water baptism in Jesus' Name.

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
CS1

CS1

Well-known member
#121
May 23, 2012
13,058
4,344
113
#121
heartwashed said:
There is an absolute promise in holy scripture, that if one repents and is baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, salvation (remission of sins and the gift of the Holy Ghost) will follow (Acts 2:38-39).
Click to expand...
and Jesus also promised that those who call on HIS name shall be saved. And Jesus also said Go and baptize everyone in the name of The Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit. Did Peter change that? No, he did not.
 
CS1

CS1

Well-known member
#122
May 23, 2012
13,058
4,344
113
#122
heartwashed said:
Because he didn't need to. he had mentioned it previously, in Acts 2:38.

The Holy Ghost hermeneutic is comparing scripture with scripture (1 Corinthians 2:13).
Click to expand...
LOL FYI chapters and verses do not stay on the same day or situation always the context changes as does the day.
 
H

heartwashed

Banned
#123
May 17, 2023
830
57
28
#123
CS1 said:
believe on the Lord Jesus, and you shall be saved. Baptism doesn't save you.
Click to expand...
I think that it does (and did).

There is an absolute promise of remission of sins and the gift of the Holy Ghost; repentance and baptism in Jesus' Name is the condition of the promise.

Fulfill the condition, receive the promise.
 
H

heartwashed

Banned
#124
May 17, 2023
830
57
28
#124
CS1 said:
and Jesus also promised that those who call on HIS name shall be saved. And Jesus also said Go and baptize everyone in the name of The Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit. Did Peter change that? No, he did not.
Click to expand...
You're right. He didn't disobey Matthew 28:19 when he baptized them according to Acts 2:38.
 
Cameron143

Cameron143

Well-known member
#125
Mar 1, 2022
19,192
6,607
113
62
#125
heartwashed said:
I think that it does (and did).

There is an absolute promise of remission of sins and the gift of the Holy Ghost; repentance and baptism in Jesus' Name is the condition of the promise.

Fulfill the condition, receive the promise.
Click to expand...
That is a salvation predicated on works. It is antithetical to the gospel.
 
H

heartwashed

Banned
#126
May 17, 2023
830
57
28
#126
Cameron143 said:
That is a salvation predicated on works. It is antithetical to the gospel.
Click to expand...
No; because verily, verily, I say to you, baptism in Jesus' Name is not a work in this instance.

It is apprehending a point of contact for faith in order that you might receive a conditional promise in holy scripture.
 
CS1

CS1

Well-known member
#128
May 23, 2012
13,058
4,344
113
#128
heartwashed said:
I think that it does (and did).

There is an absolute promise of remission of sins and the gift of the Holy Ghost; repentance and baptism in Jesus' Name is the condition of the promise.

Fulfill the condition, receive the promise.
Click to expand...
you can think that but the word of God says

WE are saved by Grace through Faith,

Eph 2:8-9

8 For by grace you have been saved through faith, and that not of yourselves; it is the gift of God, 9 not of works, lest anyone should boast.

FYI, Baptism is an act of obedience and symbolic is by those who are saved, as Paul said in Roman chapters 6-8
 
Cameron143

Cameron143

Well-known member
#129
Mar 1, 2022
19,192
6,607
113
62
#129
heartwashed said:
No; because baptism in Jesus' Name is not a work in this instance.

It is apprehending a point of contact for faith in order that you might receive a conditional promise in holy scripture.
Click to expand...
Faith is the point of apprehension.
 
Cameron143

Cameron143

Well-known member
#130
Mar 1, 2022
19,192
6,607
113
62
#130
heartwashed said:
You deny the plain meaning of Acts 2:38-39 as being antithetical to the gospel. Why then is it included in holy scripture?
Click to expand...
The Bible isn't written like other books. It requires in many instances revelation.
 
CS1

CS1

Well-known member
#132
May 23, 2012
13,058
4,344
113
#132
heartwashed said:
No; because baptism in Jesus' Name is not a work in this instance.

It is apprehending a point of contact for faith in order that you might receive a conditional promise in holy scripture.
Click to expand...
many in the book of acts were not even baptized yet when the Holy Spirit came on them then. After that, they were baptized. Even Paul
had hands laid on him by a disciple who received the Holy Spirit and then was water baptized. Cornelius' house also recieved the Holy Spirit as Peter was still preaching. Water baptism in the name of Jesus was not done. I guess you think the Holy Spirit comes into those who are not saved?
 
H

heartwashed

Banned
#134
May 17, 2023
830
57
28
#134
CS1 said:
many in the book of acts were not even baptized yet when the Holy Spirit came on them then. After that, they were baptized. Even Paul
had hands laid on him by a disciple who received the Holy Spirit and then was water baptized. Cornelius' house also recieved the Holy Spirit as Peter was still preaching. Water baptism in the name of Jesus was not done. I guess you think the Holy Spirit comes into those who are not saved?
Click to expand...
The only instance in the book of Acts, in which people received the Holy Spirit before baptism was with Cornelius and friends. And I think that I have mentioned in this very thread that God was proving that Gentiles could be saved in that instance. For the church was in a time of transition; and therefore the existing protocols (seen in Acts 2:38) were diverted so that God could make His point that Gentiles can be saved.
 
H

heartwashed

Banned
#135
May 17, 2023
830
57
28
#135
CS1 said:
you can think that but the word of God says

WE are saved by Grace through Faith,

Eph 2:8-9

8 For by grace you have been saved through faith, and that not of yourselves; it is the gift of God, 9 not of works, lest anyone should boast.

FYI, Baptism is an act of obedience and symbolic is by those who are saved, as Paul said in Roman chapters 6-8
Click to expand...
"walking in newness of life" (salvation) is the result of baptism according to Romans 6:1-8.
 
The_Watchers_2017

The_Watchers_2017

Banned
#137
Jun 20, 2022
6,460
1,330
113
#137
CS1 said:
we can't add to the scriptures. Nothing in Acts chapter 9 says Paul was baptized in Jesus' name. YOu assume that.
Click to expand...
No, I meant Paul used into the NAME of Jesus but it was not for water Baptism.
CS1 said:
we can't add to the scriptures. Nothing in Acts chapter 9 says Paul was baptized in Jesus' name. YOu assume that.
Click to expand...
I can't imagine a Christian Act taking place like the Day of Pentecost, knowing how Peter was preaching under the Influence of the Holy Spirit, every Christian Water Baptism most likely matched Acts Chapter 2.

Clearly, the Holy Spirit, chose, to Water Baptize in Jesus Name!
 
Cameron143

Cameron143

Well-known member
#138
Mar 1, 2022
19,192
6,607
113
62
#138
heartwashed said:
You mean, sometimes we have to change the words in scripture in order to get the right meaning?
Click to expand...
You know that isn't what I mean. It means where scripture seems to contradict itself, it requires understanding that comes from God.
 
H

heartwashed

Banned
#139
May 17, 2023
830
57
28
#139
Cameron143 said:
You know that isn't what I mean. It means where scripture seems to contradict itself, it requires understanding that comes from God.
Click to expand...
So, you don't think that we really ought to change the word "for" to "because of" in Acts 2:38?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.