What divides the Book of Daniel into 2

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
#61
My, my. Your doctrinal assumptions are truly unbelievable. Daniel 12:7 and June 6th have absolutely nothing to do with the return of the Lord, except that both are about the end of the "time of the Gentiles" and the beginning of the time of the end.
And your understandings are way off.

7 Then I heard the man clothed in linen, who was above the waters of the river, when he held up his right hand and his left hand to heaven, and swore by Him who lives forever, that it shall be for a time, times, and half a time; and when the power of the holy people has been completely shattered, all these things shall be finished.

all what things? and what happens for 3 1/2 years? what happens at the end of it? is it not the ruturn of Christ and the destruction of the little horn?



Try studying more.




 
T

Therapon

Guest
#62
I went back to your first post, and found that one conclusion seemed to be most offensive to people. That conclusion is that the two witnesses represent the Jewish and Gentile church. That conclusion, I believe is contained in Revelation in another way.
Ah, that is so easy to scripturally prove that I wonder why it is not more generally taught.

Revelation 11:3-4 And I will give power unto my two witnesses, and they shall prophesy a thousand two hundred and threescore days, clothed in sackcloth. These are the two olive trees, and the two candlesticks standing before the God of the earth.

Figurative language of course, so who does Revelation tell us candlesticks are . . .

Revelation 1:20 The seven stars are the angels of the seven churches: and the seven candlesticks which thou sawest are the seven churches.

So if candlesticks are churches in Revelation 1, they are still churches in Revelation 11 unless God changes the definition of candlesticks somewhere between Revelation 1 and Revelation 11. He didn't, so the two witnesses of Revelation 11 are two churches.

So who are these two churches? Using the good sound hermeneutical rule of scriptural adjacency, we don't go to Zechariah, but to the closest place in Scripture (i.e., in the New Testament) for the definition of those two olive trees.

Romans 11:24-28 "For if thou (the Gentile church) wert cut out of the olive tree which is wild by nature, and wert graffed contrary to nature into a good olive tree (Israel): how much more shall these, which be the natural branches, be graffed into their own olive tree? For I would not, brethren, that ye (Gentiles) should be ignorant of this mystery, lest ye should be wise in your own conceits (sounds like us); that blindness in part is happened to Israel, until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in. . . As concerning the gospel, they (the Jews) are enemies for your (Gentile) sakes: but as touching the election (God's sovereign choise), they are beloved for the fathers' sakes. For the gifts and calling of God are irrevocable."

So the identity of the two witnesses and the salvation of the Jewish people, still under the Leveitical code during the Christian era, is not a debatable doctrine by Skolfield, but a provable truth given us by our sovereign God. But of course we won't believe it because it goes against our traditional doctrines. Sheesh!

 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
#63

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
#64
Romans 11:24-28 "For if thou (the Gentile church) wert cut out of the olive tree which is wild by nature, and wert graffed contrary to nature into a good olive tree (Israel): how much more shall these, which be the natural branches, be graffed into their own olive tree? For I would not, brethren, that ye (Gentiles) should be ignorant of this mystery, lest ye should be wise in your own conceits (sounds like us); that blindness in part is happened to Israel, until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in. . . As concerning the gospel, they (the Jews) are enemies for your (Gentile) sakes: but as touching the election (God's sovereign choise), they are beloved for the fathers' sakes. For the gifts and calling of God are irrevocable."

So the identity of the two witnesses and the salvation of the Jewish people, still under the Leveitical code during the Christian era, is not a debatable doctrine by Skolfield, but a provable truth given us by our sovereign God. But of course we won't believe it because it goes against our traditional doctrines. Sheesh!


why'd you CUT OUT the previous verse, ellis?

Romans 11:23
And even they, if they do not continue in their unbelief, will be grafted in, for God has the power to graft them in again.

did The Holy Spirit get it wrong?
should it have read...

Ellis 11:23
And even they, when they "win" The Six-Day War, will be grafted in, for God has the power to graft them in again.

how about:

Ellis 11:23
And even they, when they win The Six-Day War, will be grafted in, for God will graft them in again, even though they still hate The Messiah

ellis, did you know the majority of jews today are gentiles who converted to Talmudism?
 
Last edited:
T

Therapon

Guest
#65
And your understandings are way off.

7 Then I heard the man clothed in linen, who was above the waters of the river, when he held up his right hand and his left hand to heaven, and swore by Him who lives forever, that it shall be for a time, times, and half a time; and when the power of the holy people has been completely shattered, all these things shall be finished.

all what things? and what happens for 3 1/2 years? what happens at the end of it? is it not the ruturn of Christ and the destruction of the little horn?

Try studying more.
I thought you liked hermeneutics. All what things? All things in this prophecy and it can now be proven with certainty that Daniel 10:1 to Daniel 10:7 was fulfilled by June 6, 1967. It is an assumption that this is an end-time prophecy. Amd when you quote Scripture to me, please quote it a little more accurately. Here is a literal translation . . .

Daniel 12:11 "And I heard the man clothed in linen, who was on the waters of the river, when he held up his right and his left hand to the heavens and swore by Him who lives forever, that it shall be for a time, times, and a half. And when they have made an end of scattering the power of the holy people, all these things shall be finished."

The power of the holy people was no longer scattered or shattered by June 6th, 1967 when Jeruisalem was freed of Gentile control for the first time in 2573 years.
 
T

Therapon

Guest
#66
And your understandings are way off.

7 Then I heard the man clothed in linen, who was above the waters of the river, when he held up his right hand and his left hand to heaven, and swore by Him who lives forever, that it shall be for a time, times, and half a time; and when the power of the holy people has been completely shattered, all these things shall be finished.

all what things? and what happens for 3 1/2 years? what happens at the end of it? is it not the ruturn of Christ and the destruction of the little horn?

Try studying more.
That is either a bad translation or an inaccurate quote.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
#67
That is either a bad translation or an inaccurate quote.
7 Then I heard the man clothed in linen, who was above the waters of the river, when he held up his right hand and his left hand to heaven, and swore by Him who lives forever, that it shall be for a time, times, and half a time; and when the power of the holy people has been completely shattered, all these things shall be finished.

The New King James Version. 1982 (Da 12:7). Nashville: Thomas Nelson.

7 I heard the man dressed in linen, who was above the waters of the river, as he raised his right hand and his left toward heaven, and swore by Him who lives forever that it would be for a time, times, and half a time; and as soon as they finish shattering the power of the holy people, all these events will be completed.

New American Standard Bible: 1995 update. 1995 (Da 12:7). LaHabra, CA: The Lockman Foundation.

Daniel 12:7 (NIV84)
7 The man clothed in linen, who was above the waters of the river, lifted his right hand and his left hand toward heaven, and I heard him swear by him who lives forever, saying, “It will be for a time, times and half a time. When the power of the holy people has been finally broken, all these things will be completed.”


7 And I heard the man clothed in linen, which was upon the waters of the river, when he held up his right hand and his left hand unto heaven, and sware by him that liveth for ever that it shall be for a time, times, and an half; and when he shall have accomplished to scatter the power of the holy people, all these things shall be finished.

The Holy Bible: King James Version. 2009 (Electronic Edition of the 1900 Authorized Version.) (Da 12:7). Bellingham, WA: Logos Research Systems, Inc.



Take your pic, they ALL say the same :rolleyes:
 
K

kenisyes

Guest
#68
Ah, that is so easy to scripturally prove that I wonder why it is not more generally taught.
I see you took part in the "two witnesses" thread by Doulos last spring, but not the one over summer.

Can you please account for vs. 9 where it says no one was willing to put the dead bodies of the witnesses into graves? I cannot imagine how that could apply to churches.
 
May 2, 2011
1,134
8
0
#70
who or what is EILEEN NEELIE, DA:confused:
it or she might be me. but i wont know til you tell me.
Thought to reply as the thread is wandering and meandering again.

EILEEN NEELIE was in my Hermeneutics 401 class and my Psych 222 class. Though she couldn't spell very well and relied on a spell checker, she freaked out the classes from time to time with her intelligent insights and the fact that even her name was palindromic and chi astic.





.
.
.
.
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
#71
LOLOLOL DA!:D
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
#72
Ah, that is so easy to scripturally prove that I wonder why it is not more generally taught.

Revelation 11:3-4 And I will give power unto my two witnesses, and they shall prophesy a thousand two hundred and threescore days, clothed in sackcloth. These are the two olive trees, and the two candlesticks standing before the God of the earth.

Figurative language of course, so who does Revelation tell us candlesticks are . . .

Revelation 1:20 The seven stars are the angels of the seven churches: and the seven candlesticks which thou sawest are the seven churches.

So if candlesticks are churches in Revelation 1, they are still churches in Revelation 11 unless God changes the definition of candlesticks somewhere between Revelation 1 and Revelation 11. He didn't, so the two witnesses of Revelation 11 are two churches.

So who are these two churches? Using the good sound hermeneutical rule of scriptural adjacency, we don't go to Zechariah, but to the closest place in Scripture (i.e., in the New Testament) for the definition of those two olive trees.

Romans 11:24-28 "For if thou (the Gentile church) wert cut out of the olive tree which is wild by nature, and wert graffed contrary to nature into a good olive tree (Israel): how much more shall these, which be the natural branches, be graffed into their own olive tree? For I would not, brethren, that ye (Gentiles) should be ignorant of this mystery, lest ye should be wise in your own conceits (sounds like us); that blindness in part is happened to Israel, until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in. . . As concerning the gospel, they (the Jews) are enemies for your (Gentile) sakes: but as touching the election (God's sovereign choise), they are beloved for the fathers' sakes. For the gifts and calling of God are irrevocable."

So the identity of the two witnesses and the salvation of the Jewish people, still under the Leveitical code during the Christian era, is not a debatable doctrine by Skolfield, but a provable truth given us by our sovereign God. But of course we won't believe it because it goes against our traditional doctrines. Sheesh!

this is the WORST attempt i have ever seen to make unbelieving jews who have rejected Christ one of the two witnesses:D:D

stop adding your own nonsense into romans 11.
gentiles...not 'GENTILE CHURCH' << dispensational rubbish:rolleyes:
good olive tree << faithful israel

gentiles who believe grafted into jewish remnant called out who believed.
how hard is that?

there's ONE people of God.

it began with the jews who believed, the gentiles who believed were grafted in...and all people from all nations including jews who believe are the people of God, the Israel of God.

END OF STORY.

but....we have GOT to do SOMETHING about that Dome of The Rock.
and we have to convince Christians it's the right thing to do.


good work ellis....(not)

hey ellis - what's underneath the Temple Mount? any idea?
who built it and who goes there for what purpose?
 
T

Therapon

Guest
#73
why'd you CUT OUT the previous verse, ellis?

Romans 11:23
And even they, if they do not continue in their unbelief, will be grafted in, for God has the power to graft them in again.

did The Holy Spirit get it wrong?
should it have read...

Ellis 11:23
And even they, when they "win" The Six-Day War, will be grafted in, for God has the power to graft them in again.

how about:

Ellis 11:23
And even they, when they win The Six-Day War, will be grafted in, for God will graft them in again, even though they still hate The Messiah

ellis, did you know the majority of jews today are gentiles who converted to Talmudism?
"All scripture is given by inspirartion of God" and that includes the verses I quoted. It is improper to try to use one verse of Scripture to negate the intent of another. God does not speak against Himself so both verses are God's word and both are true as stated. The correct approach is to find a way to reconcile verses that appear to conflict. But your views are obviously too iimmalleable to be modified easily, so believe what you are comfortable with.
 
T

Therapon

Guest
#74
I see you took part in the "two witnesses" thread by Doulos last spring, but not the one over summer.

Can you please account for vs. 9 where it says no one was willing to put the dead bodies of the witnesses into graves? I cannot imagine how that could apply to churches.


I don't remember if I was on that thread by Doulos or not. If I was, I hope I was cogent. <smile>

But to answer your question: To understand Rev11:9, we must look at the rest of the 2nd Woe, accept the figurative nature of Revelation and recognize the validity of prophetic days representing years, as the Lord told Ezekiel in Eze 4:5-6 . . .

Revelation 9:13-15, KJV "And the sixth angel sounded, and I heard a voice from the four horns (Rev 4:6-7) of the golden altar which is before God, Saying to the sixth angel which had the trumpet, Loose the four angels which are bound (through prayer, the Church bound the works of Satan, Mat 16:19) in the great river Euphrates (This gives the geographic location, the Middle East. The Euphrates begins in Syria and runs between Iraq and Iran. But when the Coptic Church went into apostasy, no longer spiritually bound Satan and Islam began. Satan and his angels were loosed to attack the holy land). And the four angels were loosed, which were prepared for an hour, and a day, and a month, and a year, for to slay the third part of men."


The second woe is fulfilled by those four angels, but what did they do?

Time ends when the Last Trumpet blows in Rev 11:15, so these four angels must be released between Rev 9:14 and Rev 11:15! Searching Rev 9:13 through Rev 11:15. Do you see those four angels anywhere?

Take a look . . . Yes? No?

Oops, no four angels, but there is another clue to their identity . . .Time!The hour, day, month and year.

Revelation 9:14
. . . "Release the four angels who are bound at the great river EuphrateThe Euphrates river runs through the Middle East so these angels are released from within Islam!
Revelation 11:2 . . . Gentiles tread under foot the holy city for forty-two months. It was exactly 42 months (1278.34 years from the construction of the Islamic Dome of the Rock to the freeing of Jerusalem in 1967. A month is 30.437 days x 42=1278.34. Do the math yourself: 1967-1278.34=688AD and the construction of Abomination that Maketh Desolate.
Revelation 11:3 . . . Witnesses prophesy in the Gentile world for twelve hundred and sixty days. It was 1260 years from the construction of the Islamic Dome of the Rock to the new nation of Israel in 1948. Do the math yourself Dome of the Rock 688AD+1260 =1948. Even a 1st grader could do this one.
Revelation 11:13 . . . in that hour there was a great (spiritual) earthquake. The return of Jesus, still future.


So these "messengers" relate to Islam in the Holy Land, but where is the Year?


Spiritual Results of the Angels Loosed


Revelation 9:17-19
"And thus I saw the horses in the vision, and them that sat on them, having breastplates of fire, and of jacinth, and brimstone: and the heads of the horses were as the heads of lions; and out of their mouths issued fire and smoke and brimstone (all figurative). By these three was the third part of men killed (before the first Jihad, there were three major branches to the Church, the Coptic centered in Jerusalem, the Eastern Orthodox centered in Constantinople and the Roman Church headquartered in Rome. Islamic armies virtually destroyed the Coptic Church, and thus was "a third part of men" killed) by the fire, and by the smoke, and by the brimstone, (all figures of the false religion of Islam) which issued out of their mouths. For their power is in their mouth, and in their tails: for their tails were like unto serpents, and had heads, and with them they do hurt."


Army of the Enemy


Revelation 9:16
"And the number of the army of the horse-men were two hundred thousand thousand (in Greek, doo-o moo-ree’-as moo-ree’-as, defined as: two times innumerably many) and I heard the number of them."

So who are these Horsemen?


The almost 2,000,000,000 Muslims who have been a plague on the rest of the world ever since the days of Muhammad.


Islam is God’s Judgment on the Church


Revelation 9:20-21
"And the rest of the men which were not killed (the Eastern Orthodox and Roman Churches) by these plagues yet repented not of the works of their hands, that they should not worship devils, and idols of gold, and silver, and brass, and stone, and of wood (we have different "idols" today, TV, a new car, a bigger home, a power boat, a better job . . . different material things but they are idols just the same): which neither can see, nor hear, nor walk: Neither repented they of their murders (the Roman church killed millions during the Middle Ages), nor of their sorceries (in Greek: á ìá ßá, pharmakea, defined medication, i.e., drug abuse, be it alcohol or any other mind-altering substance), nor of their fornication (divorce, remarriage and casual sex), nor of their thefts."


But the Year, where is it?


Hidden in hemera, an ambiguous koine` Greek word that can be translated moment, day, time or YEAR, depending on context. In the NAS, (Strong’s 2250g) is translated year in twelve verses. If 3 ½ hay-me`-ra are 3 ½ years, then 3.5 x 365.24 = 1278.34 day-years. From Dome of the Rock to a free Jerusalem is exactly 1278.34 years. Viewed in that way, we can now understand the rest of Revelation 11.


The Three & a Half Years


Revelation 11:8-11
, NAS (Excerpts) "And their dead bodies (Greek: pto’-ma, by definition: a fall, a ruin, the carcass, the bones, i.e., the empty churches.) will lie in the street of the great city which mystically is called Sodom and Egypt, where also their Lord was crucified (Jerusalem). And those from the peoples and tribes and tongues and nations (the Moslems in the surrounding lands) will look at their dead bodies (the empty churches) for three and a half days (Years of day-years, i.e., from 688AD to 1967AD) and will not permit their dead bodies (the empty churches) to be laid in a tomb (to be torn down). And those who dwell on the earth will rejoice over them and make merry; and they will send gifts to one another, because these two prophets (the Christians and Jews) tormented those who dwell on the earth" (it is torment for the lost when the gospel is preached and they refuse to repent).

Spiritual Death of the Witnesses

Revelation 11:7
"And when they (The Two Witnesses) shall have finished their testimony (among the Gentile nations, 1948-1967), the beast (Satan) that ascendeth out of the bottomless pit shall make (spiritual) war against them, and shall overcome them (spiritually with materialism, false doctrine and the cares of this world), and kill them" (spiritually).

Isn’t that verse an accurate picture of the spiritual condition of the Church in the West today?

Luke 18:7-8 "And shall not God avenge his own elect, which cry day and night unto him, though he bear long with them? I tell you that he will avenge them speedily. Nevertheless when the Son of man cometh, shall he find faith on the earth?"
 
T

Therapon

Guest
#75
7 .

7 I heard the man dressed in linen, who was above the waters of the river, as he raised his right hand and his left toward heaven, and swore by Him who lives forever that it would be for a time, times, and half a time; and as soon as they finish shattering the power of the holy people, all these events will be completed.

New American Standard Bible: 1995 update. 1995 (Da 12:7). LaHabra, CA: The Lockman Foundation.

7 And I heard the man clothed in linen, which was upon the waters of the river, when he held up his right hand and his left hand unto heaven, and sware by him that liveth for ever that it shall be for a time, times, and an half; and when he shall have accomplished to scatter the power of the holy people, all these things shall be finished.

The Holy Bible: King James Version. 2009 (Electronic Edition of the 1900 Authorized Version.) (Da 12:7). Bellingham, WA: Logos Research Systems, Inc.



Take your pic, they ALL say the same :rolleyes:
No they don't, both the above are fine, but you cannot come to a knowledge of the truth ftom the others. But I am working on a post to explain Rev 11:9 now so I'll get to this later.
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
#76
It was 1260 years from the construction of the Islamic Dome of the Rock to the new nation of Israel in 1948. Do the math yourself Dome of the Rock 688AD+1260 =1948. Even a 1st grader could do this one.
i could do it too...if i NEEDED the DOTR to be the AOD.
too bad your magically stretching 70th week is non-existent.
too bad you picked a number that suited your math.

Medinanet - Who Built the Dome of the Rock and When? <

i wonder who really, really needs us to first of all believe Christ will be restoring any Temple or anything else in Old Jerusalem,
and secondly, who really really wants us to hate on Muslims?

The almost 2,000,000,000 Muslims who have been a plague on the rest of the world ever since
 
T

Therapon

Guest
#77
i could do it too...if i NEEDED the DOTR to be the AOD.
too bad your magically stretching 70th week is non-existent.
too bad you picked a number that suited your math.

Medinanet - Who Built the Dome of the Rock and When? <

i wonder who really, really needs us to first of all believe Christ will be restoring any Temple or anything else in Old Jerusalem,
and secondly, who really really wants us to hate on Muslims?
Abd el Malik ibn Marwan began clearing the temple platform in 685AD. Constuction of the Islamic Dome of the Rock on the Temple mount of God most holy began in 688AD. The al Aksa mosque was completed in 705AD. That is a 20 year window for Islamic construction on the Temple Mount, any year of which would fit the prophecy. However, the 1290 days of Daniel 12:11 pins us to 688AD.

We are not to hate the Muslims for whom Christ died, but we should absolutely hate Isalam, the false religion that has caused the deaths of so many of our Christian brethren.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
K

kenisyes

Guest
#78
I don't remember if I was on that thread by Doulos or not. If I was, I hope I was cogent. <smile>

But to answer your question: To understand Rev11:9, we must look at the rest of the 2nd Woe, accept the figurative nature of Revelation and recognize the validity of prophetic days representing years, as the Lord told Ezekiel in Eze 4:5-6 . . .

Revelation 9:13-15, KJV "And the sixth angel sounded, and I heard a voice from the four horns (Rev 4:6-7) of the golden altar which is before God, Saying to the sixth angel which had the trumpet, Loose the four angels which are bound (through prayer, the Church bound the works of Satan, Mat 16:19) in the great river Euphrates (This gives the geographic location, the Middle East. The Euphrates begins in Syria and runs between Iraq and Iran. But when the Coptic Church went into apostasy, no longer spiritually bound Satan and Islam began. Satan and his angels were loosed to attack the holy land). And the four angels were loosed, which were prepared for an hour, and a day, and a month, and a year, for to slay the third part of men."


The second woe is fulfilled by those four angels, but what did they do?

Time ends when the Last Trumpet blows in Rev 11:15, so these four angels must be released between Rev 9:14 and Rev 11:15! Searching Rev 9:13 through Rev 11:15. Do you see those four angels anywhere?

Take a look . . . Yes? No?

Oops, no four angels, but there is another clue to their identity . . .Time!The hour, day, month and year.

Revelation 9:14
. . . "Release the four angels who are bound at the great river EuphrateThe Euphrates river runs through the Middle East so these angels are released from within Islam!
Revelation 11:2 . . . Gentiles tread under foot the holy city for forty-two months. It was exactly 42 months (1278.34 years from the construction of the Islamic Dome of the Rock to the freeing of Jerusalem in 1967. A month is 30.437 days x 42=1278.34. Do the math yourself: 1967-1278.34=688AD and the construction of Abomination that Maketh Desolate.
Revelation 11:3 . . . Witnesses prophesy in the Gentile world for twelve hundred and sixty days. It was 1260 years from the construction of the Islamic Dome of the Rock to the new nation of Israel in 1948. Do the math yourself Dome of the Rock 688AD+1260 =1948. Even a 1st grader could do this one.
Revelation 11:13 . . . in that hour there was a great (spiritual) earthquake. The return of Jesus, still future.


So these "messengers" relate to Islam in the Holy Land, but where is the Year?


Spiritual Results of the Angels Loosed


Revelation 9:17-19
"And thus I saw the horses in the vision, and them that sat on them, having breastplates of fire, and of jacinth, and brimstone: and the heads of the horses were as the heads of lions; and out of their mouths issued fire and smoke and brimstone (all figurative). By these three was the third part of men killed (before the first Jihad, there were three major branches to the Church, the Coptic centered in Jerusalem, the Eastern Orthodox centered in Constantinople and the Roman Church headquartered in Rome. Islamic armies virtually destroyed the Coptic Church, and thus was "a third part of men" killed) by the fire, and by the smoke, and by the brimstone, (all figures of the false religion of Islam) which issued out of their mouths. For their power is in their mouth, and in their tails: for their tails were like unto serpents, and had heads, and with them they do hurt."


Army of the Enemy


Revelation 9:16
"And the number of the army of the horse-men were two hundred thousand thousand (in Greek, doo-o moo-ree’-as moo-ree’-as, defined as: two times innumerably many) and I heard the number of them."

So who are these Horsemen?


The almost 2,000,000,000 Muslims who have been a plague on the rest of the world ever since the days of Muhammad.


Islam is God’s Judgment on the Church


Revelation 9:20-21
"And the rest of the men which were not killed (the Eastern Orthodox and Roman Churches) by these plagues yet repented not of the works of their hands, that they should not worship devils, and idols of gold, and silver, and brass, and stone, and of wood (we have different "idols" today, TV, a new car, a bigger home, a power boat, a better job . . . different material things but they are idols just the same): which neither can see, nor hear, nor walk: Neither repented they of their murders (the Roman church killed millions during the Middle Ages), nor of their sorceries (in Greek: á ìá ßá, pharmakea, defined medication, i.e., drug abuse, be it alcohol or any other mind-altering substance), nor of their fornication (divorce, remarriage and casual sex), nor of their thefts."


But the Year, where is it?


Hidden in hemera, an ambiguous koine` Greek word that can be translated moment, day, time or YEAR, depending on context. In the NAS, (Strong’s 2250g) is translated year in twelve verses. If 3 ½ hay-me`-ra are 3 ½ years, then 3.5 x 365.24 = 1278.34 day-years. From Dome of the Rock to a free Jerusalem is exactly 1278.34 years. Viewed in that way, we can now understand the rest of Revelation 11.


The Three & a Half Years


Revelation 11:8-11
, NAS (Excerpts) "And their dead bodies (Greek: pto’-ma, by definition: a fall, a ruin, the carcass, the bones, i.e., the empty churches.) will lie in the street of the great city which mystically is called Sodom and Egypt, where also their Lord was crucified (Jerusalem). And those from the peoples and tribes and tongues and nations (the Moslems in the surrounding lands) will look at their dead bodies (the empty churches)for three and a half days (Years of day-years, i.e., from 688AD to 1967AD) and will not permit their dead bodies (the empty churches) to be laid in a tomb (to be torn down). And those who dwell on the earth will rejoice over them and make merry; and they will send gifts to one another, because these two prophets (the Christians and Jews) tormented those who dwell on the earth" (it is torment for the lost when the gospel is preached and they refuse to repent).

Spiritual Death of the Witnesses

Revelation 11:7
"And when they (The Two Witnesses) shall have finished their testimony (among the Gentile nations, 1948-1967), the beast (Satan) that ascendeth out of the bottomless pit shall make (spiritual) war against them, and shall overcome them (spiritually with materialism, false doctrine and the cares of this world), and kill them" (spiritually).

Isn’t that verse an accurate picture of the spiritual condition of the Church in the West today?

Luke 18:7-8 "And shall not God avenge his own elect, which cry day and night unto him, though he bear long with them? I tell you that he will avenge them speedily. Nevertheless when the Son of man cometh, shall he find faith on the earth?"
You can get most of the verses to work this way. The Greek certainly can also be interpreted that the churches will "die" and that the people will not allow them to become a memorial. The churches will be reestablished (resurrected) from heaven. If we read it that way, the rapture then follows. But now, how do you account for the fire from their mouths (it kills), and the control of the rain, rivers to blood, etc.? No church has ever demonstrated such power in history. And why are they in the streets of Jerusalem and not the whole world? Gill's commentary agrees with you that the threat is from the Moslem world. However, he has it past tense, ending in either 1453 or 1697. In other words, he gets the math to work in two other ways.

This is what I was trying to say when I brought up senses of Scripture and aorist tense. The purpose of Scriptural prophecy is to get us in touch with God's way of thinking about history, as well as to let us know what is going to happen. You can get this to work pretty well your way, and someone else can get it to work pretty well the other way. That's because all of us are reflecting different aspects of God's way in history. All history is the history of sin. Every victory of Christ is contained in here somehow, because Christ is victorious over every sin.

I also have a problem with whenever someone says "all figurative". Prophecies, when they are fulfilled are not figurative. The Wisemen really did see a star, Mary was really a virgin, Jesus really did suffer, etc. If we just accept the figurative nature of Revelation, then why can't the Euphrates be the eastern boundary of spiritual Israel, or the river from the garden of Eden? It means breaking forth, so why can't it be the breaking forth of a new day, and the angels being four elements of a new creation? We could go on and on. You have everything figurative in here, except the Euphrates. Why not that as well?

I think things are figurative, because they apply to so many other interpretations as well. Interpretations are generated by what you hold to be figurative relative to God's plan. I believe you have an interpretation which is consistent enough to stand as valid, but not the interpretation.
 
T

Therapon

Guest
#79
You can get most of the verses to work this way. The Greek certainly can also be interpreted that the churches will "die" and that the people will not allow them to become a memorial. The churches will be reestablished (resurrected) from heaven. If we read it that way, the rapture then follows. But now, how do you account for the fire from their mouths (it kills), and the control of the rain, rivers to blood, etc.? No church has ever demonstrated such power in history. And why are they in the streets of Jerusalem and not the whole world? Gill's commentary agrees with you that the threat is from the Moslem world. However, he has it past tense, ending in either 1453 or 1697. In other words, he gets the math to work in two other ways.

This is what I was trying to say when I brought up senses of Scripture and aorist tense. The purpose of Scriptural prophecy is to get us in touch with God's way of thinking about history, as well as to let us know what is going to happen. You can get this to work pretty well your way, and someone else can get it to work pretty well the other way. That's because all of us are reflecting different aspects of God's way in history. All history is the history of sin. Every victory of Christ is contained in here somehow, because Christ is victorious over every sin.

I also have a problem with whenever someone says "all figurative". Prophecies, when they are fulfilled are not figurative. The Wisemen really did see a star, Mary was really a virgin, Jesus really did suffer, etc. If we just accept the figurative nature of Revelation, then why can't the Euphrates be the eastern boundary of spiritual Israel, or the river from the garden of Eden? It means breaking forth, so why can't it be the breaking forth of a new day, and the angels being four elements of a new creation? We could go on and on. You have everything figurative in here, except the Euphrates. Why not that as well?

I think things are figurative, because they apply to so many other interpretations as well. Interpretations are generated by what you hold to be figurative relative to God's plan. I believe you have an interpretation which is consistent enough to stand as valid, but not the interpretation.
Did not the Lord say, "Is not my Word like a fire?" And in Acts2:14-21 don't you see the same figures used that you want to say is literal in Rev 11? <smile>

Looking back in Scripture, every major prophetic vision is figurative, beginning in Gen 37. Then much of Isaiah, Ezekiel, all of Daniel's visions, Joel, Zecheriah, Peter's sheet of unclean animals is figurative . . . but then we come to Revelation and say that God departed from how He's been giving visions to His prophets in the past and Revelation just has to be literal? <smile> Don't you see the incongruity of that? And don't you see when viewed figuratively, that Rev 11 fits historic reality?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
K

kenisyes

Guest
#80
Did not the Lord say, "Is not my Word like a fire?" And in Acts2:14-21 don't you see the same figures used that you want to say is literal in Rev 11? <smile>

Looking back in Scripture, every major prophetic vision is figurative, beginning in Gen 37. Then much of Isaiah, Ezekiel, all of Daniel's visions, Joel, Zecheriah, Peter's sheet of unclean animals is figurative . . . but then we come to Revelation and say that God departed from how He's been giving visions to His prophets in the past and Revelation just has to be literal? <smile> Don't you see the incongruity of that? And don't you see when viewed figuratively, that Rev 11 fits historic reality?
Joseph's dreams were figurative, but when interpreted, the prophecy they gave came true literally. His brothers said "are we ever going to bow down to you? They did, in Egypt. Pharoah's dream was of cows, Joseph interpreted prophetically, "these are your next 14 years of food supply", and it happened literally. Peter's vision was symbolic, but the message was real, "nothing is unclean for you." Because Peter acted on it, Paul was free to go to the world. Joel's prophecy came true, people prophesied and dreamed dreams. The sun darkening and moon turning to blood (meaning blood-red) are the conditions of certain eclipses, one of which happened on the day Jesus died. Matt. 27:45 suggests it may have been an eclipse, and I am told the astronomers with the computers verified it was of the right type. The prophecy says "before" the coming of the day of the Lord. The fire and smoke was probably caused by the earthquake (Matt. 27:51). This happened on the day Satan thought he won - it is before the Lord's victory.

Every vision is figurative, but the prophecy it gives is fulfilled in reality. When John's vision is fulfilled, all the verses will have meaning and fit together. We won't have any loose ends.

I'm not denying that you can interpret these verses figuratively to get to how they might actually happen. I am saying you do not have it all, and that suggests that when it happens, it will be different from what you expect. [I already know it will be different from what I expect.] We can get additional interpretations by allowing the figures to vary in how each can be interpreted. I doubt we will ever hit it correctly, because no one else ever got prophecies about Jesus right until after they were fulfilled.

Revelation 11 fails historic reality so far, since there have never been two organizations or people that stopped rain, spit out fire, etc., who were then silenced and came back to life. Until everything is fulfilled, we get only manifestations of God's will for the end that make it to earth in partial form in the meantime.