The Myth of the Roman "Catholic" Church

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Jul 3, 2011
2,417
5
0
#21
So you don't believe John 15:26?
John 15:26 But when the Comforter is come, whom I will send unto you from the Father, even the Spirit of truth, which proceedeth from the Father, he shall testify of me

I do believe this verse, but what I dont believe is that one should make a whole doctrine around one verse and the damn all who does not agree.
 
S

Scotth1960

Guest
#22
John 15:26 But when the Comforter is come, whom I will send unto you from the Father, even the Spirit of truth, which proceedeth from the Father, he shall testify of me

I do believe this verse, but what I dont believe is that one should make a whole doctrine around one verse and the damn all who does not agree.

What does Scripture say? Scripture speaks against people becoming men-pleasers. Christ certainly said that those who believe will be saved, and those who believe not will be condemned (damned). Again, it's up to Christ to say who is saved and who is condemned, but St. Paul also used the word anathema, so it is not wrong for any Christian to place an anathema, with due charity and love, against those who do not believe in the true doctrines. Where does the Bible say anywhere that we should not make a whole doctrine based on one verse? Aren't the 10 commandments basically just mentioned in very few places, if not just one place? Are we to reject the ten commandments, since they are rarely mentioned?
It's illogical to reject a doctrine merely because it's only stated in one place. Sometimes, one verse is all we have to go on. The entire Gospel is summed up nicely and completely in one verse: John 3:16; albeit, John 3:16 is explained and elaborated upon in other verses: Eph. 2:8-10, etc.
 
Jul 3, 2011
2,417
5
0
#23
What does Scripture say? Scripture speaks against people becoming men-pleasers.
No one has ever accused me of being a man pleaser. you cannot make a whole doctrine from one verse. All truth are confirmed by atleast two witnesses. Do you know another verse that confirms John 15:26?
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
#24
Rome is an absolute FANTASTIC decoy my friend. Really really good. It had me going for a while too so I cant be critical.
by the way my friend. I do not want to get into a heated dabate on this. It is not a pertinent doctrine and not worth getting huffy over. Plus this is not the room to do it either. But if you would like to discuss further to see why I believe I do I would be more than welcome. but this is not a doctrine I would want to lose sleep over if we disagree :D
 

wattie

Senior Member
Feb 24, 2009
3,057
1,032
113
New Zealand
#25
Just a bit of a thing here.. kind of an aside

There were, and always will be, independent christian congregations and assemblies that are neither Catholic.. nor a branch of the Reformers.

They could be called protestants.. because they helped the reformers at some stages.. but they were not part of the Reformation.. because they always had and have now the same teaching and belief.

Jesus promised His churches would be in all generations until the end of the church age.. if Catholicism is not it... if that is a heresy.. then there HAS to be other christians and churches seperate from them right from the start.

There are historical records of these independent churches.. from the likes of the Battle for Baptist history... The Trail of Blood... Real Churches or a Fog.. Churches in the Valley of Piedemont..

It is not either Catholic or Protestant

Real christian churches are NEITHER... unless you include them in the definition of protestants as anyone who fought against the Catholic church.

The Reformers.. there were independent christian churches around way b4 them.. and seperate from Catholicsm
 
S

Scotth1960

Guest
#26
No one has ever accused me of being a man pleaser. you cannot make a whole doctrine from one verse. All truth are confirmed by atleast two witnesses. Do you know another verse that confirms John 15:26?

Dear 4runner,
Name one verse in the Bible that says all doctrine must be in more than one verse? You can't find one, because there is not one. One verse is sufficient to establish a doctrine, because, as Christ said, "Sanctify them by the Truth; Thy Word is Truth." Christ said, "Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word which proceedeth from the mouth of God." He didn't say "every word which proceedeth in more than one verse only". He said every word, not matter how many, or how few, times He said it.
Scott in Erie
 
Aug 12, 2010
2,819
12
0
#27
(Idolatry: Statue of Martin Luther in the Lutheran Cathedral, Helsinki, Finland: Idolatry: Statute of Calvin, Knox, Beza, etc. in Geneva, Switzerland, the so called Reformation Wall)
Do people venerate these statues? Do they bend down and kiss them? Do they consider the statues Holy? NO!

Does EO church venerate inanimate objects..kiss them as if the object is Holy? YES!

EO Church practices IDOLATRY.

Secondly....why do I care what the denominations you mention do? I have no dog in any denomination race. Giving examples of how other denominations go wrong is NO DEFENCE to your own TEMPLE CULT.

Necromancy/consulting familiar spirits

Strangelove:
(Eastern Orthodoxy does not do that. False accusation (false witness(against one's neighbor, a violation of one of the ten Commandments, by the way
Scott
Are repose members of your congregation saints Scott? Can you ask them to pray for you or whatever? I asked you in a different thread but you refused to answer. Waving your arms around and jumping up and down on the spot crying false witness is infantile and doesnt add to the communications.

Hierarchical priestly structure

Strangelove:

(bishop, priest (presbyter, elder), deacon (1 and 2 Timothy)
Scott
These are OFFICES. They are not one ABOVE the other holding AUTHORITY.

EO have councils that dictate policy to those UNDERNEATH it violating Jesus command NOT to have authority over the flock.

Oral Traditions which nullify Gods Holy Law

Strangelove
(false accusation: see 2 Thess 2:15)
Scott
(2 Thessalonians 2:15) Therefore, brethren, stand fast, and hold the traditions which ye have been taught, whether by word, or our epistle.

Those traditions were from the APOSTLES that went BY WORD OR BY WRITTEN EPISTLE....same traditions (The New Covenant). What they heard from Jesus Apostles is the SAME as what we read!

But the EO and the Pharisaic Jews (Same cult basically) like to both think they have some secret line on ADDED tradition. Sorry but if it NULLIFIES Gods Law its NOT ok. Example CHANTING.

Works based salvation

Strangelove, False. False accusation.

Faith and works based salvation (Gal. 5:6, James 2:24)

(so, Saint James 2:24 and Galatians 5:6 are false then, "Strangelove"? And Eph. 2:10 is false?)
Scott'
All your magic rituals are WORKS. We're not talking about the works which Jesus causes us to walk in by the indwelling Holy Spirit we're talking about all the stuff the EO (and Rabbinic Judaism) ADD. Example....the cutting hair and burning it thingee.


Strangelove,

False accusation. No problem.

Scriptures which forbid priestly clothing, please?) Scott
EO and Pharisee priestly cloths IDENTICAL. Just more evidence they are the same cult.

Name one Church Father that says the teachings of the Orthodox Church are the same as the Talmud.
I call none Father other than the Father in heaven. I dont care what MEN say I care what God says. But for someone who relies so much on WORLDLY TRADITION its a predictable question.

You have read the Talmud, yes? So have I. Some of it. Through Michael Hoffman's book "Judaism's Strange Gods". If you are going by Hoffman as a guide to the Talmud, Hoffman says nothing about EO being Talmudic.
I'm not going on his book as a guide. He doesnt cover EO...so what?

You are way off base here, Strangelove. Why should you be taken seriously when you don't even have the common sense to use your own name? After all, why would anyone want to take a movie character seriously. If this is just a casual chat forum, fine. I assume people have something more substantial to believe in. We in America here are really spoiled by Evangelical Christianity. Too many gullible people are expecting hopefully a late great pre-tribulation rapture to "rapture" them out of all their earthly sufferings. I trust you don't believe that pre-tribulation myth, either, you are smarter than that. For a few years, I read Hal Lindsey and Tim LaHaye, and, not knowing the Scriptures or the power of God, I believed what they said. John F. Walvoord's book "The Rapture Question" (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan), also had me brainwashed for a while. It was while I was a Protestant I was following human traditions.
Do you want some chocolate milk with that irrelevant waffle?

No Christian tradition follows the Talmud, so you are simply stating a falsehood here.
2 words CHRISTIAN ZIONISM.

Pre-millenialism is TOTALLY talmudic as is any kind of earthly kingdom or dominion.

The very fact that EO has traditions that nullify Gods Word is pharisaic in itself.

Chanting, sorcery, idolatry, authority over the herd, meaningless rituals, the pomp and garb...all talmudic.

It is Luther's oral traditions and Luther's words which nullify God's holy law. Consider Luther's oral (and written) tradition: "Luther took the opportunity afforded him in his self-appointed role of translator of the Bible into German, to add and delete words, from the Bible to bolster his ideological-theological revolutionary agenda. For instance, he decided to strengthen some of his favorite passages, like Romans Chapter 4, and weaken others. He added the word "only" to key Biblical passages in which he revised such sentences as: you are saved only by faith, or you are saved by faith alone. These essential forgeries provided Luther with the "proofs" he needed to bolster his evolving and creatively innovative theology. (1)
"In 1529, Dr. Link, the pre-eminent German language scholar of the day, wrote to Luther asking him why he had been inserting words into the German Bible. Luther's astonishing written answer nicely sums up the heart of the Protestant problem with individualistic subjectivity, "It is so because Dr. Luther says it is so!" (Dancing Alone: The Quest For Orthodox Faith in the Age of False Religion. Copyright 2002, Frank Schaeffer, Salisbury, MA: Regina Orthodox Press, pages 76-77. Regina Orthodox Press Online Store ).

Notes.
1. Luther went so far as to insert the word "alone" in his translation of Romans 3:28 making it read: "that man is justified without the works of the law, through faith alone". While he defended the insertion ... his critics attacked him fro "lacerating and falsifying" (Ec. Enchir., 5 C Cath 34: 97-98)) not only the biblical text but the biblical doctrine" (Jaroslav Pelikan, Reformation of Church and Dogma, p. 252.).
I dont give two hoots what Luther said. I have no dog in Luthers race. Pointing out faults with Martin Luther does not justify the EO cult and its many false doctrines.

God save us all from every false belief and forgive us our trespasses as we forgive those who trespass against us. Amen.
Amen.
 
Aug 12, 2010
2,819
12
0
#28
Just a bit of a thing here.. kind of an aside

There were, and always will be, independent christian congregations and assemblies that are neither Catholic.. nor a branch of the Reformers.

They could be called protestants.. because they helped the reformers at some stages.. but they were not part of the Reformation.. because they always had and have now the same teaching and belief.

Jesus promised His churches would be in all generations until the end of the church age.. if Catholicism is not it... if that is a heresy.. then there HAS to be other christians and churches seperate from them right from the start.

There are historical records of these independent churches.. from the likes of the Battle for Baptist history... The Trail of Blood... Real Churches or a Fog.. Churches in the Valley of Piedemont..

It is not either Catholic or Protestant

Real christian churches are NEITHER... unless you include them in the definition of protestants as anyone who fought against the Catholic church.

The Reformers.. there were independent christian churches around way b4 them.. and seperate from Catholicsm
Ya but its much easier for Scotty to lump us in with Luther and Calvin coz then he can try and take the heat off his own cult by attacking stuff they said and convicting us guilty by association,,,,even tho we're not associated.

Good post bud.
 
Aug 12, 2010
2,819
12
0
#29
by the way my friend. I do not want to get into a heated dabate on this. It is not a pertinent doctrine and not worth getting huffy over. Plus this is not the room to do it either. But if you would like to discuss further to see why I believe I do I would be more than welcome. but this is not a doctrine I would want to lose sleep over if we disagree :D
I agree its no salvation issue but peeps need to be clued up just incase we're near the end coz if you go trusting them pharisees you might get caught up in their false kingdom of God on Earth and that could definately effect your chances.

Example....You think Rome is the big bad guy....the "Jews" come up with a plan to absorb the RCC into what you think is Gods people...lets call the plan the "Noahide Plan" just for kicks (which the RCC have already signed onto by the way) and you get sucked into this...ahem.....new world religion...naturally believing Gods people and the state of Israel are totally legit etc....without knowing that this plan is the ultimate deathcard to wipe out true Christians in the final ferlong.

I've done threads on the Mother of Harlots before. Believe me I've seen every evidence for Rome. It's a great decoy. Jerusalem and the Pharisees fit much better. You wouldnt expect anything less from the Synagogue of Satan than to erect a superb smokescreen would you?

Anyhoot...heres my thread:

Erm....are we allowed to link to other forums?
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
#30
I agree its no salvation issue but peeps need to be clued up just incase we're near the end coz if you go trusting them pharisees you might get caught up in their false kingdom of God on Earth and that could definately effect your chances.

Example....You think Rome is the big bad guy....the "Jews" come up with a plan to absorb the RCC into what you think is Gods people...lets call the plan the "Noahide Plan" just for kicks (which the RCC have already signed onto by the way) and you get sucked into this...ahem.....new world religion...naturally believing Gods people and the state of Israel are totally legit etc....without knowing that this plan is the ultimate deathcard to wipe out true Christians in the final ferlong.

I've done threads on the Mother of Harlots before. Believe me I've seen every evidence for Rome. It's a great decoy. Jerusalem and the Pharisees fit much better. You wouldnt expect anything less from the Synagogue of Satan than to erect a superb smokescreen would you?

Anyhoot...heres my thread:

Erm....are we allowed to link to other forums?
yeah you are if you can find it. I made one too along time ago. Which showed what I believed. When I get a chance later. I will make it again. I have it written on notepad somewhere.

Thanks for discussing things in a nice mannor. Unlike some people.
 
Aug 12, 2010
2,819
12
0
#31
yeah you are if you can find it. I made one too along time ago. Which showed what I believed. When I get a chance later. I will make it again. I have it written on notepad somewhere.

Thanks for discussing things in a nice mannor. Unlike some people.
Ahaaaaa....thats why on my personal forum I have a thread full of links to my favourite topics I've been involved in all over cyberspace for easy reference. Here ya go:

Mystery, Babylon the Great, Mother of Harlots
 
S

Scotth1960

Guest
#32
Do people venerate these statues? Do they bend down and kiss them? Do they consider the statues Holy? NO!

Does EO church venerate inanimate objects..kiss them as if the object is Holy? YES!

EO Church practices IDOLATRY.

Secondly....why do I care what the denominations you mention do? I have no dog in any denomination race. Giving examples of how other denominations go wrong is NO DEFENCE to your own TEMPLE CULT.



Are repose members of your congregation saints Scott? Can you ask them to pray for you or whatever? I asked you in a different thread but you refused to answer. Waving your arms around and jumping up and down on the spot crying false witness is infantile and doesnt add to the communications.



These are OFFICES. They are not one ABOVE the other holding AUTHORITY.

EO have councils that dictate policy to those UNDERNEATH it violating Jesus command NOT to have authority over the flock.



(2 Thessalonians 2:15) Therefore, brethren, stand fast, and hold the traditions which ye have been taught, whether by word, or our epistle.

Those traditions were from the APOSTLES that went BY WORD OR BY WRITTEN EPISTLE....same traditions (The New Covenant). What they heard from Jesus Apostles is the SAME as what we read!

But the EO and the Pharisaic Jews (Same cult basically) like to both think they have some secret line on ADDED tradition. Sorry but if it NULLIFIES Gods Law its NOT ok. Example CHANTING.



All your magic rituals are WORKS. We're not talking about the works which Jesus causes us to walk in by the indwelling Holy Spirit we're talking about all the stuff the EO (and Rabbinic Judaism) ADD. Example....the cutting hair and burning it thingee.



EO and Pharisee priestly cloths IDENTICAL. Just more evidence they are the same cult.



I call none Father other than the Father in heaven. I dont care what MEN say I care what God says. But for someone who relies so much on WORLDLY TRADITION its a predictable question.



I'm not going on his book as a guide. He doesnt cover EO...so what?



Do you want some chocolate milk with that irrelevant waffle?



2 words CHRISTIAN ZIONISM.

Pre-millenialism is TOTALLY talmudic as is any kind of earthly kingdom or dominion.

Dear friend,
Premillennialism and Christian Zionism are sectarian, not EO Christian.
So I spoke corretcly. Christian Zionism is "heresy in the name of Christ".
Scott

The very fact that EO has traditions that nullify Gods Word is pharisaic in itself.
Dear strangelove,

False.
Totally false.
Calling them pharisaic doesn't make them pharisaic.
You are committing false accusations.
There is no verse in any Bible that proves the EOC is pharisaic.
Only the Pharisees were pharisaic.
Scott
PS By the way, Saint Paul was a Pharisee, but he did not follow false Jewish traditions after he was converted to Christ.


Chanting, sorcery, idolatry, authority over the herd, meaningless rituals, the pomp and garb...all talmudic.

Friend, You're mistaken. None of these things happen in the EOC. They are fabrications of your own Turkish-Namibian mind, wherever you're coming from. You can't even correctly identify your point of origin. If you are dishonest in this, why should any one believe you? Turkey is not in Namibia; Namibia is not in Turkey. So you're a proven falsifier.
Take care.
God bless you.
Scott R. Harrington


Strangelove,
False. Calling your self "Strangelove". See what games you play!
Scott


I dont give two hoots what Luther said. I have no dog in Luthers race. Pointing out faults with Martin Luther does not justify the EO cult and its many false doctrines.

Dear "Strangelove":
Calling EO a cult is pure bigotry.

What about the "cult of Strangelove"? There is no cult of Strangelove, is there?
So also, there is no EO cult. That's a vain thought in your strange head.



Amen
 
R

rodogg

Guest
#33
I can really feel the love of Jesus Christ in here.
 
Aug 12, 2010
2,819
12
0
#34
What is your problem with using quote boxes Scott?

This last post of yours is an utter mess!

Dear friend,
Premillennialism and Christian Zionism are sectarian, not EO Christian.
Yes and that sect is Talmudism. I never said those things were from the EO church. I was countering your claim that nothing Christian is from the talmud.

False.
Totally false.
Calling them pharisaic doesn't make them pharisaic.
You are committing false accusations.
There is no verse in any Bible that proves the EOC is pharisaic.
Only the Pharisees were pharisaic.
Heres some verses proving that EO is pharisaic (follows its own traditions which nullify Gods law)

(Matthew 20:25) But Jesus called them unto him, and said, Ye know that the princes of the Gentiles exercise dominion over them, and they that are great exercise authority upon them.

(Matthew 20:26) But it shall not be so among you: but whosoever will be great among you, let him be your minister;

(Matthew 20:27) And whosoever will be chief among you, let him be your servant:

(Matthew 20:28) Even as the Son of man came not to be ministered unto, but to minister, and to give his life a ransom for many.


Since you completely ignored my comment about how the EO church has an authoritarian priestly structure we'll have to assume that you are not arguing the point. Authoritarian structures are not permitted in the Kingdom of Christ. Therefore the EO is not part of that Kingdom and is a cult, the traditions of which nullify Gods Word.

PS By the way, Saint Paul was a Pharisee, but he did not follow false Jewish traditions after he was converted to Christ.
Thats because he stuck to the teachings of Christ, rather than traditions of men. Pity the megachurches like the RCC and EO didnt do likewise. They preferred to follow the pharisees methods.

Friend, You're mistaken. None of these things happen in the EOC.
Chanting doesnt happen in the EO church? Are you sure?

Whats this guy doing then? whats with all the vain repetitions?

‪Great Vespers, Saturday 1 Jan 2011 part 1 of 2‬‏ - YouTube

As for idolatry thats obvious....ICONS.

Pomp and garb.....OBVIOUS...GOLD and SILVER everywhere and ridiculous robes.

Sorcery with your cutting hair then burning it thing and countless other meaningless rituals in your liturgy.

So YES these things DO go on in your cult.

They are fabrications of your own Turkish-Namibian mind, wherever you're coming from. You can't even correctly identify your point of origin. If you are dishonest in this, why should any one believe you? Turkey is not in Namibia; Namibia is not in Turkey. So you're a proven falsifier.
Take care.
God bless you.
Scott R. Harrington

Strangelove,
False. Calling your self "Strangelove". See what games you play!
Scott

Dear "Strangelove":
Calling EO a cult is pure bigotry.

What about the "cult of Strangelove"? There is no cult of Strangelove, is there?
So also, there is no EO cult. That's a vain thought in your strange head.
Meaningless personal waffle. Deflect away good sir, I'm not phazed in the least with this childish nonsense.

Remember....quote boxes, and try and address the points on the topic in a lucid and organized manner. C'mon Scotty can you defend your cult? We have 17 threads started per day by you attacking other denominations, but we see when someone presents critical analysis of your own sect you fall apart like a cheap toy.
 

dscherck

Banned [Reason: persistent, ongoing Catholic heres
Aug 3, 2009
1,272
3
0
#35
Just a bit of a thing here.. kind of an aside

There were, and always will be, independent christian congregations and assemblies that are neither Catholic.. nor a branch of the Reformers.

They could be called protestants.. because they helped the reformers at some stages.. but they were not part of the Reformation.. because they always had and have now the same teaching and belief.

Jesus promised His churches would be in all generations until the end of the church age.. if Catholicism is not it... if that is a heresy.. then there HAS to be other christians and churches seperate from them right from the start.

There are historical records of these independent churches.. from the likes of the Battle for Baptist history... The Trail of Blood... Real Churches or a Fog.. Churches in the Valley of Piedemont..

It is not either Catholic or Protestant

Real christian churches are NEITHER... unless you include them in the definition of protestants as anyone who fought against the Catholic church.

The Reformers.. there were independent christian churches around way b4 them.. and seperate from Catholicsm
Trail of Blood has been repeatedly proven to be filled with made up histories and numerous historical errors. The only reason people like it is because it "proves" that the Catholic Church isn't the Church founded by Our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ. Unfortunatelyfor its proponents, every other piece of historical evidence, along with the Scriptures themselves show that the Catholic Church is what it claims to be, THE Church, founded by Our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ.
 

dscherck

Banned [Reason: persistent, ongoing Catholic heres
Aug 3, 2009
1,272
3
0
#36
yeah you are if you can find it. I made one too along time ago. Which showed what I believed. When I get a chance later. I will make it again. I have it written on notepad somewhere.

Thanks for discussing things in a nice mannor. Unlike some people.
I always find it amusing that these so called "proofs" always point to the fact that Rome sits on 7 hills but ignores the fact that the Vatican isn't in Rome and rather sits on just one hill. But hey, why let facts get in the way?
 
Aug 12, 2010
2,819
12
0
#37
Trail of Blood has been repeatedly proven to be filled with made up histories and numerous historical errors. The only reason people like it is because it "proves" that the Catholic Church isn't the Church founded by Our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ. Unfortunatelyfor its proponents, every other piece of historical evidence, along with the Scriptures themselves show that the Catholic Church is what it claims to be, THE Church, founded by Our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ.
RCC is nothing but a harlot daughter of the Mother Jerusalem...just like the EO.

No rope-a-pope for me.
 
Aug 12, 2010
2,819
12
0
#38
I always find it amusing that these so called "proofs" always point to the fact that Rome sits on 7 hills but ignores the fact that the Vatican isn't in Rome and rather sits on just one hill. But hey, why let facts get in the way?
Jerusalem fits though dunnit bud?
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
#39
I always find it amusing that these so called "proofs" always point to the fact that Rome sits on 7 hills but ignores the fact that the Vatican isn't in Rome and rather sits on just one hill. But hey, why let facts get in the way?
who said anything about 7 hills? Have you ever heard me say this? Maybe you didn't read my posts about the harlot. If you did, you would have seen I never even mentioned the 7 hills.

And rome is the empire. not the city. And it has world influence. Rome doe not have world influence right now does it? Nor does jerusalem. Not to mention the fact the world will not cry if the city of rome gets destroyed. Nor if Israel gets destroyed (they will praise whatever God they worship if Israel gets destroyed) But we do know a world power that does fit these characteristics (no it is not a nation)!
 

dscherck

Banned [Reason: persistent, ongoing Catholic heres
Aug 3, 2009
1,272
3
0
#40
who said anything about 7 hills? Have you ever heard me say this? Maybe you didn't read my posts about the harlot. If you did, you would have seen I never even mentioned the 7 hills.

And rome is the empire. not the city. And it has world influence. Rome doe not have world influence right now does it? Nor does jerusalem. Not to mention the fact the world will not cry if the city of rome gets destroyed. Nor if Israel gets destroyed (they will praise whatever God they worship if Israel gets destroyed) But we do know a world power that does fit these characteristics (no it is not a nation)!
Hrmm, a world power that fits those characteristics.... The UN?