There Are Many Scriptures That Disprove The Trinity

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
A

Arwen4CJ

Guest
Arwen4cj,

Thank you for the different translations of these 5 scriptures. You did a marvelous job. I hope it didn't take you all night.
I will respond later, but I just want to read each translation and enjoy your post. Thanks again. johnluke.
Your very welcome :)

It did take longer than a normal post, but I thought it was well worth it. Sometimes it is good to see the same verse in multiple translations.

I hope that you enjoy reading these, and that the Holy Spirit speaks truth into your heart.
 
Apr 24, 2012
263
1
0
1 John 5:7-8 (NASB)
[SUP]7 [/SUP]For there are three that testify: [SUP]8 [/SUP][SUP][a][/SUP]the Spirit and the water and the blood; and the three are [SUP][b][/SUP]in agreement.
Footnotes:


  1. 1 John 5:8 A few late mss add ...in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Spirit, and these three are one. And there are three that testify on earth, the Spirit
  2. 1 John 5:8 Lit for the one thing



Only part of those verses are not thought to be in the original manuscript, not the whole thing. Most modern translators put the part that is not thought to be original in a footnote, as seen here in the NASB.

You show that you do not understand textual criticism. Bible translators compare different copies of manuscripts that are available, and the pay special attention to the oldest copies. If something is found in the oldest copies, then they are pretty confident it was in the original. If something is not in the older manuscripts, but was in newer ones, then they are less likely to think it was in the original manuscript. We can be fairly certain that most Bibles today contain close to what the originals had.

There is already a discussion going on in the forum regarding translation purity -- it's a KJV thread.

Yes -- let us hope that we learn from one another.

Thank you for helping me out with this scripture. If there is a proper way to do it, it looks like the way the NASB does it would be the best, put the controversial part in a footnote.
 
Apr 24, 2012
263
1
0
The term Trinity is an epithet used to describe the nature of the Biblical God as He has chosen to reveal himself throughout scripture....as such, NO scripture thwarts it...because it represents ALL scripture!

What part of that do you Trinity-deniers not get?!
The only thing that the word "Trinity" describes is the number 3 in a different language. We agree that there are 3 in the "Godhead". (Which is actually mentioned in the Bible.)
It is interesting that the very few times in the history of the world that God the Father, Jesus, and the Holy Ghost have chosen to reveal themselves all together in one place, and only 3 times on the pages of the Holy Bible they have revealed that they are separate and distinct individuals.
See Mark 9:2 the mount of transfiguration event.
See Acts 7:55 Steven's stoning event.
See Matthew 3:16-17 at the baptismal event.
 

VCO

Senior Member
Oct 14, 2013
11,995
4,615
113
Unitarians like to listen to their stereo out of one speaker...

That is a good one, and I can picture it. We need an artist to draw us picture with two halves.

One half with a sign above the three seated Throne of God that Says TRINITARIAN; and a Trinity Believer listening to all three speakers on the seats: The SON Speaker on the right hand side, The FATHER Sub-Wolfer Speaker in the middle, and the HOLY SPIRIT Speaker on the left; and all three speaking beautiful music to the Trinitarian Believer. And the Caption under it should read: He who is plugged into all THREE hears the beautiful Music of GOD written into His Word.

And on the second half the sign reads UNITARIAN; with both the SON Speaker and the HOLY SPIRIT Speaker obviously UNPLUGGED, and just the BOOM, BOOM, BOOM, coming from the FATHER sub-wolfer and a bewildered look on the face of the Unitarian trying to listen to GOD. And the Caption written under that one should read: He who is NOT plugged into all THREE Does NOT hear the beautiful Music of GOD written into His Word.
 
Last edited:
T

timberdoodle

Guest
The Trinity doctrine is an illogical, non-Bible based teaching. Many are confused by this falsehood...and as a result do not feel close to God; or feel real love or real connection to/ for God because this erroneous teaching.John 7:29, is one of many verses in the Bible that disproves the Trinity doctrine.
I feel very close to God and I believe in the Trinity.

How does that work?
 

VCO

Senior Member
Oct 14, 2013
11,995
4,615
113
Krow, Collosians 1:15 is one of the great scriptures in the entire Bible. It, however, also demonstrates the liberty that translators take to advance a position on a particular topic. In the King James Version of the Bible, this scripture is translated differently than the translation that you used. It is so different that the entire meaning of the scripture is jeopardized. Not having the original, it is left up to the translators of a copy to get it right. One half say one way, the other half another way, with plenty of arguments and ugly accusations being thrown from both sides, so that the real rendition and hence the real meaning may be lost forever for this verse.
So here is how the KJV renders this translation:
Who is in the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of every creature.
Your version makes it sound like Jesus is the supervisor over the entire creation. The KJV makes it sound like Jesus is the first creature born of all the creatures. One a creator, one a creature. How much more different can it be?
What is the truth?
Tell us what version you quoted please and thank you.
By the way, I do not believe Jesus had a beginning, he is eternal. In his eternal journey though, he went through different phases. For instance when he was born on the earth, it was the first time in his immortal existence that his mind and spirit were housed in a body of flesh and bone and blood. For the eternities before his earth experience he was composed of mind and spirit. After he died on Calvary, he went into another phase of just mind and spirit again. After he was resurrected, he went through another phase, he was composed of a mind and spirit housed again in a body of flesh and bone, but this time the body was a resurrected, perfect, eternal body of flesh and bone similar to, but light years away from an earthly body of flesh and bone and blood.

It was the NIV, WHY? If you want to debate Versions, that is another thread, where I have validated that the KJV is NOT an Inspired English Translation but only a Paraphrase, that was intended to only improve previous Translations. Who did I quote to prove that, THE KJV TRANSLATORS THEMSELVES. Come on over if you want. http://christianchat.com/bible-disc...noring-deity-jesus-christ-16.html#post1339788 Starting with my Posts #316, 329, 331, 334, and 441.
 
Apr 24, 2012
263
1
0
I feel very close to God and I believe in the Trinity.

How does that work?

To feel close to God is the most important thing. Be close to God, receive his grace, keep his commandments, and you will be with him and Jesus in the kingdom of God. Debating about their nature is interesting but what you are doing is more important.
 
A

Arwen4CJ

Guest
Thank you for helping me out with this scripture. If there is a proper way to do it, it looks like the way the NASB does it would be the best, put the controversial part in a footnote.
Yes. Other Bible translations do this as well. That way the controversial part isn't deleted, but it isn't in the main part of the text, and there is an explanation given for why it isn't in the main part of the text.
 
T

timberdoodle

Guest
To feel close to God is the most important thing. Be close to God, receive his grace, keep his commandments, and you will be with him and Jesus in the kingdom of God. Debating about their nature is interesting but what you are doing is more important.
What He is doing through me is more important. It is no longer I who lives but Christ Jesus who lives through me.

Hope this helps

Blessings

Timber
 
Nov 19, 2012
5,484
27
0
The only thing that the word "Trinity" describes is the number 3 in a different language. We agree that there are 3 in the "Godhead". (Which is actually mentioned in the Bible.)

Show us.




It is interesting that the very few times in the history of the world that God the Father, Jesus, and the Holy Ghost have chosen to reveal themselves all together in one place, and only 3 times on the pages of the Holy Bible they have revealed that they are separate and distinct individuals.
See Mark 9:2 the mount of transfiguration event.
See Acts 7:55 Steven's stoning event.
See Matthew 3:16-17 at the baptismal event.
What is your hang-up with the three Persons of the Trinity?

Of course they are NOT each other - but each is the ONE God.

Your idea of the Trinity is jacked...
 

VCO

Senior Member
Oct 14, 2013
11,995
4,615
113
The Trinity doctrine is an illogical, non-Bible based teaching. Many are confused by this falsehood...and as a result do not feel close to God; or feel real love or real connection to/ for God because this erroneous teaching.John 7:29, is one of many verses in the Bible that disproves the Trinity doctrine.

You really do not listen, when you talk to Trinitarians, do you? Like Tim, most of us feel MORE than very close to GOD; we feel HIM in us, and we feel we are in HIM, the true Triune GOD. PLUS we feel a very DEEP, personal, LOVE relationship with GOD, as we submit to Jesus Christ as LORD.

Let all who agree with me say, AMEN!
 
Apr 24, 2012
263
1
0
Show us.






What is your hang-up with the three Persons of the Trinity?

Of course they are NOT each other - but each is the ONE God.

Your idea of the Trinity is jacked...

The problem I have with the Trinity doctrine has to do with the word (homoousios), in English it is "consubstantial" which means "of the same substance".
The idea that God the Father, His Son Jesus, and the Holy Ghost are 3 distinct persons but are physically consubstanial is a mind-bending concept. I do not believe it is supported by scripture. The words "consubstantial", and "Trinity", and
"persons", referring to God and Jesus and the Holy Ghost, are nonbiblical.
Just because Jesus says that God is in him and he is in God and they are one does not mean that they are physically consubstantial. God will dwell in any worthy person, and any worthy person can dwell in God. Any worthy person can be one with God and Jesus, but certainly not physically consubstantial.
That is why I am so hung up on the 3 being separate and distinct, this concept I believe is fully supported by scripture.
 
A

Arwen4CJ

Guest
The problem I have with the Trinity doctrine has to do with the word (homoousios), in English it is "consubstantial" which means "of the same substance".
The idea that God the Father, His Son Jesus, and the Holy Ghost are 3 distinct persons but are physically consubstanial is a mind-bending concept. I do not believe it is supported by scripture. The words "consubstantial", and "Trinity", and
"persons", referring to God and Jesus and the Holy Ghost, are nonbiblical.
Just because Jesus says that God is in him and he is in God and they are one does not mean that they are physically consubstantial. God will dwell in any worthy person, and any worthy person can dwell in God. Any worthy person can be one with God and Jesus, but certainly not physically consubstantial.
That is why I am so hung up on the 3 being separate and distinct, this concept I believe is fully supported by scripture.
So, do you believe that the Father, Jesus, and the Holy Spirit are three different gods?

Or do you believe that only the Father is God, but Jesus and the Holy Spirit are something lesser than God (like some kind of demigods)?

You have disputed that they are all one God, and you keep emphasizing the separate and distinctness.....so that causes me to think that you probably believe in three gods?
 
T

tucksma

Guest
Might be Morman? That's what they think.
 
Nov 10, 2013
266
1
0
1 John 5:
[SUP]7 [/SUP]For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.
[SUP]8 [/SUP]And there are three that bear witness in earth, the Spirit, and the water, and the blood: and these three agree in one.

Disprove God here...
 
T

tucksma

Guest
1 John 5:
[SUP]7 [/SUP]For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.
[SUP]8 [/SUP]And there are three that bear witness in earth, the Spirit, and the water, and the blood: and these three agree in one.

Disprove God here...
The fact you went here just shows you didn't study enough.

That verse (7) isn't in any of the original texts and wasn't in any texts at all until year 1000. Most commentator who are legit commentators don't even comment on that verse because it isn't supposed to be in scripture.

The story how it got put in is actually quite interesting if you wanna PM me about it.

But yeah that verse shouldn't be in the bible.

Google it if you want.
 
A

Arwen4CJ

Guest
Might be Morman? That's what they think.
Yes, that is what they think. However, they also think that the Father was once a human who was a good Mormon on another planet, and then was given godship of his own planet (Earth). They also think that the Father had a Father, and a Grandfather, etc. They think that when they die, if they are good Mormons, they get to become gods of their own planets, too.
 
T

tucksma

Guest
The hasty dismissal of this passage in most modern versions of the Bible is largely due to the fact that it is only found in eight of the five hundred Greek manuscripts that witness to the fifth chapter of I John. Consequently, it is almost unanimously regarded among modern textual critics as a later scribal emendation.
 
Nov 10, 2013
266
1
0
The fact you went here just shows you didn't study enough.

That verse (7) isn't in any of the original texts and wasn't in any texts at all until year 1000. Most commentator who are legit commentators don't even comment on that verse because it isn't supposed to be in scripture.

The story how it got put in is actually quite interesting if you wanna PM me about it.

But yeah that verse shouldn't be in the bible.

Google it if you want.
Oh sorry, you are using a false bible, theres where the problem is... Ha, I didnt study enough. The bible is not hard to understand, if you have the true word of God.
 
T

tucksma

Guest
Yes, that is what they think. However, they also think that the Father was once a human who was a good Mormon on another planet, and then was given godship of his own planet (Earth). They also think that the Father had a Father, and a Grandfather, etc. They think that when they die, if they are good Mormons, they get to become gods of their own planets, too.
I didn't say they were right! I've looked into their faith a lot because I have one talking to me and I see a lot of problems with the book of mormans that show it's falseness. I was just making a guess at his perspective.