AGAIN: I'll be very happy to defend my interpretation of
1Cor 15:9-10 as soon as you give me a straight "yes" or "no" answer to the rhetorical question in
Jer 13:23. (Comprende?)
Since you know I've answered you already and pointed you to follow the links back to find the answer, this fallacious tactic of Argument of Repetition leaves you asserting that you don't have to answer your interpretation of 1Cor since you posit falsely that I haven't answered you. You've got tools, I'll grant you that, albeit they're all fallacious argumentation methods that go along with your eisegetical methods. You clearly revel in the negative and are not to be trusted to get to Truth.