The Gospel of ?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Timeline

Senior Member
Mar 20, 2014
1,826
17
38
#1
Is there a strong, biblical claim that The Gospel of John was written by John.

John 21:20-24
[SUP]20 [/SUP]Peter, turning around, *saw the disciple whom Jesus loved following them; the one who also had leaned back on His bosom at the supper and said, “Lord, who is the one who betrays You?” [SUP]21 [/SUP]So Peter seeing him *said to Jesus, “Lord, and what about this man?” [SUP]22 [/SUP]Jesus *said to him, “If I want him to remain until I come, what is that to you? You follow Me!” [SUP]23 [/SUP]Therefore this saying went out among the brethren that that disciple would not die; yet Jesus did not say to him that he would not die, but only, “If I want him to remain until I come, what is that to you?”
[SUP]24 [/SUP]This is the disciple who is testifying to these things and wrote these things, and we know that his testimony is true.

John 13:23-26
[SUP]23 [/SUP]There was reclining on Jesus’ bosom one of His disciples, whom Jesus loved. [SUP]24 [/SUP]So Simon Peter *gestured to him, and *said to him, “Tell us who it is of whom He is speaking.” [SUP]25 [/SUP]He, leaning back thus on Jesus’ bosom, *said to Him, “Lord, who is it?”
[SUP]26 [/SUP]Jesus then *answered, “That is the one for whom I shall dip the morsel and give it to him.” So when He had dipped the morsel, He *took and *gave it to Judas, the son of Simon Iscariot.

I am sure that I am missing something, but I can/have not been able to positively concluded that the "disciple whom Jesus loved", was John.

John 19:26-30
[SUP]26 [/SUP]When Jesus then saw His mother, and the disciple whom He loved standing nearby, He *said to His mother, “Woman, behold, your son!” [SUP]27 [/SUP]Then He *said to the disciple, “Behold, your mother!” From that hour the disciple took her into his own household.
[SUP]28 [/SUP]After this, Jesus, knowing that all things had already been accomplished, to fulfill the Scripture, *said, “I am thirsty.” [SUP]29 [/SUP]A jar full of sour wine was standing there; so they put a sponge full of the sour wine upon a branch of hyssop and brought it up to His mouth.
[SUP]30 [/SUP]Therefore when Jesus had received the sour wine, He said, “It is finished!” And He bowed His head and gave up His spirit.

One time I thought I had narrowed it down by this verse...but the "two other disciples" really didn't help narrow this down. But we do have plenty of information to conclude that the disciple whom Jesus loved was not Peter - but that is about all the narrowing down I have really done - anyone except Peter.

John 21:1-7
After these things Jesus manifested Himself again to the disciples at the Sea of Tiberias, and He manifested Himself in this way. [SUP]2[/SUP]Simon Peter, and Thomas called Didymus, and Nathanael of Cana in Galilee, and the sons of Zebedee, and two others of His disciples were together. [SUP]3 [/SUP]Simon Peter *said to them, “I am going fishing.” They *said to him, “We will also come with you.” They went out and got into the boat; and that night they caught nothing.
[SUP]4 [/SUP]But when the day was now breaking, Jesus stood on the beach; yet the disciples did not know that it was Jesus. [SUP]5 [/SUP]So Jesus *said to them, “Children, you do not have any fish, do you?” They answered Him, “No.” [SUP]6 [/SUP]And He said to them, “Cast the net on the right-hand side of the boat and you will find a catch.” So they cast, and then they were not able to haul it in because of the great number of fish. [SUP]7 [/SUP]Therefore that disciple whom Jesus loved *said to Peter, “It is the Lord.”

Mark 14:43-52
[SUP]43 [/SUP]Immediately while He was still speaking, Judas, one of the twelve, *came up accompanied by a crowd with swords and clubs, who were from the chief priests and the scribes and the elders. [SUP]44 [/SUP]Now he who was betraying Him had given them a signal, saying, “Whomever I kiss, He is the one; seize Him and lead Him away under guard.” [SUP]45 [/SUP]After coming, Judas immediately went to Him, saying, “Rabbi!” and kissed Him. [SUP]46 [/SUP]They laid hands on Him and seized Him. [SUP]47 [/SUP]But one of those who stood by drew his sword, and struck the slave of the high priest and cut off his ear. [SUP]48 [/SUP]And Jesus said to them, “Have you come out with swords and clubs to arrest Me, as you would against a robber? [SUP]49 [/SUP]Every day I was with you in the temple teaching, and you did not seize Me; but this has taken place to fulfill the Scriptures.” [SUP]50 [/SUP]And they all left Him and fled.
[SUP]51 [/SUP]A young man was following Him, wearing nothing but a linen sheet over his naked body; and they *seized him. [SUP]52 [/SUP]But he pulled free of the linen sheet and escaped naked. - who is this "naked" man


No doubt there will be someone who reads this that will think, "Don't we have more important things to think about" - Well, stop reading this thread. It may not be important, but I would like to have some input of this, since, for some reason, it keeps coming up - in my mind. I thought that maybe someone could shed some light on this for me. If I understand correctly, "The Gospel of John" was not on the original, but for discussion's sake, let's assume that it wasn't. Can anyone give me scriptural evidence that the disciple whom Jesus loved was, in fact John.
 

p_rehbein

Senior Member
Sep 4, 2013
30,298
6,591
113
#2
Matthew didn't really write the Gospel According to Matthew. Mark didn't really write the Gospel According to Mark. Luke wasn't EVEN an eyewitness, nor is there any Scriptural evidence that I remember reading that he EVER met Jesus in person, so his account is at best "hearsay" and thus not admissible for evidence of Truth. John really didn't write the Gospel of John. The Apostle Paul was a "false" Apostle. Who was Jude "really?" Who was John the Revelator "really?" Peter didn't really write the Epistles credited to him. And who in the world wrote all those Epistles credited to John? Which John wrote them?

Did Jesus REALLY love ANY of His disciples? Did Jesus really exist? Is there any such thing as a God? Prove it...........definitive proof necessary.........

Given all of this, what say we just CALL THE WHOLE THING OFF...............OR...............how about this:

The Gospel According to John (found in the Holy Bible at the beginning of the eyewitness account of the ministry of Jesus Christ by the disciple John whom Jesus loved.

(works for me)
 

p_rehbein

Senior Member
Sep 4, 2013
30,298
6,591
113
#4
.yeah.....however this is simply speculation.......and I ain't going with it.......sorry......

The same argument can be made for Matthew and Mark...........for their Gospels ARE NOT exact duplicates of each event.

People can deny John all they want..........and they will............but I'll go with the Holy Bible........The Gospel of Love surely throws a lot of denominational ideology into a tail spin and maybe that's why folks want to discount it so very much?
 
May 15, 2013
4,307
27
0
#5
Is there a strong, biblical claim that The Gospel of John was written by John.

John 21:20-24
[SUP]20 [/SUP]Peter, turning around, *saw the disciple whom Jesus loved following them; the one who also had leaned back on His bosom at the supper and said, “Lord, who is the one who betrays You?” [SUP]21 [/SUP]So Peter seeing him *said to Jesus, “Lord, and what about this man?” [SUP]22 [/SUP]Jesus *said to him, “If I want him to remain until I come, what is that to you? You follow Me!” [SUP]23 [/SUP]Therefore this saying went out among the brethren that that disciple would not die; yet Jesus did not say to him that he would not die, but only, “If I want him to remain until I come, what is that to you?”
[SUP]24 [/SUP]This is the disciple who is testifying to these things and wrote these things, and we know that his testimony is true.

John 13:23-26
[SUP]23 [/SUP]There was reclining on Jesus’ bosom one of His disciples, whom Jesus loved. [SUP]24 [/SUP]So Simon Peter *gestured to him, and *said to him, “Tell us who it is of whom He is speaking.” [SUP]25 [/SUP]He, leaning back thus on Jesus’ bosom, *said to Him, “Lord, who is it?”
[SUP]26 [/SUP]Jesus then *answered, “That is the one for whom I shall dip the morsel and give it to him.” So when He had dipped the morsel, He *took and *gave it to Judas, the son of Simon Iscariot.

I am sure that I am missing something, but I can/have not been able to positively concluded that the "disciple whom Jesus loved", was John.

John 19:26-30
[SUP]26 [/SUP]When Jesus then saw His mother, and the disciple whom He loved standing nearby, He *said to His mother, “Woman, behold, your son!” [SUP]27 [/SUP]Then He *said to the disciple, “Behold, your mother!” From that hour the disciple took her into his own household.
[SUP]28 [/SUP]After this, Jesus, knowing that all things had already been accomplished, to fulfill the Scripture, *said, “I am thirsty.” [SUP]29 [/SUP]A jar full of sour wine was standing there; so they put a sponge full of the sour wine upon a branch of hyssop and brought it up to His mouth.
[SUP]30 [/SUP]Therefore when Jesus had received the sour wine, He said, “It is finished!” And He bowed His head and gave up His spirit.

One time I thought I had narrowed it down by this verse...but the "two other disciples" really didn't help narrow this down. But we do have plenty of information to conclude that the disciple whom Jesus loved was not Peter - but that is about all the narrowing down I have really done - anyone except Peter.

John 21:1-7
After these things Jesus manifested Himself again to the disciples at the Sea of Tiberias, and He manifested Himself in this way. [SUP]2[/SUP]Simon Peter, and Thomas called Didymus, and Nathanael of Cana in Galilee, and the sons of Zebedee, and two others of His disciples were together. [SUP]3 [/SUP]Simon Peter *said to them, “I am going fishing.” They *said to him, “We will also come with you.” They went out and got into the boat; and that night they caught nothing.
[SUP]4 [/SUP]But when the day was now breaking, Jesus stood on the beach; yet the disciples did not know that it was Jesus. [SUP]5 [/SUP]So Jesus *said to them, “Children, you do not have any fish, do you?” They answered Him, “No.” [SUP]6 [/SUP]And He said to them, “Cast the net on the right-hand side of the boat and you will find a catch.” So they cast, and then they were not able to haul it in because of the great number of fish. [SUP]7 [/SUP]Therefore that disciple whom Jesus loved *said to Peter, “It is the Lord.”

Mark 14:43-52
[SUP]43 [/SUP]Immediately while He was still speaking, Judas, one of the twelve, *came up accompanied by a crowd with swords and clubs, who were from the chief priests and the scribes and the elders. [SUP]44 [/SUP]Now he who was betraying Him had given them a signal, saying, “Whomever I kiss, He is the one; seize Him and lead Him away under guard.” [SUP]45 [/SUP]After coming, Judas immediately went to Him, saying, “Rabbi!” and kissed Him. [SUP]46 [/SUP]They laid hands on Him and seized Him. [SUP]47 [/SUP]But one of those who stood by drew his sword, and struck the slave of the high priest and cut off his ear. [SUP]48 [/SUP]And Jesus said to them, “Have you come out with swords and clubs to arrest Me, as you would against a robber? [SUP]49 [/SUP]Every day I was with you in the temple teaching, and you did not seize Me; but this has taken place to fulfill the Scriptures.” [SUP]50 [/SUP]And they all left Him and fled.
[SUP]51 [/SUP]A young man was following Him, wearing nothing but a linen sheet over his naked body; and they *seized him. [SUP]52 [/SUP]But he pulled free of the linen sheet and escaped naked. - who is this "naked" man


No doubt there will be someone who reads this that will think, "Don't we have more important things to think about" - Well, stop reading this thread. It may not be important, but I would like to have some input of this, since, for some reason, it keeps coming up - in my mind. I thought that maybe someone could shed some light on this for me. If I understand correctly, "The Gospel of John" was not on the original, but for discussion's sake, let's assume that it wasn't. Can anyone give me scriptural evidence that the disciple whom Jesus loved was, in fact John.
The naked young lad has to have been a Greek that was listening among to Jews at the time. Only Greeks wore sheets with nothing underneath, and Jews must fully cover themselves in public. The Greek were called heathens is because they had shown more than they had should and displayed themselves openly. John was one of the disciples of Jesus and the one who written the Book of revelation, because Paul had spoken about him later on in life.

2 Corinthians 12:2 I know a man in Christ who fourteen years ago was caught up to the third heaven. Whether it was in the body or out of the body I do not know—God knows.

Revelation 1:9 I, John, your brother and companion in the suffering and kingdom and patient endurance that are ours in Jesus, was on the island of Patmos because of the word of God and the testimony of Jesus. 10 On the Lord’s Day I was in the Spirit, and I heard behind me a loud voice like a trumpet, 11 which said: “Write on a scroll what you see and send it to the seven churches: to Ephesus, Smyrna, Pergamum, Thyatira, Sardis, Philadelphia and Laodicea.”


[TABLE="class: infobox vcard, width: 22"]
[TR]
[TH]Birth name[/TH]
[TD="class: nickname"]Saul of Tarsus[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]Born[/TH]
[TD]c. AD 5[SUP][1][/SUP]
in Tarsus in Cilicia[SUP][2][/SUP]
(south-central Turkey)[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]Died[/TH]
[TD]c. AD 67[SUP][3][/SUP]
probably in Rome[SUP][3][/SUP][/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]


[TABLE="class: infobox vcard, width: 22"]
[TR]
[TH]Born[/TH]
[TD]c. 6 AD
Bethsaida, Judaea, Roman Empire[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]Died[/TH]
[TD]c. 100 (aged around 94)[SUP][1][/SUP]
Ephesus, Asia, Roman Empire[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]Honored in[/TH]
[TD]Christianity[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]Canonized[/TH]
[TD]Pre-congregation[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]Feast[/TH]
[TD]27 December[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
 

Timeline

Senior Member
Mar 20, 2014
1,826
17
38
#6
Herein lies another opinion of who wrote the Gospel of John - A Bible study on the beloved disciple, author of the fourth gospel
Yeah, that was the conclusion that I have come to:), though not conclusively. I don't know how important this is, but like I said it keeps coming up - mainly because we are studying John in bible class and the teacher keeps says what did "John" mean when he wrote.... Which really shouldn't bother me, but it does. I just think it is kind of silly to assume that the disciple whom Jesus loved was John when there is little to no evidence to support it.
 

p_rehbein

Senior Member
Sep 4, 2013
30,298
6,591
113
#7
Well, as long as we are speculating..........how about this one?

EXCERPT FROM ARTICLE

Who wrote the Gospels in the New Testament?
If you open a Bible today, you see books titled 'The Gospel according to Matthew,' 'The Gospel according to Mark,' and so on for Luke and John.
In fact, the Gospels are all anonymous - they don't actually say who wrote them. But:

  • The names of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John were linked with them as their authors right from the very earliest days
  • No other authors were ever suggested for them
  • There are thousands of Greek manuscripts of the Gospels, and they all give them the same authors
If the names of these authors had only been connected with their Gospels in the second or third centuries, it's very unlikely that all the Greek manuscripts would give them the same authors. By then, these Gospels were being circulated very widely.
Together
The four Gospels may have been circulated together very soon after they were written. It could have been at this stage that the authors' names were attached to them, as a way of distinguishing them from each other.
Matthew and John
Matthew's Gospel is probably based on the testimony of Jesus's disciple Matthew, and John's Gospel on the testimony of the disciple John. This doesn't necessarily mean that it was Matthew and John who wrote them down in the final form they've come to us in. In fact, in the case of John's Gospel, there's internal evidence that this isn't what happened.
Mark
Matthew and John were among Jesus's disciples, but Mark wasn't - he was a comparatively unimportant player in the New Testament story. If you were going to make up someone to be the author of a Gospel, Mark probably wouldn't have been the first name to come to mind.
But there's a tradition going back to the church leader Papias, early in the second century, that Mark's Gospel is based on the testimony of Simon Peter, written down by Mark. If it is true, this would explain why the church accepted it as authoritative so quickly.
Found here:
1. Who wrote the Gospels in the New Testament - Matthew, Mark ...
www.facingthechallenge.org/gospels.php Cached
Who wrote the Gospels in the New Testament? If you open a Bible today, you see books titled 'The Gospel according to Matthew,' 'The Gospel according to Mark,' and so ...
 
May 15, 2013
4,307
27
0
#8
Most of them didn't know how to write because they were uneducated fisherman, and they had to look for an scribe to publish there books like Luke was the scribe for Paul.
 

Timeline

Senior Member
Mar 20, 2014
1,826
17
38
#9
The naked young lad has to have been a Greek that was listening among to Jews at the time. Only Greeks wore sheets with nothing underneath, and Jews must fully cover themselves in public. The Greek were called heathens is because they had shown more than they had should and displayed themselves openly. John was one of the disciples of Jesus and the one who written the Book of revelation, because Paul had spoken about him later on in life.

2 Corinthians 12:2 I know a man in Christ who fourteen years ago was caught up to the third heaven. Whether it was in the body or out of the body I do not know—God knows.

Revelation 1:9 I, John, your brother and companion in the suffering and kingdom and patient endurance that are ours in Jesus, was on the island of Patmos because of the word of God and the testimony of Jesus. 10 On the Lord’s Day I was in the Spirit, and I heard behind me a loud voice like a trumpet, 11 which said: “Write on a scroll what you see and send it to the seven churches: to Ephesus, Smyrna, Pergamum, Thyatira, Sardis, Philadelphia and Laodicea.”


[TABLE="class: infobox vcard, width: 22"]
[TR]
[TH]Birth name[/TH]
[TD="class: nickname"]Saul of Tarsus[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]Born[/TH]
[TD]c. AD 5[SUP][1][/SUP]
in Tarsus in Cilicia[SUP][2][/SUP]
(south-central Turkey)[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]Died[/TH]
[TD]c. AD 67[SUP][3][/SUP]
probably in Rome[SUP][3][/SUP][/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]


[TABLE="class: infobox vcard, width: 22"]
[TR]
[TH]Born[/TH]
[TD]c. 6 AD
Bethsaida, Judaea, Roman Empire[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]Died[/TH]
[TD]c. 100 (aged around 94)[SUP][1][/SUP]
Ephesus, Asia, Roman Empire[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]Honored in[/TH]
[TD]Christianity[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]Canonized[/TH]
[TD]Pre-congregation[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]Feast[/TH]
[TD]27 December[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
Thanks, I think that is the most information I have ever received on "the naked" guy. And, while I appreciate any information, I think you will understand that I like to kind of footnote things in my mind - keeping them as a reference, but not applying them until I feel that I have had a confirmation.

And I also found it interesting that you say that Paul referenced John (as being the one who was taken up) "fourteen years ago". So, you believe that Revelation was written before 2 Corinthians (or at least the vision happened before it was written). Maybe I misunderstood.

Most people have a problem with Revelation being written or "seen" been any of the other books of the NT were written - I don't see scriptural evidence that it could not have been written before most of the other letters of the NT.
 

Timeline

Senior Member
Mar 20, 2014
1,826
17
38
#10
.yeah.....however this is simply speculation.......and I ain't going with it.......sorry......

The same argument can be made for Matthew and Mark...........for their Gospels ARE NOT exact duplicates of each event.

People can deny John all they want..........and they will............but I'll go with the Holy Bible........The Gospel of Love surely throws a lot of denominational ideology into a tail spin and maybe that's why folks want to discount it so very much?
p-rehbein, I am not trying to discount or discredit anything. I believe that "The Gospel of John" is inspired. I just wanted to know why we think that the "disciple whom Jesus loved" was John.......that is all.
 

p_rehbein

Senior Member
Sep 4, 2013
30,298
6,591
113
#11
Most of them didn't know how to write because they were uneducated fisherman, and they had to look for an scribe to publish there books like Luke was the scribe for Paul.
Of all........Paul WAS educated.......as for Luke being his scribe, can you point me in the direction of Scripture that says this?

I agree that some of the disciples were not well educated.........however their Gospels are the "eyewitness account" THEY GAVE...............what does it matter who actually penned their words to paper?

It is believed true that Paul didn't pen ALL of his Epistles because there were times he was in prison and very ill which would suggest he would be unable to do so............BUT that doesn't mean he wasn't educated enough to know how to read and write.........just saying.........
 

p_rehbein

Senior Member
Sep 4, 2013
30,298
6,591
113
#12
p-rehbein, I am not trying to discount or discredit anything. I believe that "The Gospel of John" is inspired. I just wanted to know why we think that the "disciple whom Jesus loved" was John.......that is all.
I know.........BUT there are those who will seize upon this opportunity to "discredit" the Gospel of John, just as they "seize" upon any opportunity to declare Paul to be a false apostle............so........I'm aiming my comments AT THEM..........not you.

If folks will just read the four Gospels, they will notice a distinctively different writing style in each of them........sometimes it comes down to recognizing the "style" in which a person wrote that leads to learning their identity........ :)

Bible says: The Gospel ACCORDING to John..............not PENNED BY JOHN..............just as with Matthew and Mark..........it is John's EYEWITNESS account of the ministry of Jesus Christ............and, for the sake of argument........let us say that ANOTHER actually transcribed John's eyewitness account........it would be quite understandable for that person to refer to John as the disciple that Jesus loved.........well, for me anyway........

Given that the Gospel of John is considered the Gospel of Love.............it would go hand in hand .......... and the actual transcriber may have realized this and thus referred to John as such.
 

p_rehbein

Senior Member
Sep 4, 2013
30,298
6,591
113
#13
Another point to consider:

Look at how the Gospel of John begins.............compare that to how the 1st Epistle of John begins.......get back with me......
 

Timeline

Senior Member
Mar 20, 2014
1,826
17
38
#14
p_rehein, you remind me of my dad, not an insult, I love my dad, but he tries to figure out where the conversation is going instead of discussing the topic itself. Kind of frustrating for me. But I do understand, to a point. You don't want to unknowingly give aid to an ungodly idea or practice. But I assure you that I consider the entire bible as The Inspired Word of God. I just want to know if there is conclusive evidence that John is "the disciple whom Jesus loved". That is all. And from what I've seen here so far, there really isn't.
 
Last edited:
May 15, 2013
4,307
27
0
#15
Thanks, I think that is the most information I have ever received on "the naked" guy. And, while I appreciate any information, I think you will understand that I like to kind of footnote things in my mind - keeping them as a reference, but not applying them until I feel that I have had a confirmation.

And I also found it interesting that you say that Paul referenced John (as being the one who was taken up) "fourteen years ago". So, you believe that Revelation was written before 2 Corinthians (or at least the vision happened before it was written). Maybe I misunderstood.

Most people have a problem with Revelation being written or "seen" been any of the other books of the NT were written - I don't see scriptural evidence that it could not have been written before most of the other letters of the NT.
People wanted it in the back of the books because it sounded so dreary., and which basically the scholars had put it on the back burner because they couldn't understand it and believed that the people will also be confuse by it as well. In the Book of Job, it stated that there's a time that the souls meet up in the spirit or you can say up in the air and which back then they didn't know how exactly a spirit is but they referred it to air.

Job 19:25 I know that my redeemer lives,
and that in the end he will stand on the earth.
26 And after my skin has been destroyed,
yet in my flesh I will see God; (This verse is saying that Job noticed that his body is destroyed in this vision, but yet, He was able to see or sense the present of God without having his physical body. But he was caught up in the spirit to witness this vision were the sons of God and satan all meet.)
 

p_rehbein

Senior Member
Sep 4, 2013
30,298
6,591
113
#16
With regards to the Twelve being ignorant or educated, here is a good article to consider:

[h=3]Occupations of the 12 Disciples - AllAboutJesusChrist.org[/h]
www.allaboutjesuschrist.org/occupations-of-the-12... CachedWhat were the occupations of the 12 disciples? The Sea of Galilee offered fishermen a livelihood for many generations.
 

p_rehbein

Senior Member
Sep 4, 2013
30,298
6,591
113
#17
p_rehein, you remind me of my dad, not an insult, I love my dad, but he tries to figure out where the conversation is going instead of discussing the topic itself. Kind of frustrating for me. But I do understand, to a point. You don't want to unknowingly give aid to an ungodly idea or practice. But I assure you that I consider the entire bible as The Inspired Word of God. I just want to know if there is conclusive evidence that John is "the disciple whom Jesus loved". That is all. And from what I've seen here so far, there really isn't.
.....and there is no CONCLUSIVE evidence that he was not the disciple that Jesus loved........right? Did you review the 1st Chapter of the Gospel of John and the 1st Chapter of the Epistle of John?

check out The Gospel of John, Chapter 3, verse 16

check out the 1st Epistle of John, Chapter 3, verse 16
 
May 15, 2013
4,307
27
0
#18
Of all........Paul WAS educated.......as for Luke being his scribe, can you point me in the direction of Scripture that says this?

I agree that some of the disciples were not well educated.........however their Gospels are the "eyewitness account" THEY GAVE...............what does it matter who actually penned their words to paper?

It is believed true that Paul didn't pen ALL of his Epistles because there were times he was in prison and very ill which would suggest he would be unable to do so............BUT that doesn't mean he wasn't educated enough to know how to read and write.........just saying.........
Most all of the Pharisee had scribes because they weren't educated like Lawyers and which they uses Paralegals to do their Jobs while they are in the courtroom or golf courts., and scribes was an occupation back then, but now we doesn't need them as much as they had use them back then, but you see them at times being Translators.



Luke the Evangelist (Ancient Greek: Λουκᾶς, Loukás) is one of the Four Evangelists or authors of canonical Gospels of Jesus Christ. Luke was a native of the Hellenistic city of Antioch in Syria. The early church fathers ascribed to him authorship of both theGospel according to Luke and the book of Acts of the Apostles, which originally formed a single literary work, referred to as Luke-Acts. Such authorship was later reaffirmed by prominent figures in early Christianity such as Jerome and Eusebius, although within scholarly circles, both secular and religious, discussions have been held due to the lack of evidence as to the identity of the author of the works.
In the New Testament, Luke is mentioned briefly a few times, and referred to as a doctor in the Pauline epistle to the Colossians; thus he is thought to have been both a physician and a disciple of Paul. Luke the Evangelist - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 

p_rehbein

Senior Member
Sep 4, 2013
30,298
6,591
113
#19
That's all well and good brother, but it is not Scriptural evidence that Luke was the official scribe for Paul......just saying....
 

p_rehbein

Senior Member
Sep 4, 2013
30,298
6,591
113
#20
p_rehein, you remind me of my dad, not an insult, I love my dad, but he tries to figure out where the conversation is going instead of discussing the topic itself. Kind of frustrating for me. But I do understand, to a point. You don't want to unknowingly give aid to an ungodly idea or practice. But I assure you that I consider the entire bible as The Inspired Word of God. I just want to know if there is conclusive evidence that John is "the disciple whom Jesus loved". That is all. And from what I've seen here so far, there really isn't.
......well, in all fairness.......I did discuss the TOPIC, and provided an Article concerning the topic.......as to who wrote the Gospel of John.........so............but you are correct............I find it very important to be aware of what any discussion will ultimately lead to............we must be prepared for those ravenous wolves who will enter into our midst..........

I have no doubt of your love for the Holy Bible............