Sermon on the mount - life or legalistic junk

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
F

FreeNChrist

Guest
Why should I apologize to you for your lack of understanding truth?

If anyone is digging in heels and causing trouble it's you. Seems to me you are more interested in protecting turf and exerting control than discussing anything.

Ephesians 2:5 - "even when we were dead in our transgressions, God made us alive together with Christ, it is by grace you have been saved."
 
Aug 15, 2009
9,745
179
0
What believers in a self-effort/self-performance D.I.Y. holiness/righteousness based mindset and the self-appointed "fruit inspectors" have a very hard time with is the "acceptance grace" part. This just drives them nuts and I understand why. It is scandalous and it "conflicts" with our religious man-made traditions.
Watch out everyone! G777 is calling names again!

He used more names this time..... must feel holier than usual.
:p
 

valiant

Senior Member
Mar 22, 2015
8,025
124
63
And 3 verses later it tells you plainly that Faith saves you...Man was never given saving grace he was given saving faith.

There is a vast difference between what you think is saving grace and enabling, empowering and restraining grace.
By GRACE (God acting in unmerited love) you have been saved, through faith, and that not of yourselves. It is the gift of God and not of works, lest any man should boast (Eph 2.8-9). Seems like saving grace to me.

Who has saved us and called us with a holy calling, not according to our doings, but according to His purpose and grace -- (2 Tim 1.9) -- saved by His grace.

All is of grace.

Man was given saving faith by the grace of God.
 
Mar 7, 2016
4,678
24
0
As Jesus says in the seed and the sower, if His word does not abide in you and
produce crop of more words, then you are not part of Him.
yup but you can return peter
 
Apr 4, 2017
290
9
0
By GRACE (God acting in unmerited love) you have been saved, through faith, and that not of yourselves. It is the gift of God and not of works, lest any man should boast (Eph 2.8-9). Seems like saving grace to me.

Who has saved us and called us with a holy calling, not according to our doings, but according to His purpose and grace -- (2 Tim 1.9) -- saved by His grace.

All is of grace.

Man was given saving faith by the grace of God.
I do not disagree with this at all.

Grace is the method, truth is the convincing change agent, faith is the action and Lord/savior over all is the intended result.

When we state we are saved by grace, we need to be very careful. Righteousness is not given to us do to grace, it is credited to us through our faith in what Jesus did on the cross.

Abraham was not credited with Righteousness by the grace of God, he was made rightoeus by his faith.

We are saved by grace "through faith"....Grace is the method that brings salvation to all men, but it never saved anyone. Faith in the work of the cross does.
 
Last edited:
Dec 2, 2016
1,652
26
0
Seems like a strange discussion to me. All the actions that are involved in us being saved are the result of the gracious acts of God...all of it. So we are most definitely saved by grace, the gracious acts of God toward mankind. It is the gracious act of God that gives us the sacrifice of Christ, the gracious act of God that gives us conviction of sin and the faith to believe in Christ. There is not anything that we have from God that did not come from God being gracious toward us...grace.
 
Feb 24, 2015
13,204
168
0
Seems like a strange discussion to me. All the actions that are involved in us being saved are the result of the gracious acts of God...all of it. So we are most definitely saved by grace, the gracious acts of God toward mankind. It is the gracious act of God that gives us the sacrifice of Christ, the gracious act of God that gives us conviction of sin and the faith to believe in Christ. There is not anything that we have from God that did not come from God being gracious toward us...grace.
The problem is emphasis. I can graciously give you a car, me reason for giving it can be
because of grace, the way I give it is graceful, but the car is still a car and functions like
a car. So Christ gave His life for us, suffered and died at the hands of sinners so that
we might overcome sin and death through Him. That is what was done but it was all done
through grace.

Once you replace the facts with the word grace, and then transpose this on to the world,
the world is saved. But this is just mucking about with language not the meaning, and taking
things too far which is done miles too much.
 

John146

Senior Member
Jan 13, 2016
16,756
3,562
113
This is totally wrong and based on ignorance.

Matthew is the one who uses "Kingdom of Heaven" because he writes to the Jews. It was an offence to Jews (still is to some!) to use the name of God or even the word God. So "Kingdom of Heaven" is a euphemism for "Kingdom of God, which the other gospel writers use.

"While some believe that the Kingdom of God and Kingdom of Heaven are referring to different things, it is clear that both phrases are referring to the same thing. The phrase “kingdom of God” occurs 68 times in 10 different New Testament books, while “kingdom of heaven” occurs only 32 times, and only in the Gospel of Matthew. Based on Matthew’s exclusive use of the phrase and the Jewish nature of his Gospel, some interpreters have concluded that Matthew was writing concerning the millennial kingdom while the other New Testament authors were referring to the universal kingdom. However, a closer study of the use of the phrase reveals that this interpretation is in error."

Mark and Luke used “kingdom of God” where Matthew used “kingdom of heaven” frequently in parallel accounts of the same parable Compare Matthew 11:11-12 with Luke 7:28; Matthew 13:11with Mark 4:11 and Luke 8:10; Matthew 13:24 with Mark 4:26; Matthew 13:31 with Mark 4:30 and Luke 13:18; Matthew 13:33 with Luke 13:20; Matthew 18:3 with Mark 10:14 and Luke 18:16; and Matthew 22:2 with Luke 13:29. In each instance, Matthew used the phrase “kingdom of heaven” while Mark and/or Luke used “kingdom of God.” Clearly, the two phrases refer to the same thing."

https://www.gotquestions.org/kingdom-heaven-God.html

View attachment 168448


The phrase “kingdom of Heaven” occurs thirty-two (32) times and only in the Gospel of Matthew. The phrase “kingdom of God” occurs thirty-two (32) times in the Gospel of Luke, the most of any book in the Bible.
An examination of Synoptic parallels will demonstrate that the two phrases refer to the same idea.

  • “the kingdom of Heaven is at hand” (Matt. 4:17) || “the kingdom of God is at hand” (Mark 1:15)
  • “Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of Heaven” (Matt. 5:3) || “Blessed are the poor, for yours is the kingdom of God” (Luke 6:20)
  • “Among those born of women there has not risen a greater than John the Baptist, notwithstanding he who is least in the kingdom of Heaven is greater than him.” (Matt. 11:11) || “Among those born of women there is not a greater prophet than John the Baptist, but he who is least in the kingdom of God is greater than him.” (Luke 7:28)
  • “the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven” (Matt. 13:11) || “the mysteries of the kingdom of God” (Mark 4:11 cp. Luke 8:10)
  • “the kingdom of Heaven is like a grain of mustard seed” (Matt 13:31) || “the kingdom of God...is like a grain of mustard seed” (Mark 4:30-31 cp. Luke 13:18-19)
  • “The kingdom of Heaven is like leaven” (Matt. 13:33) || “the kingdom of God...is like leaven” (Luke 13:20)
  • “Except you be converted, and become as little children, you shall not enter into the kingdom of Heaven” (Matt. 18:3-4) || “Whosoever shall not receive the kingdom of God as a little child, he shall not enter therein” (Mark 10:15)
  • “Allow little children, and do not forbid them to come to me, for of such is the kingdom of Heaven.” (Matt. 19:14) || “Allow the little children to come to me, and do not forbid them, for of such is the kingdom of God.” (Mark 10:14 cp. Luke 18:16)
  • “a rich man shall hardly enter into the kingdom of Heaven” (Matt. 19:23) || “How hardly shall they who have riches enter into the kingdom of God!” (Luke 18:24)
In other words, “kingdom of God” = “kingdom of Heaven.” If this is so, then “God” = “Heaven,” which leads us into my next point."
matthew - What is the difference in the Kingdom of Heaven and the Kingdom of God? - Biblical Hermeneutics Stack Exchange

Please see the article if you want to learn the next point!
In Matthew 5, the Kingdom of Heaven is spoken about and it says that if one sinned against God that he would go to hell. While Paul taught that the Kingdom of God is where the Christian lived(Romans 14:17). If the two are same then there is a contradiction that the Christian's salvation includes works.

Matthew 25:14-30 talks about the Kingdom of Heaven where an unfaithful servant goes to hell. Luke 19:12-27 talks about the Kingdom of God where the unfaithful servant loses his rewards and this matches up with the Christian at the Judgment Seat of Christ(2 Cor. 5:10). There is obviously a difference between the two kingdoms.

The Kingdom of Heaven is a physical kingdom that will take place on earth and consists of violence. Remember that the earth is in the heaven(Genesis 1:14-16).

Matthew 11:12 "And from the days of John the Baptist until now the kingdom of heaven suffereth violence, and the violent take it by force."

The first place where the Kingdom of Heaven is mentioned is where John the Baptist was preaching about the the fulfillment of Isaiah 40. John was preaching about the Kingdom of Jesus Christ on this earth. Other Old Testament prophecies also reveal that the Kingdom of Heaven was physical. Read Genesis 49:10; Isaiah 2:1-5, 49:5-13; Psalms 2; Jeremiah 23:5 and Luke 1:30-33.

Matthew 3:2 "And saying, Repent ye: for the kingdom of heaven is at hand. 3 For this is he that was spoken of by the prophet Esaias, saying, The voice of one crying in the wilderness, Prepare ye the way of the Lord, make his paths straight."

Jesus tells the Jews that the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand in Matthew 4:17. This proves that it is physical because it shows a kingdom coming on earth and is not referring to someone dying. The book of Matthew mentions the Kingdom of Heaven several times speaking of an earthly rule of Israel that is talked about in Old Testament prophecies(Matthew 5:1-6, 13, Matthew 19:10-30).

Matthew 4:17 "From that time Jesus began to preach, and to say, Repent: for the kingdom of heaven is at hand."

The gospel that Jesus Christ preached for Israel to the Jews was the Kingdom of Heaven(Matthew 4:23, 5:4, 8:11-12, 19:28, 20:16, 25:31-34). The Jews knew that this gospel that Jesus was preaching was the physical reign on earth(John 1:41,45,49, 6:14-15, 12:13). The disciples of Jesus Christ knew that the Kingdom of Heaven was on earth like King David and Solomon's kingdom. Notice in the below verse, Jesus does not rebuke them and this proves that it is physical.

Acts 1:6 "When they therefore were come together, they asked of him, saying, Lord, wilt thou at this time restore again the kingdom to Israel? 7 And he said unto them, It is not for you to know the times or the seasons, which the Father hath put in his own power."
 
Apr 4, 2017
290
9
0
Seems like a strange discussion to me. All the actions that are involved in us being saved are the result of the gracious acts of God...all of it. So we are most definitely saved by grace, the gracious acts of God toward mankind. It is the gracious act of God that gives us the sacrifice of Christ, the gracious act of God that gives us conviction of sin and the faith to believe in Christ. There is not anything that we have from God that did not come from God being gracious toward us...grace.
Grace, truth and faith work together toward salvation. Saying grace alone saves is wrong...The Bible does not teach that anywhere. The act of faith in what Jesus Did saves you...yeah it splitting little frog hairs, but frog hairs can turn into beards of doctrine....
 

Grandpa

Senior Member
Jun 24, 2011
11,551
3,190
113
Isaiah 42:21 [FONT=&quot]The [/FONT][FONT=&quot]Lord[/FONT][FONT=&quot] is well pleased for his righteousness' sake; he will magnify the law, and make it honourable.

That was a prophecy in Isaiah.

The sermon on the mount is the fulfillment of that prophecy.


Everyone who told the Lord Jesus that they obeyed all the commandments He told them, always, there was one more thing they lacked.

Why? Why did He never tell anyone "Good job you good and faithful servant" after they told Him they obeyed the commandments?

Because they didn't understand the depth of the law. But the sermon on the mount explains the depth of the law. To everyone, for all time.

Be Perfect like your Father in Heaven is Perfect. People claim to obey the commandments. But not many claim to be perfect like God is Perfect.

Because it is something that is not attainable from inside their own self, by their own strength and power. They have to look outside of themselves to receive power from God, to be Perfect like God is Perfect. They have to look to Christ to receive this power.

Galatians 3:24-26
[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]24 Wherefore the law was our schoolmaster to bring us unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]25 But after that faith is come, we are no longer under a schoolmaster.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]26 For ye are all the children of God by faith in Christ Jesus.


So is it life or legalistic junk? It is life if it has shown you that you must look to the Lord Jesus Christ. It is legalistic junk if you think you can obey it by your own will and strength and attempt to tell others they must do the same.[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]


[/FONT]
 

John146

Senior Member
Jan 13, 2016
16,756
3,562
113
This is totally wrong and based on ignorance.

Matthew is the one who uses "Kingdom of Heaven" because he writes to the Jews. It was an offence to Jews (still is to some!) to use the name of God or even the word God. So "Kingdom of Heaven" is a euphemism for "Kingdom of God, which the other gospel writers use.

"While some believe that the Kingdom of God and Kingdom of Heaven are referring to different things, it is clear that both phrases are referring to the same thing. The phrase “kingdom of God” occurs 68 times in 10 different New Testament books, while “kingdom of heaven” occurs only 32 times, and only in the Gospel of Matthew. Based on Matthew’s exclusive use of the phrase and the Jewish nature of his Gospel, some interpreters have concluded that Matthew was writing concerning the millennial kingdom while the other New Testament authors were referring to the universal kingdom. However, a closer study of the use of the phrase reveals that this interpretation is in error."

Mark and Luke used “kingdom of God” where Matthew used “kingdom of heaven” frequently in parallel accounts of the same parable Compare Matthew 11:11-12 with Luke 7:28; Matthew 13:11with Mark 4:11 and Luke 8:10; Matthew 13:24 with Mark 4:26; Matthew 13:31 with Mark 4:30 and Luke 13:18; Matthew 13:33 with Luke 13:20; Matthew 18:3 with Mark 10:14 and Luke 18:16; and Matthew 22:2 with Luke 13:29. In each instance, Matthew used the phrase “kingdom of heaven” while Mark and/or Luke used “kingdom of God.” Clearly, the two phrases refer to the same thing."

https://www.gotquestions.org/kingdom-heaven-God.html

View attachment 168448


The phrase “kingdom of Heaven” occurs thirty-two (32) times and only in the Gospel of Matthew. The phrase “kingdom of God” occurs thirty-two (32) times in the Gospel of Luke, the most of any book in the Bible.
An examination of Synoptic parallels will demonstrate that the two phrases refer to the same idea.

  • “the kingdom of Heaven is at hand” (Matt. 4:17) || “the kingdom of God is at hand” (Mark 1:15)
  • “Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of Heaven” (Matt. 5:3) || “Blessed are the poor, for yours is the kingdom of God” (Luke 6:20)
  • “Among those born of women there has not risen a greater than John the Baptist, notwithstanding he who is least in the kingdom of Heaven is greater than him.” (Matt. 11:11) || “Among those born of women there is not a greater prophet than John the Baptist, but he who is least in the kingdom of God is greater than him.” (Luke 7:28)
  • “the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven” (Matt. 13:11) || “the mysteries of the kingdom of God” (Mark 4:11 cp. Luke 8:10)
  • “the kingdom of Heaven is like a grain of mustard seed” (Matt 13:31) || “the kingdom of God...is like a grain of mustard seed” (Mark 4:30-31 cp. Luke 13:18-19)
  • “The kingdom of Heaven is like leaven” (Matt. 13:33) || “the kingdom of God...is like leaven” (Luke 13:20)
  • “Except you be converted, and become as little children, you shall not enter into the kingdom of Heaven” (Matt. 18:3-4) || “Whosoever shall not receive the kingdom of God as a little child, he shall not enter therein” (Mark 10:15)
  • “Allow little children, and do not forbid them to come to me, for of such is the kingdom of Heaven.” (Matt. 19:14) || “Allow the little children to come to me, and do not forbid them, for of such is the kingdom of God.” (Mark 10:14 cp. Luke 18:16)
  • “a rich man shall hardly enter into the kingdom of Heaven” (Matt. 19:23) || “How hardly shall they who have riches enter into the kingdom of God!” (Luke 18:24)
In other words, “kingdom of God” = “kingdom of Heaven.” If this is so, then “God” = “Heaven,” which leads us into my next point."
matthew - What is the difference in the Kingdom of Heaven and the Kingdom of God? - Biblical Hermeneutics Stack Exchange

Please see the article if you want to learn the next point!
When the New Testament begins Jesus comes into the world and the Jews remember that God promised them that he would restore His physical kingdom as talked about earlier in the article. Jesus preached about both the Kingdom of Heaven and the Kingdom of God(John 4:24). He preached about both because he can rule both at the same time, which explains why he talks about them with conjunction with each other sometimes in the Gospels. The Kingdom of Heaven was put off for Israel because they rejected Jesus as King and chose a Gentile king instead.
 

valiant

Senior Member
Mar 22, 2015
8,025
124
63
I do not disagree with this at all.

Grace is the method, truth is the convincing change agent, faith is the action and Lord/savior over all is the intended result.
Grace is both the motive and the means that God purposes and uses. His grace expressed before time began in choosing me. His grace in giving One Who bore my sins and thereby made me righteous. He then carries it out by giving us faith which is the medium by which we receive it. But my salvation is by grace alone. God did all. And it is received by faith. Had it not been for God's grace I would not be saved.

Abraham was COUNTED AS RIGHTEOUS by his faith. But God had to provide the righteousness through His grace.

Had it not been for His acting in grace and provision by grace we would never have been saved and never have believed,

When we state we are saved by grace, we need to be very careful. Righteousness is not given to us do to grace, it is credited to us through our faith in what Jesus did on the cross.
Righteousness is given to us by grace. Faith merely receives it. We are justified BY HIS GRACE freely through the redemption which is in Christ Jesus whom God has set forth to be a propitiation through faith in His blood (Rom 3.24-25).

Abraham was not credited with Righteousness by the grace of God, he was made rightoeus by his faith.
It was by the grace of God that he was reckoned as righteous. He received it by faith.

We are saved by grace "through faith"....Grace is the method that brings salvation to all men, but it never saved anyone. Faith in the work of the cross does.
Faith in the cross would not save you but for the grace of God. Who do you think gave His Son to die on the cross.? You seem to think WE take the initiative. The Bible makes clear it is God.

we are saved by grace, the gracious action of God on our behalf, both in calling us and providing the propitiation. His part.

we receive salvation by faith, - our part - but it is through His grace .,
 
Aug 15, 2009
9,745
179
0
I believe that all those really born of God in Christ will have some sort of change happen to them. The grace of God will be the thing that changes us - not us by our own will-power or self-effort of the flesh. That is what I am really saying.

Doing righteous deeds does not make one righteous. Deeds of righteousness are fruits of already being righteous in Christ. Get this backwards like some do and we create a religion of self-works and righteousness. This is called a works-based righteousness which is anti-Christ at it's core. Christ alone is our righteousness.

We all agree to what the Christian life looks like when the life of Christ is being manifested. it's how we get there that is the issue. Some say it's by what we do - others say it's by the grace of God in Christ only that this transformation is shown in our lives. We do not produce fruit. Christ in us bears His fruit on us the branches.

Some of this is true. We do righteous things because of the life of Christ in us but this does not make us righteous noir saved as in making sure we can still go to be with the Lord. Peter believes that we evolve from a sinner to being a saint by what we do. That is not the gospel. That is a works-righteousness mindset that is anti-Christ in it's core belief.
~~~ It's a well-known fact that in G777's mind, grace does everything.~~~

The scripture says that's not true


We are changed by the Spirit of God.

2 Corinthians 3:18

New International Version
And we all, who with unveiled faces contemplate the Lord's glory, are being transformed into his image with ever-increasing glory, which comes from the Lord, who is the Spirit.

New Living Translation
So all of us who have had that veil removed can see and reflect the glory of the Lord. And the Lord--who is the Spirit--makes us more and more like him as we are changed into his glorious image.

English Standard Version
And we all, with unveiled face, beholding the glory of the Lord, are being transformed into the same image from one degree of glory to another. For this comes from the Lord who is the Spirit.

Berean Study Bible
And we, who with unveiled faces all reflect the glory of the Lord, are being transformed into His image with intensifying glory, which comes from the Lord, who is the Spirit.

Berean Literal Bible
And we all having been unveiled in face, beholding as in a mirror the glory of the Lord, are being transformed into the same image, from glory to glory, even as from the Lord, the Spirit.

New American Standard Bible
But we all, with unveiled face, beholding as in a mirror the glory of the Lord, are being transformed into the same image from glory to glory, just as from the Lord, the Spirit.

King James Bible
But we all, with open face beholding as in a glass the glory of the Lord, are changed into the same image from glory to glory, even as by the Spirit of the Lord.


Don't you even realize how stupid you look when you say grace does everything, when the Bible tells us plainly that's not true?

Are you so eat up with Hp******e & Joseph prince that you can't even discern the scriptures?!?
 
Nov 22, 2015
20,436
1,430
0
To keep the malice and slander down to a minimum again I will post what I have said over 50x times on CC. The Holy Spirit transforms us as we behold the glory/goodness of the Lord as in a mirror. 2 Cor. 3:17-18

The Holy Spirit is called the Spirit of grace. Heb. 10:29

I have also said dozens of times that we participate in this with the Holy Spirit for it is God who is at work in us both to will and to do of His good pleasure. Phil. 2:13

Malice and the slandering of others in the body of Christ is no different then those that are living a homosexual lifestyle. They are all in the same lists as works of the flesh.
 
Last edited:
Apr 4, 2017
290
9
0
Hebrews 10:26 can be a stumbling block if we don't take the context in which this passage was written.

Some times well intentioned people take Hebrews 10:26-29 out of context with the book of Hebrews.

We can take an isolated scripture out of it's context and say anything they want. Here is an example in the scripture below - Ex 32:33.
Anyone who has ever sinned is blotted out of God's book.

Exodus 32:33 (NASB)
[SUP]33 [/SUP] The LORD said to Moses, "Whoever has sinned against Me, I will blot him out of My book.

This is truly stated in the OT but it is not the ultimate statement of truth. The work of Jesus's finished work on the cross trumps what is said in Ex. 32:33.

Obviously we need to view all scripture through the finished work of Christ. We don't take obscure verses and discount the abundance of clear scriptures on what our Lord has done for us.

Hebrews 10 is talking about Jewish people after hearing about Christ for the only sacrifice for sins and rejecting it to go back to the temple sacrifices for their sins.

Hebrews was written a few years before the temple system came crashing down in 70AD when it was trampled by the Roman army.

The "willful sinning" is after hearing the "knowledge" of the truth of Christ's sacrifice - those that go back to the temple sacrifices and do not receive Christ's work by faith - this is the wilful sinning being talked about - the rejection of Christ's sacrifice and blood for the forgiveness of all sins.

This is insulting the Spirit of grace. The Holy Spirit's work is to convict/convince/expose the world of their sin - which is unbelief in Christ's work. John 16:8-9

There is a vast difference between receiving the "knowledge" of the truth and "receiving the truth" which is Christ Himself.
Why is it so easy for some of you to simply "discount" the whole counsel of the written word of God, by suggesting who the intended audience was and is not?

The case can be made that Hebrews is a book for the modern day church movement that is a mile long but only a 1/4" deep in doctrine.
 
Apr 4, 2017
290
9
0
Grace is both the motive and the means that God purposes and uses. His grace expressed before time began in choosing me. His grace in giving One Who bore my sins and thereby made me righteous. He then carries it out by giving us faith which is the medium by which we receive it. But my salvation is by grace alone. God did all. And it is received by faith. Had it not been for God's grace I would not be saved.

Abraham was COUNTED AS RIGHTEOUS by his faith. But God had to provide the righteousness through His grace.

Had it not been for His acting in grace and provision by grace we would never have been saved and never have believed,



Righteousness is given to us by grace. Faith merely receives it. We are justified BY HIS GRACE freely through the redemption which is in Christ Jesus whom God has set forth to be a propitiation through faith in His blood (Rom 3.24-25).



It was by the grace of God that he was reckoned as righteous. He received it by faith.



Faith in the cross would not save you but for the grace of God. Who do you think gave His Son to die on the cross.? You seem to think WE take the initiative. The Bible makes clear it is God.

we are saved by grace, the gracious action of God on our behalf, both in calling us and providing the propitiation. His part.

we receive salvation by faith, - our part - but it is through His grace .,
I stated just as much as you did. I am taking aim at those that say GRACE alone saves...GRACE alone does not save and that is exactly what hirelings of the mega churches are preaching...
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
The Jews were promised a physical kingdom, the kingdom of heaven in Scripture. The Jews are God's physical people. The sermon on the mount can be viewed as the constitution for living in this earthly kingdom where Christ will reign a thousand years. The spiritual kingdom will be manifest at that time as well, the kingdom of God. Both aspects of the kingdom will be revealed as the spiritual people of God, the church will reign on the earth with Christ over the nations. The kingdom of heaven was at hand but was postponed due to the Jew's rejection of the King.
dispensational dual covenant rubbish
 
Aug 15, 2009
9,745
179
0
Hebrews 10:26 can be a stumbling block if we don't take the context in which this passage was written.

Some times well intentioned people take Hebrews 10:26-29 out of context with the book of Hebrews.


Hebrews 10 is talking about Jewish people after hearing about Christ for the only sacrifice for sins and rejecting it to go back to the temple sacrifices for their sins.

Hebrews was written a few years before the temple system came crashing down in 70AD when it was trampled by the Roman army.

The "willful sinning" is after hearing the "knowledge" of the truth of Christ's sacrifice - those that go back to the temple sacrifices and do not receive Christ's work by faith - this is the wilful sinning being talked about - the rejection of Christ's sacrifice and blood for the forgiveness of all sins.

This is insulting the Spirit of grace. The Holy Spirit's work is to convict/convince/expose the world of their sin - which is unbelief in Christ's work. John 16:8-9

There is a vast difference between receiving the "knowledge" of the truth and "receiving the truth" which is Christ Himself.
~~~ There you are..... doing what he says others are doing. I wonder how many folks fall for that old trick? ~~~

New American Standard Bible
For if we go on sinning willfully after receiving the knowledge of the truth, there no longer remains a sacrifice for sins,

[TABLE="class: maintext, width: 100%"]
[TR]
[TD="class: top, width: 18%, bgcolor: #0099FF"]NASB ©[/TD]
[TD="class: top, width: 18%, bgcolor: #0099FF"]Greek[/TD]
[TD="class: top, width: 18%, bgcolor: #0099FF"]Transliteration[/TD]
[TD="class: top, width: 10%, bgcolor: #0099FF"]Strong's[/TD]
[TD="class: top, width: 18%, bgcolor: #0099FF"]Definition[/TD]
[TD="class: top, width: 18%, bgcolor: #0099FF"]Origin[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: eng"]For if we go on sinning[/TD]
[TD="class: greek2"]ἁμαρτανόντων[/TD]
[TD="class: translit"]amartanontōn[/TD]
[TD="class: strongsnt"]264[/TD]
[TD="class: eng2"]to miss the mark, do wrong, sin[/TD]
[TD="class: eng3"]from an early root hamart-[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: eng"]willfully[/TD]
[TD="class: greek2"]Ἐκουσίως[/TD]
[TD="class: translit"]ekousiōs[/TD]
[TD="class: strongsnt"]1596[/TD]
[TD="class: eng2"]voluntarily[/TD]
[TD="class: eng3"]from hekousios[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: eng"]after[/TD]
[TD="class: greek2"]μετὰ[/TD]
[TD="class: translit"]meta[/TD]
[TD="class: strongsnt"]3326[/TD]
[TD="class: eng2"]with, among, after[/TD]
[TD="class: eng3"]a prim. preposition[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: eng"]receiving[/TD]
[TD="class: greek2"]λαβεῖν[/TD]
[TD="class: translit"]labein[/TD]
[TD="class: strongsnt"]2983[/TD]
[TD="class: eng2"]to take, receive[/TD]
[TD="class: eng3"]from a prim. root lab-[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: eng"]the knowledge[/TD]
[TD="class: greek2"]ἐπίγνωσιν[/TD]
[TD="class: translit"]epignōsin[/TD]
[TD="class: strongsnt"]1922[/TD]
[TD="class: eng2"]recognition, knowledge[/TD]
[TD="class: eng3"]from epiginóskó[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: eng"]of the truth,[/TD]
[TD="class: greek2"]ἀληθείας[/TD]
[TD="class: translit"]alētheias[/TD]
[TD="class: strongsnt"]225[/TD]
[TD="class: eng2"]truth[/TD]
[TD="class: eng3"]from aléthés[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: eng"]there no longer[/TD]
[TD="class: greek2"]οὐκέτι[/TD]
[TD="class: translit"]ouketi[/TD]
[TD="class: strongsnt"]3765[/TD]
[TD="class: eng2"]no longer, no more[/TD]
[TD="class: eng3"]from ou, and eti[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: eng"]remains[/TD]
[TD="class: greek2"]ἀπολείπεται[/TD]
[TD="class: translit"]apoleipetai[/TD]
[TD="class: strongsnt"]620[/TD]
[TD="class: eng2"]to leave, leave behind[/TD]
[TD="class: eng3"]from apo and leipó[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: eng"]a sacrifice[/TD]
[TD="class: greek2"]θυσία[/TD]
[TD="class: translit"]thusia[/TD]
[TD="class: strongsnt"]2378[/TD]
[TD="class: eng2"]a sacrifice[/TD]
[TD="class: eng3"]from thuó[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: eng"]for sins,[/TD]
[TD="class: greek2"]ἁμαρτιῶν[/TD]
[TD="class: translit"]amartiōn[/TD]
[TD="class: strongsnt"]266[/TD]
[TD="class: eng2"]a sin, failure[/TD]
[TD="class: eng3"]from hamartanó[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]


Ellicott's Commentary for English Readers
(26) For.—The connecting links are the thought of the consequences to which such sinful neglect (Hebrews 10:25) may lead, and the awful revelation of judgment which the final day will bring. Even more clearly than in Hebrews 6:4-6 the state described is one of wilful and continued sin, which is the result and the expression of apostasy from Christ. It is not, “If we fall under temptation and commit sin;” but, “If we are sinning wilfully.” The descriptive words are few as compared with those of the former passage, but they teach the same lesson. Not merely the “knowledge” but the “full knowledge” (Romans 1:28) of the truth has been received by those to whom the writer here makes reference; they have been “sanctified in the blood of the covenant” (Hebrews 10:29). For such “there remaineth no longer a sacrifice for sins:” that offering of Jesus which they deliberately reject has abolished all the earlier sacrifices. The observances and ceremonies of Judaism, which had been full of meaning whilst they pointed to Him that was to come, have lost all their virtue through His coming. Nay more: for such sin as this, the sin of knowing and wilful rejection of the only Sin offering, God has provided no other sacrifice. In its general significance this passage does not differ from Hebrews 6:4-6.

When it comes to the meanings of scripture, G777 gets the majority wrong.

And no wonder..... he will search for videos of no-name people & check no-name websites of people nobody knows to validate everything he says.

G777 will not use a well established commentary, obviously because it doesn't agree with him & you simply can't twist a commentary.

In a nutshell, G777 has no clue what he's talking about.

To anyone's satisfaction, I can post numerous commentaries to match the one above.
:)
 
Nov 22, 2015
20,436
1,430
0
Why is it so easy for some of you to simply "discount" the whole counsel of the written word of God, by suggesting who the intended audience was and is not?

The case can be made that Hebrews is a book for the modern day church movement that is a mile long but only a 1/4" deep in doctrine.
I believe and so do many others that we need to look at all scripture through the finished work of Christ and in the context it was given in or that "text will con us" and the wilfull sinning Hebrews was taking about from Chapter 3 on up to Heb. 10:26 is the sin of unbelief. I realize that this conflicts with some of our church teachings that we were taught.

Would you agree that all works of the flesh are "wilfull" acts?. Let's take "outbursts of anger" as an example. If a person has outbursts of anger for the last 2 years since he was born again and he has an episode today and then dies right afterward - does this Christian go to hell now because he wilfully sinned and there remains no more sacrifice for sins as Heb. 10:26 says?