The Error is Baptism in Jesus name only for salvation

[CS1]

Yeah, makes sense; just eliminate Peter words in between... Repent, AND be baptized everyone of you in the name of Jesus Christ for, remission of sin. I think not.

Excuse me, Luke is the person you need to take issue with in Chapter 24 and Jesus in Matthews 28:19 I didn't eliminate anything.

 

[Cameron143]

I have no idea what you mean.

Jesus can't simply forgive sins on a whim. For sins to be forgiven, sins must be atoned for, or there is unrighteousness with God.

 

[Cameron143]

Are you looking for a loophole to the Gospel?

John 21:22
Jesus answered, “If I want him to remain until I return, what is that to you? You follow Me!”

I suggest you focus on the Gospel and leave these questions to God.

I'll have to because you can't answer them.

 

[CS1]

The latter doesn't negate the former; it simply shows more revelation is necessary.
So...what did Jesus actually do in breathing on the disciples? Simply greater revelation?

Hmm, well, if one is told the Spirit gave you insight and then the Lord said to you, Get behind me. Satan does speak to the issue of Peter not fully understanding that Jesus came to die, which scripture tells us HE Peter understood after the resurrection, not before.

 

[Lamar]

Who said Water Baptism was optional? Please show me where I said that? My point is water Baptism in the name of the F, S, and HS is valid. What are you talking about? Creating false Narratives?

Is water baptism optional or required for the remission of sins?

Yes or No?

I say yes, what about you?

 

[Magenta]

The thief on the cross wasnt baptised at all.

That's an assumption.

 

[Lamar]

I'll have to because you can't answer them.

You have to because why???

I can't wait for your response.

 

[Magenta]

It is to your argument, but not the argument of another poster. He contend that the thief has not been
baptized, but instead says Jesus decided to forgive him anyway. In effect, he has Jesus acting unrighteously
by forgiving sins apart from fulfilling all that he believes is necessary for sins to be righteously forgiven.

Yes, I get it. Six of one half a dozen of the other. But an assumption either way regardless.

The thief on the cross could have been baptized and people say he was not when they don't know.

Or they say he was baptized, but the text never says any such thing.

That is why it is an assumption either way.

 

[Lamar]

Jesus can't simply forgive sins on a whim. For sins to be forgiven, sins must be atoned for, or there is unrighteousness with God.

Did you just write that "Jesus can't"?

 

[Cameron143]

You have to because why???

I can't wait for your response.

Only the secret things belong to the Lord. Everything else...it is the glory of kings to search out a matter.

 

[Cameron143]

Did you just write that "Jesus can't"?

Good catch. Should have said will not. Jesus will never act unrighteously.

 

[Cameron143]

Yes, I get it. Six of one half a dozen of the other. But an assumption either way regardless.

The thief on the cross could have been baptized and people say he was not when they don't know.

Or they say he was baptized, but the text never says any such thing.

That is why it is an assumption either way.

I already agreed with this before.

 

[CS1]

Is water baptism optional or required for the remission of sins?

Yes or No?

I say yes, what about you?

I will answer that. No, Belief in Christ and Repentance is. Baptism is an act of obedience.

In Acts, Peter tells a Roman named Cornelius that “whosoever believeth in [Christ] shall receive remission of sins” (Acts 10:43). Cornelius and those in his home did believe, and they received forgiveness in Christ.



God remits sin on the basis of Jesus’ sacrifice on the cross (Romans 3:24-25). The teaching of Scripture is that remission only comes by grace through faith (Ephesians 2:8-9).

 

[Beckworth]

Sorry, but I am not going to unravel which person you are addressing so if you want a response from me, kindly just quote me, Thanks

I thought I was responding to JBTN. At least my comment was under his post. I’m not sure how your post got in there also; but then I am not very “tech” savvy. My apologies.

 

[Magenta]

I already agreed with this before.

Le sigh.

 

[Cameron143]

Le sigh.

If you want to know the degree of my agreement with your posts, perhaps you can get administration to include a superagree emoji that has 5 checkmarks. In the meantime, if you keep reposting your posts, I'll give successive checkmarks to reveal if I'm in mere agreement to super agreement.

 

[lrs68]

I did a quick search for did Jesus command to baptize in His name.

Overwhelming response of scholars and theologians believe Acts 2:38 is the direct true response to Matthew 28:19.

They mean the same thing is the common belief.

 

[DeanM]

And I knew you were going to show up.

I was here first 🤣

 

[lrs68]

I did a quick search for did Jesus command to baptize in His name.

Overwhelming response of scholars and theologians believe Acts 2:38 is the direct true response to Matthew 28:19.

They mean the same thing is the common belief.

They are stating that John 14 when you see the Father you see Me and Peter in Acts 5 the Holy Spirit was called the Spirit of the Lord reveals the Disciples thought there was more to Jesus than just the Son.

Interesting.

Let's say they are correct. What does that actually mean?

 

[Magenta]

Only the secret things belong to the Lord. Everything else...it is the glory of kings to search out a matter.

Psalm 24 verses 1-2 ~ The earth is the LORD’s, and the fullness thereof, the world and all who dwell therein. For He has founded it upon the seas and established it upon the waters.