The KJV Only & The Textus Receptus Only - a continuous thread

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Dec 28, 2016
5,455
236
63
#21
You missed one important rule. Any thread devoted to this discussion should not be used to (1) revile those who hold to the KJV, (2) revile the KJV, or (3) revile the Textus Receptus. The thread which was started for brethren who hold to the KJV attracted a lot of KJV-bashers, when it was not even meant for them. Those people who reject the KJV should have their own thread extolling the "virtues" of their modern Bibles.
So, its okay for the KJVO'ers to say the NIV, NASB, NLT, ESV, ASV, et al are corrupt versions?

But its not okay for us to say one word in the negative about the KJV?

That's what I'd call the epitome of hypocrisy.
 

trofimus

Senior Member
Aug 17, 2015
10,684
794
113
#22
So, its okay for the KJVO'ers to say the NIV, NASB, NLT, ESV, ASV, et al are corrupt versions?

But its not okay for us to say one word in the negative about the KJV?

That's what I'd call the epitome of hypocrisy.
I have even seen saying them that they are satanic or that if somebody reads them regulerly, such a person cannot be saved...
 
Dec 28, 2016
5,455
236
63
#23
I have even seen saying them that they are satanic or that if somebody reads them regulerly, such a person cannot be saved...
One on here had the audacity to say they were saved reading the NIV, but not born again until reading the KJVO. Their stoopidity knows no bounds.
 
Nov 23, 2013
13,684
1,212
113
#24
I have even seen saying them that they are satanic or that if somebody reads them regulerly, such a person cannot be saved...
What is your take on this verse, what is the incorruptible seed?

1 Peter 1:23 KJV
Being born again, not of corruptible seed, but of incorruptible, by the word of God, which liveth and abideth for ever.
 
Nov 23, 2013
13,684
1,212
113
#25
One on here had the audacity to say they were saved reading the NIV, but not born again until reading the KJVO. Their stoopidity knows no bounds.
Yeah that would be me you're calling stupid... the fruit of the spirit is all over you lol.
 

trofimus

Senior Member
Aug 17, 2015
10,684
794
113
#26
What is your take on this verse, what is the incorruptible seed?

1 Peter 1:23 KJV
Being born again, not of corruptible seed, but of incorruptible, by the word of God, which liveth and abideth for ever.

ἀναγεγεννημένοι οὐκ ἐκ σπορᾶς φθαρτῆς, ἀλλὰ ἀφθάρτου, διὰ λόγου ζῶντος θεοῦ καὶ μένοντος εἰς τὸν αἰῶνα.
(RP Byzantine text)
- through the word of living God

---

And now, see the difference here:

ἐραυνᾶτε τὰς γραφάς, ὅτι ὑμεῖς δοκεῖτε ἐν αὐταῖς ζωὴν αἰώνιον ἔχειν· καὶ ἐκεῖναί εἰσιν αἱ μαρτυροῦσαι περὶ ἐμοῦ·
"You study the Scriptures diligently because you think that in them you have eternal life. (J 5:39, NIV)

---

What do you think that the KJV is?
a) "Word of God", i.e. "Logos tu Theu" which gives life?
b) Translation and edition of "Scriptures", i.e. "graphas", which pharisees wrongly thought it can give them life?

---

My response:
We are born again by/through the word of God (or Word of God?). By his declared will.

We are not born again by reading writings, editions, Scriptures, which is the KJV, NIV, ESV etc.
 
Last edited:
Nov 23, 2013
13,684
1,212
113
#27
ἀναγεγεννημένοι οὐκ ἐκ σπορᾶς φθαρτῆς, ἀλλὰ ἀφθάρτου, διὰ λόγου ζῶντος θεοῦ καὶ μένοντος εἰς τὸν αἰῶνα.
(RP Byzantine text)
- through the word of living God

---

And now, see the difference here:

ἐραυνᾶτε τὰς γραφάς, ὅτι ὑμεῖς δοκεῖτε ἐν αὐταῖς ζωὴν αἰώνιον ἔχειν· καὶ ἐκεῖναί εἰσιν αἱ μαρτυροῦσαι περὶ ἐμοῦ·
"You study the Scriptures diligently because you think that in them you have eternal life. (J 5:39, NIV)

---

What do you think that the KJV is?
a) "Word of God", i.e. "Logos tu Theu" which gives life?
b) Translation and edition of "Scriptures", i.e. "graphas", which pharisees wrongly thought it can give them life?

---

My response:
We are born again by/through the word of God (or Word of God?). By his declared will.

We are not born again by reading writings, editions, Scriptures, which is the KJV, NIV, ESV etc.
I believe the KJV is the word of God and the Word of God. The vehicle which Christ choses to manifest himself to the world, either in a human body, written words, or through visions makes no difference, it is still the Spirit of Christ manifest to the world.

What scripture says that we are born again by his declared will? I mean exactly that, we are born againg by his declared will, not the assumption that being chosen or saved is by God's declared will, I mean where does the bible say we are BORN AGAIN by God's declared will?
 

trofimus

Senior Member
Aug 17, 2015
10,684
794
113
#28
I believe the KJV is the word of God and the Word of God. The vehicle which Christ choses to manifest himself to the world, either in a human body, written words, or through visions makes no difference, it is still the Spirit of Christ manifest to the world.

What scripture says that we are born again by his declared will? I mean exactly that, we are born againg by his declared will, not the assumption that being chosen or saved is by God's declared will, I mean where does the bible say we are BORN AGAIN by God's declared will?
"Declared will" was just my illustration of what the word of God is. That it is not a book, it is not a translation, it is not anything material, Scriptures are material. Which is a difference.

It seems to me that if some king said His will (words of king), somebody wrote it down (scripture), somebody translated it to English, you would say that the translation is the king?

It seems to me you are saying the same with Bible - that it is the Word of God (Christ). Which it is not, like a photography of you is not you.
 
Nov 23, 2013
13,684
1,212
113
#29
"Declared will" was just my illustration of what the word of God is. That it is not a book, it is not a translation, it is not anything material, Scriptures are material. Which is a difference.

It seems to me that if some king said His will (words of king), somebody wrote it down (scripture), somebody translated it to English, you would say that the translation is the king?

It seems to me you are saying the same with Bible - that it is the Word of God (Christ). Which it is not, like a photography of you is not you.
Hebrews 4:12 KJV
For the word of God is quick, and powerful, and sharper than any twoedged sword, piercing even to the dividing asunder of soul and spirit, and of the joints and marrow, and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart.

Is this verse talking about the Word of God or the word of God?
 

trofimus

Senior Member
Aug 17, 2015
10,684
794
113
#30
Hebrews 4:12 KJV
For the word of God is quick, and powerful, and sharper than any twoedged sword, piercing even to the dividing asunder of soul and spirit, and of the joints and marrow, and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart.

Is this verse talking about the Word of God or the word of God?
It surelly is not talking about Scriptures (i.e. about the KJV :))

Scriptures can represent the word of God, but neither in its perfectness nor in its whole. (Like photography is not you, Bible is not God)
 
Aug 30, 2017
14
0
0
#31
Boy, I'm taken back at all the fussing about bibles and at the same time the lack of applying it principles.
For one, every bible teaches loving God & neighbor, but I onlt see few are applying it.

Don't you think applying what it teaches is more important than what version you read?
 
Nov 23, 2013
13,684
1,212
113
#32
It surelly is not talking about Scriptures (i.e. about the KJV :))

Scriptures can represent the word of God, but neither in its perfectness nor in its whole. (Like photography is not you, Bible is not God)
So when you read the Bible you don't come to know Christ, his personality and character as you read? If not, then how do you come to know him and be conformed to his image?
 

trofimus

Senior Member
Aug 17, 2015
10,684
794
113
#33
Boy, I'm taken back at all the fussing about bibles and at the same time the lack of applying it principles.
For one, every bible teaches loving God & neighbor, but I onlt see few are applying it.

Don't you think applying what it teaches is more important than what version you read?
It certainly is :)
 

trofimus

Senior Member
Aug 17, 2015
10,684
794
113
#34
So when you read the Bible you don't come to know Christ, his personality and character as you read? If not, then how do you come to know him and be conformed to his image?
Of course we can get to know about Christ, about his personality, character etc.

But it is in vain if He is not living in us and if we do not have a personal relationship with Him.

"Depart from me... I never knew you" - we can think we know Him, but knowing Him is about daily walking with Him. It is not a knowledge gained by reading.
 

John146

Senior Member
Jan 13, 2016
16,756
3,562
113
#35
So when you read the Bible you don't come to know Christ, his personality and character as you read? If not, then how do you come to know him and be conformed to his image?
Yes!

When we pray, it is us speaking to God.
When we read the word, it is God speaking to us.
When we study the word, we are preparing ourselves to speak to others.

Our lives need all the above. That's a relationship.
 

trofimus

Senior Member
Aug 17, 2015
10,684
794
113
#36
Yes!

When we pray, it is us speaking to God.
When we read the word, it is God speaking to us.
When we study the word, we are preparing ourselves to speak to others.

Our lives need all the above. That's a relationship.
Do you have some example from the Bible, where the Bible is called "word of God" or even "the word of God"? (Greek : logos tu Theu).

Because I think there is a significant difference between "word of God", Scriptures and Bible.

And I think that because you make them synonyms and use it as you wish by chance, you got to KJV Onlyism.
 

John146

Senior Member
Jan 13, 2016
16,756
3,562
113
#37
Do you have some example from the Bible, where the Bible is called "word of God" or even "the word of God"? (Greek : logos tu Theu).

Because I think there is a significant difference between "word of God", Scriptures and Bible.

And I think that because you make them synonyms and use it as you wish by chance, you got to KJV Onlyism.
Is not Scripture the words given by God to man, and man preserved the words by writing it down(script) as he was moved by the Holy Spirit?

2 Timothy 3:15 And that from a child thou hast known the holy scriptures, which are able to make thee wise unto salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus.

Romans 9:17 For the scripture saith unto Pharaoh, Even for this same purpose have I raised thee up, that I might shew my power in thee, and that my name might be declared throughout all the earth.

There was no written Scripture at the time of this confrontation, and yet Scripture spoke to Pharaoh. Scripture is equated to God's word given to Moses to Aaron to Pharaoh. How did Timothy know holy Scripture if not preserved by God through the writings of men as they were moved by the Holy Spirit?
 

trofimus

Senior Member
Aug 17, 2015
10,684
794
113
#38
Is not Scripture the words given by God to man, and man preserved the words by writing it down(script) as he was moved by the Holy Spirit?

2 Timothy 3:15 And that from a child thou hast known the holy scriptures, which are able to make thee wise unto salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus.

Romans 9:17 For the scripture saith unto Pharaoh, Even for this same purpose have I raised thee up, that I might shew my power in thee, and that my name might be declared throughout all the earth.

There was no written Scripture at the time of this confrontation, and yet Scripture spoke to Pharaoh. Scripture is equated to God's word given to Moses to Aaron to Pharaoh. How did Timothy know holy Scripture if not preserved by God through the writings of men as they were moved by the Holy Spirit?
I do not think you responded to my question.

Where is Bible called (the) word of God (logos tu Theu)?

Because word of God is called perfect, enduring etc, and because you think it means English translation of Scriptures, you have your KJV Onlyism.
 

John146

Senior Member
Jan 13, 2016
16,756
3,562
113
#39
I do not think you responded to my question.

Where is Bible called (the) word of God (logos tu Theu)?

Because word of God is called perfect, enduring etc, and because you think it means English translation of Scriptures, you have your KJV Onlyism.
I'm sure you know that the word bible is a word we use to describe the complete word of God, Scripture. It is like using the word trinity to describe the Godhead, three in one.
 

trofimus

Senior Member
Aug 17, 2015
10,684
794
113
#40
I'm sure you know that the word bible is a word we use to describe the complete word of God, Scripture. It is like using the word trinity to describe the Godhead, three in one.
No, I do not know that.

1. Word of God - sayings, commands, prophecies, declared will given by God
2. Scriptures - writings made by inspired authors or by their company
3. Manuscripts - hand-made copies of various Scriptures made by people, not inspired
4. Text editions - critical text of selected books made by comparing various manuscripts, not inspired
5. Bible - translation of text editions to various languages made by people, not inspired

You make a jump in your assumptions and say that the very Bible you have in our home in 2017 is what was in the beginning, the word of God.

Can you prove it somehow? Because I think you use these terms wrongly.