Trinity haters on CC

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Dino246

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2015
24,685
13,374
113
Jesus as the Son of man denied that his flesh profiting for something? It was a one time outward demonstration promised in Isiah 53 (the father and son working as one, two not three)) as the lamb of God slain from the foundation of the world . Corrupted flesh and blood could never enter heaven .

God simply is not a man as us.

If we walk by his faith that works in us to both will and do his good pleasure then there is no need to try and make God, eternal Spirit into to a man.

2 Corinthians 5:7 (For we walk by faith, not by sight)
Again I will caution you against the heretical belief that Jesus' body was corrupt.
 

TheLearner

Well-known member
Jan 14, 2019
7,895
1,458
113
67
Brighton, MI
This is so incredibly ignorant....but it is very typical of heretics who have spun church history to accomodate their persecution complex.

Rome was only one bishopric of several in the true church. Major bishoprics were Jerusalem, Antioch, Alexandria, Constantinople and Rome.

The bishop of Rome, Sylvester, didn't even show up at the Council of Nicea. He sent a few representatives instead.

Rome didn't even have a "pope" in any sense until about 600 AD, with Pope Gregory. Even then, the Roman Catholic Church didn't exist in the form we know it until after the Great Schism. There were bold claims to supremacy after about 450 ad, but they considered themselves to be one of several bishoprics of the true church until the Great Schism.

When you read history, you must realize that the word "catholic" means, basically, pure in teachings. It came about largely to distinguish itself from Arians. Arians and anti-Trinitarians would not have been "catholic" in the sense that they were not real Christians.

Concerning the ones who killed Jesus and the 12 apostles, it's laughable that you claim they were killed by Roman Catholics since they didn't even exist in the form you are claiming. Jesus was killed by the Roman government at the demand of the Jews. The apostles were martyred by different groups, including Jews and secular Romans (not Roman Christians..that's crazy).

By the way, Alexandrian Christians were not Arians...Arians are not Christians. Alexandria had a bishopric of true believers, but they were not Arians. Arians are false believers.

For everyone else, realize that I, too, was caught up in this nutty, conspiracy theory view of Christianity. My guess is that jaybird88 is sitting at home in a bunker surrounded by cultic literature that is feeding his theology. He probably doesn't have a fellowship at all, and if he does, it is some cultic group (perhaps Sabbathkeepers) who hold similar conspiracy theory level views that feed their vain minds with a martyr complex. They view themselves as being the lone defenders of the true faith.

I suggest that you read good books on Church history, such as Nick Needham's 2000 Years of Christ's Power, and realize that church history displays the relentless march of Christians toward glory, with sinful episodes and growth along the way.

And, realize that there are dozens of cultic groups teaching the same essential conspiracy theory level views as jaybird88 is portraying. Don't be fooled by them, and led off into some goofy cultic movement.

I will tell you one thing those types of people don't talk about much: Jesus. After leaving these groups, I found that out. They are obsessed with their little proof-texts claiming that Christians are a false version of the truth. And, in the process, they fail to give Jesus the honor he is due. That is why they hate the teaching that he is God....they don't give honor to Him.

Hi UnitedWithChrist, was it not Tertullian who coined the word Trinity?

http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/0315.htm
http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/3302.htm
http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/2904.htm
http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/130102.htm
http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/0511.htm
http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/0606.htm
http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/0606.htm
http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/2602.htm
http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/0317.htm
http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/0301.htm
http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/0315.htm
http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/0311.htm
http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/0407.htm
http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/0713.htm ****
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/04012c.htm
http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/050704.htm
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/08580c.htm
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/10499a.htm
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/15047a.htm
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/07449a.htm

http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/14588a.htm



Against the Sabellians
Please help support the mission of New Advent and get the full contents of this website as an instant download. Includes the Catholic Encyclopedia, Church Fathers, Summa, Bible and more — all for only $19.99...

1. Now truly it would be just to dispute against those who, by dividing and rending the monarchy, which is the most august announcement of the Church of God, into, as it were, three powers, and distinct substances (hypostases), and three deities, destroy it. For I have heard that some who preach and teach the word of God among you are teachers of this opinion, who indeed diametrically, so to speak, are opposed to the opinion of Sabellius. For he blasphemes in saying that the Son Himself is the Father, and vice versa; but these in a certain manner announce three gods, in that they divide the holy unity into three different substances, absolutely separated from one another. For it is essential that the Divine Word should be united to the God of all, and that the Holy Spirit should abide and dwell in God; and thus that the Divine Trinity should be reduced and gathered into one, as if into a certain head — that is, into the omnipotent God of all. For the doctrine of the foolish Marcion, which cuts and divides the monarchy into three elements, is assuredly of the devil, and is not of Christ's true disciples, or of those to whom the Saviour's teaching is agreeable. For these indeed rightly know that the Trinity is declared in the divine Scripture, but that the doctrine that there are three gods is neither taught in the Old nor in the New Testament.

2. But neither are they less to be blamed who think that the Son was a creation, and decided that the Lord was made just as one of those things which really were made; whereas the divine declarations testify that He was begotten, as is fitting and proper, but not that He was created or made. It is therefore not a trifling, but a very great impiety, to say that the Lord was in any wise made with hands. For if the Son was made, there was a time when He was not; but He always was, if, as He Himself declares, He is undoubtedly in the Father. And if Christ is the Word, the Wisdom, and the Power — for the divine writings tell us that Christ is these, as you yourselves know — assuredly these are powers of God. Wherefore, if the Son was made, there was a time when these were not in existence; and thus there was a time when God was without these things, which is utterly absurd. But why should I discourse at greater length to you about these matters, since you are men filled with the Spirit, and especially understanding what absurd results follow from the opinion which asserts that the Son was made? The leaders of this view seem to me to have given very little heed to these things, and for that reason to have strayed absolutely, by explaining the passage otherwise than as the divine and prophetic Scripture demands. The Lord created me the beginning of His ways. For, as you know, there is more than one signification of the word created; and in this place created is the same as set over the works made by Himself — made, I say, by the Son Himself. But this created is not to be understood in the same manner as made. For to make and to create are different from one another. Is not He Himself your Father, that has possessed you and created you? says Moses in the great song of Deuteronomy. And thus might any one reasonably convict these men. Oh reckless and rash men! Was then the first-born of every creature something made?— He who was begotten from the womb before the morning star? — He who in the person of Wisdom says, Before all the hills He begot me? Proverbs 8:25 Finally, any one may read in many parts of the divine utterances that the Son is said to have been begotten, but never that He was made. From which considerations, they who dare to say that His divine and inexplicable generation was a creation, are openly convicted of thinking that which is false concerning the generation of the Lord.

3. That admirable and divine unity, therefore, must neither be separated into three divinities, nor must the dignity and eminent greatness of the Lord be diminished by having applied to it the name of creation, but we must believe in God the Father Omnipotent, and on Christ Jesus His Son, and on the Holy Spirit. Moreover, that the Word is united to the God of all, because He says, I and the Father are one; John 10:30 and, I am in the Father, and the Father is in Me. John 14:10 Thus doubtless will be maintained in its integrity the doctrine of the divine Trinity, and the sacred announcement of the monarchy.
http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/0713.htm


http://www.newadvent.org/utility/se...D:9&siteurl=http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/
 
Sep 14, 2019
258
64
28
From time to time someone will message me regarding my belief on the Trinity of God. Trinitarianism is monotheistic by definition and not polytheistic. The fact that there is only one God can not be over stated. I am comfortable knowing that I can never fully understand the Triune Godhead as long as I'm in this mortal body but I accept it by faith.
I thought I would post this visual aid so that there will be no confusion as to what I personally believe or understand.
Feel free to chime in :)


View attachment 142711
in Rev 1:8 it is written "I am the Alpha and the Omega,” says the Lord God" and in Rev 22:13 it says "I am the Alpha & Omega, the First and Last, the Beginning & End". Also, the Alpha & Omega = the Father, the First & Last = the Son and the Beginning & End = the Holy Spirit. We see here that these three beings are all three the "Lord God" so it is the "Lord God" who is 3 in 1 not "God". That being said the Lord God can act as 1 being the "Lord God", 2 separate beings the "Lord" and "God" and/or 3 beings as listed above. But God is 7 beings as shown in Rev 4:5 it is written "From the throne came flashes of lightning, rumblings and peals of thunder. In front of the throne, seven lamps were blazing. These are the seven spirits of God." but these 7 spirits can all act together as 1 being.

Who is the Lord? He is the Lamb of God who came from heaven to earth in the person of Jesus and is part of who the Lord God is and Jesus is the angel of the Lord God. So Jesus is both the angel of the Lord and the angel of God as well as the Son of God.
 

TheLearner

Well-known member
Jan 14, 2019
7,895
1,458
113
67
Brighton, MI
in Rev 1:8 it is written "I am the Alpha and the Omega,” says the Lord God" and in Rev 22:13 it says "I am the Alpha & Omega, the First and Last, the Beginning & End". Also, the Alpha & Omega = the Father, the First & Last = the Son and the Beginning & End = the Holy Spirit. We see here that these three beings are all three the "Lord God" so it is the "Lord God" who is 3 in 1 not "God". That being said the Lord God can act as 1 being the "Lord God", 2 separate beings the "Lord" and "God" and/or 3 beings as listed above. But God is 7 beings as shown in Rev 4:5 it is written "From the throne came flashes of lightning, rumblings and peals of thunder. In front of the throne, seven lamps were blazing. These are the seven spirits of God." but these 7 spirits can all act together as 1 being.

Who is the Lord? He is the Lamb of God who came from heaven to earth in the person of Jesus and is part of who the Lord God is and Jesus is the angel of the Lord God. So Jesus is both the angel of the Lord and the angel of God as well as the Son of God.
The correct understanding is three persons in One God. Not three Gods. Maybe you need to clarify what you were saying.

thanks, daniel
 

Dino246

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2015
24,685
13,374
113
in Rev 1:8 it is written "I am the Alpha and the Omega,” says the Lord God" and in Rev 22:13 it says "I am the Alpha & Omega, the First and Last, the Beginning & End". Also, the Alpha & Omega = the Father, the First & Last = the Son and the Beginning & End = the Holy Spirit. We see here that these three beings are all three the "Lord God" so it is the "Lord God" who is 3 in 1 not "God". That being said the Lord God can act as 1 being the "Lord God", 2 separate beings the "Lord" and "God" and/or 3 beings as listed above. But God is 7 beings as shown in Rev 4:5 it is written "From the throne came flashes of lightning, rumblings and peals of thunder. In front of the throne, seven lamps were blazing. These are the seven spirits of God." but these 7 spirits can all act together as 1 being.

Who is the Lord? He is the Lamb of God who came from heaven to earth in the person of Jesus and is part of who the Lord God is and Jesus is the angel of the Lord God. So Jesus is both the angel of the Lord and the angel of God as well as the Son of God.
You're playing word games that have no basis in either proper scriptural interpretation nor in historical understanding of the Trinity.
 
Sep 14, 2019
258
64
28
You're playing word games that have no basis in either proper scriptural interpretation nor in historical understanding of the Trinity.
words do make a difference as we see in Gen 1 & 2. In Gen 1 it is God's creation in Gen 2 it is the LORD God's creation...the text is clearly making the distinction between God and the LORD God. It is our job to sort out the differences but the differences are clearly shown.
 

Attachments

Sep 14, 2019
258
64
28
You're playing word games that have no basis in either proper scriptural interpretation nor in historical understanding of the Trinity.
I would say there is another layer of God's creation above the LORD God's creation.
 

TheLearner

Well-known member
Jan 14, 2019
7,895
1,458
113
67
Brighton, MI
You're playing word games that have no basis in either proper scriptural interpretation nor in historical understanding of the Trinity.
Thanks, that explains why his post made no sense.

Does the poster believe in three gods or is he One God wearing three masks?