The book of Job cannot be scripture for death reigned from Adam to Moses.

[Dino246]

9:37 EDT and he’s been banned. 😎

That may be a record... for someone who was not simply vile or batch-posting advertising.

 

[MessageOfTheCross]

A grandson of Jacob through Issachar is named Job (Gen. 46:13). Many scholars believe Job is the grandson of Jacob.

 

[Nehemiah6]

The book of Job cannot be scripture and that cannot be refuted by opinion.

You are evidently confused about the verse quoted as well as the book of Job. It is one of the most important books of the Old Testament, and we do not need *opinion* to validate it. The Lord Jesus Christ Himself made it perfectly clear that the 24 books of the Hebrew Tanakh (Bible) are all Scripture, and Job is one of those books. So you are challenging the Lord Jesus Christ with this OP.

You might want to contact the mods and ask them to remove this thread before you dig yourself into a very deep hole.

 

[posthuman]

The book of Job was written before God chose the Israelites, as His chosen people, during the time when there was no covenant which could possible save Job or for Job to have restored contact with God, which Adam lost (Gen 3:22).

huh i guess Noah must have been out of luck too. & Enoch.

smh, late to the party

 

[Locoponydirtman]

The book of Job was written before God chose the Israelites, as His chosen people, during the time when there was no covenant which could possible save Job or for Job to have restored contact with God, which Adam lost (Gen 3:22).

Death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over those who had not sinned according to the likeness of the transgression of Adam (Rom 5:14)

Therefore the author of Job wasn't a Jew. However, salvation is of the Jews (John 4:22, Rom 3:2).

The book of Job cannot be scripture and that cannot be refuted by opinion.

So we are taking a generalization and turning it into specifications. Because Enoch, Noah, Methuselah, Melchizedek, and apparently Job, and Elihu.

 

[PennEd]

The gospel according to Luke, and Acts were not written by a Jew, either.

Many, if not most scholars, believe Luke was a Hellenistic Jew. Although there are some that think he was not.

 

[calibob]

I knew as soon as I read the OP that he would take that sleepy little exit off of I-44 into Banville.......yep.........!!!

I-44 dosn't go near Ban-ning it goes to Tulsa. Calif I-10 goes right through it. It's a terrible hot place.

Hot like hell!​

 

[Grandpa]

What about Enoch? Was he not a friend of God and was he not taken?

I was going to bring up the exact same thing!!

He walked with God.

Also Abraham...

 

[Grandpa]

Its kind of funny that a person who names theirself Conqueror gets banned....

If you really think about it...

I'd say that's 0-1

Maybe not ready to capitalize the c of conqueror just yet...

 

[Nehemiah6]

Many, if not most scholars, believe Luke was a Hellenistic Jew. Although there are some that think he was not.

Correct. The entire Bible was written by Hebrews and it is merely AN ASSUMPTION that Luke was a Gentile. Here is a commentator who asserts that Luke was a Hellenistic Jew who wrote a major portion of the New Testament.

But the balance of probabilities favours the view that Luke was a hellenistic Jew. This leaves open the possibility that Luke is the Lucius (Paul’s cousin?) mentioned in Rom. 16: 21. Like Silas and Silvanus, Luke and Lucius were alternate forms of the same name. (E. Earle Ellis, The Gospel of Luke. New Century Bible Commentary, Marshall, Morgan & Scott/Eerdmans, pp 52f)