What was the original purpose for sex?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Status
Not open for further replies.
S

sword

Guest
#1
Since sex is only used for reproduction in the animal kingdom. Some animals are even monogamous; females never let males have sex unless they are in their mating season, so why should we human beings use anticonceptives to have sex just for an egoistic pleasure? Isn´t reproduction the original and natural purpose of sex? Then what should be the purpose of sex for us Christians?
 
May 21, 2009
3,955
25
0
#2
And then they became one. God wants people to have pleasure. Even the animals enjoy it.
 
G

greatkraw

Guest
#3
Since sex is only used for reproduction in the animal kingdom. Some animals are even monogamous; females never let males have sex unless they are in their mating season, so why should we human beings use anticonceptives to have sex just for an egoistic pleasure? Isn´t reproduction the original and natural purpose of sex? Then what should be the purpose of sex for us Christians?

NO - it was not
 
S

silverwind

Guest
#4
I believe that 'in the beginning' and after the flood it was intended for procration. However, if you read the Song of Solomon, (phew) it is all about pleasure :) :) So.... what was it for? procration AND pleasure.
 
G

greatkraw

Guest
#5
as the traditional wedding vows state - for mutual help and comfort:)
 
S

sword

Guest
#6
I believe that 'in the beginning' and after the flood it was intended for procration. However, if you read the Song of Solomon, (phew) it is all about pleasure :) :) So.... what was it for? procration AND pleasure.
Since in the beginning the original and natural purpose for sex was procreation we can infer that because of the original sin God allowed man to have sex just for pleasure, so exclusive sexual pleasure was not part of God`s original plan. Besides contraceptives don´t grow on trees, do they?
 
May 4, 2009
1,534
6
0
#8
For fun and to make kids. I can't wait till I get married. ;_;
 
I

iraasuup

Guest
#9
Well I've been married for 5 years. We don't have children, nor do we have any intention of trying anytime in the near future. If sex is purely meant for procreation as you suggest, then I suppose my husband and I (and countless other married, Christian, childless couples) are all living in sin?
 
S

silverwind

Guest
#10
well i'm done having kids..... i guess that means... the fun is over? lol.
btw i meant procreation, not pocration... that was strictly typo... mybad :)
 
S

sword

Guest
#11
Well I've been married for 5 years. We don't have children, nor do we have any intention of trying anytime in the near future. If sex is purely meant for procreation as you suggest, then I suppose my husband and I (and countless other married, Christian, childless couples) are all living in sin?
The apostle Paul said that if something is not wrong for you then you can do it unless it`s forbidden by God`s moral law of course. However there are some couples who have no sexual intercourse and live happily. This is similar to the kind of food man used to eat before the original sin: only vegetables, but then after the original sin God allowed man to eat some kinds of meat, but that was not part of His original plan.
 
S

songster

Guest
#12
A connection between the sexual practices of animals and those of human beings has often been the supporting premise in a number of debates, from darwinism to homosexuality, but the fact remains that humans and animals, though they may share similar traits, are not the same.

The ability to procreate is described in the bible as being fruitful and multiplying, but there were also times when even the most unlikely men exhibited a desire which was not simply to procreate, but to simply have sex. In Genesis 38, Judah, after losing his wife Shuah, laid with a woman he thought was a prostitute, but who was actually his widowed daughter-in-law in disguise who was disgruntled because Judah prevented his last son from marrying her.

Judah's desire was not uncommon. He was tempted as many men are tempted. Even Pauls writings describe individuals who are not able to restrict themselves from being sexually active and who should therefore marry.

These desires are not based on a 'season', a 'cycle' or 'mating period', but rather, a simple desire to be sexually active. While this should not be the primary reason for anyone to marry, it is certainly considered. Paul's writings clearly show that the husband and wife are to continually make themselves available to each other for sex.

7:3 ... The husband should fulfill his marital duty to his wife and likewise, the wife to her husband. The wife's body does not belong to her alone, but to her husband. In the same way the husband's body does not belong to him alone, but to his wife.

7:5 ... 'Do Not' deprive each other, except with mutual consent, for a time, that you may give yourselves to prayer. Then 'come together again, lest satan tempts you because of your lack of self control.

It is clear that these scriptures are not limiting sexual activity to procreative purposes alone, but also to satisfy sexual desire. It is, and always will be, a mistake to compare the behavior of animals to the behavior of God's children. In many ways, the animal kingdom is an example of what 'not' to do. They are wild and not held to a Godly standard, or subject to any doctrine. We follow the Word of God for every aspect of our lives. Sex was meant to be enjoyed, within the bond of marriage, between a man and a woman. To restrict marital rights by beginning to include prohibitive rules, is to open a door for man made doctrines, having nothing to do with God's Word.
 
Last edited:
I

iraasuup

Guest
#13
A connection between the sexual practices of animals and those of human beings has often been the supporting premise in a number of debates, from darwinism to homosexuality, but the fact remains that humans and animals, though they may share similar traits, are not the same.

The ability to procreate is described in the bible as being fruitful and multiplying, but there were also times when even the most unlikely men exhibited a desire which was not simply to procreate, but to simply have sex. In Genesis 38, Judah, after losing his wife Shuah, laid with a woman he thought was a prostitute, but who was actually his widowed daughter-in-law in disguise who was disgruntled because Judah prevented his last son from marrying her.

Judah's desire was not uncommon. He was tempted as many men are tempted. Even Pauls writings describe individuals who are not able to restrict themselves from being sexually active and who should therefore marry.

These desires are not based on a 'season', a 'cycle' or 'mating period', but rather, a simple desire to be sexually active. While this should not be the primary reason for anyone to marry, it is certainly considered. Paul's writings clearly show that the husband and wife are to continually make themselves available to each other for sex.

7:3 ... The husband should fulfill his marital duty to his wife and likewise, the wife to her husband. The wife's body does not belong to her alone, but to her husband. In the same way the husband's body does not belong to him alone, but to his wife.

7:5 ... 'Do Not' deprive each other, except with mutual consent, for a time, that you may give yourselves to prayer. Then 'come together again, lest satan tempts you because of your lack of self control.

It is clear that these scriptures are not limiting sexual activity to procreative purposes alone, but also to satisfy sexual desire. It is, and always will be, a mistake to compare the behavior of animals to the behavior of God's children. In many ways, the animal kingdom is an example of what 'not' to do. They are wild and not held to a Godly standard, or subject to any doctrine. We follow the Word of God for every aspect of our lives. Sex was meant to be enjoyed, within the bond of marriage, between a man and a woman. To restrict marital rights by beginning to include prohibitive rules, is to open a door for man made doctrines, having nothing to do with God's Word.
Well said my friend!
 
N

NewJerusalem

Guest
#14
Since sex is only used for reproduction in the animal kingdom. Some animals are even monogamous; females never let males have sex unless they are in their mating season, so why should we human beings use anticonceptives to have sex just for an egoistic pleasure? Isn´t reproduction the original and natural purpose of sex? Then what should be the purpose of sex for us Christians?
"And the two shall become "one flesh"
 
L

living2love

Guest
#15
And then they became one. God wants people to have pleasure. Even the animals enjoy it.
I do agree God does `1want us to be joined as One in flesh, 2 does wnat us to enjoy beinig joined with our soulmate however Love...animals do not enjoy haveing sex. Ever heard cats mate? Birds take thiers from the females, and God to has done this to controle the population of his animals. I wish humans could chatch on to the reason.
 
C

charisenexcelcis

Guest
#16
I do agree God does `1want us to be joined as One in flesh, 2 does wnat us to enjoy beinig joined with our soulmate however Love...animals do not enjoy haveing sex. Ever heard cats mate? Birds take thiers from the females, and God to has done this to controle the population of his animals. I wish humans could chatch on to the reason.
I disagree. If that were to be the pattern, then the teaching of Paul, to marry rather than burn with passion, would make no sense...
 
Oct 8, 2009
169
0
0
#17
What was the original perpose for sex? What kind of question is that.

For making babies of course
 
H

Harley_Angel

Guest
#18
That was a great post, Songster! You hit the point right on the head!
 
S

sword

Guest
#19
Maybe you should read this interesting article:

"What constitutes sexual excess? The reply has been given: Anything is excess when procreation is not the end. Man has become sexually perverted. He is the only creature that has his `social problem,' the only creature that supports prostitution, the only creature that practices self-abuse, the only creature that is demoralized by all forms of sexual perversions, the only creature whose male will attack the females, the only creature where the desire of the female is not the law, the only one that does not exercise his sexual powers in harmony with their natural constitution."
 
C

CIRBaptist

Guest
#20
Well I've been married for 5 years. We don't have children, nor do we have any intention of trying anytime in the near future. If sex is purely meant for procreation as you suggest, then I suppose my husband and I (and countless other married, Christian, childless couples) are all living in sin?

Why is procreation sinful? The marriage bed is undefiled.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.