Could Trump do anything to make you stop supporting him?

[cv5]

Now the Donald is saying the temporary protected status of legal migrants in Springfield, OH has to be revoked. He keeps saying Springfield was a "beautiful community" before they came; we all know "beautiful" means "white." Those immigrants are hurting no one; he's basing this solely on the ridiculous lie that they're eating dogs and cats. This is truly a wicked and evil man.

The hapless migrants are mere pawns in a criminal election fraud conspiracy.

A conspiracy that you are a willing accessory to. You know....aiding and abetting.

Bummer being you.

 

[ZNP]

A hypocrite is an actor wearing a mask. When Jesus accused the religious leaders of being hypocrites He was saying that unbelievers with reprobate minds and hearts were wearing a mask, just like Lucifer does, pretending to be angels of light when in fact they were involved in the occult, pagan worship, and every evil. As a result the term hypocrite has taken on another meaning which is they say one thing but do another.

Jesus talked about those who sit in Moses seat, they don't lift one pinky to help carry the burdens they put on others, so they are hypocrites. However, because they are pushing the word of God you should do the things they say and not the things they do.

For example, Resident Alien has pointed out an applicable verse.

"I was a stranger and you did not take Me in," Matthew 25:43

Kamala Harris did let the strangers in. She did feed, clothe and house them. Not with her money, not with her food, not with her home, but with yours. As a result she has almost nothing to give the victims of Helene and we are now told that there will be nothing for the victims of the next big disaster this year.

Matthew 23:2 Saying The scribes and the Pharisees sit in Moses' seat: 3 All therefore whatsoever they bid you observe, that observe and do; but do not ye after their works: for they say, and do not. 4 For they bind heavy burdens and grievous to be borne, and lay them on men's shoulders; but they themselves will not move them with one of their fingers.

 

[ZNP]

Isaiah 58:9 Then shalt thou call, and the Lord shall answer; thou shalt cry, and he shall say, Here I am. If thou take away from the midst of thee the yoke, the putting forth of the finger, and speaking vanity; 10 And if thou draw out thy soul to the hungry, and satisfy the afflicted soul; then shall thy light rise in obscurity, and thy darkness be as the noon day: 11 And the Lord shall guide thee continually, and satisfy thy soul in drought, and make fat thy bones: and thou shalt be like a watered garden, and like a spring of water, whose waters fail not. 12 And they that shall be of thee shall build the old waste places: thou shalt raise up the foundations of many generations; and thou shalt be called, The repairer of the breach, The restorer of paths to dwell in. 13 If thou turn away thy foot from the sabbath, from doing thy pleasure on my holy day; and call the sabbath a delight, the holy of the Lord, honourable; and shalt honour him, not doing thine own ways, nor finding thine own pleasure, nor speaking thine own words: 14 Then shalt thou delight thyself in the Lord; and I will cause thee to ride upon the high places of the earth, and feed thee with the heritage of Jacob thy father: for the mouth of the Lord hath spoken it.

 

[Smoke]

When a moderator deliberately interfered with whatever Vance wanted to say, how could anyone be pleased with this bogus debate? Their rules even called for no fact-checking and no shutting down the mic of the person speaking. Both these rules were broken.

And you say that you were impressed with Walz? Was that sarcasm or do you avoid the proof of your own eyes (if indeed you watched).
Top Pollster’s Focus Group Overwhelmingly Gives Victory To Vance Over Walz In VP Debate (dailywire.com)
When pressed by CNN how the group felt about Walz, he said they felt the first 30 minutes the Gov. was “stumbling” and “struggled,” but got better as the debate went on. He also said the focus group didn’t give him as high marks as Vance because they were critical of how Walz wasn’t “answering the questions” that the moderators posed to him.

Walz's performance was a total disaster, and only the dishonest MSM will refuse to admit it. Stumbling and struggling and looking like a deer caught in the headlights (as one picture showed). And lying through his teeth, like Harris.

I think you missed the key word in my post. I was "more" pleased with the VP debate rather than the presidential debate for a few reasons. The candidates actually debated substantively, the moderators were not AS biased against Vance as they were Trump, and there was a level of respect amongst the candidates.

There are two ways to view a debate performance: technically/stylistically and ideologically. Of course I prefer Vance's ideological framework exponentially more than Walz, this much ought to be a given. Technically/stylistically, I think it's clear that Vance crushed Walz. If not for the moment Vance was asked about the 2020 election, I could argue Vance threw a no hitter the entire debate. And to Walz's credit, he actually debated more honestly than Kamala.