Why the king james?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
P

PeacefulWarrior

Guest
Ok then correct me, in the KJV was Abraham justified before God by his works? Was Abraham made righteous through his works like the NIV says? Don't forget about the verse below now.

Romans 4:2 KJV
For if Abraham were justified by works, he hath whereof to glory; but not before God.
What does justified mean?

adjective: justified


  • 1. having, done for, or marked by a good or legitimate reason.
    "the doctors were justified in treating her"

  • 2.
    THEOLOGY
    declared or made righteous in the sight of God.

  • 3.
    PRINTING
    having been adjusted so that the print fills a space evenly or forms a straight line at one or both margins.
    "the text is left-justified"


    Definition #1 & 2 are best for our context here (since we're not talking about print margins).

What does righteous mean?

adjective: righteous

  • 1.
    (of a person or conduct) morally right or justifiable; virtuous.
    "he is a good, righteous man, I am sure"
    [TABLE="class: vk_tbl vk_gy"]
    [TR]
    [TD="class: lr_dct_nyms_ttl"]synonyms:[/TD]
    [TD]good, virtuous, upright, upstanding, decent; More
    [/TD]
    [/TR]
    [/TABLE]

    [TABLE="class: vk_tbl vk_gy"]
    [TR]
    [TD="class: lr_dct_nyms_ttl"]antonyms:[/TD]
    [TD]sinful, unjustifiable[/TD]
    [/TR]
    [/TABLE]


Righteousness and justification are practically synonyms in this context.

No offense intended... but your problem is not with doctrine but with understanding definitions of words in the English language. I suggest a dictionary to go along with whatever Bible version you are reading.
 
Nov 23, 2013
13,684
1,212
113
I hate to leave but I to go fix my tractor and cut the grass.
 

John146

Senior Member
Jan 13, 2016
16,721
3,551
113
Amen! I never would consider to call a brother in Christ an enemy. I'm just passionate about what I believe. Here are some good questions to ask:

#1 How many people am I leading to Hell because I believe the KJV is the true word of God?

#2 How many young Christians will grow up with a stunted knowledge of the Bible, if I teach them to read it with the believe it is infallible and the very words of God?

#3 What is wrong with holding up the KJV and telling Bible-believing Christians, "You can trust every word"?

#4 How much of my reward will I lose for trusting God to keep his "WORDS" to every generation?

#5 If I am not allowed to believe the AV1611 is infallible, then which version should hold that distinction?


I hope that you can begin to see that we are brothers and not enemies.
 

John146

Senior Member
Jan 13, 2016
16,721
3,551
113
Who killed Goliath? 2 Samuel 21:19 Is there a difference in the versions?

KJV "And there was again a battle in Gob with the Philistines, where Elhanan the son of Jaareoregim, a Bethlehemite, slew the brother of Goliath the Gittite, the staff of whose spear was like a weaver's beam."

ESV "And there was again war with the Philistines at Gob, and Elhanan the son of Jaare-oregim, the Bethlehemite, struck down Goliath the Gittite, the shaft of whose spear was like a weaver's beam."

NASB "There was war with the Philistines again at Gob, and Elhanan the son of Jaare-oregim the Bethlehemite killed Goliath the Gittite, the shaft of whose spear was like a weaver’s beam."

I thought David killed Goliath...
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
Amen! I never would consider to call a brother in Christ an enemy. I'm just passionate about what I believe. Here are some good questions to ask:

#1 How many people am I leading to Hell because I believe the KJV is the true word of God?
You can't send anyone to hell. Bt the division people like you on this topic call cause many to not want a thing to do with God. So in context. Maybe many will end up in hell, and use your division causing tactics as the reason they rejected God.

#2 How many young Christians will grow up with a stunted knowledge of the Bible, if I teach them to read it with the believe it is infallible and the very words of God?
A christian can grow up with a stunted knowledge no matter what bible they use. Many younger christians can not speak old english, so would be lost trying to read a KJV.

A christian can also grow mature in the word and in God no matter what version they use. So this point is basically useless.




#3 What is wrong with holding up the KJV and telling Bible-believing Christians, "You can trust every word"?
Actually, no I can't. Because the english language is flawed. thus any word for word version would be flawed right with it.

But I can know I have a place to go if I have questions, or people to turn to. Thats why God gave us leaders by the way..

#4 How much of my reward will I lose for trusting God to keep his "WORDS" to every generation?
You will lose alot if you keep causing division and hate based on this topic. which is nonsensical.

You will get no reward for worshiping the king jimmy

#5 If I am not allowed to believe the AV1611 is infallible, then which version should hold that distinction?
You would be best not to trust any 100%, But to trust that all of them can lead you to christ, and lead you to maturity.
 

John146

Senior Member
Jan 13, 2016
16,721
3,551
113
You would be best not to trust any 100%, But to trust that all of them can lead you to christ, and lead you to maturity.
We have a winner...If there's not a Bible I can trust, then let's not call it the word of God. The word of God, I can trust 100%.

No final authority to appeal to = man is the final authority, see the RCC.

Btw, multiple Bibles cause divisions. There would be no version issue if we only had one Bible to trust.
 
Nov 22, 2015
20,436
1,430
0
Both versions used the same Hebrew texts .as outlined by Adam Clarke..the text itself was transcribed from 1 Chronicles 20:5

Elhanan the son of Jaare-oregim—slew—Goliath the Gittite—Here is a most manifest corruption of the text, or gross mistake of the transcriber; David, not Elhanan, slew Goliath.

In 1 Chronicles 20:5, the parallel place, it stands thus: "Elhanan, the son of Jair, slew Lahmi, the brother of Goliath the Gittite, whose spear-staff was like a weaver's beam."

This is plain; and our translators have borrowed some words from Chronicles to make both texts agree. The corruption may be easily accounted for by considering that [FONT="Ezra Sil" !important]‏ארגים‎[/FONT] [FONT="Gentium" !important]oregim[/FONT], which signifies weavers, has slipped out of one line into the other; and that [FONT="Ezra Sil" !important]‏בית הלחמי‎[/FONT] [FONT="Gentium" !important]beith hallachmi[/FONT], the Beth-lehemite, is corrupted from [FONT="Ezra Sil" !important]‏את לחמי‎[/FONT] [FONT="Gentium" !important]eth Lachmi[/FONT]; then the reading will be the same as in Chronicles. Dr. Kennicott has made this appear very plain in his First Dissertation on the Hebrew Text, p. 78, etc.

Adam Clarke's Commentary.
 
Last edited:
P

PeacefulWarrior

Guest
We have a winner...If there's not a Bible I can trust, then let's not call it the word of God. The word of God, I can trust 100%.

No final authority to appeal to = man is the final authority, see the RCC.

Btw, multiple Bibles cause divisions. There would be no version issue if we only had one Bible to trust.
You seem to not realize that the Word of God is Jesus Christ.
 
P

PeacefulWarrior

Guest
Who killed Goliath?
2 Samuel 21:19 Is there a difference in the versions?

KJV "And there was again a battle in Gob with the Philistines, where Elhanan the son of Jaareoregim, a Bethlehemite, slew the brother of Goliath the Gittite, the staff of whose spear was like a weaver's beam."

ESV "And there was again war with the Philistines at Gob, and Elhanan the son of Jaare-oregim, the Bethlehemite, struck down Goliath the Gittite, the shaft of whose spear was like a weaver's beam."

NASB "There was war with the Philistines again at Gob, and Elhanan the son of Jaare-oregim the Bethlehemite killed Goliath the Gittite, the shaft of whose spear was like a weaver’s beam."

I thought David killed Goliath...


Did President Obama kill Osama Bin Laden?
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
We have a winner...If there's not a Bible I can trust, then let's not call it the word of God. The word of God, I can trust 100%.

No final authority to appeal to = man is the final authority, see the RCC.

Btw, multiple Bibles cause divisions. There would be no version issue if we only had one Bible to trust.

Yep.

Keep causing division. You think God is going to bless you for this.

It has been proven to you the english language word for word bible is not completely accurate, It can;t be.

But you go on believing what you want, and ignore all the FACTS..
 

trofimus

Senior Member
Aug 17, 2015
10,684
794
113
I hope you will read this carefully and consider what I've said. I think you would agree that Hosea is talking about judgement on Ephraim and Judah right. God said I desired mercy and not sacrifice meaning in my opinion that loving and showing mercy to one another was more important than animal sacrifices. Judgement was already passed on Judah and Ephraim in the book of Hosea, there was no option for them to go back and "get it right" or as Jesus put it, go learn what that means.

Now step forward to Jesus. Jesus is dealing with the same type of people as Ephraim and Judah. Jesus said "go learn what that means".... Jesus was giving them a chance to turn. Jesus was offering grace before judgment was passed.

Jesus wasn't quoting Hosea, he was fulfilling Hosea, he was giving the Pharisees which were foreshadowed by Ephraim and Judah every chance possible to change before he passed judgement on them... not much after he said that, he passed judgement.

You have done exactly what the newer bible translators have done. You have already decided and passed judgement that Jesus was quoting Hosea rather than fulling Hosea. I don't know what the Greek and Hebrew says in those verses and I don't care because I know what Hosea was talking about and I know what Jesus was talking about.

Thanks for posting the supposed KJV error, this was a good one. I never noticed Jesus was fulfilling Hosea in that verse.
I think you missed my point.
My point was, that Jesus was quoting Scripture (not paraphrasing it), so His version of Hosea 6:6 differs from your KJV version.
There is no need to elaborate some possible explanations, how both version could be true. He quoted Old Testament and it differs from what you have in your "perfect and inspired" Old Testament.

The same with other verses.

Difference between "created" and "made" is that created is something from nothing, made is something from something (for example man from dust).
But it again is not my point, my point is the difference between what Jesus quotes as a Scripture and what you have in your Bible.

And to your question what is biblical Greek good for - exactly for this. For the control if your translation is good or bad.
 
Last edited:
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
I am still waiting to be shown how an aorist or perfect tense verb can be properly translated in a word for word bible in english, Since English does not have equivalent words or grammar laws to translate them with.
 
Nov 22, 2015
20,436
1,430
0
You seem to not realize that the Word of God is Jesus Christ.

Amen..to say that one version is the "only" word of God as like all the others it is a translation from the Greek and Hebrew texts is spiritual ignorance gone completely to seed..IMO

One even says that all other people born-again from reading a verse from other versions do not have the same Christ as "they" do that were born-again from reading a verse from KJV...guys this stuff is so messed up and completely foolish and in fact not true and grossly deceptive and divisive.

We should be listening to Prodigal in post #1180 and be avoiding these people..

Quote:

Romans 16:17-18King James Version (KJV)

[SUP]17 [/SUP]Now I beseech you, brethren, mark them which cause divisions and offences contrary to the doctrine which ye have learned; and avoid them.
[SUP]18 [/SUP]For they that are such serve not our Lord Jesus Christ, but their own belly; and by good words and fair speeches deceive the hearts of the simple.

King James Version (KJV)

Unquote
 

trofimus

Senior Member
Aug 17, 2015
10,684
794
113
I am still waiting to be shown how an aorist or perfect tense verb can be properly translated in a word for word bible in english, Since English does not have equivalent words or grammar laws to translate them with.
Even more simple examples - Greek has 6 words for love. English one? Or maybe two, if we will count "like" too. So whenever somebody translates the Greek term that is not in English for love, he must choose some "wrong" one, because he does not have the equivalent.

The same with "hell", Greek has at least 4 words for it, with absolutely different meanings. For example "tartaros" is quite impossible to translate correctly, without some additional explanation.
 
Last edited:
P

PeacefulWarrior

Guest

Amen..to say that one version is the "only" word of God as like all the others it is a translation from the Greek and Hebrew texts is spiritual ignorance gone completely to seed..IMO

One even says that all other people born-again from reading a verse from other versions do not have the same Christ as "they" do that were born-again from reading a verse from KJV...guys this stuff is so messed up and completely foolish and in fact not true and grossly deceptive and divisive.

We should be listening to Prodigal in post #1180 and be avoiding these people..

Quote:

Romans 16:17-18King James Version (KJV)

[SUP]17 [/SUP]Now I beseech you, brethren, mark them which cause divisions and offences contrary to the doctrine which ye have learned; and avoid them.
[SUP]18 [/SUP]For they that are such serve not our Lord Jesus Christ, but their own belly; and by good words and fair speeches deceive the hearts of the simple.

King James Version (KJV)

Unquote
I agree. They're sneaky though -- sometimes act as if they're sincerely searching and other times seem completely bent on holding on to their mistaken belief.
 
P

PeacefulWarrior

Guest
Even more simple examples - Greek has 6 words for love. English one? Or maybe two, if we will count "like" too. So whenever somebody translates the Greek term that is not in English for love, he must choose some "wrong" one, because he does not have the equivalent.

The same with "hell", Greek has at least 4 words for it, with absolutely different meanings.
Yeah! This is why people say stuff like, "I AGAPE you." (not 'mouth wide-open, but Christian love)
 
Nov 22, 2015
20,436
1,430
0
I agree. They're sneaky though -- sometimes act as if they're sincerely searching and other times seem completely bent on holding on to their mistaken belief.
In these kinds of cases - it would not make any difference what the truth is..they will not believe anything different ..the King James "version" to them is the only word of God despite all what was shown to them that shows the contrary...

This is a complete waste of time.

All translations have some errors and bias..and the Greek is so easily available now for the serious student of the word of God. The Lord has made so many Greek helps available to anyone that can read today on the internet....

The Holy Spirit is the only one that can interpret the scriptures anyway - not any men.
 

John146

Senior Member
Jan 13, 2016
16,721
3,551
113
My point exactly. The different versions promote different doctrines. That's been proven on here time and time again. So what do you do? Which versions do you avoid because they teach a different doctrine?


Romans 16:17-18King James Version (KJV)

[SUP]17 [/SUP]Now I beseech you, brethren, mark them which cause divisions and offences contrary to the doctrine which ye have learned; and avoid them.
[SUP]18 [/SUP]For they that are such serve not our Lord Jesus Christ, but their own belly; and by good words and fair speeches deceive the hearts of the simple.

King James Version (KJV)

Unquote