Ah, a well-written defense for divinely commanded genocide. See, the difference between the first group and the second group is that the first group doesn't see any need to justify God commanding genocide. He said to do it. So it's good and just. The second group looks for reasons why the command could be good or just, which you did a fairly good job at doing.
One thing I am curious about though is your last paragraph. You hint to an age of accountability for children. Many Christians believe in this ideology one way or another but there is virtually no Scripture to back up this claim. There is no doctrine that I know of that is more widely accepted than the Age of Innocence or Age of Accountability doctrine that has such little Scriptural backing.
We say the only way to heaven is through Christ, yet there is this backdoor exception. If you are too young, or some have even included the extremely mentally handicapped, then you get a free pass. Where is the line drawn for the age of accountability? How mentally handicapped does someone have to be? What about someone who gets into an accident that leaves them severely handicapped or in a coma? Who knows? All I know is I'd hate to be the kid who died just after he passed that imaginary line.
This doctrine has always struck me as conscious insurance. We all would feel a whole lot better knowing that babies and toddlers aren't going to hell in masses. But is there really enough Scripture to merit believing in this. And how old are we going here? 5? 7? 9? Apparently you'd go as far as 12 if you were referring to the orphan boy in my analogy. But it doesn't seem like age is necessarily the factor here, but rather the ability to be able to accept Jesus Christ as your personal savior. No matter how old a severely mentally handicapped person gets, they will never be able to do this. So people often include that group among those that get the free pass. One could even argue that people that have never heard of Jesus or God should get the free pass as well. I'd really be interested to here someone expound on this mysterious doctrine, using Scripture as backing.
Hi nogard,
I would submit that there may not be a certain age for everyone and you may be correct in that it is more about one's ability to know God. However, I do believe there is Scriptural support for the idea as Paul tells us that where there is no law sin is not imputed. Paul said,
7 What shall we say then? Is the law sin? God forbid. Nay, I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet. {lust: or, concupiscence}
8 But sin, taking occasion by the commandment, wrought in me all manner of concupiscence. For without the law sin was dead.
9 For I was alive without the law once: but when the commandment came, sin revived, and I died.
10 And the commandment, which was ordained to life, I found to be unto death.
11 For sin, taking occasion by the commandment, deceived me, and by it slew me.
12 Wherefore the law is holy, and the commandment holy, and just, and good.
13 Was then that which is good made death unto me? God forbid. But sin, that it might appear sin, working death in me by that which is good; that sin by the commandment might become exceeding sinful.
14 For we know that the law is spiritual: but I am carnal, sold under sin.
15 For that which I do I allow not: for what I would, that do I not; but what I hate, that do I. {allow: Gr. know}
16 If then I do that which I would not, I consent unto the law that it is good.
(Rom 7:7-16 KJV)
Paul says that he was alive once without the Law. I understand this to mean that before he understood the Law it did not condemn him. However, once he was able to comprehend the Law he became guilty of sin under the Law. He said, where this is no Law sin is not imputed.
12 Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned: {for that: or, in whom}
13 (For until the law sin was in the world: but sin is not imputed when there is no law.
14 Nevertheless death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over them that had not sinned after the similitude of Adam's transgression, who is the figure of him that was to come. (Rom 5:12-14 KJV)
This suggests to me that those who are not able to comprehend what is and is not sin would fall under this statement.