The Attack on The Bible part 2.
- Thread starter ChosenbyHim
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
E
So was the end of Mark 16. No where else did Jesus use baptism and belief as a means of being saved. He always used belief only, only in this questionable text And what he followed that with is just plain old not true. It was not found in the oldest texts. The closer any text is in age to the original manuscript is usually the most reliable. because it is usually missing stuff added at later dates. Even if there are more later copies. It does not make them more reliable.
Hi Shroom2,
you are welcome. And thank you for taking the time to read my responses. Now, when I talked about most if not all of the "alleged errors" being answered and addressed, I was not referring to myself only. Now, I have addressed a few of them, but I was mainly referring to other men of God and Bible believers who have answered and addressed many of these "supposed errors" that are "allegedly" in the King James Bible. Great men of God like Samuel Gipp, Douglas Stauffer, Will Kinney, Kirk DiVietro, Bryan Denlinger, James Knoxx, and there are several more I could mention. These men have addressed most of those supposed errors and contradictions that Bible agnostics and Bible critics are always throwing at us Bible believers.
The last gentleman whom I mentioned, James Knoxx has done a really good video on "16 alleged contradictions" in the Bible. He does a real good job addressing each of the alleged contradictions. I highly recommend you watch it.
Now sir, which of those alleged errors were you specifically referring to? Again, what are the errors which you believe you have found that are in the King James Holy Bible?
I understand that you and I disagree in regard to the Inerrancy of the Bible. You are free to believe what you want sir about the Bible, but I along with thousands of other King James Bible believers in this country and across the world believe in a "hold it in your hands" infallible and inerrant Bible. The truth is that the modern versions today have no settled text but keep on changing as each new edition and revision gets rolled off the press. It is no wonder that more and more Christians today are no longer believing in the inerrancy of Scripture. Not only do the modern versions disagree among themselves in scores of places of their textual readings but their underlying Greek texts are getting revised continually. Indeed, today in scholar land and in the field of textual criticism, the doubt, confusion and uncertainty as to what God really said is only growing in the seminaries, evangelical churches, and other institutions that do not teach or believe the inerrancy of Scripture. Now on the contrary, we King James Bible believers are sure, confident and certain as to what God said and what He declared and inspired in His word: The Holy Bible.
If there is one thing that has been lost in today's seminaries and so called "prestige" universities, it is a reverence for God's holy words. Which today are found only in the King James Bible.
you are welcome. And thank you for taking the time to read my responses. Now, when I talked about most if not all of the "alleged errors" being answered and addressed, I was not referring to myself only. Now, I have addressed a few of them, but I was mainly referring to other men of God and Bible believers who have answered and addressed many of these "supposed errors" that are "allegedly" in the King James Bible. Great men of God like Samuel Gipp, Douglas Stauffer, Will Kinney, Kirk DiVietro, Bryan Denlinger, James Knoxx, and there are several more I could mention. These men have addressed most of those supposed errors and contradictions that Bible agnostics and Bible critics are always throwing at us Bible believers.
The last gentleman whom I mentioned, James Knoxx has done a really good video on "16 alleged contradictions" in the Bible. He does a real good job addressing each of the alleged contradictions. I highly recommend you watch it.
Now sir, which of those alleged errors were you specifically referring to? Again, what are the errors which you believe you have found that are in the King James Holy Bible?
I understand that you and I disagree in regard to the Inerrancy of the Bible. You are free to believe what you want sir about the Bible, but I along with thousands of other King James Bible believers in this country and across the world believe in a "hold it in your hands" infallible and inerrant Bible. The truth is that the modern versions today have no settled text but keep on changing as each new edition and revision gets rolled off the press. It is no wonder that more and more Christians today are no longer believing in the inerrancy of Scripture. Not only do the modern versions disagree among themselves in scores of places of their textual readings but their underlying Greek texts are getting revised continually. Indeed, today in scholar land and in the field of textual criticism, the doubt, confusion and uncertainty as to what God really said is only growing in the seminaries, evangelical churches, and other institutions that do not teach or believe the inerrancy of Scripture. Now on the contrary, we King James Bible believers are sure, confident and certain as to what God said and what He declared and inspired in His word: The Holy Bible.
If there is one thing that has been lost in today's seminaries and so called "prestige" universities, it is a reverence for God's holy words. Which today are found only in the King James Bible.
One more thing though sir,
1 John 5:7 is the one I specifically addressed. I am sure you took the time to read it. What is it about my response to 1 John 5:7 that you believe is wrong and incorrect? Would you mind telling me? Or showing me some evidence that 1 John 5:7 was added by the KJV translators? Since you have not yet given me an answer or provided any proof that supports your claim and backs up your statement about 1 John 5:7. Well, I look forward to your response. Good day sir and shalom,
1 John 5:7 is the one I specifically addressed. I am sure you took the time to read it. What is it about my response to 1 John 5:7 that you believe is wrong and incorrect? Would you mind telling me? Or showing me some evidence that 1 John 5:7 was added by the KJV translators? Since you have not yet given me an answer or provided any proof that supports your claim and backs up your statement about 1 John 5:7. Well, I look forward to your response. Good day sir and shalom,
ChosenbyHim, here is a verse that ONLY the KJV has added to the Word of God, because it is not in any other translation nor in the original Hebrew,
KJV- Ezekiel 39:2 ANd I will turn thee back, and leave but the sixth part of thee. The part in blue was added in the KJV version, that's adding to the word of God. It is not correct, and is a sin. Shalom
KJV- Ezekiel 39:2 ANd I will turn thee back, and leave but the sixth part of thee. The part in blue was added in the KJV version, that's adding to the word of God. It is not correct, and is a sin. Shalom
The original Greek NT and the Greek OT (Septuagint LXX) is the preserved, infallible and inerrant Word of God. The King James Version is a fallible, man made, sometimes heretical translation of the original Bible.
It contains the Word of God in SOME of its verses, but NOT IN ALL VERSES. It is SUBJECT TO ERRORS.
The Bible does not promise that the KJV would be inspired by God. THAT IS ANATHEMA HERESY!
I disagree with you Scott. The Holy Bible talks about its preservation and inspiration. The King James Bible is the 100% pure and true words of the living God.
Every word of God is pure: he is a shield unto them that put their trust in him.
Add thou not unto his words, lest he reprove thee, and thou be found a liar. - Proverbs 30:5-6
Also, the Old Testament Scripture (Torah) was not given to us in Greek but Hebrew:
What advantage then hath the Jew? or what profit is there of circumcision? Much every way: chiefly, because that unto them were committed the oracles of God. For what if some did not believe? shall their unbelief make the faith of God without effect?
God forbid: yea, let God be true, but every man a liar; as it is written, That thou mightest be justified in thy sayings, and mightest overcome when thou art judged. - Romans 3:1-4
The Old Testament was written in Hebrew and some parts of it Aramaic. The New Testament was written in Koine Greek.
The Apostles did not quote from the Septuagint LXX and neither did our Lord Jesus. They read and quoted the Hebrew Old Testament Scriptures (The Torah and the Prophets).
So I don't know where you got taught at Scott or where you are getting your information from but wherever it is, just know that you are being greatly misinformed.
Every word of God is pure: he is a shield unto them that put their trust in him.
Add thou not unto his words, lest he reprove thee, and thou be found a liar. - Proverbs 30:5-6
Also, the Old Testament Scripture (Torah) was not given to us in Greek but Hebrew:
What advantage then hath the Jew? or what profit is there of circumcision? Much every way: chiefly, because that unto them were committed the oracles of God. For what if some did not believe? shall their unbelief make the faith of God without effect?
God forbid: yea, let God be true, but every man a liar; as it is written, That thou mightest be justified in thy sayings, and mightest overcome when thou art judged. - Romans 3:1-4
The Old Testament was written in Hebrew and some parts of it Aramaic. The New Testament was written in Koine Greek.
The Apostles did not quote from the Septuagint LXX and neither did our Lord Jesus. They read and quoted the Hebrew Old Testament Scriptures (The Torah and the Prophets).
So I don't know where you got taught at Scott or where you are getting your information from but wherever it is, just know that you are being greatly misinformed.