Greetings,
What exactly is this "sinful nature" that people believe mankind has inherited? Truly, the words "sinful nature" do not appear in most Bibles except for the NIV, and that same Greek word is translated as flesh when used to describe Jesus.
So the correct term is actually "flesh." Now then, is the "flesh" to blame for mankind being rebels against God?
There is a good scripture verse here:
Heb 2:
15And deliver them who through fear of death were all their lifetime subject to bondage.
Now why are men in bondage to sin? Because of fear of death. They sin to comfort themselves out of fear of God's wrath against them. They also sin to comfort themselves due to worries about their necessities being cared for. If they trusted Christ for all of their necessities, and trusted Christ that they wouldn't burn in Hell, then they would no longer fear death and would no longer be in bondage to sin, correct? So then flesh is not to blame for our bondage to sin, but rather fear of death.
1 John 4:18-20
18 There is no fear in love; but perfect love casteth out fear: because fear hath torment. He that feareth is not made perfect in love.
19 We love him, because he first loved us.
20 If a man say, I love God, and hateth his brother, he is a liar: for he that loveth not his brother whom he hath seen, how can he love God whom he hath not seen?
KJV
In my own walk of late I have noticed one thing, that the more I focus on Christ and His love for me, the more I am changed from sin to holiness. Because I am not focused on all of the negative things around me, I am not sinning to comfort myself as much. Does this mean that my flesh is dying? Has my flesh somehow changed? Nope, I don't think it's changed at all, but my fear of death and distrust for God seems to be decreasing.
1 John 3:2-3
2 Beloved, now are we the sons of God, and it doth not yet appear what we shall be: but we know that, when he shall appear, we shall be like him; for we shall see him as he is.
3 And every man that hath this hope in him purifieth himself, even as he is pure.
KJV
It's interesting that St. John says that a man who has this hope in him "purifies himself." In the scripture below, Paul tells us that because of God's promises we are able to "cleanse ourselves."
2 Cor 7:1
7:1 Having therefore these promises, dearly beloved, let us cleanse ourselves from all filthiness of the flesh and spirit, perfecting holiness in the fear of God.
KJV
I found this online:
II. "Flesh" and one's spiritual condition
A. "Flesh" is not equivalent to spiritual depravity.
B. "Flesh" does not refer to spiritual conditon.
C. "Flesh" is not inherent, intrinsic, or innate within man.
D. "Flesh" is not nascent. We are not born with the "flesh."
E. "Flesh" is not a generative source of evil within the individual.
F. "Flesh" is not to be equated with satan.
G. "Flesh" does not negate the completeness of spiritual regeneration.
H. "Flesh" is not substantive or partitive; "hunk of evil; dirty old man."
This article seems to say that our flesh is actually learned patterns of behavior mankind has developed in order to meet their own needs. Therefore, mankind through fear came into bondage and developed patterns of behavior that are termed: "flesh." If we walk in the Spirit, we no longer adhere to our old learned patterns of behavior. Walking in the Spirit then is actually just trusting God. Therefore, God doesn't physically change people from sinners to righteous men, but men change themselves by faith in Christ.
Thoughts?
What exactly is this "sinful nature" that people believe mankind has inherited? Truly, the words "sinful nature" do not appear in most Bibles except for the NIV, and that same Greek word is translated as flesh when used to describe Jesus.
So the correct term is actually "flesh." Now then, is the "flesh" to blame for mankind being rebels against God?
There is a good scripture verse here:
Heb 2:
15And deliver them who through fear of death were all their lifetime subject to bondage.
Now why are men in bondage to sin? Because of fear of death. They sin to comfort themselves out of fear of God's wrath against them. They also sin to comfort themselves due to worries about their necessities being cared for. If they trusted Christ for all of their necessities, and trusted Christ that they wouldn't burn in Hell, then they would no longer fear death and would no longer be in bondage to sin, correct? So then flesh is not to blame for our bondage to sin, but rather fear of death.
1 John 4:18-20
18 There is no fear in love; but perfect love casteth out fear: because fear hath torment. He that feareth is not made perfect in love.
19 We love him, because he first loved us.
20 If a man say, I love God, and hateth his brother, he is a liar: for he that loveth not his brother whom he hath seen, how can he love God whom he hath not seen?
KJV
In my own walk of late I have noticed one thing, that the more I focus on Christ and His love for me, the more I am changed from sin to holiness. Because I am not focused on all of the negative things around me, I am not sinning to comfort myself as much. Does this mean that my flesh is dying? Has my flesh somehow changed? Nope, I don't think it's changed at all, but my fear of death and distrust for God seems to be decreasing.
1 John 3:2-3
2 Beloved, now are we the sons of God, and it doth not yet appear what we shall be: but we know that, when he shall appear, we shall be like him; for we shall see him as he is.
3 And every man that hath this hope in him purifieth himself, even as he is pure.
KJV
It's interesting that St. John says that a man who has this hope in him "purifies himself." In the scripture below, Paul tells us that because of God's promises we are able to "cleanse ourselves."
2 Cor 7:1
7:1 Having therefore these promises, dearly beloved, let us cleanse ourselves from all filthiness of the flesh and spirit, perfecting holiness in the fear of God.
KJV
I found this online:
II. "Flesh" and one's spiritual condition
A. "Flesh" is not equivalent to spiritual depravity.
B. "Flesh" does not refer to spiritual conditon.
C. "Flesh" is not inherent, intrinsic, or innate within man.
D. "Flesh" is not nascent. We are not born with the "flesh."
E. "Flesh" is not a generative source of evil within the individual.
F. "Flesh" is not to be equated with satan.
G. "Flesh" does not negate the completeness of spiritual regeneration.
H. "Flesh" is not substantive or partitive; "hunk of evil; dirty old man."
This article seems to say that our flesh is actually learned patterns of behavior mankind has developed in order to meet their own needs. Therefore, mankind through fear came into bondage and developed patterns of behavior that are termed: "flesh." If we walk in the Spirit, we no longer adhere to our old learned patterns of behavior. Walking in the Spirit then is actually just trusting God. Therefore, God doesn't physically change people from sinners to righteous men, but men change themselves by faith in Christ.
Thoughts?