The Church and Anti Antisemitism,Can We Talk About It?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
S

Sophia

Guest
We're seeing the same verses in a different light.I dont think we'll change each others minds.lol But I do thank you for keep the thread friendly and not being angry and defensive in your posts.Its nice not to have name calling and shouting. I do read and look up what you share even though I still see things from a dispensationalist view. Well spell check is trying to correct me but not giving any suggestions,some help he is! Dispensationalist ? You get my drift.
To you the same :)
I am very grateful for you here. Even when I jumped all over you for the "flip answer", you came back with grace.
 

Reborn

Senior Member
Nov 16, 2014
4,087
217
63
We're seeing the same verses in a different light......
I'm going to go with this for now.
Same verses/different view type argument. ( All arguments on CC, actually:))

Sophia,
Our confusion? I believe, is how Paul said "called to be saints" in 1 Corinthians 1?

You believe all Christians are "Saints"?
....and that Paul isn't referencing "them/including Paul" and "us/including you and I", like I see it?

It all goes back to the 144K convo, the remnant, Israel...... and since we dropped that topic, my guess this will be short lived too...or get bitter?

To understand my view, we have to go back to that, or else we will never get to where I was heading.
No worries.
We both will just be confused on each others points.

The whole Bible has to be brought up, to understand how I see Paul's Epistles.
We can just meet up again on some other thread someday?.......it's all good.
Til then, Be well Sis.:)
God Bless.
 

MarcR

Senior Member
Feb 12, 2015
5,486
183
63
Well said!

Speaking as a Jewish believer, I am glad to see this thread
 

MarcR

Senior Member
Feb 12, 2015
5,486
183
63
I believe some,some Jews killed Christ.The high priests hated him for blasphemy but to call the Jews Christ killers is wrong.I was brought up in a Christian home and we were taught that our sins nailed Christ to the cross.He died as a sacrifice,for us.His blood was on our hands.I was never taught Jews were Christ killers.And I think that belief was why so many Jews were persecuted by Christians,so called.People believed they deserved punishment,and many stood silent as the died by the thousands in death camps. Over 6 million Jews blood are on the hands of Christians who stood silent as Gods chosen were massacred.
Unless we believe that our individual and collective sins killed Christ we miss the boat. Roman soldiers under orders from Pontius Pilate physically killed Christ. but could not have done so had Jesus not willingly submitted Himself to it.
 

MarcR

Senior Member
Feb 12, 2015
5,486
183
63
Not only Ro 11 makes it clear. Zech chapters 12-14 makes it certain!
 

MarcR

Senior Member
Feb 12, 2015
5,486
183
63
Ac 2:23
23 Him, being delivered by the determinate counsel and foreknowledge of God, ye have taken, and by wicked hands have crucified and slain:
KJV
Peter is saying that by having Jesus killed the Pharisees, who were politically motivated, fulfilled God's plan.

This unlike Adams sin was not passed down to successive generations. Most believers of the first century church including all the New Testament writers except Luke were Jewish
 

MarcR

Senior Member
Feb 12, 2015
5,486
183
63
Ro 11:26
26 And so all Israel shall be saved: as it is written, There shall come out of Sion the Deliverer, and shall turn away ungodliness from Jacob:
KJV
We have no way of knowing how inclusive All Israel is; but taken at face value it opens the possibility that you are mistaken. In any case it proves that God has NOT permanently rejected the Jews.
 

MarcR

Senior Member
Feb 12, 2015
5,486
183
63
Unless you reject the Old Testament as being from God, You can not label Judaism as a false religion.
Certainly elevating rabbinic tradition to the authority of Scripture is not good practice; but more than 80% of the Scripture quoted by Jesus comes from Leviticus and Deuteronomy.
Mt 5:17-19
17 Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.
18 For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.
19 Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.
KJV
In Ps 22 and Is 53 we see that God knew that most of the Jewish people would reject Christ at his first coming and would accept Him en masse at his second coming (Zc 12:12-13:2).

The greatest obstacle to Jewish people accepting Christ in our time is that most of what identifies itself as the church does not exhibit the love we are supposed to be recognized by. Jn 13:34-35
34 A new commandment I give unto you, That ye love one another; as I have loved you, that ye also love one another.
35 By this shall all men know that ye are my disciples, if ye have love one to another.
KJV
 
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
Kaylagrl, dear sis......?

Those who begin to teach things as fact, and press it, (from my experience) are picking and choosing to create a super doctrine.
They feel good about it, so they push it....usually skipping over most of the Bible's harmony.
The whole Bible is important, including introductions to each book, .....even the book of Revelation!
Christ is "revealing" His ultimate plan in it.

All text is there for our benefit.
What I am presenting is nothing new.....nor does it take away from the Bible even slightly.
The whole Bible is good.

But, most are just adding to some old church doctrine of the past few hundred years, or filling it in with odd guesswork.
Never relying on their Bible and the Holy Spirit, to give them it's key.
Using terrible labels, and man made groups to justify why they believe what they believe.
You and I have been told to trust men....well, .....men lie, my Bible does not.

Don't trust me even....pour over scripture......trust the Bible and God.


1 Corinthians 1:1
1.Paul, called to be an apostle of Jesus Christ through the will of God, and Sosthenes ourbrother,
[SUP]2 [/SUP]To the church of God which is at Corinth, to those who are sanctified in Christ Jesus, called to be saints, withall who in every place call on the name of Jesus Christ our Lord, both THEIRS and OURS :
[SUP]3 [/SUP]Grace to you and peace from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ.

Paul is speaking to 2 groups in this
.
Paul is actually speaking to the whole church, one group who were in Corinth, and "all who are in every other place." (1:1)
And in speaking to the whole church, he is speaking to a lot more than just two groups.


Same book, he goes on.......

1 Corinthians 7:10-16

[SUP]10 [/SUP]Now to the married.
I command, yet not I but the Lord: A wife is not to depart from her husband. [SUP]11 [/SUP]But even if she does depart, let her remain unmarried or be reconciled to her husband. And a husband is not to divorce his wife.
[SUP]12[/SUP]But to the rest I, not the Lord, say: If any brother has a wife who does not believe, and she is willing to live with him, let him not divorce her. [SUP]13 [/SUP]And a woman who has a husband who does not believe, if he is willing to live with her, let her not divorce him. [SUP]14 [/SUP]For the unbelieving husband is sanctified by the wife, and the unbelieving wife is sanctified by the husband; otherwise your children would be unclean, but now they are holy. [SUP]15 [/SUP]But if the unbeliever departs, let him depart; a brother or a sister is not under bondage in suchcases. But God has called us to peace. [SUP]16 [/SUP]For how do you know, O wife, whether you will save your husband? Or how do you know, O husband, whether you will save your wife?

Once again, two groups.
Actually Paul is speaking to the one group addressed in 1:1, the whole church--those in Corinth and "all who are in every other place," and is answering (7:1) five different questions presented to him regarding marriage and divorce:

1) Is sex unspiritual? (7:2-7)--No.
2) Should those saved after widowing remarry? (7:8-9)--Yes.
3) Should those saved after marriage divorce?
---a) both saved (7:10-11)--No.
---b) one saved (7:12-16)--Only if the unbeliever leaves.
4) Should salvation change your marital status? (7:17-24)--No.
5) Should those never married marry? (7:25-28)--It's best not to in these times.

Otherwise the verses above ARE confusing?? Do we stay or do we leave our spouse???
Watch someone try to explain this away....which is cool...I am not God, nor do I save.
The beauty of free will.

THIS, clears up what sounds like a contradiction within 3 sentences......Paul is not confusing!.....
he is talking to the remnant(who will convert and a certain group,)...... and us Christians.
Actually Paul is talking to the whole church, those in Corinth and "all who are in every other place." (1:1)

If one does not see this obvious speech pattern, then they just explain away why Paul can sound confusing in some of his Epistles.

No need to actually search the Bible on why that may be, I guess?


BTW, If anyone tries to say that in the case above..." if anything is confusing then
Paul is talking just to the Corinthians, in some parts"...
Actually, Paul is talking to the whole church, those in Corinth and "all who are in every other place." (1:1)

well, THEN that logic has to apply to all of his Epistles, because we are not allowed to pick and choose what is what to fit our doctrine.
A pattern to Paul's Epistles has been established....with just this one example above.
Well, not really. . .because there is no "pattern" in 1Co 7.
Paul is simply answering questions presented to him by letter (7:1).

If Paul is talking to separate people in Corinthians, can he ....just maybe?....be doing the same in certain/ other epistles?
This is where your "hermeneutic" gets dicey.

First of all, Paul is not talking to separate groups in the letter to Corinthians.

Nor would talking to separate groups in Corinthians be grounds for asserting it anywhere else.

Each letter must stand on its own context.
 
Last edited:

MarcR

Senior Member
Feb 12, 2015
5,486
183
63
Israel was founded on atheism (zionism)
As for 'Gods chosen'? You do know that atheists attend synagogues as long as they are identified as 'jews'?......dont you????
Isa 66:8
8 Who hath heard such a thing? who hath seen such things? Shall the earth be made to bring forth in one day? or shall a nation be born at once? for as soon as Zion travailed, she brought forth her children.
KJV
The nation is Modern Israel born 11/11/1948. and those who made it happen are hardly atheists!
 

Reborn

Senior Member
Nov 16, 2014
4,087
217
63
Paul is actually speaking to the whole church, one group who were in Corinth, and "all who are in every other place." (1:1)
And in speaking to the whole church, he is speaking to a lot more than just two groups.


Actually Paul is speaking to the one group addressed in 1:1, the whole church--those in Corinth and "all who are in every other place," and is answering (7:1) five different questions presented to him regarding marriage and divorce:

1) Is sex unspiritual? (7:2-7)--No.
2) Should those saved after widowing remarry? (7:8-9)--Yes.
3) Should those saved after marriage divorce?
---a) both saved (7:10-11)--No.
---b) one saved (7:10-16)--Only if the unbeliever leaves.
4) Should salvation change your marital status? (7:17-24)--No.
5) Should those never married marry? (7:25-28)--It's best not to in these times.

Actually Paul is talking to the whole church, those in Corinth and "all who are in every other place." (1:1)

Actually, Paul is talking to the whole church, those in Corinth and "all who are in every other place." (1:1)

Well, not really. . .because there is no "pattern" in 1Co 7.
Paul is simply answering questions presented to him by letter (7:1).

This is where your "hermeneutic" gets dicey.

First of all, Paul is not talking to separate groups in Corinthians.

Nor would talking to separate groups in Corinthians be grounds for asserting it anywhere else.

Each letter must stand on its own context.
Thanks for taking the time to reply.:)
I disagree....sorry.

I don't know where to go from here?

I stand by what I say.
I feel no need to defend what I've presented, because that would take days, hours, page and pages.
In no way do I take away from scripture, I stated over and over, everything in the Bible, and NT is to be learned by Christians.

This doesn't just boil down to Corinthians, it would take dozens of other scripture and cross-ref of other Epistles.

Every time this happens, it feels like I spend hours on it, ......just so most could breeze over it.
Not worth it to me, sorry.

Like I said to Sophia, if you and I aren't on the same page when it comes to "time of the Gentiles" being fulfilled....
....this would be a long drawn out, never ending debate.

I am not here to change anyone's mind......overall, I share opinions.
Really,.... I crave peace.
Although, I am guilty....because once in awhile, I will go against a select few in the BDF.

God Bless Elin.:)
 
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
Unless we believe that our individual and collective sins killed Christ we miss the boat. Roman soldiers under orders from Pontius Pilate physically killed Christ. but could not have done so had Jesus not willingly submitted Himself to it.
God uses his enemies as instruments of judgment, as the Christ-rejecting Jews were the instruments of God's judgment on our sin at the cross, but God still holds them guilty of their crime even though he used it to accomplish his purposes.

It is their crime for which God holds them guilty that we are talking about here.
 
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
Unless you reject the Old Testament as being from God, You can not label Judaism as a false religion.
Certainly elevating rabbinic tradition to the authority of Scripture is not good practice; but
more than 80% of the Scripture quoted by Jesus comes from Leviticus and Deuteronomy.
You might want to check that out.

Jesus quoted from the Psalms more than any other book.

The greatest obstacle to Jewish people accepting Christ in our time is that most of what identifies itself as the church does not exhibit the love we are supposed to be recognized by. Jn 13:34-35
That's not what the NT word of God says.

It says it is because God has hardened (blinded) the hearts of a large part of Israel in judgment for rejecting the Christ.
 
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
Elin said:
Paul is actually speaking to the whole church, one group who were in Corinth, and "all who are in every other place." (1:1)
And in speaking to the whole church, he is speaking to a lot more than just two groups.


Actually Paul is speaking to the one group addressed in 1:1, the whole church--those in Corinth and "all who are in every other place," and is
is answering (7:1) five different questions presented to him regarding marriage and divorce:

1) Is sex unspiritual? (7:2-7)--No.
2) Should those saved after widowing remarry? (7:8-9)--Yes.
3) Should those saved after marriage divorce?
---a) both saved (7:10-11)--No.
---b) one saved (7:10-16)--Only if the unbeliever leaves.
4) Should salvation change your marital status? (7:17-24)--No.
5) Should those never married marry? (7:25-28)--It's best not to in these times.

Actually Paul is talking to the whole church, those in Corinth and "all who are in every other place." (1:1)

Actually, Paul is talking to the whole church, those in Corinth and "all who are in every other place." (1:1)

Well, not really. . .because there is no "pattern" in 1Co 7.
Paul is simply answering questions presented to him by letter (7:1).

This is where your "hermeneutic" gets dicey.

First of all, Paul is not talking to separate groups in Corinthians.

Nor would talking to separate groups in Corinthians be grounds for asserting it anywhere else.

Each letter must stand on its own context
.
Thanks for taking the time to reply.:)
I disagree....sorry.

I don't know where to go from here?

I stand by what I say.
I feel no need to defend what I've presented,
Thanks, I understand.

And I am also happy to let these Scriptures speak for themselves.
It's your hermeneutic that is the problem

God bless you also.
Elin
 
Last edited:
K

kaylagrl

Guest
There is a difference between blessing Christ loving Christians and blessing Christ hating jews

Once again, Romans 11. And would you not bless those not saved as much as those that are? Not all my relatives are believers does that mean I dont bless them? Or give to them when I see them in need? "Christ hating Jews" is a pretty strong term to bandy about.
 
K

kaylagrl

Guest
Isa 66:8
8 Who hath heard such a thing? who hath seen such things? Shall the earth be made to bring forth in one day? or shall a nation be born at once? for as soon as Zion travailed, she brought forth her children.
KJV
The nation is Modern Israel born 11/11/1948. and those who made it happen are hardly atheists!
Thank you Marc,I appreciate you sharing that.
 
K

kaylagrl

Guest
I must say the term "Christ hating Jews" bothers me. Do you say "Christ hating Americans" for those who dont believe in Christ? "Christ hating Brits?" and so on.Plenty of people dont accept Christ. Christ died for OUR SIN. That is what sent him to the cross,that is why he came,to die. The Romans nailed him there,the high priests called him a blasphemer and turned him over to Pilate but it was our sin that kept him there.He became the blood sacrifice.
 
K

kaylagrl

Guest
To you the same :)
I am very grateful for you here. Even when I jumped all over you for the "flip answer", you came back with grace.

I am trying hard to learn it! I tend to be reactive and Im trying so hard not to be that way. Perhaps you were sent to test me. lol lol Its easy to get heated on here.Especially when we dont see the person we're talking to face to face.I've had to apologize on here when I got hoof in mouth disease. I'm getting older and hopefully a little wiser.Whats your favorite hymn,maybe we can agree on that.One of my favorites is "When I Survey The Wondrous Cross". It kept going through my mind as I watched the "Passion of the Christ" movie. Beautiful song.
 
R

RachelBibleStudent

Guest
If you really want the rundown on the likes of Jerris and Hagee check out Brother Nathanaels' clips on YouTube.
He should know - he was born and raised a jew but now is Christian
not to be argumentative but 'brother nathanael' is absolutely -not- a trustworthy source...he is a known fraud and a mental case...those youtube videos are -literally- what happens when he goes off his meds and puts on a fake monk costume and pretends to be involved in a church body that he actually has no fellowship with...
 

MarcR

Senior Member
Feb 12, 2015
5,486
183
63
You might want to check that out.

Jesus quoted from the Psalms more than any other book.


That's not what the NT word of God says.

It says it is because God has hardened (blinded) the hearts of a large part of Israel in judgment for rejecting the Christ.
That is NOT POSSIBLE!

After God (Is 53) predicts rejection of Christ by most of the Jewish people; We have
Jer 31:31-34
31 Behold, the days come, saith the Lord, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah:
32 Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt; which my covenant they brake, although I was an husband unto them, saith the Lord:
33 But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel; After those days, saith the Lord, I will put my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and will be their God, and they shall be my people.
34 And they shall teach no more every man his neighbour, and every man his brother, saying, Know the Lord: for they shall all know me, from the least of them unto the greatest of them, saith the Lord; for I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more.
KJV
and after denouncing Israel for unfaithfulness and threatening punishment in Hos 2:1-13; God says:
Hos 2:14-23
14 Therefore, behold, I will allure her, and bring her into the wilderness, and speak comfortably unto her.
15 And I will give her her vineyards from thence, and the valley of Achor for a door of hope: and she shall sing there, as in the days of her youth, and as in the day when she came up out of the land of Egypt.
16 And it shall be at that day, saith the Lord, that thou shalt call me Ishi; and shalt call me no more Baali.
17 For I will take away the names of Baalim out of her mouth, and they shall no more be remembered by their name.
18 And in that day will I make a covenant for them with the beasts of the field, and with the fowls of heaven, and with the creeping things of the ground: and I will break the bow and the sword and the battle out of the earth, and will make them to lie down safely.
19 And I will betroth thee unto me for ever; yea, I will betroth thee unto me in righteousness, and in judgment, and in lovingkindness, and in mercies.
20 I will even betroth thee unto me in faithfulness: and thou shalt know the Lord.
21 And it shall come to pass in that day, I will hear, saith the Lord, I will hear the heavens, and they shall hear the earth;
22 And the earth shall hear the corn, and the wine, and the oil; and they shall hear Jezreel.
23 And I will sow her unto me in the earth; and I will have mercy upon her that had not obtained mercy; and I will say to them which were not my people, Thou art my people; and they shall say, Thou art my God.
KJV