Saved "All my life" Is NOT a possibiliy nor Biblical

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
#21
The Machine: " so again I say who cares when anybody believes they are saved?"

God does and here are scriptures to support that WHEN IS AN ISSUE:



  1. Acts 8:12 But when they believed Philip preaching the good news about the kingdom of God and the name of Jesus Christ, they were being baptized, men and women alike.

  1. Acts 13:12 Then the proconsul believedwhen he saw what had happened, being amazed at the teaching of the Lord.

  1. Acts 13:48 When the Gentiles heard this, they began rejoicing and glorifying the word of the Lord; and as many as had been appointed to eternal life believed.
    Acts 14:23 Whenthey had appointed elders for them in every church, having prayed with fasting, they commended them to the Lord in whom they had believed.
    Acts 18:8 Crispus, the leader of the synagogue, believed in the Lord with all his household, and many of the Corinthians whenthey heard were believing and being baptized.
    Acts 18:27 And when he wanted to go across to Achaia, the brethren encouraged him and wrote to the disciples to welcome him; and when he had arrived, he greatly helped those who had believedthrough grace,
    Acts 19:2 He said to them, “Did you receive the Holy Spirit when you believed?” And they said to him, “No, we have not even heard whether there is a Holy Spirit.”
    Acts 21:20 And when they heard it they began glorifying God; and they said to him, “You see, brother, how many thousands there are among the Jews of those who have believed, and they are all zealous for the Law;
    Romans 13:11 Do this, knowing the time, that it is already the hour for you to awaken from sleep; for now salvation is nearer to us than when we believed.

    If in scripture the people could tell WHEN they believed, we, today, also need to be able to say "I believed WHEN"
maggie, your argument is meaningless. since you don't apply it to yourself.
and appear not even to believe it.


And since there is no time in the spirit realm, you can still dedicate your little girl to Him, regardless of how long ago she passed. He has her in His care regardless.
Maggie
 
T

TheMachine

Guest
#22
The Machine: " so again I say who cares when anybody believes they are saved?" God does and here are scriptures to support that WHEN IS AN ISSUE:
  1. Acts 8:12 But when they believed Philip preaching the good news about the kingdom of God and the name of Jesus Christ, they were being baptized, men and women alike.

  1. Acts 13:12 Then the proconsul believedwhen he saw what had happened, being amazed at the teaching of the Lord.

  1. Acts 13:48 When the Gentiles heard this, they began rejoicing and glorifying the word of the Lord; and as many as had been appointed to eternal life believed.
    Acts 14:23 Whenthey had appointed elders for them in every church, having prayed with fasting, they commended them to the Lord in whom they had believed.
    Acts 18:8 Crispus, the leader of the synagogue, believed in the Lord with all his household, and many of the Corinthians whenthey heard were believing and being baptized.
    Acts 18:27 And when he wanted to go across to Achaia, the brethren encouraged him and wrote to the disciples to welcome him; and when he had arrived, he greatly helped those who had believedthrough grace,
    Acts 19:2 He said to them, “Did you receive the Holy Spirit when you believed?” And they said to him, “No, we have not even heard whether there is a Holy Spirit.”
    Acts 21:20 And when they heard it they began glorifying God; and they said to him, “You see, brother, how many thousands there are among the Jews of those who have believed, and they are all zealous for the Law;
    Romans 13:11 Do this, knowing the time, that it is already the hour for you to awaken from sleep; for now salvation is nearer to us than when we believed.

    If in scripture the people could tell WHEN they believed, we, today, also need to be able to say "I believed WHEN"
I find it interesting that you said "God does" and then used these reactionary scriptures to prove your point. I guess I must be missing your connection and please allow me to explain. I could use the same theory to say "when I went outside in -20 weather with high winds , I was very cold." The when is not pointing to a specific time,but rather an action. Pretty much all of the scripture you used here shows this, WHEN they HEARD, they BELIEVED. This points to the action of hearing and the direct result of believing. So in a sense you are right, that God wants us to BELIEVE WHEN we HEAR the good news, but I see no where in these references where God says through the author " and they heard as a child and believed," or " and when only the people old enough to understand heard they knew to write down the date of their salvation for they knew this date means something to the father".....I think that when we are made alive in Him the angels and hosts of heaven celebrate and it is a great time indeed, but I submit that it isn't nearly as important as giving the Glory to God. I also think that celebrating and sharing the salvation of and with others would be far more prudent. You usedRom 13:11 Do this, knowing the time, that it is already the hour for you to awaken from sleep; for now salvation is nearer to us than when we believed. Which is a wonderful and urgent scripture to bring to the saved and unsaved alike. Essentially saying Do this NOW, or the time is at hand, or DON'T WAIT and when you read the whole section of the chapter it highlights the actions required. But I find it curious that it says that salvation is closer now than when we believed.....don't you?

"Salvation is nearer to us than when we believed" This screams to the folks who are already believers....perhaps they were sluggish in their faith? Lazy in their carrying out the day to day of the Church? What I do get from this passage is that our salvation although assured and "not in jeopardy" as Spurgeon said. Rather it is in a state of construction at all times...it is being worked on, molded and growing much like a seed, it requires water, sunlight and aeration.

I apologize for my lack of understanding of your side of the discussion, and please do not take my views as adversarial in the least. I enjoy the iron sharpens iron type of conversation. God Bless.


The Machine

"You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.".......Inigo Montoya
 
Last edited by a moderator:

DiscipleDave

Senior Member
Sep 4, 2012
3,095
69
48
#23
On your website you have a link called 'Lost Books' and in that article you state...

'' This chapter is about those epistles that they discarded and chose not to put into the Bible. It also has epistles that the Church didn't find, but were found later, after the Bible was already completed. Anytime i read something, i determine if it is good or if it is bad. How i do this is: whatever i read if it is contrary to the Bible, i read no more of it, but if it talks of doing good and not bad i believe it, for the Bible says the same thing; Do good, not evil ''

Then towards the bottom of the article you quote three passages from the book of Mormon.

Question: Do you see the Book of Mormon contrary to the Bible and therefore 'read it no more', or do you 'believe it' because it 'talks of doing good and evil'?
You say "at the bottom of the article you quote three passages from the book of Mormon" , yet you do not quote the three verses. i have read the entire Book of Mormon, and have found the message of the book to be : believe in Jesus, do good and not evil. However i have upset Mormons when they teach things that is contrary to their Book of Mormon. i believe the Book of Mormon to be exactly what it says it is "Another testament of Jesus Christ" i have a testament of Jesus Christ as well, i have my own story about what Jesus has done in my life. The book of Mormon is a testament about what Jesus did in their lives as well. Now to say the Book of Mormon is the Word of God or it is to be believed as such is indeed wrong and is not the Truth. The book of Mormon is not the Word of God, it is merely a testimony what Jesus did in their lives.

^i^
 

DiscipleDave

Senior Member
Sep 4, 2012
3,095
69
48
#24
Interesting. I have found error in about every topic you posted on your site. God is not all knowing? Wow.
Did you read the article, or just make an assumption about it and not read it? If you have read it, then tell me what part you disagree with? If you loved me, as a Christian is to do, you will take the time to try to help me. If i have said something wrong or in error in the article, then by all means please help me correct it, and tell me what it is that you do not agree with. Or you can just look the other way and not help at all, like this generation is notorious in doing.

Looks to me like your site is more a reflection of your own views, but you have ommited important passages on topics because they would obviously conflict with your opinion.
Again, you accuse me of something, yet show nothing as to what i have said that does this. Please tell me what i have said that you believe reflects my own views. Because if that is True, i will correct that error, through your help, but if i know not what you are referring to, how can i correct it. If you feel that i am teaching falsely, should you not try to help me, or at least tell me what it is that i am teaching falsely? i will continue to teach what is in the article, because you failed to tell me what is in error in the article. How can i change it or correct it, if i know not what is in error.

Like your topic on war. You mentoned many wonderful passages on love, but ommited actual passages talking about war.
You say that i have omitted actual passages talking about war, yet you do not list one passage. Tell me what passages have i omitted? Can i add all passages? Is it possible i missed a passage that you know about? How can i add the passage i missed if you do not tell which passage it is that i missed?

What about the soldier at the foot of the cross? The bible doesn't tell us that he was told to walk away from his job.
i do not recall i ever saying that either. Are you saying that i have said that a soldier should walk away from his/her job? i have no ideal why i would say such a thing, i was four years active duty Air Force and 8 years Army National Guard. Is it possible you do not understand the article about War, and have made these false assumptions about me?

What about the good soldiers the Hebrew writer spoke of?
What about them? Because you did not quote what i said, how is anyone to know what you are talking about?

What about the parable of the Kings War in the book of Luke?
Again, don't know what you are talking about. Please be more specific.

What about the wars on the OT where it is evident God was on the Israelites side?
Now i know you have not read the article on war, if you were to have read the entire thing, you have seen that i said God did approve of war in the Old Testament, and condoned it. If you were to have read the entire article you have seen i do not disaprove of military, only WAR. Jesus said Love your enemies, He did not instruct to kill them. But because it appears you are a supporter of WAR and killing your enemies, you have attacked me, (well to me it feels like an attack) on my article about War. i don't condone killing people, i know Jesus does not condone killing people either. So you read a few lines of the article then disregarded the rest of it, because it was contrary to what you believe.
As i have said before and say now, what i teach is not from my own personal opinions, it is what God has told me. If then the article about war, is what God told me, then you do not disagree with me, but with Him who told me.
Have i offended you somehow?

^i^
 
J

jimmydiggs

Guest
#25
I agree with, MM, we MUST be 'born again.
Unless you were born-again rather early.

Also, you falsely assume born-again = sinner's prayer. That is patently false, John 1:13 says a person is born of God, not by human decision.
 
Last edited:

DiscipleDave

Senior Member
Sep 4, 2012
3,095
69
48
#26
The article about War can be found HERE. Judge for yourself if it is True or not.

^i^
 

JGPS

Banned
Jan 11, 2013
629
0
0
#27
True. Because when we're talking about being saved we're talking about being saved from judgment and eternal damnation.

No one alive has faced judgment day yet, so one should really never say 'I was saved'. Rather what we have is certain hope that 'I will be saved'.

No one here was saved, or is presently saved. But all of us (except the occational atheist lurker) are to be saved.
 

willfollowsGod

Senior Member
Apr 14, 2011
1,515
66
48
33
#28
First of all, when it comes to the topic of this thread, I would not say I was saved all my life. As for the saved part, the church I go to calls it already-not-yet theology. When you come to Christ and accept as your personal Savior and sovereign Lord, you are saved. If you do not leave the faith and leave, then you are still saved until the end of your life. So I like to think of this as you are saved and will be completely saved when you die, if you accepted Jesus Christ as your Savior and Lord. This one time was discussed in my adult Sunday school class and when I heard it, it made sense. But if for you it does not make sense, then I hope that God can give you some clarity in this subject and if I am in the wrong, then I am in the wrong. God bless and stay strong in the faith of Jesus Christ.
 
J

jimmydiggs

Guest
#29
No one here was saved, or is presently saved. But all of us (except the occational atheist lurker) are to be saved.
I'm not quite sure where you get that, but it's not quite scriptural.

Was saved, am saved, am being saved.
 

JGPS

Banned
Jan 11, 2013
629
0
0
#30
I'm not quite sure where you get that, but it's not quite scriptural.

Was saved, am saved, am being saved.
In the context Maggie is talking about salvation from judgment, not temporal safety and protection. Clearly babies can have temporal safety. Salvation of the soul, not salvation of the body.
 
J

jimmydiggs

Guest
#31
In the context Maggie is talking about salvation from judgment, not temporal safety and protection. Clearly babies can have temporal safety. Salvation of the soul, not salvation of the body.
I will appear before the Judgement Seat, but I am saved from that judgement by Christ. He has already taken on my judgement. Penal Substition is a wonderful thing.

2 Cor. 5:10
For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ, so that each of us
may receive what is due us for the things done while in the body, whether good
or bad.
 
J

jimmydiggs

Guest
#33
Skinski's soon to copy and paste...:)
Pre-emptive striek:


Some scholars and church leaders argue that penal substitutionary atonement—the doctrine that when Jesus died on the cross God punished him for the sins of his people, in whose place he stood—is at best one scriptural metaphor among many. Such teachers argue that we should push penal substitution to the sidelines of the gospel message. Should we therefore de-emphasize, de-centralize, or even lay aside this doctrine in favor of a
more balanced presentation? Not if we want to be faithful to Scripture. While the Bible does use other images and ideas to describe Christ’s work on the cross (such as healing, reconciliation, and victory over Satan), penal substitutionary atonement is central to the gospel in at least two ways.

  1. It’s by far the most common biblical explanation of Christ’s work on the cross. Christ was pierced for our transgressions (Isa. 53:5). The Lord laid on him the iniquity of us all (Isa. 53:6).Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures (1 Cor. 15:3). We’re justified by the blood of Christ (Rom. 5:9). God set forth Christ as a propitiation—a sacrifice that turns away God’s wrath—so that those who believe in Christ would be declared righteous (Rom. 3:25, 1 John 2:2). All of these verses and plenty more (take a look at the book of Leviticus!) speak of God pouring out on Christ the wrath we deserved for our sins. Penal substitution is inescapably central to the Bible’s teaching about the gospel.
  2. Penal substitutionary atonement is what makes all of the other images “work.” Christ triumphed over Satan on the cross by bearing God’s wrath in our place and so freeing us from Satan’s power and claims (Col. 2:14-15). Christ healed us by bearing the wounds we deserved (Isa. 53:5). Christ reconciled us to God by satisfying God’s wrath against us (Rom. 5:9-11). According to Scripture, our biggest problem is God’s wrath due to us for our sin. In providing for our greatest need Christ accomplished everything else we need for salvation.



Copy-Pasta Y'all, everyone get a plate.
 
T

Tintin

Guest
#34
That is not how you read the Bible. You don't just highlight the word believed and say they apply to what you're talking about. Some of those verses do, but others are completely irrelevant to your case. This is why context is so important.
 

JGPS

Banned
Jan 11, 2013
629
0
0
#35
I will appear before the Judgement Seat, but I am saved from that judgement by Christ. He has already taken on my judgement. Penal Substition is a wonderful thing.

2 Cor. 5:10
For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ, so that each of us
may receive what is due us for the things done while in the body, whether good
or bad.
Seeing that you must yet appear at judgment you are not presently saved from it.

2Co 5:21 For he hath made him to be sin for us, who knew no sin; that we might be made the righteousness of God in him.
But yeah, you're presently cleansed so that you have sure safety at judgment.

But now we're getting into a timeline of something that is nigh in-temporal. It's really a minor difference in how things are phrased.
 
C

carey

Guest
#36
James 2:19
Even demons believe there is one God, just because you believe, that doesn't make you saved
As for reading and following what is good, isn't always good, budhist are known to be good, as are hindus, yet they worship hundreds of gods and goddesses, wicans claim to be good, see where I'm going here? The road to hell is paved with good intentions. The Only way to be saved is through Jesus Christ, there is NO other way, repent, and believe Jesus died for your sins and rose again on the third day,, and confess with your mouth that Jesus is Lord!
 
T

Tintin

Guest
#37
Carey, I don't think any Christians here would dispute your post.
 

Elizabeth619

Senior Member
Jul 19, 2011
6,397
109
48
#38
Did you read the article, or just make an assumption about it and not read it? If you have read it, then tell me what part you disagree with? If you loved me, as a Christian is to do, you will take the time to try to help me. If i have said something wrong or in error in the article, then by all means please help me correct it, and tell me what it is that you do not agree with. Or you can just look the other way and not help at all, like this generation is notorious in doing.



Again, you accuse me of something, yet show nothing as to what i have said that does this. Please tell me what i have said that you believe reflects my own views. Because if that is True, i will correct that error, through your help, but if i know not what you are referring to, how can i correct it. If you feel that i am teaching falsely, should you not try to help me, or at least tell me what it is that i am teaching falsely? i will continue to teach what is in the article, because you failed to tell me what is in error in the article. How can i change it or correct it, if i know not what is in error.



You say that i have omitted actual passages talking about war, yet you do not list one passage. Tell me what passages have i omitted? Can i add all passages? Is it possible i missed a passage that you know about? How can i add the passage i missed if you do not tell which passage it is that i missed?



i do not recall i ever saying that either. Are you saying that i have said that a soldier should walk away from his/her job? i have no ideal why i would say such a thing, i was four years active duty Air Force and 8 years Army National Guard. Is it possible you do not understand the article about War, and have made these false assumptions about me?

What about the good soldiers the Hebrew writer spoke of?
What about them? Because you did not quote what i said, how is anyone to know what you are talking about?



Again, don't know what you are talking about. Please be more specific.



Now i know you have not read the article on war, if you were to have read the entire thing, you have seen that i said God did approve of war in the Old Testament, and condoned it. If you were to have read the entire article you have seen i do not disaprove of military, only WAR. Jesus said Love your enemies, He did not instruct to kill them. But because it appears you are a supporter of WAR and killing your enemies, you have attacked me, (well to me it feels like an attack) on my article about War. i don't condone killing people, i know Jesus does not condone killing people either. So you read a few lines of the article then disregarded the rest of it, because it was contrary to what you believe.
As i have said before and say now, what i teach is not from my own personal opinions, it is what God has told me. If then the article about war, is what God told me, then you do not disagree with me, but with Him who told me.
Have i offended you somehow?

^i^
First off you are far from offending me. Not agreeing with someone doesn't mean they are offended.
I also do not mind discussing any of your website with you. I will publicaly, or privately. However you wish.

You are also responding to a post I made a month ago. You never responded 4 weeks ago so it would be only natural to think you weren't interested in discussing any of it. That's why nothing more was said.
 
J

jimmydiggs

Guest
#39
Seeing that you must yet appear at judgment you are not presently saved from it.



But yeah, you're presently cleansed so that you have sure safety at judgment.

But now we're getting into a timeline of something that is nigh in-temporal. It's really a minor difference in how things are phrased.
Do you believe Penal Substitution?
 
1

1still_waters

Guest
#40
Psalms 8
[SUP]2 [/SUP] Out of the mouth of babies and infants,
you have established strength because of your foes,
to still the enemy and the avenger.

Jesus confirms...

Matthew 21
[SUP]15 [/SUP]But when the chief priests and the scribes saw the wonderful things that he did, and the children crying out in the temple, “Hosanna to the Son of David!” they were indignant, [SUP]16 [/SUP]and they said to him, “Do you hear what these are saying?” And Jesus said to them, “Yes; have you never read,
“‘Out of the mouth of infants and nursing babies
you have prepared praise’?”