"Tongues of angels" was a hyperbolic way of saying that even if you supposedly spoke the most exalted heavenly language but love was absent, then tongues meant nothing. Paul was trying to tell Christians at that time to "cool it" (in modern parlance). He was minimizing tongues in relation to other spiritual gifts.
"Tongues" is simply another translation for human languages. In the 17th century it was used interchangeably with language. But today the word "language" would be correct. And "unknown" was added gratuitously and merely added to the confusion. It is not present in the Greek textThey spoke to men in either Hebrew or Greek. How they communicated in Heaven seems to reflect how they spoke on earth. See Revelation.
"Tongues" is simply another translation for human languages. In the 17th century it was used interchangeably with language. But today the word "language" would be correct. And "unknown" was added gratuitously and merely added to the confusion. It is not present in the Greek textThey spoke to men in either Hebrew or Greek. How they communicated in Heaven seems to reflect how they spoke on earth. See Revelation.
they had to speak some language to converse with
Abraham, Daniel, and Mary. Is not the fact that an angel is speaking to a person who has a language special?
In addition, is that not, even more, telling of an example of what is a " known Tongue" As Paul said
in 1cor 14:1
"Though I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, "
What is the language of angels? You stated
" There is no record in Scripture about any special language spoken by angels."
you just confirmed " unknown languages "
that was spoken amen.