Sheep and goats. Separate from, or same as The great white throne judgment?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Oct 25, 2018
2,377
1,198
113
#82
Luk 23:46 (KJV) And when Jesus had cried with a loud voice, he said, Father, into thy hands I commend my spirit: and having said thus, he gave up the ghost.

Commend means to put in the trust of. In other words - father here is my spirit do with it as you please.
From Mounce’s Greek interlinear of Luke 23:46...

παρατίθημι (paratithēmi)

to place by the side of, or near; to set before, Mk. 6:41; 8:6, 7; Lk. 9:16; met. to set or lay before, propound, Mt. 13:24, 31; to inculcate, Acts 17:3; to deposit, commit to the charge of, entrust, Lk. 12:48; 23:46; to commend, Acts 14:23
 
Nov 23, 2013
13,684
1,212
113
#85

Locutus

Senior Member
Feb 10, 2017
5,928
685
113
#87
Back to the sheep and goats. I see the terms are used interchangeably with wheat and tares and has a 1st century application.

Matt 25 "sheep and goats" is a continuation of Matt 24. Jesus is speaking to his disciples rather than sending a general broadcast message for all future generations:

Mat 10:16 Behold, I send you forth as sheep in the midst of wolves: be ye therefore wise as serpents, and harmless as doves.

Mat 10:22 And ye shall be hated of all men for my name's sake: but he that endureth to the end shall be saved.

Mat 10:23 But when they persecute you in this city, flee ye into another: for verily I say unto you, Ye shall not have gone over the cities of Israel, till the Son of man be come.

The above is spoken to HIS contemporary disciples.

So lets look at the context of the goats and sheep:

Mat 25:33 And he shall set the sheep on his right hand, but the goats on the left.

Mat 25:34 Then shall the King say unto them on his right hand, Come, ye blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world:

Notice next:

Mat 25:40 And the King shall answer and say unto them, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me.

Jesus is speaking of his contemporary brethren that were to proclaim the gospel, the goats would be those Jews/Israelites in the cities of Israel and the nations where the gospel was being spread, the goats rejecting and persecuting them in the councils and synagoguess during the 40 years after Christ death.

Mat 10:17 But beware of men: for they will deliver you up to the councils, and they will scourge you in their synagogues;
 
Nov 23, 2013
13,684
1,212
113
#88
Back to the sheep and goats. I see the terms are used interchangeably with wheat and tares and has a 1st century application.

Matt 25 "sheep and goats" is a continuation of Matt 24. Jesus is speaking to his disciples rather than sending a general broadcast message for all future generations:

Mat 10:16 Behold, I send you forth as sheep in the midst of wolves: be ye therefore wise as serpents, and harmless as doves.

Mat 10:22 And ye shall be hated of all men for my name's sake: but he that endureth to the end shall be saved.

Mat 10:23 But when they persecute you in this city, flee ye into another: for verily I say unto you, Ye shall not have gone over the cities of Israel, till the Son of man be come.

The above is spoken to HIS contemporary disciples.

So lets look at the context of the goats and sheep:

Mat 25:33 And he shall set the sheep on his right hand, but the goats on the left.

Mat 25:34 Then shall the King say unto them on his right hand, Come, ye blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world:

Notice next:

Mat 25:40 And the King shall answer and say unto them, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me.

Jesus is speaking of his contemporary brethren that were to proclaim the gospel, the goats would be those Jews/Israelites in the cities of Israel and the nations where the gospel was being spread, the goats rejecting and persecuting them in the councils and synagoguess during the 40 years after Christ death.

Mat 10:17 But beware of men: for they will deliver you up to the councils, and they will scourge you in their synagogues;
Mat 10:23 But when they persecute you in this city, flee ye into another: for verily I say unto you, Ye shall not have gone over the cities of Israel, till the Son of man be come.
Common sense dictates that either the 2nd advent happened in the first century OR the verse ISN'T talking about the 2nd advent it's talking about the resurrection of Christ.

This verse is the simple easy to understand verse that can't be, as far as I can see, symbolic. The other verses are not so simple to understand and must be looked at in light of this verse.

The same principle holds true for most of the other biblical doctrines like OSAS, works etc. The simple easy to understand verses set the stage and the not so easy to see, or the verses that seem to contradict the simple verse need to be looked at in light of the simple verses.
 
Jul 23, 2018
12,199
2,775
113
#89
I understand, believe it or not. Ive been going back and forth on eschatology as can be seen in my posts here.

However, Revelation 20 is just TOO MUCH in the amil view. Satan is clearly not bound, nations ARE being deceived, apostasy is upon us no doubt, saints are NOT reigning, world lies in wickedness, and im not too fancy on spiritualizing the gog and magog war as the apostasy and persecution of the church either.

If Revelation 20 started at 20:11 amill would be perfect fit. But it doesnt.

If all we had was the gospels, everyone would be amil.

What makes the millennium "required" is: Rev 20 itself, in Rev 13 satan is deceiving nations (as we see today) in rev 20 he isnt no more. Spiritualizing first resurrection is unbelievable to say the least as well.
The OT witness to a kingdom for Israel, is undeniable. The sabbath rest for earth has a great picture for the millennium, types and shadows you know. Peter asking Jesus will you at this restore the kingdom to Israel and Jesus responding with only its not for us to know the times, Jesus did NOT say that no such kingdom is coming.

etc. Diffuse Revelation 20 in a reasonable manner and everyone is amil. Thats the key. Rev 20 is clear, 1000
Yep.
No brainer
Stick to your guns.
 
Jul 23, 2018
12,199
2,775
113
#90
You are a great guy. Good attitude

Lets try one more time: How can satan be deceiving the nations now, while in rev20 it says he cant do that when bound?
He isn't bound. You are right.
They need him to be bound,therefore they think it.
 
Jul 23, 2018
12,199
2,775
113
#91
I see two opinions of this floating around.

Me PERSONALLY I believe the sheep and goats judgment occurs at the second coming, not after the millenium.

I base this opinion on Matthew 25:31 which says that when Jesus comes in glory with angels. Therefore I believe it cannot be the great white throne, because where would Jesus be "coming from" with the angels if He is already on the earth during the millennium?

You see my point?

If you disagree with me, prove your point from Scripture! And lets discuss it!
The only way you could be right,is if there is more than one " casting into the lake of fire".
...because satan is cast into it after the mil,along with the tares and those resurrected to be judged at theGWT JUDGEMENT.
You could be right.
Time will tell
 

TheDivineWatermark

Well-known member
Aug 3, 2018
10,218
1,981
113
#92
Mat 10:23 But when they persecute you in this city, flee ye into another: for verily I say unto you, Ye shall not have gone over the cities of Israel, till the Son of man be come.
Common sense dictates that either the 2nd advent happened in the first century OR the verse ISN'T talking about the 2nd advent it's talking about the resurrection of Christ.
Neither of those is true and what the passage involves.

Scripture-writers make use of what is called the "proleptic 'you'" which is basically "all those in the future of the same category" (the same is used with regard to "the Church which is His body" where one thing is stated to be true of it [all those who are saved throughout the entire time "the Church which is His body" continues its existence on the earth], and we [even today] apply it directly to ourselves, because [even] we are still of "the Church which is His body" [the Rapture concludes THAT time span]).

This passage, though, is directed to those to who "the promised and prophesied earthly Millennial Kingdom" was promised (note Acts 1 and their question there, as well as the specific way Jesus answered it). The Olivet Discourse, for example, is not covering the SUBJECT of our "Rapture" (the Rapture pertains SOLELY to "the Church which is His body," not to all other saints of all OTHER time periods), as that is NOT its CONTEXT.

...and one way to ascertain all this, is by examining the "SEQUENCE" issues you and I covered the other day ["the beginning of birth PANGS"]. The CHRONOLOGY of "what happens when" impacts how we understand these (and the "proleptic 'you'" of any given context).
 

Hevosmies

Well-known member
Sep 8, 2018
3,612
2,632
113
#94
The only way you could be right,is if there is more than one " casting into the lake of fire".
...because satan is cast into it after the mil,along with the tares and those resurrected to be judged at theGWT JUDGEMENT.
You could be right.
Time will tell
I understand that, but brother could you provide your commentary on verse 31?

When Jesus is COMING in his glory with his angels.

If this is at the GWT, from WHERE is Jesus coming to WHERE? Since Jesus is on earth ruling during the millennium right?

If you got a good explanation for this verse(matt 25:31) that would PROVE your view correct.
 
Nov 23, 2013
13,684
1,212
113
#95
Neither of those is true and what the passage involves.

Scripture-writers make use of what is called the "proleptic 'you'" which is basically "all those in the future of the same category" (the same is used with regard to "the Church which is His body" where one thing is stated to be true of it [all those who are saved throughout the entire time "the Church which is His body" continues its existence on the earth], and we [even today] apply it directly to ourselves, because [even] we are still of "the Church which is His body" [the Rapture concludes THAT time span]).

This passage, though, is directed to those to who "the promised and prophesied earthly Millennial Kingdom" was promised (note Acts 1 and their question there, as well as the specific way Jesus answered it). The Olivet Discourse, for example, is not covering the SUBJECT of our "Rapture" (the Rapture pertains SOLELY to "the Church which is His body," not to all other saints of all OTHER time periods), as that is NOT its CONTEXT.

...and one way to ascertain all this, is by examining the "SEQUENCE" issues you and I covered the other day ["the beginning of birth PANGS"]. The CHRONOLOGY of "what happens when" impacts how we understand these (and the "proleptic 'you'" of any given context).
Propleptic - the representation of something in the future as if it already existed or had occurred.

Jesus said that the disciples (proleptic you) would not cover the cities of Israel before he would come. What makes the disciples proleptic?

For this to be a proleptic you, the disciples would have to return to earth at a later time and finish going to the cities of Israel after Christ comes again. Wouldn't that by definition be the only way that verse could be a proleptic you?
 

TheDivineWatermark

Well-known member
Aug 3, 2018
10,218
1,981
113
#96
^ The disciples represented (during His earthly ministry) "those to whom the promised and prophesied earthly Millennial Kingdom" was promised; and they ask Him about it in Acts 1 (just before His VISIBLE ascension [not His "[ACTIVE] ascension" 40 days earlier ON Firstfuit/His Resurrection Day (which no one "saw," He only TOLD MM to "say unto them"...Jn20:17], which is the same way He will "RETURN" to the earth: VISIBLY, at the time of His Second Coming to the earth, Rev19 [see "RETURN" in Lk12:36-37,38,40,42-44 ("when he will RETURN FROM the wedding..." THEN the meal) AND in Lk19:12,15,17,19 (when he deals out responsibilities having to do with "have thou authority over 10 cities" and "thou over 5 cities" i.e. on the earth)]. This is distinct from what "the Church which is His body" will have (i.e. our "Rapture" and the purposes for THAT [ex: 1Cor6:3[14] "we shall judge angels"--but note what the 12 were promised: Lk22:30 and its parallels "judging the 12 tribes of Israel")
 

TheDivineWatermark

Well-known member
Aug 3, 2018
10,218
1,981
113
#97
… "represented" does not mean the actual 12 return to carry out the rest... (during the trib; the believing remnant of Israel [who come to faith WITHIN the trib (AFTER our Rapture)] will do that. Matt22:7 = 70ad events, and then verse 8 "THEN SAITH HE to his servants" = the far-future "servants" [Rev7:3 for example (Rev1:1 "IN QUICKNESS [NOUN]")] who do the "INVITING" to the wedding FEAST/SUPPER [earthly MK]). These are the "proleptic 'you'" of the passages that pertain to THAT, like in Matt10 parts, etc. [Rev19:7 (the "BRIDE/WIFE [SINGULAR]") is DISTINCT FROM the Rev19:9 "INVITED GUESTS [PLURAL]" to the supper (earthly MK)]
 
Nov 23, 2013
13,684
1,212
113
#98
^ The disciples represented (during His earthly ministry) "those to whom the promised and prophesied earthly Millennial Kingdom"
All I can say is wow.... do you really believe that? I don't see how in the world did you come to the conclusion that the disciples represent anything much less those in the millennial kingdom.

Where do you draw the line on these assumptions I mean when do you believe the bible for exactly what it says?
 
Jul 23, 2018
12,199
2,775
113
#99
I understand that, but brother could you provide your commentary on verse 31?

When Jesus is COMING in his glory with his angels.

If this is at the GWT, from WHERE is Jesus coming to WHERE? Since Jesus is on earth ruling during the millennium right?

If you got a good explanation for this verse(matt 25:31) that would PROVE your view correct.
When he comes with us,the saints he immediately does battle with the AC and that army.
You could be correct that he then sets up judgement. Some intermediate judgement. But i doubt it.

That would remove all but followers of Jesus,his holy body for the next 1000 yrs.
I don't see any way that could be.
 

Hevosmies

Well-known member
Sep 8, 2018
3,612
2,632
113
When he comes with us,the saints he immediately does battle with the AC and that army.
You could be correct that he then sets up judgement. Some intermediate judgement. But i doubt it.

That would remove all but followers of Jesus,his holy body for the next 1000 yrs.
I don't see any way that could be.
what does verse31 mean then? from whence is Jesus coming?