Smoking

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
S

SantoSubito

Guest
#61
I would have to agree that smoking in and of itself isn't a sin. However, I have yet to eet a smoker who is not an addict!

Once addiction takes place then its sin. who controls you then? smokers need the fix. It ahs nothing to do with how secular society sees smoking, it is the addiction for the believer.
I would refine this a bit and say that the addiction becomes a sin once the addiction causes you to act rudely towards other.
 
Jan 26, 2009
639
22
18
37
#62
one preacher said if God wanted u to smoke hed have given a chimney on ur head haaha anyways if ur in it if u give it up will be good for u and am not saying this lightly cuz i know how hard it gets but its not impossible
 
M

Maddog

Guest
#63
Then can your opinion be trusted? You are addicted to nicotine. Saying this addiction is wrong would convict you.
Don't make such rash (and insulting) assumptions and insinuations.
 

Dude653

Senior Member
Mar 19, 2011
12,499
1,076
113
#64
smokin is bad..mmmmmkay
 
R

rainacorn

Guest
#65
Don't make such rash (and insulting) assumptions and insinuations.
Please explain how what I said was

1. rash
2. insulting
3. an insinuation

I totally get that it's an assumption. The fact that you were smoking led me to believe you are a smoker. I can see how that may not be the case.
 
M

Maddog

Guest
#66
Please explain how what I said was

1. rash
2. insulting
3. an insinuation

I totally get that it's an assumption. The fact that you were smoking led me to believe you are a smoker. I can see how that may not be the case.
You constructed an entire 'addiction' around a throwaway remark I made. I can concede that it's reasonable to assume that, since I was presently smoking that I am a smoker. But 'smoker' is not what you said; you said 'You are addicted to nicotine'. You have no way of knowing that, and you then used your prejudiced assumptions to suggest that my opinion, and moral judgement, was not credible. Hopefully you can see why that is insulting.

For what it's worth, I'm sure you meant no harm by your comment so I see no reason to fall out over it, but I'd respectfully suggest you try and be more careful in the future.
 
S

SantoSubito

Guest
#67
Hmm, I may regret asking this, but.... Do any of you think smoking weed is a sin? It doesn't have anywhere near the addictive potential of nicotine (in fact I don't think it has any addictive compounds). Personally, I'm torn. I won't say it is a sin, but then theres also the "Follow the laws of man insofar as they agree with the laws of God" thing.


Now on another note; I do not smoke weed.
 
G

GloryBe

Guest
#68
Then can your opinion be trusted? You are addicted to nicotine. Saying this addiction is wrong would convict you.
Ok...it appears that most everyone would agree that any serious addiction is a sin. Anyone disagree with this?

Some seem to believe that the seriousness (or sinfullness) of an addiction is based upon and in proportion to the harm being done to the body (the temple of the Holy Spirit).

Others believe that the seriousness (or sinfullness) of an addiction is in its master/slave relationship to fleshly desires.


Also, most seem to agree that cigarettes in and of themselves are not a sin; however they are highly addictive which makes "enjoying a smoke" an unnecessary and unwise high risk for believers who don't want to end up sinfully addicted.

I agree 100% with all I have written here and I know that I am an addicted smoker and that my addiction is not pleasing to God. We are working on it.

Even so, I also hold the view that it is important to point out ...that too often non smoking Christians combine the current world views re: the social taboos of smoking with the sinfullness of addiction to make it (in their minds) a worse offense against God than say..addictive overeating or overworking. It is not any better or any worse a sinin actuality...except in the views of the world. The result of this too common mistake is very often a self righteous attitude toward smoking and/or smokers ...which is also a sin.
 
Last edited:
G

GloryBe

Guest
#69
Hmm, I may regret asking this, but.... Do any of you think smoking weed is a sin? It doesn't have anywhere near the addictive potential of nicotine (in fact I don't think it has any addictive compounds). Personally, I'm torn. I won't say it is a sin, but then theres also the "Follow the laws of man insofar as they agree with the laws of God" thing.


Now on another note; I do not smoke weed.

LOL!!! See the last paragraph of my last post (re: social stigmas combined/confused with sinfullness) and then mulitply it by 100!!!!:D
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
#70
Hmm, I may regret asking this, but.... Do any of you think smoking weed is a sin? It doesn't have anywhere near the addictive potential of nicotine (in fact I don't think it has any addictive compounds). Personally, I'm torn. I won't say it is a sin, but then theres also the "Follow the laws of man insofar as they agree with the laws of God" thing.


Now on another note; I do not smoke weed.
hi Santo!
well, i don't smoke weed (yuck). but i know many who do.
i don't know what The Lord would say, pretty sure He wouldn't like it.

i do know that it can destroy lives, kinda slowly. it seems to make people lethargic (?)
not to mention it's illegal in most countries so there could be the trouble about breaking the Laws of the Land, as you mentioned.

on the other hand, it is available here for medicinal purposes, so i really couldn't say. i don't know for what conditions it is prescribed but if it helps someone from suffering (?)
 
A

Abiding

Guest
#71
I don't see dancing, kissing and going to the movies as being equivalent to smoking or partaking in other substances designed to be addicting.

I totally get that people are saying it isn't the object that is sinful. I, too, made that exact point. However, kissing, dancing and going to the movies are neither physically harmful nor addictive. Nicotine belongs in the same category as heroin or alcohol or cocaine... not making out.



Hmmm making out can get pretty addicting :)
 
S

SantoSubito

Guest
#72
hi Santo!
well, i don't smoke weed (yuck). but i know many who do.
i don't know what The Lord would say, pretty sure He wouldn't like it.

i do know that it can destroy lives, kinda slowly. it seems to make people lethargic (?)
not to mention it's illegal in most countries so there could be the trouble about breaking the Laws of the Land, as you mentioned.

on the other hand, it is available here for medicinal purposes, so i really couldn't say. i don't know for what conditions it is prescribed but if it helps someone from suffering (?)
Treatment for lack of appetite and pain in cancer patients is it's most common use. People with a low tolerance for prescription drugs is another one. My grandpa, for example, can't even take aspirin without it making him vomit, so they told him the only other option to deal with his pain is for them to put in a morphine pump (which is basically opium and would eventually destroy his liver and kidneys). Instead he gets a small amount of weed each day from one of his friends who grows it for personal use.

Honestly in situations like my grandpa's I can't see condemning people for it. When your only options are live in pain and live long, live pain free legally, but die early because the medicine destroyed your kidneys, or live pain free illegally, and live a full life. In that situation even I would pick the the 3rd option.
 
G

GloryBe

Guest
#73
There are exceptions of course, where weed is the most reasonable alternative for those who genuinely need it for medical reasons....

Other than that.....

I've known a few people who were addicted to weed (they say its more of a psycological addiction?), so if addiction is a sin.........

Also, you don't smoke without getting high (do you?) which would make it the equivalent of drunkeness in the scriptures, right?

And, of course it is illegal..so unless a Christian was hoping to minister to others in jail..... :)
 
S

SantoSubito

Guest
#74
I've known a few people who were addicted to weed (they say its more of a psycological addiction?), so if addiction is a sin........
Weed can form a psychological addiction e.g. you like it so much you don't want to give it up (like chocolate or coffee), but it does not form a physical dependence (like nicotine)

Also, you don't smoke without getting high (do you?) which would make it the equivalent of drunkeness in the scriptures, right?
Well it depends, if you eat it you just kind of get a really relaxed feeling, but if you smoke it you get that mind altering high. This is all second hand info so take it as you will.
 
G

GloryBe

Guest
#76
Hmmm making out can get pretty addicting :)
So true...lol! Recently I wrote that while addiction is a sin... a cigarette is not; however it is an unwise risk for Christians who didn't want to sin to smoke. I was thinking the same thing is so very true of the question of "making out".

I believe that differentiating between what is sinning and what is playing with temptation should be understood and taught ..however like my momma always said...."If you play in the mud puddle, chances are you will get dirty!". I think that applies equally to smoking and to making out.:)
 
M

Maddog

Guest
#78
Honestly in situations like my grandpa's I can't see condemning people for it. When your only options are live in pain and live long, live pain free legally, but die early because the medicine destroyed your kidneys, or live pain free illegally, and live a full life. In that situation even I would pick the the 3rd option.
I think that is the right option. I'm no expert in moral theology, but it seems to me that breaking the law in this instance is justified.