mean when He said "The time is at hand"? What He was saying is that those seven churches were to immediately receive those letters sent by the hands of angels, and after the book of Revelation was completed, the events of the first five seals would go into effect (as noted in the Olivet Discourse).
 
You must log in or register to reply here.