I'm not the one claiming that we are saved by Jesus' obedience to the law.
Do you have a scrioture for that yet? Why not?
How many days do I have to wait for you to substantiate a claim?
Do you have a scrioture for that yet? Why not?
How many days do I have to wait for you to substantiate a claim?
The thing I am gathering is you have some sort of quasi savior who didn't obey God's law. I challenge you to find any commentator that claims in Romans 5:19 that Jesus didn't obey the law. The law is the context of the chapter.
This isn't the only claim of yours that is unbiblical in this scenario. You've also claimed he laid aside the law, which is not only unbiblical it's Antinomian as well. Your false gospel is frankly reckless, and your distorting of truth and Scripture is remarkable.
How many people does it take to show you that your interpretations on this are errant? Several have already done so, including myself. Lot's of folks here trying to help you see, but perhaps that is not possible in light of 2 Corinthians 2:14?
Part of the reason your absurdities are false and unbiblical is your lame claim that Jesus obeyed in order to fulfill prophecies. His earthly ministry wasn't a play or skit. He is the fulfillment of prophecies in his person, which is why he is Prophet, Priest, King.
People here have given multitudes of Scripture refuting your asinine claim that Jesus laid aside the law and that he didn't fulfill the law by obedience. Said Scriptures were provided proving him as the only one who could obey the law perfectly, therefore being the only one who could offer himself as a perfect sacrifice. Thus Romans 5, the SoTM &c.
Now, troll away dude, I'm not just going to ignore you, I'm going to "lay sketchy aside" and put you on ignore. Buh-bye!