Indeed, and I do not believe a PhD with 21 years of formal experience in biblical textual criticism would make such statements or communicate in such a juvenile manner.
The Majority Text is the form found in the largest number of surviving manuscripts, though not in the oldest. It differentiates from the Textus Receptus Greek Text; however, while the Majority Text underlies the Textus Receptus Greek text used for most of the original Reformation-era translations of the New Testament into vernacular languages what our "expert" omitted is that our modern translations primarily use Eclectic editions that conform more often to the Alexandrian text-type.
Read 'The Cambridge History of the Bible' Volumes 1, Part III: The Old Testament Text and Part IV: The New Testament Text. As Part IV states:
"All modern hand editions rest upon the work of the great scholars of the nineteenth century, who all agreed in preferring a text which is related in some measure to the exercise of critical acumen amongst the Christian scholars of Alexandria."
Furthermore, obviously the King James version is based on the Textus Receptus which is based mainly on late manuscripts of the Byzantine text-type not the Alexandrian text. As you know, this is all very elementary.
But for our general audience, what's as important to understand is that no textual variant alters any essential in Christendom.
Really? Perhaps you can provide us with statistical data that supports such an outlandish claim. Which MSS do not?