I shake my head, I really do
So that is your get out of jail card is it, so you do not have to answer the question. Boy oh boy how desperate were you not to answer
See the thing is Zone, you are OK discussing pure theology, of some subjects but you cannot answer the plain reality that ministers will not preach from their pulpits(or they won't in the uk and I doubt many do in the us either) what you believe is acceptable and unacceptable belief as to who Christ is unto salvation and the consequences of getting it wrong
Can you face this subject and truly give your opinion on it? No you cannot
but I'll tell you something, only a head theologist could refuse to respond to that truth, anyone with truly heartfelt conviction would have to respond, not prevaricate as you do just trying to play with words.
Truth is, you are plainly not bothered in the slighhtest that miniasters will not plainly state from the pulpit what to you is salvational belief concerning who Christ must be believed to be and the consequences of getting it wrong
Andv this is why you and others make the statements here you do, although the ministers from the pulpits(in the UK I know of) will not make them, and at least 90% of people in church would consider ridiculoius.
Strange people come on these sites, with weird views indeed, they truly are trapped in their world of scholars/theologians and the little grey cells
As I know you will not properly address the question, just porevaricate I'm putting you on ignore immediately. There is just no point to this
Clearly you ain't bothered if the flock here what to you is the truth and the result of getting it wrong, but heck, this is cyberspace after all
So that is your get out of jail card is it, so you do not have to answer the question. Boy oh boy how desperate were you not to answer
See the thing is Zone, you are OK discussing pure theology, of some subjects but you cannot answer the plain reality that ministers will not preach from their pulpits(or they won't in the uk and I doubt many do in the us either) what you believe is acceptable and unacceptable belief as to who Christ is unto salvation and the consequences of getting it wrong
Can you face this subject and truly give your opinion on it? No you cannot
but I'll tell you something, only a head theologist could refuse to respond to that truth, anyone with truly heartfelt conviction would have to respond, not prevaricate as you do just trying to play with words.
Truth is, you are plainly not bothered in the slighhtest that miniasters will not plainly state from the pulpit what to you is salvational belief concerning who Christ must be believed to be and the consequences of getting it wrong
Andv this is why you and others make the statements here you do, although the ministers from the pulpits(in the UK I know of) will not make them, and at least 90% of people in church would consider ridiculoius.
Strange people come on these sites, with weird views indeed, they truly are trapped in their world of scholars/theologians and the little grey cells
As I know you will not properly address the question, just porevaricate I'm putting you on ignore immediately. There is just no point to this
Clearly you ain't bothered if the flock here what to you is the truth and the result of getting it wrong, but heck, this is cyberspace after all
where's THE BIG question?
post it already
edit: oh....i see i'm on ignore.
does anyone remember back in the day when we had a "prophet" on here, and there was an Arian sidekick?
what was that guy's name?
Last edited: