H
Your entitled to your opinion. But it is just that, your opinion. If as you claim Dispensationalism as believed by Darby was around for so long how come such a vital teaching was not mentioned by none of the leading Church fathers or anyone else for nineteen hundred years. Were they all so incompetent and spiritually blind that none of them noticed it in their Bibles? Are you suggesting that the Holy Spirit ignored people like Luther, Calvin, Wesley and Spurgeon but popularised it by using a cultist like Derby and a convicted defrauder like Scofield? As I write there are millions of Christians who do not believe
in it. You should get around more.
As for me not listening, perhaps you should check out who you are listening to.
Its not the Bibles inerrency that is the issue. Its your interpretation of it that I take issue with
in it. You should get around more.
As for me not listening, perhaps you should check out who you are listening to.
Its not the Bibles inerrency that is the issue. Its your interpretation of it that I take issue with
You say (incorrectly) there was no rapture teaching placing the gathering pretrib.(and remember , some,if not most of your dead men were AMILLINEAL).
Your pinnacle of "truth" HAS TO RIDE on your imposed INFALLABILITY of your dead men.
IOW they HAVE to be right.
OK,so what you are invoking is "rule of first belief" ,"since they ,the dead men,believed it FIRST ,and they ,under your dynamic,were infallible , your next "logical" conclusion is ,it HAS TO BE RIGHT.
Well,you also have to believe Jesus is NOT THE MESSIAH. Because the Jews believed that FIRST.(that Jesus is an impostor)
Once we play out your "rule of first belief",we can see it is totally made up in your mind.