Where did King James only originate?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

justbyfaith

Well-known member
Sep 16, 2021
4,707
462
83
Your claim is this:

"Because the translation accurately portrays Christ where many of the modern translations remain faulty in their execution of the language."

The "evidence" you cited does not even remotely match your claim, let alone support it. There is no "faulty execution of the language" in the examples you have given, and further, you haven't identified any particular translations.

Once again, you have failed miserably to substantiate your assertion. I must conclude that your assertions have no merit until you consistently demonstrate otherwise.
Try the NIV as opposed to the kjv. There are others of the same tradition that also have the errors that I speak of.

In Luke 9:55-56, Romans 13:9, and John 8:1-11, words, phrases, sentences, and even entire passages are removed from holy scripture in the passages that I have cited.

The evidence is there before you. All you have to do is look up the passages in the respective Bibles. The NIV is not the only one; so I told you to look at a variety of Bibles concerning this.
 

justbyfaith

Well-known member
Sep 16, 2021
4,707
462
83
Dude, you give yourself far too much credit. You just aren't that smart... and given your rampant arrogance on this board, you aren't that wise either.
I know that when it comes to my personal wisdom concerning living my life, I can even be a fool.

But since the Lord gave me "the word of wisdom" as a gift; and since I have begun to use it in my personal life, my personal life has improved greatly.

I am saying by this that I have no personal wisdom that is inherent in my flesh.

However, it has been prophesied over me that I have the gift of "the word of wisdom" and so you would do well to listen to what I have to say; at least some of the time you ought to consider it.

I know that it is written thus,

Pro 9:7, He that reproveth a scorner getteth to himself shame: and he that rebuketh a wicked man getteth himself a blot.
Pro 9:8, Reprove not a scorner, lest he hate thee: rebuke a wise man, and he will love thee.
Pro 9:9, Give instruction to a wise man, and he will be yet wiser: teach a just man, and he will increase in learning.
 

Dino246

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2015
25,472
13,785
113
Try the NIV as opposed to the kjv. There are others of the same tradition that also have the errors that I speak of.

In Luke 9:55-56, Romans 13:9, and John 8:1-11, words, phrases, sentences, and even entire passages are removed from holy scripture in the passages that I have cited.

The evidence is there before you. All you have to do is look up the passages in the respective Bibles. The NIV is not the only one; so I told you to look at a variety of Bibles concerning this.
You just aren't getting it.

The evidence that you claim does not even remotely support your assertion. NO amount of repetition will make it support your claim.
 

Dino246

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2015
25,472
13,785
113
I know that when it comes to my personal wisdom concerning living my life, I can even be a fool.

But since the Lord gave me "the word of wisdom" as a gift; and since I have begun to use it in my personal life, my personal life has improved greatly.

I am saying by this that I have no personal wisdom that is inherent in my flesh.

However, it has been prophesied over me that I have the gift of "the word of wisdom" and so you would do well to listen to what I have to say; at least some of the time you ought to consider it.
Clearly, you do not understand what the gift of "the word of wisdom" is, and you are both immature and self-important for mentioning it and thinking that anyone should pay attention to you because of it.

I have addressed these matters more thoroughly in another thread.
 

justbyfaith

Well-known member
Sep 16, 2021
4,707
462
83
You just aren't getting it.

The evidence that you claim does not even remotely support your assertion. NO amount of repetition will make it support your claim.
Okay, this will not be repetition but I will now do your homework for you and show you your error.

kjv:
Luk 9:55, But he turned, and rebuked them, and said, Ye know not what manner of spirit ye are of.
Luk 9:56, For the Son of man is not come to destroy men's lives, but to save them. And they went to another village.


NIV:
Luk 9:55, But Jesus turned and rebuked them.
Luk 9:56, Then he and his disciples went to another village.

.
.
.
kjv:
Rom 13:9, For this, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not kill, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness, Thou shalt not covet; and if there be any other commandment, it is briefly comprehended in this saying, namely, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.
NIV:
Rom 13:9, The commandments, “You shall not commit adultery,” “You shall not murder,” “You shall not steal,” “You shall not covet,”[fn] and whatever other command there may be, are summed up in this one command: “Love your neighbor as yourself.”[fn]

.
.
.
In the above passages, I have placed in larger print what is removed out of the NIV.
.
.
.
In John 8:1-11, the NIV completely removes the entire passage as being scriptural; whereas the kjv accepts that it is indeed scripture.
 

justbyfaith

Well-known member
Sep 16, 2021
4,707
462
83
Clearly, you do not understand what the gift of "the word of wisdom" is, and you are both immature and self-important for mentioning it and thinking that anyone should pay attention to you because of it.

I have addressed these matters more thoroughly in another thread.
It is written (1 Timothy 1:18, 4:14) that we ought to wage the good warfare through the prophecies that have been made over us.

If I have mentioned a prophecy that was laid over me, it is in obedience and in reliance upon that scripture that I do so.
 

justbyfaith

Well-known member
Sep 16, 2021
4,707
462
83
@Dino246, it is very likely true that you are my new "thorn in the flesh" given to me as a messenger of satan to buffet me and to keep me from being exalted above measure.

His grace is sufficient for me; and His power is made perfect in my weakness.
 

fredoheaven

Senior Member
Nov 17, 2015
4,110
960
113
the Septuagint uses Strong's G2193 for Heylel, but Revelation 22:16 has ὁ ἀστὴρ ὁ λαμπρὸς ὁ πρωϊνός
which is pretty interesting eh




however, Jerome's own commentary on Isaiah 14:12:

Pro eo quod nos interpretati sumus ob facilitatem intelligentiae: Quomodo cecidisti de cælo, lucifer, qui mane oriebaris, in Hebraico, ut verbum exprimamus ad verbum, legitur: Quomodo cecidisti de cælo, ulula fili diluculi.
Jerome's comment in English:

Because of that which we have interpreted for ease of understanding: "How have you fallen from heaven, Lucifer, who rose in the morning." In Hebrew, when we express it literally, it is read: "How have you fallen from heaven! Wail, son of the dawn!"
so if the kjv translators weren't just appropriating Jerome's interpretive change ((which he himself calls it)) from the literal to something he thought 'more understandable' then they were at the least using the very same argument to agree with him and do the same thing.
Lucifer is still a Latin word, not a Hebrew one, so we are still at the question 'is his name Daniel or is his name Belteshazzar?'
Umm, I have some sort of hard understanding here that Septuagint uses Strong or Strong referenced the Septuagint, but as far as I know, Strong’s number system was based on the KJB. Correct me if I am wrong but Strong’s G2193 is ἕως héōs, heh'-oce; of uncertain affinity; a conjunction, preposition and adverb of continuance, until (of time and place):—even (until, unto), (as) far (as), how long, (un-)til(-l), (hither-, un-, up) to, while(-s).

Post, is there any relevance in the topic at hand?

Lucifer is a Latin translation for the Hebrew ‘heylel’. Actually, Jerome’s Latin Vulgata is from Hebrew text and not the Greek Septuagint.

Now the KJB Translators were also beyond comparable. They too know full well of Latin. Lancelot Andrews possessed great ability in Greek, Latin, Hebrew, Chaldea, Syriac, and Arabic. William Bedwell is an author of 7 language lexicons including Hebrew, Lawrence Charlederton is a great scholar in Latin, Greek, and Hebrew, etc.. With these 54 able men can speak or converse Latin, Greek, Hebrew, I believe without hesitation that they were correct the rendering of the Hebrew heylel as Lucifer which so happened the same as Latin even as it sounds 'hell' which connotes fire, flame, light which he will fall therein in the future.
forgot to finish that thought -- i rather think the 70 most God-fearing & greatest scholars in Israel who could be found to translate the OT from Hebrew to Greek, who fluently spoke both, know better how to translate Hebrew to Greek than anyone living today.
they put
εωσφόρου for heylel in Isaiah 14:12.
they put
εωσφόρου also in these places, even tho they are not heylel in Hebrew:
  • 1 Samuel 30:17
  • Job 3:9
  • Job 11:17
  • Job 38:12
  • Job 41:18
  • Psalms 110:3
i guess it could be argued that non-native speakers of either language ~ 2,000 lving in a far-away pagan land years later knew the languages better, or that the 70 must have been wicked pharisees & lying scholars determined to corrupt the scripture ((tho there's no way they foresaw Revelation 22 being written)). but there is still evidence here that the Jews understood Heylel to have a reference/association to/with the brightness of the morning ((alternately interpreted/translated as 'twilight' in English)), and Isaiah being a Jew writing to Jews strongly suggests that the Jewish reading of this passage is an important thing to consider.


but Isaiah 14:12 is one word in one language, and Revelation 22:16 is 6 words in another language.
Isaiah 14:12 is Heylel, whatever that means
Revelation 22:16 is literally The Brightness, The Morning, The Star


:unsure:

we are thinking too much about the pagan language called English when we approach this, IMO
no scripture is written in English ;)
You brought out the 70 interpreters yet according to the KJB translators though they were commendable, their works did not fully satisfy the learned men for
‘…it is evident, (and Saint Jerome affirmeth as much) that the Seventie were Interpreters, they were not Prophets; they did many things well, as learned men; but yet as men they stumbled and fell, one while through oversight, another while through ignorance, yea, sometimes they may be noted to adde to the Originall, and sometimes to take from it” as taken execrpts from the ‘Translators to the Readers.’ KJB.

  • 1 Samuel 30:17 the KJV put it twilight rather than the 'morning'. KJV is correct. The Peshitta (Syriac) translated from the Hebrew also translated the same as the KJB = twilight which definitely differs from the morning.
  • Job 3:9- same as the above.
  • Job 11:17- the Hebrew word differs here and not as heylel or nesheph but as boker translated in the KJB as “morning”.
  • Job 38:12- Boker is being used being translated in the KJB as “morning”. Job 38:7 refers to the angelic being as sons of God or “morning stars" which is the NIV rendering for the Hebrew words “bôqer kôkâb” or “Sachar kokab” as my earlier post yet either of them definitely not being used in Isa. 14:12 for the Hebrew word used was “heylel”
  • Job 41:18- “shakh'-ar” is a Hebrew word for the 'morning.'
  • Psalms 110:3 mish-khawr' means “morning”.
As said the 70 were interpreters and true scribes of the Old Testament must copy the scripture in the land of Israel.

As to the angelic being called Lucifer, Heb Evans says “It is pretty difficult for the Morning star to fall from heaven and to be cut down to the ground. Also, we never heard of a star weakening nations, but then we are not into science fiction. We also do not know how a star can say things in its heart or challenge God. The name of Lucifer which may mean a shining one is a “transformer,” for he can transform into an angel of light? Job, called the angels “sons of God” and “morning stars” and Satan was “a” morning star of beauty and brightness by the name of Lucifer. We can abide trying to translate Bible names literally for effect, and that is one thing since the roots of such names do have literal root meanings. The root meaning in Isa 14:12 does pertain to shining or light or brightness (see Ezekiel 28). Still, none of these Hebrew roots in Isa 14:12 mean “morning” or “star” at all in Hebrew”
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
Okay, this will not be repetition but I will now do your homework for you and show you your error.

kjv:
Luk 9:55, But he turned, and rebuked them, and said, Ye know not what manner of spirit ye are of.
Luk 9:56, For the Son of man is not come to destroy men's lives, but to save them. And they went to another village.


NIV:
Luk 9:55, But Jesus turned and rebuked them.
Luk 9:56, Then he and his disciples went to another village.

.
.
.
kjv:
Rom 13:9, For this, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not kill, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness, Thou shalt not covet; and if there be any other commandment, it is briefly comprehended in this saying, namely, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.
NIV:
Rom 13:9, The commandments, “You shall not commit adultery,” “You shall not murder,” “You shall not steal,” “You shall not covet,”[fn] and whatever other command there may be, are summed up in this one command: “Love your neighbor as yourself.”[fn]

.
.
.
In the above passages, I have placed in larger print what is removed out of the NIV.
.
.
.
In John 8:1-11, the NIV completely removes the entire passage as being scriptural; whereas the kjv accepts that it is indeed scripture.
The NIV is not a word for word trans;ation

You can not compair the two because they are not the same type of interpretation.

Anyone who really truly studied the fact would understand this
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
@Dino246, it is very likely true that you are my new "thorn in the flesh" given to me as a messenger of satan to buffet me and to keep me from being exalted above measure.

His grace is sufficient for me; and His power is made perfect in my weakness.
You my friend are the most proud person I have ever met

God resist the proud but gives mercy to the humble

God is using many people to try to show you your pride. But you keep ignoring Gods message to you. And keep pointing back to yourself in pride

Remember the pharisee pumped his chest. The sinner got on their knees

The sinner went him justified.
 

ResidentAlien

Well-known member
Apr 21, 2021
8,313
3,618
113
Okay, this will not be repetition but I will now do your homework for you and show you your error.

kjv:
Luk 9:55, But he turned, and rebuked them, and said, Ye know not what manner of spirit ye are of.
Luk 9:56, For the Son of man is not come to destroy men's lives, but to save them. And they went to another village.


NIV:
Luk 9:55, But Jesus turned and rebuked them.
Luk 9:56, Then he and his disciples went to another village.

.
.
.
kjv:
Rom 13:9, For this, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not kill, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness, Thou shalt not covet; and if there be any other commandment, it is briefly comprehended in this saying, namely, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.
NIV:
Rom 13:9, The commandments, “You shall not commit adultery,” “You shall not murder,” “You shall not steal,” “You shall not covet,”[fn] and whatever other command there may be, are summed up in this one command: “Love your neighbor as yourself.”[fn]

.
.
.
In the above passages, I have placed in larger print what is removed out of the NIV.
.
.
.
In John 8:1-11, the NIV completely removes the entire passage as being scriptural; whereas the kjv accepts that it is indeed scripture.
I agree with you on this; I just don't don't agree the KJV 1611 is without error of any kind. No one can know that for sure. If you believe it, and it makes you feel better, then more power to you. I believe the Byzantine text is the best, but it's delusional to say the KJV 1611 is the only version that reflects the autographs with 100% accuracy.
 

justbyfaith

Well-known member
Sep 16, 2021
4,707
462
83
The NIV is not a word for word trans;ation

You can not compair the two because they are not the same type of interpretation.

Anyone who really truly studied the fact would understand this
There is no excuse for taking an entire statement of the Lord out of Luke 9:55-56.
 

justbyfaith

Well-known member
Sep 16, 2021
4,707
462
83
You my friend are the most proud person I have ever met

God resist the proud but gives mercy to the humble

God is using many people to try to show you your pride. But you keep ignoring Gods message to you. And keep pointing back to yourself in pride

Remember the pharisee pumped his chest. The sinner got on their knees

The sinner went him justified.
It is often when we see sin in other people that the same sins are most clearly inherent in our own lives.

It is common for people to see their own sins, magnified, in other people, even if those sins do not exist in that other person.

I made it my prayer at the beginning of my Christian walk that the Lord would produce in my the following virtues: humility, wisdom, and love.

I believe that the Lord answered my prayer in the affirmative (see Mark 11:24).

So, I believe that your accusation against me of pride is unfounded.

But you should really search your own heart to see where is the pride that you have been projecting onto me.

I hope that the Lord will be able to deal with that in you;

Because, believe it or not, I care about your eternal soul.
 

justbyfaith

Well-known member
Sep 16, 2021
4,707
462
83
I agree with you on this; I just don't don't agree the KJV 1611 is without error of any kind. No one can know that for sure. If you believe it, and it makes you feel better, then more power to you. I believe the Byzantine text is the best, but it's delusional to say the KJV 1611 is the only version that reflects the autographs with 100% accuracy.
If that is true, then the only way to get God's unadulterated message is to be an expert in Greek and Hebrew.

The "educated" scribes and Pharisees rejected Jesus; while the common people heard Him gladly.

I believe therefore that God would not limit His unadulterated message to "educated" Greek and Hebrew scholars but that He gives it to the common people (those who read their Bibles in common English; in the kjv).
 

ResidentAlien

Well-known member
Apr 21, 2021
8,313
3,618
113
If that is true, then the only way to get God's unadulterated message is to be an expert in Greek and Hebrew.

The "educated" scribes and Pharisees rejected Jesus; while the common people heard Him gladly.

I believe therefore that God would not limit His unadulterated message to "educated" Greek and Hebrew scholars but that He gives it to the common people (those who read their Bibles in common English; in the kjv).
Like I said, if it works for you more power to you.
 

Nehemiah6

Senior Member
Jul 18, 2017
26,074
13,776
113
There is no excuse for taking an entire statement of the Lord out of Luke 9:55-56.
And that is only the tip of the iceberg. A careful examination of all the omissions in the modern versions shows that there has been a deliberate attempt to attack Bible truth.
 

Dino246

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2015
25,472
13,785
113
There is no excuse for taking an entire statement of the Lord out of Luke 9:55-56.
Nobody “took out” anything. Go and learn WHY these verses aren’t in (all of) the newer translations, and stop spewing lies and ignorance.
 

Dino246

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2015
25,472
13,785
113
I believe therefore that God would not limit His unadulterated message to "educated" Greek and Hebrew scholars but that He gives it to the common people (those who read their Bibles in common English; in the kjv).
KJV English is not common English, and never was.
 

Dino246

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2015
25,472
13,785
113
I made it my prayer at the beginning of my Christian walk that the Lord would produce in my the following virtues: humility, wisdom, and love.
Keep praying; it hasn’t happened yet.
 

Nehemiah6

Senior Member
Jul 18, 2017
26,074
13,776
113
Nobody “took out” anything.
This is called wilful ignorance. So kindly check out Acts 8:37 for starters. Its absence destroys the passage completely. And that is only THE TIP OF THE ICEBERG!