Jesus embodied the Mosaic Law by living in sinless obedience to it, that's not a question of if he did, and there is nothing about him living in sinless obedience to it that means that it expired when he died on the cross, especially because all of God's righteous laws are eternal (Psalms 119:160). Moreover, if the Mosaic Law expired because Jesus expired on the cross, then that would mean that it also resurrected when he resurrected. Though the reality is that they took Jesus down from the cross because of the Sabbath, so the Sabbath did not expire because he kept the Sabbath perfectly and then expired.
In Titus 2:14, it does not say that Jesus gave himself to free us from God's law, but that he gave himself to redeem us from all lawlessness and to purify for himself a people of his own possession who are zealous for doing good works, so becoming zealous for doing good works in obedience to the Mosaic Law is the way to believe in what he accomplished through the cross (Acts 21:20), while returning to the lawlessness that he gave himself to redeem us from is the way to reject what he accomplished. The fact that Jesus gave himself to pay the penalty for our sins should make us want to go and sin no more, not consider ourselves free to do what God has revealed through His law to be sin.
Christ walked in obedience to the Mosaic Law and 1 John 2:6 says that those who are in Christ are obligated to walk in the same way he walked, so if someone is not walking in obedience to the Mosaic Law, then they should not consider verses that speak about those who are in Christ to be referring to them. Christ all spent his ministry spreading the Gospel message calling for repentance and obedience to the Mosaic Law so he taught his followers to obey it by word and by example, which means that it would be absurd to think that the Law of Christ is something other or contrary to what Christ taught. God is not in disagreement with Himself about which laws we should follow, so the Law of Christ is the same as the Law of the Spirit and the Law of the Father, which was given to Moses. In 1 Corinthians 9:21, Paul used parallel statement to equate not being outside the Law of God with being under the Law of Christ, and the Law of Moses is interchangeably referred to as the Law of God in verses like Nehemiah 8:1-8, Ezra 7:6-12, and Luke 2:22-23.
Jesus did not go around teaching a new set of laws after he resurrected, so it doesn't make any sense to me why people think that the resurrection means rejecting everything Jesus taught during his ministry and following a new and undefined set of laws that he didn't teach. Instructions for how to act in accordance with God's nature can't be abolished without first abolishing God.
In Titus 2:14, it does not say that Jesus gave himself to free us from God's law, but that he gave himself to redeem us from all lawlessness and to purify for himself a people of his own possession who are zealous for doing good works, so becoming zealous for doing good works in obedience to the Mosaic Law is the way to believe in what he accomplished through the cross (Acts 21:20), while returning to the lawlessness that he gave himself to redeem us from is the way to reject what he accomplished. The fact that Jesus gave himself to pay the penalty for our sins should make us want to go and sin no more, not consider ourselves free to do what God has revealed through His law to be sin.
Christ walked in obedience to the Mosaic Law and 1 John 2:6 says that those who are in Christ are obligated to walk in the same way he walked, so if someone is not walking in obedience to the Mosaic Law, then they should not consider verses that speak about those who are in Christ to be referring to them. Christ all spent his ministry spreading the Gospel message calling for repentance and obedience to the Mosaic Law so he taught his followers to obey it by word and by example, which means that it would be absurd to think that the Law of Christ is something other or contrary to what Christ taught. God is not in disagreement with Himself about which laws we should follow, so the Law of Christ is the same as the Law of the Spirit and the Law of the Father, which was given to Moses. In 1 Corinthians 9:21, Paul used parallel statement to equate not being outside the Law of God with being under the Law of Christ, and the Law of Moses is interchangeably referred to as the Law of God in verses like Nehemiah 8:1-8, Ezra 7:6-12, and Luke 2:22-23.
Jesus did not go around teaching a new set of laws after he resurrected, so it doesn't make any sense to me why people think that the resurrection means rejecting everything Jesus taught during his ministry and following a new and undefined set of laws that he didn't teach. Instructions for how to act in accordance with God's nature can't be abolished without first abolishing God.
Let me know if you ever become successful in finding life.