I really do not think that this pardoning scheme is going to work.
Kyle Becker on X: "President Joe Biden should be required, by law, to explicitly list every crime for which he intends to pardon his son, Hunter Biden. Anything less than full disclosure not only erodes public trust but also raises profound constitutional questions about the misuse of executive https://t.co/e1HEEC3iRw" / X
President Joe Biden should be required, by law, to explicitly list every crime for which he intends to pardon his son, Hunter Biden. Anything less than full disclosure not only erodes public trust but also raises profound constitutional questions about the misuse of executive power. If the president issues a blanket pardon—granting his son immunity without clearly specifying the offenses—it could establish a dangerous precedent that undermines the rule of law.
A blanket pardon of this nature is an affront to the Constitution. Legal scholars and historians alike agree: the Founding Fathers did not intend for the pardon power to serve as a get-out-of-jail-free card for the politically connected. The framers envisioned a government rooted in accountability and transparency, yet here we are, watching the very pillars of justice wobble under the weight of partisan abuse.
If Hunter Biden were allowed to walk away from his legal troubles without the American public knowing the full extent of his wrongdoing, it would signal open season for corruption. Worse, it would grant Hunter Biden something no other U.S. citizen enjoys: absolute immunity from prosecution. Such a privilege flies in the face of the most basic principle of our justice system—"No one is above the law."
Blanket immunity for any U.S. citizen is unconstitutional and ripe for legal challenge. The precedent it sets is chilling. Imagine if every president could pardon their family members or close allies in this way. It would create a two-tiered justice system: one for the elite, who can commit crimes without consequence, and another for everyone else.