For those with a Spirit led mind, not an academic led mind:
As one minister put it ‘’ The difference is not in the essence of Christ, but his title’’. Hopefully at least some can appreciate that! If a person believes the Holy Spirit fully resides in Christ, but they still term Christ solely the Son the God, how do they differ from other views here in reality? People believe the Holy Spirit is God himself. Therefore, where the essence of Christ is concerned, they would agree with a person who believed the Holy Spirit fully resided in Christ. The only difference then is the title of Christ isn’t it. Only on the internet would people state it is not enough simply to term Christ the son of God, bearing in mind there is agreement as to his essence. In my view, it shows the errors of head theology, built on the academic mind of man
As one minister put it ‘’ The difference is not in the essence of Christ, but his title’’. Hopefully at least some can appreciate that! If a person believes the Holy Spirit fully resides in Christ, but they still term Christ solely the Son the God, how do they differ from other views here in reality? People believe the Holy Spirit is God himself. Therefore, where the essence of Christ is concerned, they would agree with a person who believed the Holy Spirit fully resided in Christ. The only difference then is the title of Christ isn’t it. Only on the internet would people state it is not enough simply to term Christ the son of God, bearing in mind there is agreement as to his essence. In my view, it shows the errors of head theology, built on the academic mind of man
IN GOD THE SON,
bluto
- 1
- 1
- Show all