Refuting The Cessationism Doctrine: Spiritual Gifts, Tongues, Miracles Haven’t Ceased Since Pentecost!!

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

UnitedWithChrist

Well-known member
Aug 12, 2019
3,739
1,928
113
Why would you be critical of my position, then?


Does that mean you are telling the little grandma from some other religion that has artrhitis, "It's your fault you have athritis"?



I would ask you to pray about your heart attitude toward other believers and consider whether you are a bit of a snob, and think of yourself more highly than others. If certain men take up a lot of airtime promoting certain doctrinal error, and they believe in gifts of the Spirit, that doesn't mean that the apostles were wrong for believing in gifts of the Spirit. If someone utters a false prophecy, now, that doesn't make all prophecy false. It doesn't make Isaiah a false prophet. Nor does it make all who believe in gifts of the Spirit now false.

I try to put myself in your shoes. If I hadn't grown up hearing sound Bible teaching and fellowshipping with people who were devoted to Christ who believed in and in some cases operated in these gifts of the Spirit, and I just saw certain men on TV promoting the idea who were preaching money into their pockets, I might be skeptical. But someone who goes to a type of church I grew up in who only encountered really left-wing clergy from European state churches could have similar views about movements like Anglicanism, Lutheranism, or the various Calvinist state churches may have a negative attitude about those whole movements. If all we saw of Baptists or Calvinism was Westboro Baptist people protesting at funerals, what kind of impression would we have?



I wouldn't say there is no comingling among different groups. There are Pentecostals who would have WOFers speak at their churches and those that would reject it. There are also different Pentecostal denominations.

How many theologians have written a systematic theology, anyway? Sam Storms, who you are familiar with, has written on the topic. He might not call himself 'Charismatic' but believes in the exercise of spiritual gifts in the church. I believe Gordan Fee's background is Assemblies of God, a Pentecostal denomination. Craig Keener is a continuationist, also. He works at Asbury Theological Seminar. He is known for his Bible commentaries. He has written a work entitled Miracles also. Cessationism is an untenable position to hold, Biblically. There are continuationists of all kinds of theological backgrounds.

As far as 'Charismatics' go, the largest group that takes that label is in the RCC. There are Charismatic Lutherans. Not all Calvinists have always been cessationists. There were the 'French Prophets'. There are accounts of prophecies and miracles in the Scottish Reformation. During the Covenanter movement, Alexander Peden was known as 'prophet Peden', who prophesied or received similar revelation, predicting John Brown's death and knowing it happened from far away when it occurred, and reportedly praying over the deceased body of a young Irish nobleman until he came back to life.

Cessationism evolved over time. Something I notice with Protestant denominations that tended toward cessationism early on is that many of them have moved toward liberalism==not believing in the authority of scripture and eventually embracing left-wing moral stances on issues like abortion and gay marriage. Some of the denominations have 'co-mingling' with conservatives and those who hold to unChristian viewpoints on issues of faith and morality. I wonder if the steps go from not believing God's power can or will work in certain ways today to being skeptical about whether the power of God worked in the past. Cessationism and the arguments for it we see today seem to have grown out of 'Englightenment' thinking. Cessationism is a convenient way of thinking for those surrounded by Deists or Modernists who either believe God does not interfere with the world, or that everything is explained by natural phenomenon. The cessationist can think the world operates the way a Deist or Modernist think it does now, and just relegate all the stuff that doesn't fit that thinking to the past. It's one more step to say God didn't really operate like that back then, either.

Historically, the church was not cessationist, either. Augustine made a comment used by cessationists when he was young, but later recorded a number of supernatural healings (lots of fistula healings for some reason) and encouraged people to testify of their healings.



That's great. The resurrection of Christ is a core teaching. I agree with you. I would also point out that believing all the other teachings of scripture is important, too. In this thread, one topic discussed is that the scriptures teach that the Spirit gifts members of the body of Christ 'as the Spirit wills.'
So, basically you are claiming that cessationists are similar to liberal individuals who deny the authority of Scripture as well as comparing them to Deists.

To be honest, within the Reformed faith, they are very concerned about Scripture. They spend months going over a particular book like Romans, for instance. The sound ones practice expository teaching.

What are your services like? Do you cover books of the Bible, in context, in depth? Or, does your church do topical sermons, which can easily be manipulated through proof-texting without regard to context? Or, do they spend their time involved in emotional frenzies, perhaps jumping pews and running laps around the church?

I'm just wondering.

I think I've also made it clear that I have no issue with expressing emotions, especially when overwhelmed with the magnificent truths of Scripture.

Additionally, I do not deny that miracles occur, and do not claim God is detached. My main concern are questions such as, what is the gift of languages in the Bible? Is it still needed today? I am not satisfied with the typical continuationist claims.

Nor am I amused with people flopping on the floor, laying there twitching in some type of a trance. Nor do I believe that dreams or visions are normative. Nor do I believe the charismatic claims by individuals about their healings and their resurrections.

Do I believe healings and resurrections still occur? Yes....I just don't believe outlandish tales from unbalanced people. I would need to know that person to know if their accounts are credible or not.

And, as I have said, almost all continuationists I know are not credible.

Like I have said, I don't like using the words "continuationists" or "cessationists" anyways because that gives the impression that "cessationists" don't believe God heals or perhaps even resurrects people physically today. Either way it is not normative but is extraordinary.
 

UnitedWithChrist

Well-known member
Aug 12, 2019
3,739
1,928
113
I agree that 'tongues' means 'languages', but I also grew up using the KJV, so I use certain terminology. I don't use 'Thee' when I pray, though. Historically, Pentecostals saw tongues as 'languages.' I think most in the US still do if they consider or study the issue at all. There were a number of testimonies from Azusa Street of people speaking in languages recognized by other people who spoke them. LA was an international city even back then. One of the people there, interviewed probably in the late '60's or early '70's said the people speaking in foreign languages is what drew the crowds. I've known a number of people who have had similar experiences.



I hope you aren't calling me a joker. :) I've never been to a psychiatrist or therapist. I've felt depressed a few days over a girl when I was young, but I wouldn't categorize that as an abnormal 'mental health' issue.

That was quite a story about your grandmother. I cannot comment on that situation in particular, but i do not see it as wrong to prophesy about someone's personal situation if the Lord directs. There are many examples of scripture in it, including Paul describing prophesying when an unbeliever or uninstructed attends a church gathering and the 'secrets of his heart are made manifest' through it. I see scripture as normative for the church, rather than church practice, tradition, or a modern sense of propriety. I would also say it would be wrong for a Christian woman to divorce her husband because he was infertile and marry another.

I did not live your experiences, so I don't know about the mental health and gross immorality issues you experienced. I cannot say that I have known a lot of people I went to church with to have had mental health issues. I am sure there have been some. A lot of Pentecostal churches were historically found among working class people. The same is true of certain Baptist denominations, too. There are also urban churches that have outreach to the homeless. Some Pentecostal churches reach out to the down-and-outs and don't aspire to only attract the wealthy or educated. If a church were made up of all elite and educated people in a community where not everyone is that way, I might be uncomfortable in that environment when I compared it to the types of followers Jesus attracted and the makeup of the early church. Jesus said that God had not 'revealed it unto the wise and prudent, but hast revealed it unto babes.' Paul pointed out that not many wise men after the flesh, not many mighty, not many noble had been called. The church in Jerusalem had a lot of widows and poor saints. A friend of mine was telling me how his Assemblies of God church had a lot of mentally retarded people there that they had reached out too.

Grossly immoral? My experience growing up is that there were people who would testify of being redeemed from grossly immoral backgrounds, and an emphasis on holy living. Now, I see a lot of seeker sensitive churches and a lot of 'lighter' preaching by a lot of evangelicals in general, and some Pentecostals and Charismatics have gone in that direction. Usually, though, it doesn't seem like these churches exercise certain spiritual gifts in their meetings either. People can get lost in the crowd no matter how they live in a lot of these churches.

The issue, though, is what does the Bible teach. Is your set of personal experiences an excuse for not believing scripture on this issue? If scripture teaches that the Spirit gives the I Corinthians 12 gifts, 'as He wills', does your set of personal experiences justify you in saying that passage is not true, or to declare what the Spirit may or may not will? Wouldn't it be wise to respect God's sovereignty on this issue and be open to the idea that the Spirit still has the right to do this?
I don't think the typical cessationist view of these gifts is the correct one. I believe that the community indoctrinates the person in the presuppositions of its worldview, which is the filter through which their expectations are formed.

It is the same thing regarding the cult that I belonged to. The Scriptures are objective, but the presuppositions form the eyeglasses through which the Scripture is read by the individual.

I also believe God is purposeful, and there is no value to the disordered, frenzied behavior I associate with continuationism.

You might want to explain what the gift of languages involve, and how they serve a purpose in the Church today.

What are tongues? What purpose do they serve in the Church today? If you stick with this theme, perhaps you can remove an alleged barrier in my mind.

If they don't have an identifiable purpose in the Church today, then why would the Holy Spirit give them to men?

So, if you can answer those questions, I would find that interesting.
 

UnitedWithChrist

Well-known member
Aug 12, 2019
3,739
1,928
113
That was quite a story about your grandmother. I cannot comment on that situation in particular, but i do not see it as wrong to prophesy about someone's personal situation if the Lord directs. There are many examples of scripture in it, including Paul describing prophesying when an unbeliever or uninstructed attends a church gathering and the 'secrets of his heart are made manifest' through it. I see scripture as normative for the church, rather than church practice, tradition, or a modern sense of propriety. I would also say it would be wrong for a Christian woman to divorce her husband because he was infertile and marry another.


Grossly immoral? My experience growing up is that there were people who would testify of being redeemed from grossly immoral backgrounds, and an emphasis on holy living. Now, I see a lot of seeker sensitive churches and a lot of 'lighter' preaching by a lot of evangelicals in general, and some Pentecostals and Charismatics have gone in that direction. Usually, though, it doesn't seem like these churches exercise certain spiritual gifts in their meetings either. People can get lost in the crowd no matter how they live in a lot of these churches.
Regarding my grandmother, think about this from the perspective of the child, who was born with cerebral palsy and mental retardation. If he believed that God struck him with this affliction due to his mom's sin regarding divorce, how would that cause him to view himself?

I don't know if my aunt repeated this account to him, but if so, it would not be a good thing.

She also spoke in a distorted voice, claiming that she was speaking for God.

This kind of thing might be ok in your community, but not in mine.

Regarding gross immorality, I believe I was referring to the charismatic lady who was having sex with her son's friends, and bragged about being a MILF. She was clubbing with them and bragging about her "outreach" effort in this regard. If the person practiced this sort of behavior in churches I've been associated with, I think she would have been warned and expelled if there was no repentance. Perhaps that would happen in continuationist churches, but I don't know about that. There is a strong stress of obedience to God's law within Reformed churches.
 
Jan 12, 2019
7,497
1,399
113
The problem is, as a theory for cessationism, the Bible doesn't teach this. It shows God performing signs in Egypt. God gave Moses signs to show the Israelites, stick into snake, the leprous hand. But Moses did signs before Pharaoh as well. God split the Red Sea and caused it to close over the Egyptian army, and He had said when He gained glory over Pharaoh and all his army, the Egyptians shall "know I am the LORD."

Signs were also for Gentiles back then.

When Paul wrote Romans 11, the situation was the same is it is now, in that there are those of Israel who are blinded and do not believe, and there is the remnant according to the election of grace. In the first century, there was actually a recognizable community among Israelites who believed in Yeshua. But in more recent centuries, such people may have generally had to join churches the Jews anathemized. But the situation still fits Paul's words in the passage.

You have theory that assumes a once-for-all rejection of Christ by the Jewish people later in the first century, while Romans 11 lays out the situation of the blinded and the remnant while Paul was alive. You have a theory that has signs and wonders removed (if I understand you right) after that historical point in time. The scriptures do not teach that.
Paul taught us in 1 Cor 13:8 that signs are for the unbelievers, and they shall ceased, that is as explicit as it can be.

I have quoted Acts 15 that showed that signs and wonders were done among the Gentiles, in order to convince the Jews that the gospel of the uncircumcision was a valid gospel.

Do you have scripture that hinted in anyway that signs are needed to convince Gentiles about the gospel of grace after Paul was commissioned with that gospel?
 
Jan 12, 2019
7,497
1,399
113
The jews were brought up to believe prophecy ,he warns them about sign and wonders seekers.

They made Jesus into a circus seal .

Perform something and when we see it then we will believe.

Prophecy for those who believe by faith. Signs like making a noise without meaning and then fall backward mocking God for those who rebel .

John 6:30 They said therefore unto him,(circus seal) What sign shewest thou then, that we may see, and believe thee? what dost thou work?

John 4:48 Then said Jesus unto him, Except ye see signs and wonders, ye will not believe.

The law of signs verses prophecy .One teaching master .Which one? Signs or prophecy

In the law it is written, With men of other tongues and other lips will I speak unto this people; and yet for all that will they not hear me, saith the Lord. Wherefore tongues are for a sign, not to them that believe, but to them that believe not: but prophesying serveth not for them that believe not, but for them which believe 1 Corinthians 14:21 -33

The sign they use for mocking God "falling backward" is the one promised to expose them who have another kind of authority of hearing themselves. (refusing sola scriptura) hearing God.

Just ask them where they got the idea of falling backward from ? Why mock God for a little wonderment called self edifying. (self righteousness )
Again, I would ask you to read Exodus 4. The Jews were taught by God to expect signs and wonders from anyone claiming to be his messenger. As (Heb. 2:3-4) indicated, this is also true in the 4 Gospels, as well as Acts.

how will we escape if we neglect so great a salvation? After it was at the first spoken through the Lord, it was confirmed to us by those who heard,

4 God also testifying with them, both by signs and wonders and by various miracles and by gifts of the Holy Spirit according to His own will.

Hebrews 2:4 would make no sense if signs and wonders were not required to convince the Jews.
 

EternalFire

Well-known member
Jan 3, 2019
658
351
63
Paul taught us in 1 Cor 13:8 that signs are for the unbelievers, and they shall ceased, that is as explicit as it can be.

I have quoted Acts 15 that showed that signs and wonders were done among the Gentiles, in order to convince the Jews that the gospel of the uncircumcision was a valid gospel.

Do you have scripture that hinted in anyway that signs are needed to convince Gentiles about the gospel of grace after Paul was commissioned with that gospel?
Romans 15:17-19
So in Messiah Yeshua, I have reason to boast before God. For I will not dare to speak of anything except what Messiah accomplished through me, to bring about the obedience of the Gentiles by word and deed, in the power of signs and wonders, in the power of the Spirit of God. So from Jerusalem and around even to Illyricum, I have fully proclaimed the Good News of Messiah.
 
Jan 12, 2019
7,497
1,399
113
Romans 15:17-19
So in Messiah Yeshua, I have reason to boast before God. For I will not dare to speak of anything except what Messiah accomplished through me, to bring about the obedience of the Gentiles by word and deed, in the power of signs and wonders, in the power of the Spirit of God. So from Jerusalem and around even to Illyricum, I have fully proclaimed the Good News of Messiah.
Okay, so if you take that passage as teaching that signs are also available for us now, we who are commissioned by Paul to reach to non Christians with the gospel of grace, as in 2 Corinthians 5:11-21, my question is

why do you think we are not given signs now to bring the non Christians into obedience to the gospel? Have anyone ever ask you to "show a sign that we might believe you", when you preach to them 1 Cor 15:1-4, and you showed a sign to him right there and then?

Why did Paul not teach that to us too, as Jesus taught the 12 in Mark 16:17-18, and confirmed that in Mark 16:20, the final verse of Mark?

20 Then the disciples went out and preached everywhere, and the Lord worked with them and confirmed his word by the signs that accompanied it.
 

presidente

Senior Member
May 29, 2013
9,160
1,787
113
She also spoke in a distorted voice, claiming that she was speaking for God.

This kind of thing might be ok in your community, but not in mine.
I never heard of speaking in a distorted voice and claiming to speak for God in a Pentecostal church. Loud, prophesying, yes, without microphones.

Regarding gross immorality, I believe I was referring to the charismatic lady who was having sex with her son's friends, and bragged about being a MILF. She was clubbing with them and bragging about her "outreach" effort in this regard. If the person practiced this sort of behavior in churches I've been associated with, I think she would have been warned and expelled if there was no repentance. Perhaps that would happen in continuationist churches, but I don't know about that. There is a strong stress of obedience to God's law within Reformed churches.
There are a variety of Charismatic groups all over the map. And the seeker sensitive thing and recent trends make it harder to generalize. Aside from that in Pentecostal churches in my experience, showing too much skin is a no-no. A lot of the churches are against any drinking at all, much less clubbing, and calling oneself a MILF-- a lot of people wouldn't know what that is. I had to look it up at one point. No, that's not acceptable either, nor is sex outside of marriage. My guess is that you have not attended one of these churches. But anyone can start attending a megachurch where people don't know each other. It's not that hard.
 

presidente

Senior Member
May 29, 2013
9,160
1,787
113
why do you think we are not given signs now to bring the non Christians into obedience to the gospel? Have anyone ever ask you to "show a sign that we might believe you", when you preach to them 1 Cor 15:1-4, and you showed a sign to him right there and then?
Can you think of any time someone demanded a sign right then and there in the New Testament where it happened right then and there? The only one I know of is Gabriel giving the sight that Zecharias would be mute until John was born. That wouldn't be a very pleasant sign to experience. The apostles worked signs and wonders. I see no evidence that anyone said, "Heal that lame man over there, and I'll believe." I don't see where they solicited signs. There were those who demanded a sign of Christ, but He didn't rise from the dead immediately when they asked, and He gave the sign in one case in a cryptic way that they did not understand, which the false witnesses at His trial likely twisted into a false accusation, accusing Him of saying that __He__ would destroy the temple and rebuild it in three days.
 

presidente

Senior Member
May 29, 2013
9,160
1,787
113
4 God also testifying with them, both by signs and wonders and by various miracles and by gifts of the Holy Spirit according to His own will.

Hebrews 2:4 would make no sense if signs and wonders were not required to convince the Jews.
That doesn't make sense. If God testified to the gospel with signs and wonders among Hebrews, that doesn't prove that no Jew anywhere would ever believe without a sign. I know a lot of Jews (and Muslims too) who convert do so after dreams and things like that, but I suspect you could find a Messianic Jew who converted without seeing a sign of the type you describe.
 
Jan 12, 2019
7,497
1,399
113
I don't see where they solicited signs.
Are you joking or what? Didn't I already quoted Luke 7 where Jesus performed the necessary signs prophesied in Isasiah 35 to John's disciples who was asking him to verify that he was indeed the Messiah? You read that correct?

20 When the men came to Jesus, they said, “John the Baptist sent us to you to ask, ‘Are you the one who is to come, or should we expect someone else?’”

21 At that very time Jesus cured many who had diseases, sicknesses and evil spirits, and gave sight to many who were blind. 22 So he replied to the messengers, “Go back and report to John what you have seen and heard: The blind receive sight, the lame walk, those who have leprosy[a] are cleansed, the deaf hear, the dead are raised, and the good news is proclaimed to the poor. 23 Blessed is anyone who does not stumble on account of me.”

As I have stated to garee, the purpose of book of John was to document 7 specific signs to preach the gospel of the kingdom to the Jews, for all of them to believe that Jesus is the son of God (John 20:30-31)
 
Jan 12, 2019
7,497
1,399
113
That doesn't make sense. If God testified to the gospel with signs and wonders among Hebrews, that doesn't prove that no Jew anywhere would ever believe without a sign. I know a lot of Jews (and Muslims too) who convert do so after dreams and things like that, but I suspect you could find a Messianic Jew who converted without seeing a sign of the type you describe.
Paul himself stated that the Jews required a sign, and you yourself had used that verse.
 

presidente

Senior Member
May 29, 2013
9,160
1,787
113
So, basically you are claiming that cessationists are similar to liberal individuals who deny the authority of Scripture as well as comparing them to Deists.
You could address the point I made. Doesn't a cessationist world view allow the world now, after the first century, to function the way these philosophies say it does? Benjamin Warfield's 'common sense realism' was an Englightenment philosophy.

To be honest, within the Reformed faith, they are very concerned about Scripture. They spend months going over a particular book like Romans, for instance. The sound ones practice expository teaching.

What are your services like? Do you cover books of the Bible, in context, in depth? Or, does your church do topical sermons, which can easily be manipulated through proof-texting without regard to context?
The church I go to now typically does topical teaching. Home groups have a variety of things they are doing. A recent series was on the judgment seat of Christ, going through scriptures on the topic. This church is an independent church that was formed by a merger of a Baptist church and an A/G along with a prayer ministry. Prior to that, there was a series on how God uses suffering in the lives of believers.

But I have been to Pentecostal services that teach week after week through a book. And I've also seen Sunday morning as topical and Sunday or Wednesday night services as verse by verse.

I've heard some preachers use prooftexts, and I've probably heard more of this from Charismatics than Pentecostal pastors. There are some country Pentecostal preachers who seem heavy on excitement and low on knowledge, too. Some of the Pentecostal churches in rural areas function a bit like missionary Baptists when it comes to preachers.

Or, do they spend their time involved in emotional frenzies, perhaps jumping pews and running laps around the church?
I think you are forming some stereotypes here over the type of emotional displays that make fodder for people compiling emotional displays in YouTube. Maybe once in my life, I remember the people a Full Gospel church marching around the church while singing a song during the worship time. I forget what the song was. It probably went along with what was being sung. I did attend services at a Charismatic Messianic service that might have actually been an A/G where they would get the Torah out and dance around while carrying it. That may have been after a church dinner though. Running in a frenzy is not typical of my experience. But some Charismatic churches have dancing and stuff like that based on the Psalm. Jewish believers may dance Jewish cultural dances and stuff like that. A lot of the Messianics are Charismatics, but not all. That's a small subset percentage-wise. The Psalms say '...praise His name with dancing....'

I've never seen jumping pews, swinging from chandeliers, or running on the top of pews in church. I've heard someone say something about 'swinging from the chandeliers' once, but it's not a real thing in my experience. I don't think I've ever seen anyone run a lap around the pews in the church unless I saw a healing service on TV or something like that where someone did that after their legs were prayed for.

Additionally, I do not deny that miracles occur, and do not claim God is detached. My main concern are questions such as, what is the gift of languages in the Bible? Is it still needed today? I am not satisfied with the typical continuationist claims.
A historical Pentecostal understanding is that tongues means languages--usually human languages

twitching in some type of a trance.
Btw, you know Peter and Paul went into trances in Acts.

Nor do I believe that dreams or visions are normative. Nor do I believe the charismatic claims by individuals about their healings and their resurrections.
Biblically, should dreams from God be considered normative or not? Job lived in the land of Uz, which was outside the land of Israel. There is no indication that he was an Israelite. The book of Job says that God speaks to a man in a dream to warn him of his ways. Pharoah and Nebucadnezzer had dreams to warn them or tell them of things to come. Someone in the Midianite camp had a dream foretelling what would happen. Pilate's wife had a dream.

Peter, quoting Joel said 'your old men shall dream dreams'. This is 'in the last days.' Biblically, what reason do you have for thinking the prophecy of Joel as Peter interpreted it would not apply now in the last days? If it applied in the first century, we are even further along in the last days now. Why would the statements in Job about God speaking through dreams not apply now?

I am asking for ____Biblical____ evidence, not a page out of systematic theology or something your faith community accepts, not even a confession. I am just asking for scripture. Is your reasoning on these things in any way based on scripture?

The continuationist position on this is that scripture regarding these things are still true and applicable. Shouldn't that be the default position? Isn't the burden of proof for the proposition that scripture no longer applies to this situation be on the cessationsists?

Regarding healing, if you believe that God heals, why wouldn't you believe that just maybe some oth

Do I believe healings and resurrections still occur? Yes....I just don't believe outlandish tales from unbalanced people. I would need to know that person to know if their accounts are credible or not.
My attitude is to keep an open mind. If a stranger tells me he was the dead raised, it could be true. But people can lie and misinterpret, too.

My wife and I hosted a New Year's prayer and fellowship gathering in Indonesia. Her people-group like to have family devotions on New Year's, and in the city away from her folks, we invited friends over. This one was a day-time gathering, rather than the night prayer time. But when we hosted, a friend brought someone who was a preacher in Papua. He claimed he had been raised from the dead... after a year of being dead. His wife kept everyone away from the body, and he claimed he woke up after a year.

Okay....maybe. I don't know the guy. I'm not going to say I believe him. I'm not going to say his claims are false. So I see where you are coming from on this. But it does seem like you have softened your position a bit on miracles and such. Given the fact that faith is related to healing in scripture, it does make sense to actually believe God will answer our prayers for healing and everything else when we pray.

And, as I have said, almost all continuationists I know are not credible.
Maybe you need to expand your circle of acquaintances. I've told you I've had some concerns with some of the WOF teachings. For me, the concerns aren't about associating faith with healing, because there is clearly some of that in scripture. That is something that Pentecostals an Charismatics believe in, drawing from scripture. Some of the WOFers do not believe God ever sent calamity and that it's all from the Devil, almost a dualistic way of looking at things, and various other doctrines and just weird random stuff from some of the TV preachers. But maybe I had a bit of a bad attitude toward them. Then while living overseas, I met some who seemed to be fairly solid evangelicals who didn't seem like some of the extreme TV preachers I'd seen. It changed my perspective a bit.

It might do you well to meet some 'credible' people from some different backgrounds you are not familiar with. I Corinthians 2 warns about divisions in the body, chapter 4 warns about strife. We are to love all the brethren, and not all are exactly like us.

Like I have said, I don't like using the words "continuationists" or "cessationists" anyways because that gives the impression that "cessationists" don't believe God heals or perhaps even resurrects people physically today. Either way it is not normative but is extraordinary.[/QUOTE]
 

presidente

Senior Member
May 29, 2013
9,160
1,787
113
Are you joking or what? Didn't I already quoted Luke 7 where Jesus performed the necessary signs prophesied in Isasiah 35 to John's disciples who was asking him to verify that he was indeed the Messiah? You read that correct?

20 When the men came to Jesus, they said, “John the Baptist sent us to you to ask, ‘Are you the one who is to come, or should we expect someone else?’”

21 At that very time Jesus cured many who had diseases, sicknesses and evil spirits, and gave sight to many who were blind. 22 So he replied to the messengers, “Go back and report to John what you have seen and heard: The blind receive sight, the lame walk, those who have leprosy[a] are cleansed, the deaf hear, the dead are raised, and the good news is proclaimed to the poor. 23 Blessed is anyone who does not stumble on account of me.”
I don't think I saw that post, but that doesn't prove your point, because they did not ask Jesus for a sign in that passage. I suppose words could be omitted form a passage. But if they are, we shouldn't assume the missing parts are theologically significant. It sure looks like Christ took the initiative here in healing the sick. I don't see John's disciples saying, "Show us a sign so that we can know that you are the one." Jesus performed the miracles and then sent them back with a message from John.

Peter didn't say, "Help me catch a lot of fish and I will believe in you." Jesus took the initiative and directed Peter to take the boat out.


As I have stated to garee, the purpose of book of John was to document 7 specific signs to preach the gospel of the kingdom to the Jews, for all of them to believe that Jesus is the son of God (John 20:30-31)[/QUOTE]
 

presidente

Senior Member
May 29, 2013
9,160
1,787
113
Paul himself stated that the Jews required a sign, and you yourself had used that verse.
He probably had Jews saying, "Give us a sign"-- hence "The Jews require a sign."

But that does not mean that signs were exclusively for Jews. In both New and Old Testaments signs played a role with Gentiles also. And there are still Jews and have been since the first century, so this is not a case for cessationism.
 

presidente

Senior Member
May 29, 2013
9,160
1,787
113
Okay, so if you take that passage as teaching that signs are also available for us now, we who are commissioned by Paul to reach to non Christians with the gospel of grace, as in 2 Corinthians 5:11-21, my question is

why do you think we are not given signs now to bring the non Christians into obedience to the gospel? Have anyone ever ask you to "show a sign that we might believe you", when you preach to them 1 Cor 15:1-4, and you showed a sign to him right there and then?

Why did Paul not teach that to us too, as Jesus taught the 12 in Mark 16:17-18, and confirmed that in Mark 16:20, the final verse of Mark?

20 Then the disciples went out and preached everywhere, and the Lord worked with them and confirmed his word by the signs that accompanied it.
I believe all these scriptures are valid. I've witnessed some supernatural healing. I haven't seen it happening all the time, but at different times, I have. There are also prophecies that make manifest the secrets of one's heart, which I've probably seen more times than I could count or recall. If that's a 'sign' that one seems to happen quite a bit. Considering I Corinthians, it's the sort of thing we might expect God to be generous with if we are open to receive it. Prophesying has an important role to play in church gatherings.
 
Jan 12, 2019
7,497
1,399
113
I don't think I saw that post, but that doesn't prove your point, because they did not ask Jesus for a sign in that passage. I suppose words could be omitted form a passage. But if they are, we shouldn't assume the missing parts are theologically significant. It sure looks like Christ took the initiative here in healing the sick. I don't see John's disciples saying, "Show us a sign so that we can know that you are the one." Jesus performed the miracles and then sent them back with a message from John.

Peter didn't say, "Help me catch a lot of fish and I will believe in you." Jesus took the initiative and directed Peter to take the boat out.


As I have stated to garee, the purpose of book of John was to document 7 specific signs to preach the gospel of the kingdom to the Jews, for all of them to believe that Jesus is the son of God (John 20:30-31)
[/QUOTE]

Okay if Luke 7 is not enough, The following is a non-exhaustive list,

Matthew 16:1-4
The Pharisees and Sadducees came up, and testing Jesus, they asked Him to show them a sign from heaven. But He replied to them, "When it is evening, you say, 'It will be fair weather, for the sky is red.' "And in the morning, 'There will be a storm today, for the sky is red and threatening.' Do you know how to discern the appearance of the sky, but cannot discern the signs of the times?
Mark 8:11-12
The Pharisees came out and began to argue with Him, seeking from Him a sign from heaven, to test Him. Sighing deeply in His spirit, He said, "Why does this generation seek for a sign? Truly I say to you, no sign will be given to this generation."
Matthew 12:38-39
Then some of the scribes and Pharisees said to Him, "Teacher, we want to see a sign from You." But He answered and said to them, "An evil and adulterous generation craves for a sign; and yet no sign will be given to it but the sign of Jonah the prophet;
Luke 11:29
As the crowds were increasing, He began to say, "This generation is a wicked generation; it seeks for a sign, and yet no sign will be given to it but the sign of Jonah.
Luke 11:16
Others, to test Him, were demanding of Him a sign from heaven.
Luke 12:54-56
And He was also saying to the crowds, "When you see a cloud rising in the west, immediately you say, 'A shower is coming,' and so it turns out. "And when you see a south wind blowing, you say, 'It will be a hot day,' and it turns out that way. "You hypocrites! You know how to analyze the appearance of the earth and the sky, but why do you not analyze this present time?
Luke 23:8
Now Herod was very glad when he saw Jesus; for he had wanted to see Him for a long time, because he had been hearing about Him and was hoping to see some sign performed by Him.
John 2:18
The Jews then said to Him, "What sign do You show us as your authority for doing these things?"
John 4:48
So Jesus said to him, "Unless you people see signs and wonders, you simply will not believe."
John 6:30
So they said to Him, "What then do You do for a sign, so that we may see, and believe You? What work do You perform?
 

presidente

Senior Member
May 29, 2013
9,160
1,787
113
Paul taught us in 1 Cor 13:8 that signs are for the unbelievers, and they shall ceased, that is as explicit as it can be.

I have quoted Acts 15 that showed that signs and wonders were done among the Gentiles, in order to convince the Jews that the gospel of the uncircumcision was a valid gospel.


You seem to be acting like the omniscient commentator (kind of like the omniscient narrator in literature). Your the one saying what the purpose of the miracles was there. The idea doesn't come from scripture, but from your own mind. Acts 15 does not say the purpose of the signs was to convince the Jews the gospel was valid. It certainly was not to convince them of a second gospel.

In Acts 15, they are all discussing the same Gospel. Peter stated his believe that we are saved by the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ. Paul and Barnabas' statements were among the various pieces of evidence that they considered to discern the truth by the Holy Spirit. They all also heard Peter's testimony. James also presented what scripture said and interpreted that.

Do you have scripture that hinted in anyway that signs are needed to convince Gentiles about the gospel of grace after Paul was commissioned with that gospel?
I could do the same thing you do. I quote a verse and declare what the real reason for that was-- just assert it, because it fit some theory I was promoting. I can see how signs and wonders played a role in certain individual's conversation. There are some people who hear the word and believe. Others hear the word and see a sign and believe. Some hear and don't see a sign and don't believe. And some may hear and see signs and still not believe. There were people who believed John the Baptist, but the people commented that he did not miracle.

I think you are misinterpreting 'the Jews require a sign, and the Greeks seek after wisdom.' Does that mean there were no Greeks who cared little or nothing for philosophy or wisdom? Is that really what that means? Paul was probably commenting on Jews demanding a sign from him. Your seem to be interpreting this to mean that no Jew believes without seeing a sign or that it is God's design that Jews must believe after seeing a sign. I think you read too much into that-- the wrong ideas.

If the Jews require a sign, that does not put God under an obligation to give them one. And this is not evidence for cessationism.
 

presidente

Senior Member
May 29, 2013
9,160
1,787
113
Okay if Luke 7 is not enough, The following is a non-exhaustive list,

Matthew 16:1-4
The Pharisees and Sadducees came up, and testing Jesus, they asked Him to show them a sign from heaven. But He replied to them, "When it is evening, you say, 'It will be fair weather, for the sky is red.' "And in the morning, 'There will be a storm today, for the sky is red and threatening.' Do you know how to discern the appearance of the sky, but cannot discern the signs of the times?
Mark 8:11-12
The Pharisees came out and began to argue with Him, seeking from Him a sign from heaven, to test Him. Sighing deeply in His spirit, He said, "Why does this generation seek for a sign? Truly I say to you, no sign will be given to this generation."
Matthew 12:38-39
Then some of the scribes and Pharisees said to Him, "Teacher, we want to see a sign from You." But He answered and said to them, "An evil and adulterous generation craves for a sign; and yet no sign will be given to it but the sign of Jonah the prophet;
Luke 11:29
As the crowds were increasing, He began to say, "This generation is a wicked generation; it seeks for a sign, and yet no sign will be given to it but the sign of Jonah.
Luke 11:16
Others, to test Him, were demanding of Him a sign from heaven.
Luke 12:54-56
And He was also saying to the crowds, "When you see a cloud rising in the west, immediately you say, 'A shower is coming,' and so it turns out. "And when you see a south wind blowing, you say, 'It will be a hot day,' and it turns out that way. "You hypocrites! You know how to analyze the appearance of the earth and the sky, but why do you not analyze this present time?
Luke 23:8
Now Herod was very glad when he saw Jesus; for he had wanted to see Him for a long time, because he had been hearing about Him and was hoping to see some sign performed by Him.
John 2:18
The Jews then said to Him, "What sign do You show us as your authority for doing these things?"
John 4:48
So Jesus said to him, "Unless you people see signs and wonders, you simply will not believe."
John 6:30
So they said to Him, "What then do You do for a sign, so that we may see, and believe You? What work do You perform?
I was talking about soliciting signs in the cases I mentioned.

This is pretty good evidence against what you are arguing about doing a sign instantly when asked to. Can you find a single example of that in all the quotes?

Deuteronomy allowed for the people to reject a prophet whose sign did not come to pass, but it did not guarantee them signs upon demand.
 
Jan 12, 2019
7,497
1,399
113
I was talking about soliciting signs in the cases I mentioned.

This is pretty good evidence against what you are arguing about doing a sign instantly when asked to. Can you find a single example of that in all the quotes?

Deuteronomy allowed for the people to reject a prophet whose sign did not come to pass, but it did not guarantee them signs upon demand.
You mean when you read those examples, you are saying NONE of them had the Jews soliciting signs from Jesus?

I already stated that the purpose of John was to record the 7 signs Jesus did for the Jews to believe in Jesus. Do you accept that?

You want a specific verse where BOTH must happen simultaneously? One where Jews request a sign AND Jesus respond with a sign?

Haha, okay, I can see you are determined to stick to your guns. Nothing I use from scripture will be able to change your mind then.