Clinton's Continued Self Destruction?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Dec 1, 2014
1,430
27
0
#41
it sounds to me that this topic should be dealt with in another chatroom so that it can be rationally rolled around and digested and opinions made by those those really honestly care. A CHRISTIAN knows that mankind is imperfect and that our present government is not the answer. IT bores us to be in this chatroom and hear a lot of political rhetoric. IT is not needed..nor appreciated at all. If GOD (and that is a big 'IF") is leading your heart into politics, go for it in a political chatroom, but leave it out of a CHRIST centered BIBLE quoting chatroom where sharing CHRIST is first and foremost.
 

p_rehbein

Senior Member
Sep 4, 2013
30,414
6,647
113
#42
Hmm, well as this is the News Forum, and not the Bible Discussion Forum.........well......hmm

Take a look through the various Forum Titles.........and let me know which one you would suggest?
 

Desdichado

Senior Member
Feb 9, 2014
8,768
838
113
#43
it sounds to me that this topic should be dealt with in another chatroom so that it can be rationally rolled around and digested and opinions made by those those really honestly care. A CHRISTIAN knows that mankind is imperfect and that our present government is not the answer. IT bores us to be in this chatroom and hear a lot of political rhetoric. IT is not needed..nor appreciated at all. If GOD (and that is a big 'IF") is leading your heart into politics, go for it in a political chatroom, but leave it out of a CHRIST centered BIBLE quoting chatroom where sharing CHRIST is first and foremost.
Is it hard living in a mountain monastery? Does the inside of your ears itch because of all the sand?
 
S

Sirk

Guest
#44
Hmm, well as this is the News Forum, and not the Bible Discussion Forum.........well......hmm

Take a look through the various Forum Titles.........and let me know which one you would suggest?
Thats what I thought as well. Talking about Hillary or bill or Bama or any other news in the newsroom seems totally acceptable to me.
 

Desdichado

Senior Member
Feb 9, 2014
8,768
838
113
#45
Thats what I thought as well. Talking about Hillary or bill or Bama or any other news in the newsroom seems totally acceptable to me.
If it ain't News about John MacArthur, Franklin Graham, and the mission field, then it ain't Christian news!

Heathen!
 
Dec 18, 2013
6,733
45
0
#46
The idea that Hillary Clinton is the only person capable of being President is, well, it is so sad that I can't even post my usual facepalm smileycon.............gonna have to go with this one.......

View attachment 100034
That's pretty much the situation for America, but we can only work with what we got. Might as well make the best of it.
 
V

Viligant_Warrior

Guest
#47
Hmm, well as this is the News Forum, and not the Bible Discussion Forum.........well......hmm

Take a look through the various Forum Titles.........and let me know which one you would suggest?
The guy has been complaining about threads all over the forum since he started here. He didn't like a discussion of conspiracies and corruption in the Conspiracies and Corruption Forum, so I don't think he really knows what CCF is, or why there are various forum divisions.
 

p_rehbein

Senior Member
Sep 4, 2013
30,414
6,647
113
#48
If Hillary is the best we got.........then we got nothing....and there is no making the best of nothing.

Hillary is the prime example of why the Big Bang Theory is flawed. Something can not come from nothing.

(oh, wait, did I say that out loud?)

:)
 
Dec 18, 2013
6,733
45
0
#49
If Hillary is the best we got.........then we got nothing....and there is no making the best of nothing.

Hillary is the prime example of why the Big Bang Theory is flawed. Something can not come from nothing.

(oh, wait, did I say that out loud?)

:)
Nah man, Hillary ain't all that bad actually. The right person at the right time. Precision, no mistakes. Too precise for luck to be real.
 
V

Viligant_Warrior

Guest
#50
Nah man, Hillary ain't all that bad actually. The right person at the right time. Precision, no mistakes. Too precise for luck to be real.
Pffft!

"Precision" doesn't get her Black Water, Vince Foster, "dead broke when we left the White House," private email usage in direct contravention of the law, etc., etc., etc., etc.

She's a hack being protected by the MSM, and will never, ever be elected president. Her own in-party opposition will cut her to pieces before the primary season is over.

The Clintons come from the Frank Underwood school of politics. What unites Bill’s roguish charm and Hillary’s relentless determination is an eye for the prize, with adherence to the rules optional.


 
Dec 18, 2013
6,733
45
0
#51
Pffft!

"Precision" doesn't get her Black Water, Vince Foster, "dead broke when we left the White House," private email usage in direct contravention of the law, etc., etc., etc., etc.

She's a hack being protected by the MSM, and will never, ever be elected president. Her own in-party opposition will cut her to pieces before the primary season is over.
Nah man, you can't even say she's protected by the MSM when so much crap is talked about Hillary. Everyone knows all the stuff about Hillary and has an opinion on Hillary cause we have seen Hillary for dang near 30 years for better or worse. Look around you. Putin on the move, Islam destroying itself and everything around it, America falling apart from the inside, China on the rise. WW3 in Africa, Middle East, and Europe.

You got Hillary and you got Jeb.
 
V

Viligant_Warrior

Guest
#52
You got Hillary and you got Jeb.
Neither will get through the primaries. Hillary may not even run. More likely, it's either Walker or Rubio (though I'd prefer Carson) vs. Warren.
 
Dec 18, 2013
6,733
45
0
#53
Neither will get through the primaries. Hillary may not even run. More likely, it's either Walker or Rubio (though I'd prefer Carson) vs. Warren.
Lol I thought you said it be Carson? You think if they folding him so early before he runs that they won't do the same to Rubio and Walker? Only Jeb and Hillary going to be able to survive the scrutiny of the primary process.
 

p_rehbein

Senior Member
Sep 4, 2013
30,414
6,647
113
#54
Nah man, Hillary ain't all that bad actually. The right person at the right time. Precision, no mistakes. Too precise for luck to be real.
No mistakes? Seriously? Goodness........here wait..........

laughing.gif
 
Mar 21, 2011
1,515
16
0
#55
To me, this manufactured controversy is a bit weak. It's not really going to have the same impact as the Obama manufactured scandals.

The big problem being Hilary is white. Racist stuff just works better to manufacture an opposition.

This email thing, just seems like a minor procedural thing (I agree she was stupid (or clever?) to do that, and she should have gotten an official email).

What worked in Australia for the rabid right wing to oust a female Prime Minister, is continued unrelenting sexist statements.

What you good Conservative Christian men need to do is concoct viscous misogynous slurs and play up the whole 'weak women can't lead a macho soldier military industrial complex thing'.

So until you lot start getting more sexist, your conspiracy theories and false stories will fail!

Fox News needs to start bashing and undermining women more.
 

p_rehbein

Senior Member
Sep 4, 2013
30,414
6,647
113
#56
To me, this manufactured controversy is a bit weak. It's not really going to have the same impact as the Obama manufactured scandals.

The big problem being Hilary is white. Racist stuff just works better to manufacture an opposition.

This email thing, just seems like a minor procedural thing (I agree she was stupid (or clever?) to do that, and she should have gotten an official email).

What worked in Australia for the rabid right wing to oust a female Prime Minister, is continued unrelenting sexist statements.

What you good Conservative Christian men need to do is concoct viscous misogynous slurs and play up the whole 'weak women can't lead a macho soldier military industrial complex thing'.

So until you lot start getting more sexist, your conspiracy theories and false stories will fail!

Fox News needs to start bashing and undermining women more.
Your answers/comments are no longer even credible................goodness.........manufactured controversy? Hillary herself manufactured the controversy be not adhering to the Directives of the Obama Administration.

The New York Times, Washington Post, Associated Press, and David Axelrod...........none of which are exactly right wing conservative heros..............ALL are calling her to task over this. It is the Democrats who are pushing this...........seriously.......no credibility whatsoever
 

Oncefallen

Idiot in Chief
Staff member
Jan 15, 2011
6,038
3,307
113
#57
This email thing, just seems like a minor procedural thing (I agree she was stupid (or clever?) to do that, and she should have gotten an official email).
Last time I checked intentionally ignoring the federal law that REQUIRES all Cabinet level officials to use US Govt. e-mail systems for ALL official e-mail goes well beyond a "minor procedural thing." The primary reason behind the law is so that no official can hide official communications from the public that they serve. This was a deliberate and willful attempt to circumvent the Freedom of Information Act which requires the government to release government documents to the public upon request. Since her e-mails were not on government servers the government would not be able to produce her e-mails.
 
V

Viligant_Warrior

Guest
#58
Last time I checked intentionally ignoring the federal law that REQUIRES all Cabinet level officials to use US Govt. e-mail systems for ALL official e-mail goes well beyond a "minor procedural thing." The primary reason behind the law is so that no official can hide official communications from the public that they serve. This was a deliberate and willful attempt to circumvent the Freedom of Information Act which requires the government to release government documents to the public upon request. Since her e-mails were not on government servers the government would not be able to produce her e-mails.
All exactly right. And not only that, but she issued an internal cable -- at least she didn't use an email, probably because she was confused as to which account to use -- to all State employees warning them not to use private, outside emails for State business.

Internal cable from Clinton State Department office barred use of personal email

An internal 2011 State Department cable, obtained by Fox News, shows that then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's office told employees not to use personal email for security reasons -- while at the same time, Clinton conducted all government business on a private account.
So, as always with the Clintons, particularly with Hillary, "Do as I say, not as I do."

gah.gif
 
K

kennethcadwell

Guest
#59
Looks like people jumping the gun again as it was just reported this morning again that even though Clinton used an unethical method in using the personal email account did not break any laws.
This and they brought how Jeb Bush, and Colin Powell did the same thing while in a governmental offices.
The other thing that they said this morning is that her server being in her basement is a lie, as the server that her private email account is saved to is in Connecticut on a Comcast server.
 
V

Viligant_Warrior

Guest
#60
Looks like people jumping the gun again as it was just reported this morning again that even though Clinton used an unethical method in using the personal email account did not break any laws.
Then don't read this, Ken, 'cause it might give you heartburn.

Emails show Clinton aides running interference during Benghazi attack

Emails obtained through a federal lawsuit show that two top aides to then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton were running interference internally during the 2012 Benghazi terror attack.

The aides were Philippe Reines, widely described as Clinton’s principal gate-keeper, and Cheryl Mills, who has been at Clinton's side for decades.

The emails show that while receiving updates about the assault as it happened, Mills told then-State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland to stop answering reporter questions about the status of Ambassador Chris Stevens, who was missing and later found dead.

Also littered throughout the State Department emails, obtained by conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch, are references to a so-called Benghazi Group. A diplomatic source told Fox News that was code inside the department for the so-called Cheryl Mills task force, whose job was damage control.
Anyone who doesn't think the "Benghazi Group" was lying, cheating, obfuscating, and keeping dirt off their boss is living in denial -- and that ain't just a river in Egypt.