Bill Gates' COVID mark being heavily marketed - will you take it, or remain under house arrest?

[Nehemiah6]

So Bill Gates, the guy who invented the software susceptible to computer viruses so he could sell you the cure, has moved on to do the same thing with people.

It's high time Bill Gates and all his cronies were seriously investigated for crimes against humanity. Gates was doing a coronvirus pandemic simulation weeks before that virus began its rampage. Fauci & Birx worked directly for Gates to mislead Americans and engineer a shutdown with wild predictions. Soros has invested millions in a lab in Wuhan. It is also high time that several prominent billionaires such as Soros, Zuckerberg, Bloomberg, Steyer, were investigated and locked up for colluding with the enemies of America.

 

[Angela53510]

I don't agree with all this Dispie eschatological nonsense.

BUT, I would not trust Bill Gates as far as I could throw him. I've been reading about the thousands of children/people who died or were paralyzed in India and Africa by Gates. He was using the vaccine to sterilize young girls. What a lying, deceitful practice! His goal is population control, and by putting contraceptives in vaccines, it will mean many young women being unable to have children.

So, although I have had taken lots of vaccines in the past, I would not take a Bill Gates vaccine. I left PCs behind because of their terrible viruses. I've had MacBook Pros for 15 years. I also have an IPAd, and various IPhones, and I have never had a virus. Bill Gates could have designed a computer that didn't constantly needed anti-viral checks and updates, but he allowed viruses to proliferate. I don't trust his computers, and certainly not his vaccines!

 

[Moses_Young]

I will not vote because of how it's worded it doesn't reflect my vote, but I'd like to say Certainly not.
Like @JeremiahsCup , I do not believe this is the mark of the beast. I suggest, if OP can edit the poll, to allow some other option for Certainly not because some of us who don't believe it's the mark of the beast are adamant regardless on not getting chipped. How about "just NO", lol.
Allowing to be chipped paves way for some very bad things. It also harms human dignity. I am a human, when I decide to be cyborg I'll let Bill Gates know...

Sorry friend - I'm unable to change the wording. I did wonder about including it when I put the poll together, but also wanted to make it interesting. My apologies that my additional wording prohibits you displaying your choice.

 

[Moses_Young]

God would want the Christians out there in the world during that time to witness to the world during those three and one half years.

If the Christians do not take the vaccine then they could not be out there witnessing if they have not been vaccinated, and are quarantined, and the vaccine is not the mark of the beast.

I'm a bit unsure about this. They've had the technology to control animals with chips since the mid-1900s (e.g. making a bull come to a stand-still mid-charge with the press of a button on a remote radio-controller). I don't know how technology has progressed, but I wonder how much control they would have over people who do have chips installed.

If the mark of the beast is some sort of chip/vaccine-type injection, what makes sense to me is that it would explain why it causes damnation - once installed, a victim would be controlled never to turn to Jesus for salvation.

I think if God wants us out there witnessing, He will get us out there, irrespective of quarantine/vaccine laws. Look at Peter - he didn't have to concede to the Jews that they were right, God just sent an angel, and Peter's chains fell off and he walked right out of gaol.