The Lord's Recovery aka The Local Church

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Godmen

New member
Jul 13, 2018
4
0
1
#41
Your "red flags" include your impression that those meeting with the local churches follow the teachings of their "founding fathers." You did not mention what "teachings" you have a problem with, but from my experience, all of the teachings are directly from the Bible. You can hardly read a sentence without stumbling over Scripture references several times. EVERYTHING is backed up by Scripture. The teachings point you to Scripture, and suddenly you see what has been there for 2,000 years, but no one has really noticed. If you accept what the Bible says, are you following a man, or are you following the Bible? It is not the man who is not questioned; it is the Scripture that is not questioned.

As a quick example, consider "eating Christ." Jesus was born in Bethlehem, which means "house of bread," He was laid in a trough (a place for animal food), and He said, "I am the living bread that came down out of heaven" (Jn. 6:51). He also said, Eat me, and you will live because of Me" (Jn. 6:57). Have you ever seen the matter of eating Jesus? Has anyone ever preached that to you? And yet there it is in the Bible. I didn't see it until Lee pointed it out. All I can say is "Amen, HOW do I eat You, Lord?" [Note: Catholics think "the flesh profits" something with transubstantiation, contrary to the Lord's word in Jn. 6:63]

It has not been considered "absolutely necessary" for 2,000 years and yet Jesus said that we must eat Him to live because of Him. So, which should we change, our practice or the Lord's word?

Who the "founding fathers" are is a complicated issue. Watchman Nee saw that all Christians are one, and that there should be no divisions among us except where we practically happen to be. Witness Lee brought Nee's vision to the west and worked it out. However, they didn't invent something new, as they say themselves, "We are standing on the shoulders of those who have gone before us." Drawing on the entire history of Christianity and the entire Bible, they put together the whole vision of what the Bible is about. If that sounds far-fetched, consider, what does Paul mean when he says, "Making known to us the mystery of His will according to His good pleasure, which He purposed in Himself" (Eph. 1:9) What is God's "good pleasure?" What is "the mystery of His will?"

Has anyone ever told you what God's good pleasure is? Just a hint, it is not salvation. What were we created for? Salvation was just to bring us back onto the track of accomplishing God's will, which is according to His good pleasure. The key question is, What is God's will? What is His will for Himself which impelled Him to "stretch forth the heavens, lay the foundation of the earth, and form the spirit of man within him" (Zech. 12:1). The answer to that question is what unlocks the Bible and puts all the puzzle pieces together. That answer is what Nee and Lee discovered, and it has been hiding in the Bible in plain sight all along.
Amen hallelujah☺
 

Godmen

New member
Jul 13, 2018
4
0
1
#42
I should have posted this a while ago, but I just wanted to thank everyone for your contributions to this discussion. For those who followed my posts, you may have gathered that my intent for looking deeper into the teachings of The Local Church (TLC) came from the fact that my boyfriend attends this church, and my hearts desire was to determine if I could imagine attending this church should we possibly marry.

God, in His usual perfection, granted me the peace, guidance, and discernment that I needed.. at exactly the right time and in exactly the right way.

After meeting with my pastor, and finally with elders from TLC, I put down the research and just went to God in prayer.

The end result is that after seeking godly counsel, reading His Word, doing unbiased research, having fellowship with members of that church, as well as praying fervently, God made it abundantly clear to me that this church (at least the small one here in my hometown - I cannot speak for every single location) is a family of genuine born-again believers who love the Lord with all their hearts. Not a single member of the church (including my boyfriend's parents who attend localities back in Taiwan) got defensive at my questions. They welcomed my approach as Berean, and told me to never abandon that attitude.

In the end, all of my doubts and concerns were put into context and laid to rest. The minor differences that remained were in fact so superficial that they had no negative impact whatsoever on my faith or my willingness to attend that church should I marry my boyfriend. On all of the core elements of the Christian faith, and I can confidently say that I stand in full fellowship and agreement with these brothers and sisters.

I hope that if anyone else should stumble across this thread in the future, my discoveries and perspective will be helpful. It would be hypocritical of me to ask that anyone simply accept my findings as fact, so I ask that if anyone reading this is coming from a similar situation.. please turn to the Lord and ask Him for discernment. Pray, read His word, seek His will, and trust that He will not fail you. :)
Amen sister, I am from the Lord's Recovery .
 

TheLearner

Well-known member
Jan 14, 2019
8,223
1,584
113
68
Brighton, MI
#43
Hello everyone,

I'm curious if anyone here knows anything or has any experience regarding the Lord's Recovery movement aka "The local Church".

What I do know is that for decades they've been viewed by western evangelicals as a cult, but within the last decade several misunderstandings have been cleared up and they have been somewhat reluctantly accepted as "mainstream" Christianity.

I have personal reasons for wanting to find out more about this church, which I might elaborate on later.

After personal research (including spending time with them) it seems that this church is very genuine and seems to match up on what I consider the core elements of Christianity. However, a few red flags arise. One is the way they follow the teachings of one of their "founding fathers". I know that plenty of other Christians might subscribe to the teachings of various theologians but the vibe I'm getting from TLR is that the teachings of this founding father are *almost* as important as scripture, and I don't ever see people questioning him. There are also a set of rules and traditions that are potentially good and beneficial to one's spiritual walk but not *necessary*, however they are treated as though they are absolutely necessary and that everyone must do them.

For the most part, I am confident that these lovely people are my fellow brothers and sisters in Christ, but I think I'm starting to understand why they were misunderstood as a cult in previous generations.

So to anyone who has any experience or knowledge of this church, have you made similar observations? I'd love to hear any and all respectful opinions.
Being unable to question the teachings of witness lee is a major indidication they are a cult. I visited one of their churches once, and was invited to ask questions. When I did, everyone shouted me down. They are in fact a cult. One does not become a God as they teach. They match all the earmarks of being a cult.
 

TheLearner

Well-known member
Jan 14, 2019
8,223
1,584
113
68
Brighton, MI
#44
1. Yes, I agree, which is why I steer clear of all those you claim they are the true Church, including the King James only folks.
2-3. Yes, calling on the name of the Lord is biblical, and I do it when I feel it necessary, for example when I feel tempted to sin or when I need His help in my own trials and tribulations, and in praising him. However I feel that their method of calling on the Lord's name repetitive and without real cause, which in my mind is taking His name in vain.

This group doesn't allow or didn't allow for their members to celebrate the holidays (Christmas, Easter, birthdays etc. etc.) with their biological families, which broke up many close relationships. I don't like the way the world celebrates these holidays either, but the meaning behind the holidays is what needs to be emphasized and used as a springboard to present the Gospel to others.

It is good that you are aware of these potential problems. And that said, I don't believe this group unorthodox and I think they have some biblical truths to offer, for example: 1. enjoyment of the Lord through eating and drinking (study, meditation and prayer) but I don't think you should clear and empty your mind of critical thinking and reason, 2. their non-clergy policy attracted me (but they still have a head elder), pastors and elders should have an attitude of service, not one of control, 3. everyone can and should prophesy in the Church (not in the sense of portraying the future, but of edification, enlightenment, instruction, and reproof from the Word of God). Sitting in a pew and just hearing one man preach doesn't allow for all to prophesy (which is one of the reason I attend a Sunday morning bible class and Wednesday night bible study group). That being said, I also think it necessary to have a person who is dedicated to the full time study of the Word to give a proper presentation and exegesis of the Word.

May the Spirit of God led you.
Issolating members from families is a major indication of most cults.
 

ResidentAlien

Well-known member
Apr 21, 2021
8,443
3,691
113
#46
I'm surprised I've never heard of this group. You don't have to look very long to find out they're brainwashed and controlled by Witness Lee.
 

TheLearner

Well-known member
Jan 14, 2019
8,223
1,584
113
68
Brighton, MI
#48
Yes, I'm very familiar with "the Local Church." Several of my dearest friends attended there, and many were our "TGIF" (Thank God it's Friday) hangouts discussing doctrine between us. The Lord is sweet! I actually met and sat under Witness Lee's preaching on several occasions and went witnessing (no pun intended) with him and other saints.

The Local Church was started by Witness Lee, a Baptist from China. Both of his parents were also raised Baptist, and that whole family, Lee included, endured the struggles of the "underground church" in China. Lee eventually moved to the US and established a publishing company called "Living Streams Ministry" in Anaheim, CA. That's were I met him.

The Local Church's emphasis is, practically, godly living is a daily, gradual process. Yielding to one another as one would yield to Christ is readily preached and practiced among the saints. The Local Church is big on the brethren (adult men of the congregation) being equipped to protect, guide, teach and rule over all the sisters and younger men/boys. I always felt very safe among the saints there, and I always believed they genuinely cared for those visiting them as I would.

The Local Church are joyfully a cappella during worship; all sister 12 yrs and over wear head coverings; the saints understand and appreciate the value of courtship, and doctrine of the Local Church is pretty sound Baptist-flavor overall, except when it comes to Lee's famous "economy of God," which was confusing to me; at times contradicting, and the "eating of Christ," which I refuse to be true all together since the early 90's.

They also tend to "live together" as in "brother's training home" or "sister's training home" in which one or two married couples will board-in 2-4 single brothers or single sisters to train them up in the faith. Everybody is accountable to one another for the sake of "not bringing shame to the name of our Lord Jesus Christ," as Witness would say. I stopped mingling with the Local Church back in '96. Witness Lee passed away in '97, if I remember correctly. :)

What's funny is that about 10 years ago, I was at a Target parking lot returning the cart to its place when out-of-thin-air, a lady watching what I was doing, stops me and says, "You seem peaceful. Do you know God?" I, astonished, replied, "Yes, of course!"

So, the lady hands me a "Recovery Version" NT, which I immediately recognize to be a Living Streams Ministry NT that Witness Lee had published. LOL. I couldn't believe it!. I thanked her, and we both went our merry way. That NT has since been part of my library. The Lord is good. :)

If you have access to a "Local Church," yes, it's safe to fellowship with them as long as the intensions of your heart is to learn directly from the Holy Spirit of God. If you hear/see anything goofy you may not understand at the time, ask the leading saints or another sister to explain it to you. Then pray about it to allow God to have the last say in your heart.

Remember that there is no "perfect church," there are only imperfect sinners being refined and loved by a most Holy and Perfect God. :D

Hugs in Christ,
BPie
What exactly is mingling, God-Men and their view of the Trinity?
 

TheLearner

Well-known member
Jan 14, 2019
8,223
1,584
113
68
Brighton, MI
#49
While I agree to this to an uncertain extent, the clergy-laity system did present some problems or problems emerged out of it:

1: Two class system
2. ALL believers can prophesy: meaning all can bring scripture and give testimony of how it is applied, or has been applied, through our experiences for the edification of the body). The Church in General lost this concept do to the clergy-laity hierarchical system. The laity become pew sitters instead of active participants.

I think having 1 man in charge of a local church or as head pastor would be hard to prove as the proper order of Church government biblically. This one area of a few is where I think Witness Lee and the Local Church got it right, unfortunately WL didn't follow his own teaching, since he was the head of all of his church bodies and members.

1 Cor. 14:31 [SUP]31 [/SUP]For you can all prophesy one by one, that all may learn and all may be encouraged.
29 Two or three prophets should speak, and the others should weigh carefully what is said. 30 And if a revelation comes to someone who is sitting down, the first speaker should stop. 31 For you can all prophesy in turn so that everyone may be instructed and encouraged. 32 The spirits of prophets are subject to the control of prophets. 33 For God is not a God of disorder but of peace—as in all the congregations of the Lord’s people.

34 Women[f] should remain silent in the churches. They are not allowed to speak, but must be in submission, as the law says. 35 If they want to inquire about something, they should ask their own husbands at home; for it is disgraceful for a woman to speak in the church

In the Local Church I visited it was Choas.
 

TheLearner

Well-known member
Jan 14, 2019
8,223
1,584
113
68
Brighton, MI
#50
Thanks, Zone.

I suppose if you look at just what I've written, it does seem like I'm drawing things out indefinitely. However I actually gave myself a fixed amount of time to collect information. When I created this thread 3 weeks ago was the beginning of that time, and today is literally the last day because I'm meeting with my pastor tomorrow to go over my questions, concerns, and hopefully get another perspective. All the while I've been praying for clarity and discernment, but after meeting with my pastor I'll pray some more and hopefully be able to make up my mind ASAP. I've greatly appreciated all of the insight shared on this thread by everyone, but as someone posted here earlier, I will bring all this to God and let Him have the final say in my heart.

If anything, I am thankful for this experience because it's pushed me really deep into God's Word. Not that I don't normally read my Bible, but this has been an intense time of study for me and it's forced me to really examine why I believe what I believe.
You may as well pray to see if the Book of Mormon is God's word. Maybe you will get heartburn too. So, what have you decided to believe? Do you think you can mingle with God and become a type of God Man?
 

TheLearner

Well-known member
Jan 14, 2019
8,223
1,584
113
68
Brighton, MI
#51
I should have posted this a while ago, but I just wanted to thank everyone for your contributions to this discussion. For those who followed my posts, you may have gathered that my intent for looking deeper into the teachings of The Local Church (TLC) came from the fact that my boyfriend attends this church, and my hearts desire was to determine if I could imagine attending this church should we possibly marry.

God, in His usual perfection, granted me the peace, guidance, and discernment that I needed.. at exactly the right time and in exactly the right way.

After meeting with my pastor, and finally with elders from TLC, I put down the research and just went to God in prayer.

The end result is that after seeking godly counsel, reading His Word, doing unbiased research, having fellowship with members of that church, as well as praying fervently, God made it abundantly clear to me that this church (at least the small one here in my hometown - I cannot speak for every single location) is a family of genuine born-again believers who love the Lord with all their hearts. Not a single member of the church (including my boyfriend's parents who attend localities back in Taiwan) got defensive at my questions. They welcomed my approach as Berean, and told me to never abandon that attitude.

In the end, all of my doubts and concerns were put into context and laid to rest. The minor differences that remained were in fact so superficial that they had no negative impact whatsoever on my faith or my willingness to attend that church should I marry my boyfriend. On all of the core elements of the Christian faith, and I can confidently say that I stand in full fellowship and agreement with these brothers and sisters.

I hope that if anyone else should stumble across this thread in the future, my discoveries and perspective will be helpful. It would be hypocritical of me to ask that anyone simply accept my findings as fact, so I ask that if anyone reading this is coming from a similar situation.. please turn to the Lord and ask Him for discernment. Pray, read His word, seek His will, and trust that He will not fail you. :)
Emotions is not the path to truth.
Do you think you will become a human God?
 

TheLearner

Well-known member
Jan 14, 2019
8,223
1,584
113
68
Brighton, MI
#52
It is not true that Watchman Nee was a practicing Methodist. It is also not true that he never set foot outside China. In the 1930s he visited England and Europe and also the USA. During his visit to England he spent a long time with Theodore Austin-Sparks. If memory serves me right that visit was between twelve and eighteen months. He also briefly visited Taiwan.
https://www.austin-sparks.net/english/books/004470.html
 

TheLearner

Well-known member
Jan 14, 2019
8,223
1,584
113
68
Brighton, MI
#53
Your "red flags" include your impression that those meeting with the local churches follow the teachings of their "founding fathers." You did not mention what "teachings" you have a problem with, but from my experience, all of the teachings are directly from the Bible. You can hardly read a sentence without stumbling over Scripture references several times. EVERYTHING is backed up by Scripture. The teachings point you to Scripture, and suddenly you see what has been there for 2,000 years, but no one has really noticed. If you accept what the Bible says, are you following a man, or are you following the Bible? It is not the man who is not questioned; it is the Scripture that is not questioned.

As a quick example, consider "eating Christ." Jesus was born in Bethlehem, which means "house of bread," He was laid in a trough (a place for animal food), and He said, "I am the living bread that came down out of heaven" (Jn. 6:51). He also said, Eat me, and you will live because of Me" (Jn. 6:57). Have you ever seen the matter of eating Jesus? Has anyone ever preached that to you? And yet there it is in the Bible. I didn't see it until Lee pointed it out. All I can say is "Amen, HOW do I eat You, Lord?" [Note: Catholics think "the flesh profits" something with transubstantiation, contrary to the Lord's word in Jn. 6:63]

It has not been considered "absolutely necessary" for 2,000 years and yet Jesus said that we must eat Him to live because of Him. So, which should we change, our practice or the Lord's word?

Who the "founding fathers" are is a complicated issue. Watchman Nee saw that all Christians are one, and that there should be no divisions among us except where we practically happen to be. Witness Lee brought Nee's vision to the west and worked it out. However, they didn't invent something new, as they say themselves, "We are standing on the shoulders of those who have gone before us." Drawing on the entire history of Christianity and the entire Bible, they put together the whole vision of what the Bible is about. If that sounds far-fetched, consider, what does Paul mean when he says, "Making known to us the mystery of His will according to His good pleasure, which He purposed in Himself" (Eph. 1:9) What is God's "good pleasure?" What is "the mystery of His will?"

Has anyone ever told you what God's good pleasure is? Just a hint, it is not salvation. What were we created for? Salvation was just to bring us back onto the track of accomplishing God's will, which is according to His good pleasure. The key question is, What is God's will? What is His will for Himself which impelled Him to "stretch forth the heavens, lay the foundation of the earth, and form the spirit of man within him" (Zech. 12:1). The answer to that question is what unlocks the Bible and puts all the puzzle pieces together. That answer is what Nee and Lee discovered, and it has been hiding in the Bible in plain sight all along.
You can read the literature of cults like Bible Students, Jehovah's Witnesses and stumble across many references to Scripture.
 

TheLearner

Well-known member
Jan 14, 2019
8,223
1,584
113
68
Brighton, MI
#54
Hi I am from the Lords Recovery
Godman is a colloquial unisex term used in India for a type of charismatic guru that is often raised to a demigod-like figure by their cult following.

What is your understanding of godmen?
 

TheLearner

Well-known member
Jan 14, 2019
8,223
1,584
113
68
Brighton, MI
#56
Testimonies Against the Unholy Trinity of Witness Lee, The Local Church and Living Stream Ministry
Jim Moran's website submissions and the Leeist Letters

Testimonies Against Witness Lee, The Local Church and LSM < click

sorry if someone already posted this.

C-U-L-T
This is a glaring example of a cult in action.

"
CONSUMER ALERT:

Pleae note: In January, 2003, Jim Moran, who operated Light Of Truth Ministries - a site critical of The Local Church, which is a cult of Christianity - died of a massive heart attack.

It now turns out that since Jim died without leaving a will The Local Church has managed to gain control over Jim's files, computer records and domain names.

This means that any information currently posted under the domain names thelocalchurch.org, ltm.org, biblesforamericaexposed.org, and recoveryversionexposed.org is now provided by The Local Church - the cult whose teachings and actions Jim Moran worked hard to expose.

Hopefully, the material produced by Jim Moran will soon be placed online again. Links to Jim's former sites have been adjusted. (If you had a link to Jim Moran's website, make sure you delete or change it. Otherwise, people are inadvertently misdirected to the cult's site).

Note: The Local Church (specifically, "The Church in Fullerton") has posted lies about the late Jim Moran's former website - which they claim they have 'lawfully acquired' (including "all of the copyrights, trade names, and trademarks to Mr. Moran's works, including this website").

The Local Church in Fullerton wrote:

We ask that no part of Mr. Moran's site or any of the articles, publications, postings, materials or other works of authorship be used in any way without the express written permission of The Church in Fullerton.
[...]

Defamation:

Due to the factual misrepresentations, innuendo and false impressions contained in the materials previously posted on this website, parties desiring to use those materials are cautioned to exercise care not to mislead readers or to damage reputations. Careful verification of the accuracy and fairness of such quoted materials is required.
Source: (CAUTION: we believe that comments made by the Local Church regarding the late Jim Moran and his former website can not be trusted)

It should be noted that Apologetics Index has not (yet) received any official legal communication from the Local Church. We only received an email from someone with an aol.com address, claiming to represent The Church in Fullerton. We have no way of verifying whether that person does indeed represent the Local Church, or whether the email address belongs to a 13-year old pimple-faced boy with a poor sense of humor.

The "Church in Fullerton" and any other Local Church entity is hereby put on notice that Apologetics Index will continue to quote Jim Moran's material under fair use clauses of international and local (Netherlands) copyright laws. Jim Moran's site also included materials provided by third parties, and the copyright to such third-party material was not transfered to the Local Church.

Though it claims otherwise, the Local Church has shown itself to be unable to deal with legitimate criticism in a biblical, Christian manner. (See, for example, this article)

Since it appears that the Local Church does not value free speech, we have for some time advised interested researchers to download any and all information authored and/or posted by Jim Moran to their local computers.

Such information, posted by various parties at a number of web sites could previously be found using this Google search

Google also caches copies of web pages, but Jim Moran's cached files disappeared soon after the Local Church took possession of his research material.

For a while, Apologetics Index offered interested researchers a copy of Google's cached versions of Jim Moran's site, which we downloaded from Google on April 2 and 11, 2003. Now that other sites throughout the world have taken down Jim's original writings, we will remove them from our servers in the Netherlands as well.

It should be noted that various cults have a history of using and abusing the legal system in order to try and hide any and all material that is critical of their theology and/or behavior. Rather than honestly and intelligently discussing the issues at hand, they resort to censorship. Information control is one of the warning signs of cultic behavior.

Apologetics Index, on the other hand, consistently links to information from a variety of perspectives, and from various resources - including the cults, sects, religions, movements and/or organizations it discusses.

With this is mind, we suggest you study the research resources provided in this entry. It includes fair use quotes, as well as links to pro- and contra information on the Local Church. (Incidentally, lawyer types and information-controllers may want to read this site's disclaimer)."
https://www.apologeticsindex.org/l40.html#consumeralert