No enoch, bluto does not make mistakes, especially on this issue. Before I address you post could you please use PARAGRAPHS in you post instead of us reading ONE continuous sentence. Thank you, I hope.
Now, you said this: "Some bibles do say that. The original meaning is in John 1:14, Jesus is the only begotten Son. begotten means He took on flesh to dwell among us. Jesus is the only Son who was begotten. He is our champion." When the Apostle John wrote John 3:16 under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit what do you think he/John had in mind? What was the point John was trying to impress upon the reader?
So enoch, can you please tell me what the Greek word "monogenes/begotten" in English means? You stated above it means "He took on flesh" and then you quoted John 1:14. What is the second meaning of "mongenes" and how is it used in Scripture, please give me an example or two.
IN GOD THE SON,
bluto
King James bible in John 1:14 and John 3:16 have Jesus as the only begotten son of God. I am not King James only.
NIV and ESV have Jesus as the one and only Son. footnote in ESV for John 1:14 says another word for only is unique.
Monogenes theos is in John 1:18 often translated the only Son, God but the literal meaning as I understand is One Family (of) God. I conclude that Jesus is the only Son who took on flesh to dwell among us. in John 1:14 I understand the Greek word is Jesus tabernacle with us.
Law of first mention, John 1:14 Jesus is the only Son who was begotten into human form.
So when in other places in John where Jesus is called the only Son and since only also means unique which I assume applies to Isaac in Genesis 20 where Abraham was told to sacrifice his only son, Isaac uniquely begotten, the son of Abraham's and Sarah's old age.
Since Jesus is the only Son who took on flesh to dwell among us, (we both agree with this) , we will disagree on whether there are other sons.
John 10, Ye are gods refers to Psalms 82. Read the first verse. Jesus is the head of the divine counsel (King James), Jesus is the head of the mighty in other bibles.
Ps. 82:1 refers to the princes of Daniel called archangels by Jude.
I conclude that the princes are not created.
Because modern bibles have Luke 9:35, This is my chosen Son. And all bibles have Hebrews 1:8-9, Jesus was anointed from His companions, I conclude that Jesus's companions could have been chosen but the Father chose the Son who would be obedient in all things.
The archetype is Abel and Cain. God choose Abel and his sacrifice but rejected Cain and his sacrifice. Cain took it personally, grew jealous and killed Abel. Hebrews 11:4, 12:24. Abel represents Jesus. Cain represents Satan.
Without the modern translation of Luke 9:35, I would not have understood that Jesus was chosen from the other sons of God.
I don't base my understanding on one verse but Luke 9:35 opens me to understand Hebrews 1:8-9 and the archetypes of the youngest son who is chosen to be the most important and explains what caused Satan's rebellion. The Septuagint and Catholic bible in Ezekiel 28 does not have Satan as an angel. The Masoretic and Protestant Bibles do have Satan as a angel.