Understanding God’s election

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Jul 3, 2015
64,654
32,909
113
Then explain to me how all unregenerate unbelievers are not idolaters. This dark, fallen world is filled with idolaters!

Of course, your refusal to simply come out and honestly give a simple "yes" or "no" answer re Jer 13:23a speaks volumes as to what you really believe. You, like PT, believe that Ethiopians can change their skin and leopard can change their spots. But you're too cowardly to say admit this publicly.

Ezekiel 36 verses 25-26 I will sprinkle clean water on you, and you will be clean. I will cleanse you from all your impurities and all your idols. I will give you a new heart and put a new spirit within you; I will remove your heart of stone and give you a heart of flesh.
:)
 

Rufus

Well-known member
Feb 17, 2024
4,633
593
113
I was under the impression that you didn't believe Adam was saved.
You are correct. I was just making the logical inference to Studier's appeal to Abel as, apparently, being the first believer. Re Eve, there are two passages that provide evidence she was indeed a believer after God reconciled her to Himself in Gen 3:15. Conversely, no such evidence exists for Adam.
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
22,605
7,722
113
63
You are correct. I was just making the logical inference to Studier's appeal to Abel as, apparently, being the first believer. Re Eve, there are two passages that provide evidence she was indeed a believer after God reconciled her to Himself in Gen 3:15. Conversely, no such evidence exists for Adam.
Didn't God shed blood for him when He made a covering for Adam?
 
Nov 17, 2015
4,209
986
113
Jul 3, 2015
64,654
32,909
113
Actually, Rufus is trying to redefine what context is or means.
How so? When Scripture says there are none good, does it mean some are good but we will ignore that for now? When Scripture says we all fall short, does it mean we all fall short, or does it mean there are some who meet God's standards, but we are not talking about them right now? When Scripture says, "The natural man does not accept the things that come from the Spirit of God, for they are foolishness to him, and he cannot understand them, because they are spiritually discerned..." Does it mean the natural man can understand the spiritual things of God? Does it mean he really can understand the gospel message even though it is heard as foolishness to him as Scriptures say? Is the natural man gifted with wisdom even though he has no fear of God which is the beginning of wisdom, according to Scripture? Will the lover of darkness come into the light even though Scripture says he will not, because he suppresses the truth of God in unrighteousness and is a lover of darkness, is actually defined as darkness itself, hates the light, and is a slave to sin, blinded to the truth and captive to the will of the devil, which many define as being free? Is the heart of the natural man, the stony ground that it is, fit for receiving and growing the Seed of God's Word into faith? Will that incurably wicked heart choose of its own accord to believe? Do you know how many here say everyone hears even though that contradicts what Jesus said? So odd to see so many claim when these verses about the natural man are given, claim they are being taken out of context when they are universal axioms.
 
Oct 19, 2024
5,429
1,124
113
USA-TX
How so? When Scripture says there are none good, does it mean some are good but we will ignore that for now? When Scripture says we all fall short, does it mean we all fall short, or does it mean there are some who meet God's standards, but we are not talking about them right now? When Scripture says, "The natural man does not accept the things that come from the Spirit of God, for they are foolishness to him, and he cannot understand them, because they are spiritually discerned..." Does it mean the natural man can understand the spiritual things of God? Does it mean he really can understand the gospel message even though it is heard as foolishness to him as Scriptures say? Is the natural man gifted with wisdom even though he has no fear of God which is the beginning of wisdom, according to Scripture? Will the lover of darkness come into the light even though Scripture says he will not, because he suppresses the truth of God in unrighteousness and is a lover of darkness, is actually defined as darkness itself, hates the light, and is a slave to sin, blinded to the truth and captive to the will of the devil, which many define as being free? Is the heart of the natural man, the stony ground that it is, fit for receiving and growing the Seed of God's Word into faith? Will that incurably wicked heart choose of its own accord to believe? Do you know how many here say everyone hears even though that contradicts what Jesus said? So odd to see so many claim when these verses about the natural man are given, claim they are being taken out of context when they are universal axioms.
"When Scripture says we all fall short, does it mean we all fall short, or does it mean there are some who meet God's standards, but we are not talking about them right now?" The latter, obviously/logically/semantically. IOW, all fall short before they don't by satisfying GRFS.
 

studier

Well-known member
Apr 18, 2024
3,458
735
113
The Reformed or “Calvinists,” as they are all too frequently identified, have been viewed as pairing almost dualistically “the nothingness of man” with “the overmastering power of God,” and, accordingly, as teaching a fundamentally predestinarian or deterministic theology—whether in utter accord with Calvin's thought or in a further, negative development of it. (p. 21)
______________________________________
It's no wonder that you and other FWers mercilessly bastardize the scriptures at nearly every turn. You just admitted that you could care less about how or if your interpretation of any given passage is internally consistent with the full counsel of God! But I do thank you for your unwitting honesty, especially since finding any honesty in you would be more difficult to find than a hen's tooth.
Just another repugnant try. Whenever you care to get into analyzing Scripture in context and truly comparing Scripture with Scripture from that basis, if you even know what this means, let me know. Until then you're just some guy using lube terminology to make it sound like you know something while throwing everything into a bizarre nothingness of man theory of Scripture and explaining away God's commands. You put forth some lube terminology and then can't even see context of a piece of Scripture let alone the full counsel of God's Word. One joke after another...
 

studier

Well-known member
Apr 18, 2024
3,458
735
113
The Reformed or “Calvinists,” as they are all too frequently identified, have been viewed as pairing almost dualistically “the nothingness of man” with “the overmastering power of God,” and, accordingly, as teaching a fundamentally predestinarian or deterministic theology—whether in utter accord with Calvin's thought or in a further, negative development of it. (p. 21)
______________________________________
Prove it. Give me the post number. Or just answer "yes" or "no" to the rhetorical question. You're the one playing ping pong here. It seems that with all this human spiritual ability mankind has that you keep boasting about a simple "yes" or "no" answer would not be above your pay grade.
Asked and answered. Follow the links. Do some work for a change. When you find the humility to ask graciously and respectfully for help, I know a few of us who will forgive your bad behavior and become your best friends.
 
Jul 3, 2015
64,654
32,909
113
Just another repugnant try. Whenever you care to get into analyzing Scripture in context and truly comparing Scripture with Scripture from that basis, if you even know what this means, let me know. Until then you're just some guy using lube terminology to make it sound like you know something while throwing everything into a bizarre nothingness of man theory of Scripture and explaining away God's commands. You put forth some lube terminology and then can't even see context of a piece of Scripture let alone the full counsel of God's Word. One joke after another...
Wow. So much trash talking.

Asked and answered. Follow the links. Do some work for a change. When you find the humility to ask graciously and respectfully for help, I know a few of us who will forgive your bad behavior and become your best friends.
So much hypocrisy. You have been going on like this for innumerable months now. Quite the double standard you have there.
 

studier

Well-known member
Apr 18, 2024
3,458
735
113
The Reformed or “Calvinists,” as they are all too frequently identified, have been viewed as pairing almost dualistically “the nothingness of man” with “the overmastering power of God,” and, accordingly, as teaching a fundamentally predestinarian or deterministic theology—whether in utter accord with Calvin's thought or in a further, negative development of it. (p. 21)
______________________________________​

Then explain to me how all unregenerate unbelievers are not idolaters. This dark, fallen world is filled with idolaters!

Of course, your refusal to simply come out and honestly give a simple "yes" or "no" answer re Jer 13:23a speaks volumes as to what you really believe. You, like PT, believe that Ethiopians can change their skin and leopard can change their spots. But you're too cowardly to say admit this publicly.
Do your own research. Why should anyone here show you things from Scripture or explain things to you. If it doesn't fit your bizarre nothingness of man theory all you've got is trash-talk in response.

Would you like to go through all of Scripture and study idolatry and how there have always been men of faith on the earth and how God overcomes idolatry? Of course not. I already know your modified TULIP nothingness of man theology so what's the point... A little proof-texting and disregard of context with some 3-in-1 nonsense claim goes a long way in your mind. Pointless.
 

studier

Well-known member
Apr 18, 2024
3,458
735
113
Actually, Rufus is trying to redefine what context is or means.
Agreed. He needs to change course and keep trying and then show some signs of being able to work from close context outwardly. Anyone can read theory and repeat terminology. It's like saying one has faith but has no works.
 
Jul 3, 2015
64,654
32,909
113
Do your own research. Why should anyone here show you things from Scripture or explain things to you. If it doesn't fit your bizarre nothingness of man theory all you've got is trash-talk in response.

Would you like to go through all of Scripture and study idolatry and how there have always been men of faith on the earth and how God overcomes idolatry? Of course not. I already know your modified TULIP nothingness of man theology so what's the point... A little proof-texting and disregard of context with some 3-in-1 nonsense claim goes a long way in your mind. Pointless.
First you say, do your own research, then you offer to help. Dizzy-dizzy double minded. I do understand that you are very committed to your traditions of man and un-Biblical philosophical point of view. You are so committed to it you have added a prequel to all of your recent posts that contradicts how God sees man. So very strange that you brag about your credentials and put yourself forward as a teacher of Scripture when you cannot even acknowledge that God sees flesh as grass. Of course in your man-exalting theology it does not come as a surprise.


Isaiah 40 verses 6B-8 ~ All flesh is like grass, and all its glory like the flowers of the field. The grass withers and the flowers fall when the breath of the LORD blows on them; indeed, the people are grass. The grass withers and the flowers fall, but the word of our God stands forever.
:)
 

studier

Well-known member
Apr 18, 2024
3,458
735
113
The Reformed or “Calvinists,” as they are all too frequently identified, have been viewed as pairing almost dualistically “the nothingness of man” with “the overmastering power of God,” and, accordingly, as teaching a fundamentally predestinarian or deterministic theology—whether in utter accord with Calvin's thought or in a further, negative development of it. (p. 21)
______________________________________​

So, tell us what your point was to highlighting (underlining) "we understand" in Heb 11:3? Exactly who are the "we" in the text? Is the "we" in the passage the entire world in the distributive sense? If not, what is the point to quoting the text in the first place...beside the point on top your head, of course.
All men of faith highlighted. Context in communications. Catch up if you really want to participate. Ask for help.
 
Jul 3, 2015
64,654
32,909
113
All men of faith highlighted. Context in communications. Catch up if you really want to participate. Ask for help.
There having been men of faith throughout recorded time should be contextualized. And of course
the salient information of their being far more idolaters perhaps included? No? Not in your theology?
Perhaps you need help in understanding why only eight were saved when the whole world was flooded.
 

cv5

Well-known member
Nov 20, 2018
24,594
8,953
113
Good CHOICES being made here. Pretty good deal for supposedly doomed Hivites.

[Jos 9:9 NKJV]
So they said to him: "From a very far country your servants have come, because of the name of the LORD your God; for we have heard of His fame, and all that He did in Egypt,

[Jos 9:10 NKJV]
"and all that He did to the two kings of the Amorites who [were] beyond the Jordan--to Sihon king of Heshbon, and Og king of Bashan, who was at Ashtaroth.

[Jos 9:24 NKJV]
So they answered Joshua and said, "Because your servants were clearly told that the LORD your God commanded His servant Moses to give you all the land, and to destroy all the inhabitants of the land from before you; therefore we were very much afraid for our lives because of you, and have done this thing.

[Jos 9:25 NKJV]
"And now, here we are, in your hands; do with us as it seems good and right to do to us."
 

studier

Well-known member
Apr 18, 2024
3,458
735
113
Good CHOICES being made here. Pretty good deal for supposedly doomed Hivites.

[Jos 9:9 NKJV]
So they said to him: "From a very far country your servants have come, because of the name of the LORD your God; for we have heard of His fame, and all that He did in Egypt,

[Jos 9:10 NKJV]
"and all that He did to the two kings of the Amorites who [were] beyond the Jordan--to Sihon king of Heshbon, and Og king of Bashan, who was at Ashtaroth.

[Jos 9:24 NKJV]
So they answered Joshua and said, "Because your servants were clearly told that the LORD your God commanded His servant Moses to give you all the land, and to destroy all the inhabitants of the land from before you; therefore we were very much afraid for our lives because of you, and have done this thing.

[Jos 9:25 NKJV]
"And now, here we are, in your hands; do with us as it seems good and right to do to us."
And as recorded in the NC example of Faith, a pretty good CHOICE made here by a gentile harlot who had obviously heard of Israel's God:

(Heb. 11:31 NKJ)
By faith the harlot Rahab did not perish with those who did not believe, when she had received the spies with peace.
 
Jul 3, 2015
64,654
32,909
113
Deuteronomy chapter 9 verses 3-5 But understand that today the LORD your God goes across ahead
of you as a consuming fire; He will destroy them and subdue them before you. And you will drive them
out and annihilate them swiftly, as the LORD has promised you. When the LORD your God has driven
them out before you, do not say in your heart, “Because of my righteousness the LORD has brought
me in to possess this land.” Rather, the LORD is driving out these nations before you because of their
wickedness. It is not because of your righteousness or uprightness of heart that you are going in to
possess their land, but it is because of their wickedness that the LORD your God is driving out these
nations before you, to keep the promise He swore to your fathers, to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob.
 

lrs68

Well-known member
Dec 30, 2024
1,299
364
83
You are correct. I was just making the logical inference to Studier's appeal to Abel as, apparently, being the first believer. Re Eve, there are two passages that provide evidence she was indeed a believer after God reconciled her to Himself in Gen 3:15. Conversely, no such evidence exists for Adam.
Seeing that it's the father [dad] thing to teach the sons to offer sacrifice like Cain and Abel did unto God....so it's most likely Adam taught them when he himself offered sacrifices to God.

Cain and Abel didn't just wake up one day and thought I will make a sacrifice and offer it to God because as a natural born human being that is what I know I should do. < Literally impossible for a Reformed doctrine follower to ever consider as a possibility.


Since it's most logical to think Adam taught Cain and Abel to offer sacrifice to God it's very likely to think Adam repented and offered sacrifices for his sins and his labor yield.

No doubt that Adam saw sacrifice first hand when God made him clothing from the skins of animals that had to die for his own sins and to cover his nakedness.

Sometimes logic just needs to be part of the equation when the Bible isn't specific about something. Yeah, I realize that is a difficult thing for the Reformed to accept.