TEMPLE......TO BE OR NOT TO BE....THAT IS MY QUESTION!!!!!

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
15,058
5,415
113
62
“]I don't have a good explanation of Matthew 23:39 at present. “

If you read more of the context of what he’s saying leading to it it’s supporting that that generation ups suffer all the things he was telling them

Wherefore ye be witnesses unto yourselves, that ye are the children of them which killed the prophets. Fill ye up then the measure of your fathers. Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell? Wherefore, behold, I send unto you prophets, and wise men, and scribes: and some of them ye shall kill and crucify; and some of them shall ye scourge in your synagogues, and persecute them from city to city: that upon you may come all the righteous blood shed upon the earth, from the blood of righteous Abel unto the blood of Zacharias son of Barachias, whom ye slew between the temple and the altar.

Verily I say unto you, All these things shall come upon this generation. O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto thee, how often would I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would not! Behold, your house is left unto you desolate.




For I say unto you, Ye shall not see me henceforth, till ye shall say, Blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord.”
‭‭Matthew‬ ‭23:31-39‬ ‭KJV‬‬

Do you see how trying to interpret verse 39 doesn’t erase what he’s said very clearly

“Verily I say unto you, All these things shall come upon this generation. O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto thee, how often would I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would not! Behold, your house is left unto you desolate. “

now if I challenge you to explain this it doesn’t change anything he’s already made really clear there

“For I say unto you, Ye shall not see me henceforth, till ye shall say, Blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord.”

I can’t now interpret that what he said about all those things happening in that generation is wrong because I say this verse proves it wrong lol
I don't disagree with any of this. But I need a fuller explanation for myself.
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
15,058
5,415
113
62
You should look a little closer at the 70 weeks. Daniel 9:24...70 weeks are determined upon Thy people, and upon Thy holy city, to finish the transgression...Can stop here a moment. What transgression? The filling of the cup of God's wrath and the outpouring of that wrath. Where? The holy city. Jerusalem perhaps? On whom? Thy people. Sounds like Israel.When was this aaccomplished? 70 AD.

Daniel 9:25 adds more information. 69 weeks is 483 years. From the command given to rebuild, that coincides with when Jesus began His public ministry. This is the beginning of the 70th week.

So now we know the 70th week begins with the ministry of Jesus and ends with the destruction of Israel.

The rest of the chapter gives details about what happens during the 70th week.

So the wrath was not concerning martyrs. It is the wrath spoken of by John the Baptist. The cup of God's wrath ran full with the crucifixion of Christ, and the wrath was culminated in the destruction of the holy city and the inhabitants still there.
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
15,058
5,415
113
62
Time of the end of what? If your answer is the time of the end of the old covenant then bingo. The destruction of Israel coincided with the end of the covenant because the sanctions for not fulfilling the covenant were completed.
If you don't get this understanding correct, error will inevitably ensue.
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
15,058
5,415
113
62

Kroogz

Active member
Dec 5, 2023
596
209
43
It's an OT promise. And it was fulfilled many times. But the physical aspects of
this promise no longer exist. There is no such agreement that exists.
This is getting quite silly.
Gen 15
18In the same day the LORD made a covenant with Abram, saying, Unto thy seed have I given this land, from the river of Egypt unto the great river, the river Euphrates: 19The Kenites, and the Kenizzites, and the Kadmonites, 20And the Hittites, and the Perizzites, and the Rephaims, 21And the Amorites, and the Canaanites, and the Girgashites, and the Jebusites.

Jer 31~~
35This is what the LORD says,

He who gives the sun for light by day

And the fixed order of the moon and the stars for light by night,

Who stirs up the sea so that its waves roar—

The LORD of armies is His name:

36“If this fixed order departs

From Me,” declares the LORD,

“Then the descendants of Israel also will cease

To be a nation before Me forever.”

37This is what the LORD says:

“If the heavens above can be measured

And the foundations of the earth searched out below,

Then I will also reject all the descendants of Israel

For everything that they have done,” declares the LORD.

38“Behold, days are coming,” declares the LORD, “when the city will be rebuilt for the LORD from the Tower of Hananel to the Corner Gate. 39The measuring line will go out farther straight ahead, to the hill Gareb; then it will turn to Goah. 40And the entire valley of the dead bodies and of the ashes, and all the fields as far as the brook Kidron to the corner of the Horse Gate toward the east, shall be holy to the LORD; it will not be uprooted or overthrown ever again.”
 

douggg

Active member
Oct 2, 2021
436
76
28
You should look a little closer at the 70 weeks. Daniel 9:24...70 weeks are determined upon Thy people, and upon Thy holy city, to finish the transgression...Can stop here a moment. What transgression? The filling of the cup of God's wrath and the outpouring of that wrath. Where? The holy city. Jerusalem perhaps? On whom? Thy people. Sounds like Israel.When was this aaccomplished? 70 AD.
The people of the prince who shall come in Daniel 9:26 destroyed the temple in 70 AD.

The prince who shall come in Daniel 9:27 will be the person who becomes the Antichrist, who as the King of Israel coming in his own name will confirm the Mt. Sinai covenant for the 7 years as required by Moses of all future leaders of Israel in Deuteronomy 31:9-31.

So now we know the 70th week begins with the ministry of Jesus and ends with the destruction of Israel.
No, the ministry of the messiah is not mentioned in Daniel 9. Jesus arrived in Jerusalem in John 12:12-15, hailed as the messiah, the King of Israel. 4 days later, Jesus was crucified. The 7 year 70th week is still unfulfilled.

John 12:
12 On the next day much people that were come to the feast, when they heard that Jesus was coming to Jerusalem,
13 Took branches of palm trees, and went forth to meet him, and cried, Hosanna: Blessed is the King of Israel that cometh in the name of the Lord.
14 And Jesus, when he had found a young ass, sat thereon; as it is written,
15 Fear not, daughter of Sion: behold, thy King cometh, sitting on an ass's colt.

I asked for their OT quote. All the language in the book of Revelation is found in the OT.
No it is not. Some is. The resurrection of the martyred great tribulation saints is not in the Tanach (OT).
 

douggg

Active member
Oct 2, 2021
436
76
28
Time of the end of what? If your answer is the time of the end of the old covenant then bingo
No. Time of the end of Satan and his angels activities into the affairs of man. Satan and his angels kingdom of mystery Babylon the great will be destroyed in the second half of the 7 years.

Satan, when cast down to earth in Revelation 12, will have a time, times, half times left. Which does not fit into you 1st century scenario.
 

TheDivineWatermark

Well-known member
Aug 3, 2018
10,278
1,985
113
Jesus arrived in Jerusalem in John 12:12-15, hailed as the messiah, the King of Israel. 4 days later, Jesus was crucified. The 7 year 70th week is still unfulfilled.
YES!

The "69 Weeks" [total, to that point] were concluded on this very day ^ ...

... the day when Jesus SAID the Lk19:41-44 thing [read it] and DID the Zech 9:9 thing... BOTH having to do with "the city" / "Jerusalem" (i.e. the Dan9:24 time-prophecy... ["... are determined upon THY [Daniel's] people, AND upon THY [Daniel's] holy city"]).

RIGHT! (y)




[then, shortly "AFTER," He was "CUT OFF"--Dan9:26a.]
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
15,058
5,415
113
62
This is getting quite silly.
Gen 15
18In the same day the LORD made a covenant with Abram, saying, Unto thy seed have I given this land, from the river of Egypt unto the great river, the river Euphrates: 19The Kenites, and the Kenizzites, and the Kadmonites, 20And the Hittites, and the Perizzites, and the Rephaims, 21And the Amorites, and the Canaanites, and the Girgashites, and the Jebusites.

Jer 31~~
35This is what the LORD says,

He who gives the sun for light by day

And the fixed order of the moon and the stars for light by night,

Who stirs up the sea so that its waves roar—

The LORD of armies is His name:

36“If this fixed order departs

From Me,” declares the LORD,

“Then the descendants of Israel also will cease

To be a nation before Me forever.”

37This is what the LORD says:

“If the heavens above can be measured

And the foundations of the earth searched out below,

Then I will also reject all the descendants of Israel

For everything that they have done,” declares the LORD.

38“Behold, days are coming,” declares the LORD, “when the city will be rebuilt for the LORD from the Tower of Hananel to the Corner Gate. 39The measuring line will go out farther straight ahead, to the hill Gareb; then it will turn to Goah. 40And the entire valley of the dead bodies and of the ashes, and all the fields as far as the brook Kidron to the corner of the Horse Gate toward the east, shall be holy to the LORD; it will not be uprooted or overthrown ever again.”
I agree. Joshua 21:43...And the LORD gave unto Israel all the land He sware to give unto their fathers...Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob...and they possessed it, and dwelt therein.

And you left out the most important part of Jeremiah 31...verses 31-34:
Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah:
Not according to the covenant I made with your fathers in the day I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt; which My covenant they brake, although I was an husband unto them, saith the LORD:
But this shall be the covenant I make with the house of Israel; After those days saith the LORD, I will put my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and will be their God, and they shall be My people.
And they shall teach no more every man his neighbor, and every man his brother, saying, Know the LORD: for they shall all know me, from the least of them to the greatest of them, saith the LORD: for I will forgive their iniquity, and remember their sin no more.

This is the new covenant. After those days...refers to after the destruction of Israel. It was disingenuous to give the verses you did in Jeremiah 31 without first giving the reason for them.
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
15,058
5,415
113
62
No. Time of the end of Satan and his angels activities into the affairs of man. Satan and his angels kingdom of mystery Babylon the great will be destroyed in the second half of the 7 years.

Satan, when cast down to earth in Revelation 12, will have a time, times, half times left. Which does not fit into you 1st century scenario.
The end of time finds Satan being judged and cast into the lake of fire. But the end being spoken of elsewhere as the end of the age or other such phrases is referring to the end of the old covenant.
 

TheDivineWatermark

Well-known member
Aug 3, 2018
10,278
1,985
113
No. Time of the end of Satan and his angels activities into the affairs of man. Satan and his angels kingdom of mystery Babylon the great will be destroyed in the second half of the 7 years.

Satan, when cast down to earth in Revelation 12, will have a time, times, half times left. Which does not fit into you 1st century scenario.
Right!

[when he is cast down to the earth...] "Woe...! for the devil is come down unto you HAVING GREAT WRATH, *because he KNOWETH that he hath but A SHORT TIME." (the 3.5 yrs / second HALF of the [future] 7-yr Trib)
 

douggg

Active member
Oct 2, 2021
436
76
28
The end of time finds Satan being judged and cast into the lake of fire. But the end being spoken of elsewhere as the end of the age or other such phrases is referring to the end of the old covenant.
Satan will have only a time, times, half time left after being cast down to earth. Then in Revelation 20:1-3 he will be cast into the bottomless pit prison. Not the lake of fire at that time.

When was Satan exposed in the 1st century and bound in a chain, in your scenario ?

Ezekiel 28:16-19 is about Satan cast down to earth and being made physically seen by the kings of the earth.

16 By the multitude of thy merchandise they have filled the midst of thee with violence, and thou hast sinned: therefore I will cast thee as profane out of the mountain of God: and I will destroy thee, O covering cherub, from the midst of the stones of fire.
17 Thine heart was lifted up because of thy beauty, thou hast corrupted thy wisdom by reason of thy brightness: I will cast thee to the ground, I will lay thee before kings, that they may behold thee.
18 Thou hast defiled thy sanctuaries by the multitude of thine iniquities, by the iniquity of thy traffick; therefore will I bring forth a fire from the midst of thee, it shall devour thee, and I will bring thee to ashes upon the earth in the sight of all them that behold thee.
19 All they that know thee among the people shall be astonished at thee: thou shalt be a terror, and never shalt thou be any more.

Cameron, your 1st century scenario has no way to account for the magnitude of that day. And the mount of Olives has yet to be split, half to the north, half to the south. Zechariah 14:3-4




Revelation 19, small size.jpg
 

TheDivineWatermark

Well-known member
Aug 3, 2018
10,278
1,985
113
The end of time finds Satan being judged and cast into the lake of fire. But the end being spoken of elsewhere as [...]
At Jesus' Second Coming to the earth (Rev19), this ^ isn't what happens to satan at that point in the chronology.

Rather, at that point the beast and the false prophet, those two, will be "cast alive into lake of fire burning with brimstone" (19:20c) but as for satan (20:1-3) at that point he will be cast into "the bottomless pit" until after the 1000 years [so Rev19:20c wasn't "the end of time"], after which [after the 1000 yrs] "he must be loosed a little season"





[why does it take me SO LONG to type just that little bit! LOL]
 

iamsoandso

Senior Member
Oct 6, 2011
7,865
1,567
113
News to me. Doesn't really affect the rapture doctrine one way or the other though.

I'm not sure why you think anything I referred to was an attack against anyone's rapture doctrine. To me I was trying to convey that the people we were speaking of(ones in the 1st century who were teaching that the resurrection had already taken place) also had followers in the 3rd and 4th century ad and they "corrected" the book we refer to as the Gospel of Matthew to reflect their belief. Afterwards Jerome obtained it and translated it into Latin, it was included into the LV and all our modern translations translated it into one translation or the other. The error is that they combined the gospel of the Hebrews(Ebionite) with the Gospel of Matthew(the Apostles autograph)...

I apologize for saying this so bluntly because many have never thought to read about the Q source or the M source discussion of Matthew most assume it to be good as gold. For the most part I notice that Jerome,Eusabius,Pamphilus ect. in the late 300ad's(380-400) were themselves not sure if the translations they obtained were correct(they corrected them by their own admittance in their own writings).. Not to drag the post on and on but we often hear of those disagreeing with Paul's writings(there's a thread about it here on CC contemplating what if his writings did not exist). The friction is not that Mark,Luke John to Revelation disagree with Paul it's that Mark,Luke John to Revelation disagree with Matthew(or the gospel of the Hebrews)...
 

Kroogz

Active member
Dec 5, 2023
596
209
43
I agree. Joshua 21:43...And the LORD gave unto Israel all the land He sware to give unto their fathers...Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob...and they possessed it, and dwelt therein.

And you left out the most important part of Jeremiah 31...verses 31-34:
Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah:
Not according to the covenant I made with your fathers in the day I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt; which My covenant they brake, although I was an husband unto them, saith the LORD:
But this shall be the covenant I make with the house of Israel; After those days saith the LORD, I will put my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and will be their God, and they shall be My people.
And they shall teach no more every man his neighbor, and every man his brother, saying, Know the LORD: for they shall all know me, from the least of them to the greatest of them, saith the LORD: for I will forgive their iniquity, and remember their sin no more.

This is the new covenant. After those days...refers to after the destruction of Israel. It was disingenuous to give the verses you did in Jeremiah 31 without first giving the reason for them.
You completely dismissed the physical part. Read my post again......slowly. Nobody here is denying the new covenant and what that entails.....Your DENYING the Physical aspect of it that is FOREVER. It's disingenuous to dismiss the verses that PROVE your theory wrong.
 

cv5

Well-known member
Nov 20, 2018
18,508
7,266
113
No. Time of the end of Satan and his angels activities into the affairs of man. Satan and his angels kingdom of mystery Babylon the great will be destroyed in the second half of the 7 years.

Satan, when cast down to earth in Revelation 12, will have a time, times, half times left. Which does not fit into you 1st century scenario.
Yes. Satan and his fallen angels are cast out after the Rev 12 war. Because of him accusing the brethren. Likely the newly raptured brethren of Rev 4 & 5!

Great relief and great rejoicing by the angelic host follows.
They are ALSO vexed and tormented by the presence of Satan just as we are. A lot of people do not realize this. That there is anguish and chaos in heaven much like there is on earth.

Not much longer though thank God.
 

cv5

Well-known member
Nov 20, 2018
18,508
7,266
113
I'm not sure why you think anything I referred to was an attack against anyone's rapture doctrine. To me I was trying to convey that the people we were speaking of(ones in the 1st century who were teaching that the resurrection had already taken place) also had followers in the 3rd and 4th century ad and they "corrected" the book we refer to as the Gospel of Matthew to reflect their belief. Afterwards Jerome obtained it and translated it into Latin, it was included into the LV and all our modern translations translated it into one translation or the other. The error is that they combined the gospel of the Hebrews(Ebionite) with the Gospel of Matthew(the Apostles autograph)...

I apologize for saying this so bluntly because many have never thought to read about the Q source or the M source discussion of Matthew most assume it to be good as gold. For the most part I notice that Jerome,Eusabius,Pamphilus ect. in the late 300ad's(380-400) were themselves not sure if the translations they obtained were correct(they corrected them by their own admittance in their own writings).. Not to drag the post on and on but we often hear of those disagreeing with Paul's writings(there's a thread about it here on CC contemplating what if his writings did not exist). The friction is not that Mark,Luke John to Revelation disagree with Paul it's that Mark,Luke John to Revelation disagree with Matthew(or the gospel of the Hebrews)...
Very interesting. I will have to look into that.

I do know that Rabbi Akiva altered the OT around 100AD from which we now have the Masoretic text. Fortunately we know where those modifications are.
 

Kroogz

Active member
Dec 5, 2023
596
209
43
Yes. Satan and his fallen angels are cast out after the Rev 12 war. Because of him accusing the brethren. Likely the newly raptured brethren of Rev 4 & 5!

Great relief and great rejoicing by the angelic host follows.
They are ALSO vexed and tormented by the presence of Satan just as we are. A lot of people do not realize this. That there is anguish and chaos in heaven much like there is on earth.

Not much longer though thank God.
Isa 65:17
For, behold, I create new heavens and a new earth: and the former shall not be remembered, nor come into mind.
 

iamsoandso

Senior Member
Oct 6, 2011
7,865
1,567
113
Very interesting. I will have to look into that.

I do know that Rabbi Akiva altered the OT around 100AD from which we now have the Masoretic text. Fortunately we know where those modifications are.

Yep go figure God gives the world the Gospel and immediately they took it and interpreted into languages the common people did not speak...