SALVATION ONLY POSSIBLE WITHOUT WORKS!

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,396
113
You are so far out of understanding scripture. Rom 8:1 is not even addressing the Gift of salvation. I cited and explained the Gift of salvation, given to all men in Rom 5:12-18, Here is another place, I Cor 15:12-22. Here is a text that Christ did in fact give life to all men since all men will be resurrected in the last day, I Cor 15:53, Acts 14:15, Rev 20:13.
Once again, you are actually bypassing the actual Work of Christ, that He accomplished for the world, through His Incarnation. Heb 2:14-17, Heb 2:9, II Tim 1:10, II Cor 5:18-19, Rom 3:23-25, Col 1:20, Rom 5:6-10. There is not a mention of this work done ONLY for believers. Your concept of salvation is impossible per scripture when correctly understood. John 4:42, I John 4:14.

Your teaching that God will actually have a relationship with a dead man. He may have a biological existence in this world, but your theology excludes the possibility of eternal existence. It even denies hell. If Christ cannot raise the dead then your faith is in vain, I Cor 15:17, but also hell would not exist. The end of man would be Gen 3:19, dust to dust.

You need to completely dump whatever theology you have, which sounds very much like Calvinism since there is not a shred of evidence in scripture of Calvinism.
Cassius I don't know if you missed your Geritol or lost your glasses as I never have taught nor implied the things you say I imply....I suggest you take your pills, get your glasses on and start reading in Genesis chapter 1 and I would suggest you read slowly! Seriously!
 
Mar 28, 2014
4,300
31
0
All good scriptures and how do you apply them unto what I quoted or what specific point were you making....as there are numerous truths to be gleaned in the scriptures that you posted......

This is your quote you are what you say you are


I always remind the Lord that I am a low life Gentile not worthy to lick the dust off the bottom of his righteous foot! I am like the Centurion and not worthy that the Lord should come under my roof or like the woman who reminded the Lord that even the dogs lick from the crumbs that fall from the master's table...Or the guy who beats on his chest saying, be merciful unto me a sinner....Thank God that the Heavenly Father through Jesus brought both Jews and Gentiles in under the banner of faith. Jesus gets the Glory!

This is what god says we are
But ye are a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, an holy nation, a peculiar people; that ye should shew forth the praises of him who hath called you out of darkness into his marvellous light;

Now consider this
Heb 5
[SUP]8 [/SUP]Though he were a Son, yet learned he obedience by the things which he suffered;
[SUP]9 [/SUP]And being made perfect, he became the author of eternal salvation unto all them that obey him;

[SUP]10 [/SUP]Called of God an high priest after the order of Melchisedec.
[SUP]11 [/SUP]Of whom we have many things to say, and hard to be uttered, seeing ye are dull of hearing.
 
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,396
113
This is your quote you are what you say you are


I always remind the Lord that I am a low life Gentile not worthy to lick the dust off the bottom of his righteous foot! I am like the Centurion and not worthy that the Lord should come under my roof or like the woman who reminded the Lord that even the dogs lick from the crumbs that fall from the master's table...Or the guy who beats on his chest saying, be merciful unto me a sinner....Thank God that the Heavenly Father through Jesus brought both Jews and Gentiles in under the banner of faith. Jesus gets the Glory!

This is what god says we are
But ye are a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, an holy nation, a peculiar people; that ye should shew forth the praises of him who hath called you out of darkness into his marvellous light;

Now consider this
Heb 5
[SUP]8 [/SUP]Though he were a Son, yet learned he obedience by the things which he suffered;
[SUP]9 [/SUP]And being made perfect, he became the author of eternal salvation unto all them that obey him;

[SUP]10 [/SUP]Called of God an high priest after the order of Melchisedec.
[SUP]11 [/SUP]Of whom we have many things to say, and hard to be uttered, seeing ye are dull of hearing.
Yes I get it as I was tired when I read it the first time....I know that the saved are called a special treasured people and a few other words of such caliber and I agree with what you have posted....and humble and contrite person God will heal and as a man with a past before Christ I sometimes feel (most of the time actually) unworthy of the least of the mercies of God......
 

Cassian

Senior Member
Oct 12, 2013
1,960
7
0
Cassius I don't know if you missed your Geritol or lost your glasses as I never have taught nor implied the things you say I imply....I suggest you take your pills, get your glasses on and start reading in Genesis chapter 1 and I would suggest you read slowly! Seriously!
That's because you have no understanding of salvation from beginning to end. By juxaposing your stated views against what scripture has always taught, one comes to the conclusion that I stated.
Which is why all your statements are unscriptural because your foundation for making them are unscriptural. You hold to the theories of at least three different men who changed the meaning of the Gospel of Christ. You should do a historical check on some of the things you believe.
 
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,396
113
That's because you have no understanding of salvation from beginning to end. By juxaposing your stated views against what scripture has always taught, one comes to the conclusion that I stated.
Which is why all your statements are unscriptural because your foundation for making them are unscriptural. You hold to the theories of at least three different men who changed the meaning of the Gospel of Christ. You should do a historical check on some of the things you believe.
I have checked and I have also studied and there is no contradictions found with once saved always saved as it is your contrary view that is lacking in substance...

SCRIPTURES which you never seem to have to support your own views....LIKE I said....TAKE YOUR GERITOL and PUT YOUR GLASSES ON and start in GENESIS slowly...maybe if in the next 6 months or so you will find the Lord before it is too late for you and your works for salvation heresy.
 
P

prodigal

Guest
businessmen-boxing-match-22531565.jpg

Colossians 4:6
1599 Geneva Bible (GNV)
6 Let your speech be gracious always, and powdered with salt, that ye may know how to answer every man.
 
Mar 28, 2014
4,300
31
0
I just caught this statement and I must say......this has got to be one of the top 10 responses that makes my "moronic statements list" for sure.....WOW!
Thanks for reading it I hope you did not stop at the first line.
 

Cassian

Senior Member
Oct 12, 2013
1,960
7
0
I have checked and I have also studied and there is no contradictions found with once saved always saved as it is your contrary view that is lacking in substance...

SCRIPTURES which you never seem to have to support your own views....LIKE I said....TAKE YOUR GERITOL and PUT YOUR GLASSES ON and start in GENESIS slowly...maybe if in the next 6 months or so you will find the Lord before it is too late for you and your works for salvation heresy.
If one studies with false paradigms and foundational premises, one can come up with all kinds of truths, which again is quite obvious over the last 500 years. Yet, of all those men, hundreds, only ONE came up with the idea OSAS, which is an extension of Calvinism, based on predestination. You should study where Calvin got the idea of predestination and take it to the root. It is NOT found in scripture. It has never been a teaching of scripture prior to Calvin. But if you like to keep your head in the sand, so be it.
 

know1

Senior Member
Aug 27, 2012
3,071
167
63
Thanks. . .I know you are not trying to be mean, you are too nice for that.

You are too kind ma'am. Do you remember our last discourse? If I am nice to you, it is only because you are a woman, not to mention, a very intelligent one at that. I am harder on men.
Though you have me at a disadvantage with your superior intellect and knowledge of scripture, I enjoy the challenge, when I have the time to reply. It also gives me something to think about and search out in the bible.

I see unforgiveness, or holding a grudge, or disobedience (Mt 7:21-23), etc. all as evidence
of counterfeit faith, which is not true (saving) faith, and does not save.

Okay, I gather you are talking about someone who will never forgive or refuse to let some ill will or feelings toward another person go, and not a temporary thing. Do I understand you correctly?
As for the disobedient, would you mind expounding that word for me please? What do you mean specifically? How does disobedience tie into faith?
When you say the disobedient don't have a true saving kind of faith, are you saying that it is because they are not obeying the commands of Jesus, such as, loving God with all your heart, mind, soul, and strength and your neighbor as yourself? Or is it because they are doing some sin habitually, such as getting drunk every night or every weekend?
Have you ever met someone who wanted to stop a particular sin, but couldn't?
I would question a person's salvation based more on their attitude or character toward a sin they might be committing than the act itself. If a person finds themself caught in a sin and can't get out, because they don't know how, because they haven't been taught what Jesus has done for them on the cross, would you ditch that person because of their ignorance or because of their own weakness?
On the other hand, if you have a person that has no remorse, but explains away or justifies their sins, this person, in my eyes, is not born again, as they are not being convicted in their heart of their sins.

And I understand salvation to mean that rebirth--faith--forgiveness of sin--
justification/positional righteousness ("rightwise" standing before God)--
salvation (from God's wrath on one's sin, Ro 5:9)--
repentance (turning from disobedience to obedience) all occur pretty much
simultaneously.

Would you mind elaborating, repentance, for me please?
If you are referring to the kind of repentance that turns from doubt to believing, I can agree with the above statement. But, if it is about repenting from your dead works or feeling sorry for your sins, then I would politely disagree with you ma'am.
I say this because of Romans 10: 9-10.

Rom 10:9 That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved.
Rom 10:10 For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation.
Believe with your heart, and confess that belief with your mouth, and your will be saved. If you don't add anything to those verses, and take it, as is, then that is all that is need for salvation. No baptism, or repentance of dead or evil works, just believe and confess, and you are saved.
But what if you have a person who really believes and at the first have made Jesus lord of their lives, then got caught up in some sin, hates it and themselves, wants to stop, but can't. What do you tell a person like that? 'Sorry, if you can't stop sinning, you never were saved'?



1Jn 1:9 If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.


Isn't this referring to forgiveness of sin after salvation, and not part of saving faith itself?
Yes, that is correct, that was the purpose of my putting it there in the first place. If you are already washed clean by the blood of Jesus at the time of salvation and forever after, then why are we forgiven and cleansed from our sins, after we are saved, when we confess them?

I see the curse of the law removed at the forgiveness of sin by faith through rebirth,
where Jesus' blood is applied to my sin, which bathes me clean, so that sins committed after
salvation are a matter of confession simply washing me (my feet) to make me clean (Jn 13:8-10).
Okay, I think I understand what you are saying, but don't you think their will be consequences to sins that a child of God commits and hasn't repented and confessed, such as the ones mentioned in scripture below? What happened to the ones that died because of God's judgement on them?

1Co 11:27 Wherefore whosoever shall eat this bread, and drink this cup of the Lord, unworthily, shall be guilty of the body and blood of the Lord.
1Co 11:28 But let a man examine himself, and so let him eat of that bread, and drink of that cup.
1Co 11:29 For he that eateth and drinketh unworthily, eateth and drinketh damnation to himself, not discerning the Lord's body.
1Co 11:30 For this cause many are weak and sickly among you [the church], and many sleep [God killed them].
1Co 11:31 For if we would judge ourselves [repent], we should not be judged.
1Co 11:32 But when we are judged, we are chastened of the Lord, that we should not be condemned with the world.

And Heb 12:5-11

How did they die? Was it because of the sickness that God put on them that killed them?
I personally am having a hard time comprehending why so very few Christian can see this. The fact that God judges or chastens us, when we sin and fail to repent. That God is still just to punish us for the sins we committed, but does not condemn us with the unbelievers, to eternal damnation. I just what the part of not condemning us to be noticed. Our names are still written in the Lamb's book of life, our salvation has not taken from us, yet we are judged and/or chastened in the natural world for the sins we commit.



For me, faith is that wholehearted casting of oneself on God in absolute trust in Jesus' completed work
on the cross to give me acceptance by God as his own whom he loves, and for whom he completely
provides, especially his so great salvation (Heb 2:3).
'Completely provides'? What do you mean ma'am?

I believe our will is governed by our disposition.
And I believe rebirth and faith alter our disposition toward obedience and disobedience,
so that habitual disobedience (holding a grudge, refusal to forgive) gives evidence of an
unbelieving heart, or a counterfeit faith.

Our disposition is governed by the spirit that is in us.
Joh 8:38-44
As for our will, I believe we have more than one kind. One that is of us and one that is not. One that is from one part of us, and the other from another part.
Agreed... rebirth does alter our character, because of the new or fresh heart and spirit God put within us, along with His Spirit, which causes us do His will.
Eze 36:25-27
 
Last edited:
Mar 28, 2014
4,300
31
0
Yes I get it as I was tired when I read it the first time....I know that the saved are called a special treasured people and a few other words of such caliber and I agree with what you have posted....and humble and contrite person God will heal and as a man with a past before Christ I sometimes feel (most of the time actually) unworthy of the least of the mercies of God......
God's grace be with you my friend and may he keep you in perfect peace.
 

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,716
3,655
113
If one studies with false paradigms and foundational premises, one can come up with all kinds of truths, which again is quite obvious over the last 500 years. Yet, of all those men, hundreds, only ONE came up with the idea OSAS, which is an extension of Calvinism, based on predestination. You should study where Calvin got the idea of predestination and take it to the root. It is NOT found in scripture. It has never been a teaching of scripture prior to Calvin. But if you like to keep your head in the sand, so be it.
It goes further back than Calvin or ... My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me: And I give unto them eternal life; and they shall never perish, neither shall any man pluck them out of my hand. My Father, which gave them me, is greater than all; and no man is able to pluck them out of my Father's hand. I and my Father are one. (Joh 10:27-30) Who shall separate us from the love of Christ? shall tribulation, or distress, or persecution, or famine, or nakedness, or peril, or sword? As it is written, For thy sake we are killed all the day long; we are accounted as sheep for the slaughter. Nay, in all these things we are more than conquerors through him that loved us. For I am persuaded, that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor powers, nor things present, nor things to come, Nor height, nor depth, nor any other creature, shall be able to separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord. (Rom 8:35-39) But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us. Much more then, being now justified by his blood, we shall be saved from wrath through him. For if, when we were enemies, we were reconciled to God by the death of his Son, much more, being reconciled, we shall be saved by his life. (Rom 5:8-10) ...is one going to say John and Paul were also Calvinists.
 
Last edited:
K

Kerry

Guest
I meant what work can you do that tops the Cross?
 

Cassian

Senior Member
Oct 12, 2013
1,960
7
0
It goes further back than Calvin or ... My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me: And I give unto them eternal life; and they shall never perish, neither shall any man pluck them out of my hand. My Father, which gave them me, is greater than all; and no man is able to pluck them out of my Father's hand. I and my Father are one. (Joh 10:27-30) Who shall separate us from the love of Christ? shall tribulation, or distress, or persecution, or famine, or nakedness, or peril, or sword? As it is written, For thy sake we are killed all the day long; we are accounted as sheep for the slaughter. Nay, in all these things we are more than conquerors through him that loved us. For I am persuaded, that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor powers, nor things present, nor things to come, Nor height, nor depth, nor any other creature, shall be able to separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord. (Rom 8:35-39) But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us. Much more then, being now justified by his blood, we shall be saved from wrath through him. For if, when we were enemies, we were reconciled to God by the death of his Son, much more, being reconciled, we shall be saved by his life. (Rom 5:8-10) ...is one going to say John and Paul were also Calvinists.
Where is predestination in this context?
Rom 5:8-10 is not even about believers.
You have picked a premise, a false one, namely predestination as formulated, constructed by the reformed/Calvinist theology and superimposed it on scripture. I might add, your use of Rom 5:8-10, if predestination is applied would make Calvinists Universalist since part of their theology is that whom Christ died for will also be saved, meaning going to heaven.
Historically, the origin, the stem that crept into Christian theology starts with Augustine who used many ideas from his former faith, Manicheanism. Mana, the founder, incorporated many known theories of religions of that day, including Christianity. Augustine did the reverse, incorporated many false ideas from Manicheanism and Neo-Platonism into Christianity. So, the root is actually pagan. Boettner states as much and recognizes it as being fatalism, but fatalism, not of some pagan diety, but of God.
The saddest thing is that many are taught this as scriptural and those teaching it never acknowledge the origins of the teaching. Any theory that has a man's name attached to it is suspect. There is no scriptural teachings that have man's names attached. This occurs ONLY in Protestant milieu of sola scriptura where individual men develops his own idea of what scripture might mean. That is historical fact that cannot be changed.
 
A

Alligator

Guest
Cassius I don't know if you missed your Geritol or lost your glasses as I never have taught nor implied the things you say I imply....I suggest you take your pills, get your glasses on and start reading in Genesis chapter 1 and I would suggest you read slowly! Seriously!
Why do you make fun of somebody because of their age? Remember, you will be there one day, sooner than you think.
 

Cassian

Senior Member
Oct 12, 2013
1,960
7
0
Why do you make fun of somebody because of their age? Remember, you will be there one day, sooner than you think.
Good to see you again.
Just a note, 1614 posts and the proponents of the OP have not yet made their point with any substantive texts. Lots of strawmen piling up as in the other thread.
As to his humor, for him it is necessary since he has nothing substantive to contribute.
 
Last edited:
A

Alligator

Guest
Good to see you again.
Just a note, 1614 posts and the proponents of the OP have not yet made their point with any substantive texts. Lots of strawmen piling up as in the other thread.
As to his humor, for him it is necessary since he has nothing substantive to contribute.
Heck, I'm 67 and haven't slowed down one bit. I would hate to see what he thinks of someone 80, lol.
 

Elin

Banned
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
Scripturally, historically it has never been condemned as the Gospel.
Except by Paul. . .

It has been proclaimed by Christians for 2000 years. A Gospel that has not changed. It has been preserved by the Holy Spirit and man has not been able to change it.
You keep going outside Scripture to validate Scripture.

My final authority is the NT Greek, yours is not.

There being no common final authority by which to resolve opposing differences,

you are wasting your time and ours here.
 

Cassian

Senior Member
Oct 12, 2013
1,960
7
0
Except by Paul. . .


You keep going outside Scripture to validate Scripture.

My final authority is the NT Greek, yours is not.

There being no common final authority by which to resolve opposing differences,

you are wasting your time and ours here.
Unsubstantiated assertions without evidence again. Except that we know there are hundreds of sola scripturists who use ONLY the text and have derived hundreds, of not thousands of interpretations, which yours is but one- of them. So much for your final authority. It seems to me it does not work.
 
Mar 28, 2014
4,300
31
0
I just caught this statement and I must say......this has got to be one of the top 10 responses that makes my "moronic statements list" for sure.....WOW!
Maybe you can add this to your list.
It is time for every man to judge himself by the word of God. And God has set his standard in The book of Revelation where he speaks to his Church. There are seven churches and every believer will be found in one of those. There are precise instructions and commands as to what need fixing in our lives and the promise to those who overcome.
 

Elin

Banned
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
You are too kind ma'am. Do you remember our last discourse? If I am nice to you, it is only because you are a woman, not to mention, a very intelligent one at that. I am harder on men.
Though you have me at a disadvantage with your superior intellect and knowledge of scripture, I enjoy the challenge, when I have the time to reply. It also gives me something to think about and search out in the bible.

Okay, I gather you are talking about someone who will never forgive or refuse to let some ill will or feelings toward another person go, and not a temporary thing. Do I understand you correctly?
Yes, I am speaking of a heart disposition, which shows itself not to have been changed by a new birth,
which means one is not saved.

As for the disobedient, would you mind expounding that word for me please? What do you mean specifically? How does disobedience tie into faith?
When you say the disobedient don't have a true saving kind of faith, are you saying that it is because they are not obeying the commands of Jesus, such as, loving God with all your heart, mind, soul, and strength and your neighbor as yourself? Or is it because they are doing some sin habitually, such as getting drunk every night or every weekend?
By disobedience, I mean an habitual sinful lifestyle, an habitual general walking in the darkness.

Have you ever met someone who wanted to stop a particular sin, but couldn't?
Yes, and I've also heard of some who finally did.

I would question a person's salvation based more on their attitude or character toward a sin they might be committing than the act itself. If a person finds themself caught in a sin and can't get out, because they don't know how, because they haven't been taught what Jesus has done for them on the cross, would you ditch that person because of their ignorance or because of their own weakness?
On the other hand, if you have a person that has no remorse, but explains away or justifies their sins, this person, in my eyes, is not born again, as they are not being convicted in their heart of their sins.
I would work with the person caught in the besetting sin to help them discover the root
(which always boils down to a false belief) which causes the sinful habit, then
to transform their mind by presenting the truth of Scriptures regarding this false belief, and
together in prayer with them beseech God to work into their heart His truth on the matter.

Would you mind elaborating, repentance, for me please?
If you are referring to the kind of repentance that turns from doubt to believing, I can agree with the above statement. But, if it is about repenting from your dead works or feeling sorry for your sins, then I would politely disagree with you ma'am.
I say this because of Romans 10: 9-10.
The meaning of the Greek word for repentance is a "change of mind."

Repentance is "that mighty change of heart and mind" from unbelief to belief (saving faith).

Rom 10:9 That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved.
Rom 10:10 For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation.
Believe with your heart, and confess that belief with your mouth, and your will be saved. If you don't add anything to those verses, and take it, as is, then that is all that is need for salvation. No baptism, or repentance of dead or evil works, just believe and confess, and you are saved.
But what if you have a person who really believes and at the first have made Jesus lord of their lives, then got caught up in some sin, hates it and themselves, wants to stop, but can't. What do you tell a person like that? 'Sorry, if you can't stop sinning, you never were saved'?

1Jn 1:9 If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.
I would do the same as with besetting sin, addressed above.

If you are already washed clean by the blood of Jesus at the time of salvation and forever after, then why are we forgiven and cleansed from our sins, after we are saved, when we confess them?
"Confess" is "to agree with. "

Confession is to bring our hearts into agreement with God about our sin, in order to restore fellowship with him.

Okay, I think I understand what you are saying, but don't you think their will be consequences to sins that a child of God commits and hasn't repented and confessed, such as the ones mentioned in scripture below? What happened to the ones that died because of God's judgement on them?

1Co 11:27 Wherefore whosoever shall eat this bread, and drink this cup of the Lord, unworthily, shall be guilty of the body and blood of the Lord.
1Co 11:28 But let a man examine himself, and so let him eat of that bread, and drink of that cup.
1Co 11:29 For he that eateth and drinketh unworthily, eateth and drinketh damnation to himself, not discerning the Lord's body.
1Co 11:30 For this cause many are weak and sickly among you [the church], and many sleep [God killed them].
1Co 11:31 For if we would judge ourselves [repent], we should not be judged.
1Co 11:32 But when we are judged, we are chastened of the Lord, that we should not be condemned with the world.

And Heb 12:5-11

How did they die? Was it because of the sickness that God put on them that killed them?
I personally am having a hard time comprehending why so very few Christian can see this. The fact that God judges or chastens us, when we sin and fail to repent. That God is still just to punish us for the sins we committed, but does not condemn us with the unbelievers, to eternal damnation. I just what the part of not condemning us to be noticed. Our names are still written in the Lamb's book of life, our salvation has not taken from us, yet we are judged and/or chastened in the natural world for the sins we commit.
God's "judgment" of physical death does not mean eternal death.
God disciplines/chastens those he loves, and sometimes that discipline may be physical death
to keep them from further sin.

For me, faith is that wholehearted casting of oneself on God in absolute trust in Jesus' completed work
on the cross to give me acceptance by God as his own whom he loves, and for whom he completely
provides
, especially his so great salvation (Heb 2:3).
'Completely provides'? What do you mean ma'am?

That in all things he will work for my own good.