I did not know linguists were the new authoritative Theologians of Christianity? So a "linguist fully understands the Pneumatika, charismata and Diakonia, The Gifts of the Holy Spirit and the gifts of Christ to the church?
I did not know a secular person was to even be taken seriously about biblical truths?
I'm sure there are those like evolutionist, psychologist, and now the new Linguist who is speaking for the empowering of the Holy Spirit instead of the word of God. Human reasoning is the new biblical authority.
Sorry, Lord, prophets, apostles, evangelists, and Pastors, and teachers who are saved and filled with the Spirit You should have become a "linguist".
The above attack and falsehood I notice not one verse to refute 1cor chapter 12 through 14. Not one verse given to dismiss the gifts of Christ found in Eph chapter 4. Nothing to address Mark 16 or Matthew 28 or Luke 24.
"Evenki Shaman in Siberia, a vodoun priestess in Togo and a Christian tongues-speaker in Alabama are producing are in no way different from each other. They’re all producing their glossolalia in the exact same way; they just have different explanations and beliefs as to why they’re doing it and where it comes from."
Sounds like you are seeking devil worship to disprove the gifts of the Holy Spirit and then try to make all of them fit with those who are pentacostel. That is very much close to blaspheming the Holy Spirit.
Shaman in Siberia or a Vodoun priestess in Togo and a Christian in Alabama? You do not know what you are talking about.
Try reading the Bible in the language you do understand instead of prompting up false doctors to attack the word of God.
You try to use worldly secular humanism to speak of spiritual things and have the audacity to say a Christian in Alabama is of the devil?
You are doing the same thing. Try proving the gifts of the Holy Spirit are not for today by the word of God. You can't You have to look outside the word of God to find support for your bias LOL.
A very good humanistic argument to try to defeat another humanistic argument. A true student of Scripture has Biblical arguments to defend against secular facts. However in this case, the argument brought forward by a linguist are valid concerns.
If one believes in utterances that will not stand the test of linguistics, they are compelled to disqualify the facts. Indeed they have too. If they do not, then their belief system will collapse around their ears. God's Truth, clearly understood, does not contradict well known facts but rather originates and enforces those facts. To believe otherwise is to enter the realm of mysticism.
The Bible is clear on the facts of languages:
Gen 10:20 These are the sons of Ham, after their families, after their tongues, in their lands, in their nations.
This was clearly a language held in common by a group of people. It differentiated them from others just as German, French, Spanish or English differentiates us today.
Acts 2:4 And they were all filled with the Holy Spirit, and began to speak with other tongues, as the Spirit gave them utterance.
Acts 2:5 Now there were dwelling at Jerusalem Jews, devout men, from every nation under heaven.
Acts 2:6 And when this sound was heard, the multitude came together, and were confounded, because that every man heard them speaking in his own language.
Act 2:7 And they were all amazed and marvelled, saying, Behold, are not all these that speak Galileans?
Act 2:8 And how hear we, every man in our own language wherein we were born?
These verses of Scripture, are the clearest verses in Scripture, as to the understanding of Biblical languages.
The Galileans (v.7), were speaking a new language that they had not previously known, by the gift of the Spirit (v.4). These new languages were clearly recognized by the listeners (v.6&8). The miracle here... is not the nature or linguistics of the languages but rather, the source of these languages. The Holy Spirit. Non of the Galileans had any previous formal training in these languages.
1Co_12:10 and to another workings of miracles; and to another prophecy; and to another discerning of spirits: to another various kinds of tongues; and to another the interpretation of tongues:
Here also, the various tongues and the ability to interpret various tongues were both gifts given to aid the early ministry. These tongues were still normal linguistic languages not non-linguistic gibberish. Nor was it some higher than thou heavenly language. This brings us to the two areas of Scripture that have been abused:
1Co 13:1 If I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, but have not love, I am become sounding brass, or a clanging cymbal.
1Co 13:2 And if I have the gift of prophecy, and know all mysteries and all knowledge; and if I have all faith, so as to remove mountains, but have not love, I am nothing.
This portion of Scripture, is used to set-up the proof text for the heavenly languages but by doing so, the ones that have this interpretation ignore the fact that Paul was using a Rhetorical form of argument. He was laying out the highest forms of each subject and contrasting them to "Love". In these two verses he used "Languages", "Prophecy" and "Faith". All three, raised to their highest level and then contrasted to love. Each time, LOVE was given the higher value.
Paul was not saying:
That he could speak in all languages of men, indeed there is no Scripture recording Paul as speaking in another language. He elevated his argument to the language of Angels
but we were not to understand that Paul could speak in this language. That proof is in the next portion of the argument. Additionally, we do not know if Angels even speak. After all they are non-corporal creatures. They have no mouth as we know it. The Bible only records Angels as speaking when they were in a human form and then they used the language of the one they were speaking too.
That he knew ALL mysteries and had ALL knowledge. He certainly did not!!! Only the Father in heaven knows ALL mysteries and knowledge. Even Jesus Christ did not know everything in His humanity.
That he had FAITH worthy to move mountains.
He certainly did not!!! Nor were there any Biblical examples of any man moving a mountain out of it's place.
These examples of Paul, were to make us understand how important LOVE is, not to build some fictitious Theology upon those subjects. Finally:
Verses of Scripture which make reference to "praying in the Spirit", simply mean praying with the guidance of the Holy Spirit which dwells in all believers. Such as in Romans 8:26, which tells us that we often do not know what to pray for. The Holy Spirit intercedes on our behalf because He knows what the will of the Father is for each one of us. This intercession is not audible to one praying nor is it generated by the one praying. It is the 3rd. Person of the God-Head having a conversation with the 1st. Person of the God-Head.