I'll quote just the part I was pointing out (even if just for the sake of the readers who may care to read it further--it is not too much longer than this small portion):
[quoting from link]
Robert Anderson - Forgotten Truths Appendix 4: Philippians 3:8-14 (ochristian.com)
Ephesians and Colossians, be it remembered, were written at the same period of his ministry as Philippians; and in the light of these Scriptures we can read this chapter aright. To "win Christ" (ver. 8), or to apprehend, or lay hold of, that for which he had been laid hold of, or apprehended (ver. 12);
or in other words, to realize practically in his life on earth what was true of him doctrinally as to his standing before God in heaven -- this is what he was reaching toward, and what, he says, he had not "already attained."
The "high calling" of ver. 14
is interpreted by some to mean Christ's calling up His own
to meet Him in the air (
a blessing assured to all "who are alive and remain unto the Coming of the Lord"); but this is not in keeping with the plain words --
God's high calling in Christ Jesus, i.e. what God has called us (made us) to be in Christ. [that is, IN THE HERE AND NOW]
If this passage refers to the literal resurrection, then the words "not as though I had already attained must mean that, while here on earth, and before the Lord's Coming, the Apostle hoped either to undergo the change of ver. 21, or else to win some sort of saintship diploma, or certificate, to ensure his being raised at the Coming. These alternatives are inexorable; and they only need to be stated to ensure their rejection.
One word more. If the Apostle Paul, after such a life of saintship and service, was in doubt as to his part in the resurrection, no one of us, unless he be the proudest of Pharisees or the blindest of fools, will dream of attaining it. In fact we shall dismiss the subject from our minds.
[end quoting; bracketed note mine; bold and underline mine; parentheses original]
I do not think we disagree on this point... in fact, this is what I was pointing out (and especially that "
work-out your own salvation" [they did not need Paul present with them, and though they were in "fearful" circumstances due to his imprisonment], Paul is
exhorting them to "DO IT
AFRAID, if you must! [
]," [
note again 1:14,
said of others] in the salvation they possess presently--and no, I am not suggesting one can "lose or forfeit" salvation, just to be clear.
)
Thanks for posting those thoughts. Instead of rebutting, I'll set forth my standpoint and you can compare.
The prevailing understanding in Christianity today is that, LIKE ISRAEL, we are on earth to worship and serve God in the Person of Christ. That is, we are here and Jesus is above the highest heaven sitting at the right hand of the Father in His throne. Instead of 613 laws of Moses, we have declared the circa 2,400 commands of the New Testament as our lifetstyle. One day, Jesus will return and take us all to heaven with Him. But this is a pitiful view of things. The Bible reveals the following.
Man was created (i) in God's image and likeness, to display Him, and (ii) to subdue and rule the earth, sea and sky (Gen.1:26-28). To acheive this, God put man in front to a Tree of Life and commanded him to eat. When we eat anything, the metabolism assimilates the elements of the food and distributes it through the body organically. Adam and Eve, though perfect in their construction, could not display God without having God's nature. And man, made "lower than the angels" could not subdue and rule angels and demons without God's power. God's immutable councils with man hung on what he ATE. It was, WHAT WAS ORGANICALLY IN MAN that would decide the outcome.
The Book of John fills the gap - the missing link. It is a Book dedicated to God getting Himself into man to achieve His purpose of having man in His image and likeness, having the character and power to subdue and rule a superior enemy (Rom.8:29). Paul's revelation was not an abstract group of base men behaving well and going to heaven. Paul's revelation was "GET CHRIST INTO THE MAN AND LET HIM PERMEATE THE WHOLE MAN!" If God could get Christ into men, and Christ could occupy, motivate, empower and rule a man, that man would fulfill God's purpose of Genesis 1:26-28. Philippians is a Book about experiencing Christ INTIMATELY. Look at
Philippians 1:11, "Being filled with the fruits of righteousness, which are by Jesus Christ, unto the glory and praise of God"
"Being filled" is INTRINSIC. It is not a work by command, but a work of inner nature. A dog does not need a command to bark. He will do it by nature. A man cannot turn the other cheek, except that he has that nature - the nature of Christ.
"Which are by Jesus Christ". All is clear, this inward "filling" is motivated, requested and energized by Jesus Christ INSIDE the man
"Unto the glory and praise of God". The end result is to display God so that men might see Who and What He is.
So when we come, in Chapter 3, the words "to GAIN Christ", "to WIN Christ", "to know the FELLOWSHIP of His sufferings", "to be made conformable to His death" and to "Know the power of His resurrection" ALL POINT TO AN INTIMATE PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE GAINED BY AN INTIMATE PERSONAL WALK WITH HIM ON THE SAME ROAD HE WALKED, AND, HAVE HIM IN YOU as a constant companion, speaking and motivating, and empowering you.
I agree that we must have an intellectual knowledge of Him, and with this we form our doctrines. But how will a doctrine make you "conformable with His death"??? Paul had the revelation with which to approach the Gentiles, build Churches and stand before kings with the gospel. His intellectual knowledge was vast, but he was missing the EXPERIENCE of Christ's overcoming life and nature. Have you been conformed to His death yet? Have you experienced resurrection life? Paul writes "I stretch for ...", and "I forget what is behind"! This costs. Paul actually lowers intellectual knowledge. As a Pharisee under Gamaliel, he was abounding in intellectual knowledge. After 14 years being personally taught the mysteries of the Church, the Rapture, the Second Coming of Christ, Paul was filled to capacity with intellectual knowledge. What he wanted in Philippians 3 was not more intellect. It was to be intimately acquainted with the person of Jesus INTRINSICALLY.
And in both the warning of Matthew 7:21-23, and the Virgins of Matthew 25, the deciding factor was; "I DON'T RECOGNIZE YOU" WE WERE NOT INTIMATE! Thus, if we take Philippians 3:8-14 literally and plainly for what it says, there is no problem. Christ "TAKES" some and "LEAVES" some based on INTIMACY. Have you ever wondered why only THREE of TWELVE disciples went with Him up the Mountain of Transfiguration? On this mountain we have Christ seen as never before - in glory. We have three disciples (the number of resurrection) - not twelve (the totality of God's people). We have Elijah who speaks for those alive and raptured by an UP-CALLING. We have Moses, the faithful dead whose body was fought for so that he could experience the resurrection life of Christ. But not any resurrection! It is the "EX-anastasis" (Gk.). It is only used once and means the resurrection out of the resurrection. And Paul says it must be ATTAINED.
I dare say that Philippians 3:8-14 is as plain as it reads. A Christian can be saved. He can do major works for Christ. But if he did not walk INTIMATELY with Him on His dusty, troubled, road to rejection and death, he will not ATTAINto the "out-resurrection" or the "PRIZE" of the Upward call of God.