Daughter Raised by Two Moms Speaks Out
- Thread starter p_rehbein
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
it is my opinion that gay people have no business having children. A child is meant to have a mother AND a father.. they shouldn't have to introduce their parents as "my two moms" or "my two dads." Gays also have no business getting married.. If I had gay parents, it would embarass me greatly and scar me for life, and it most certainly would have a profound effect on the rest of my life.. as it obviously has on the OP.. jmo
Its a weird age we live in when the secular crowd puts mankind of equal level with animals.
I would imagine theyd pride themselves on being the "highest" people on the earth, but now they are justifying doing wrong by saying "animals do it too". Its like they wanna "de-evolve".
EDIT Or "un-evolve", haha no idea how to say such a thing
I would imagine theyd pride themselves on being the "highest" people on the earth, but now they are justifying doing wrong by saying "animals do it too". Its like they wanna "de-evolve".
EDIT Or "un-evolve", haha no idea how to say such a thing
G
I agree. Children need a mom and a dad. They, the mom and dad, are two polar opposites and together contribute to a child's development and growth. Only confusion emits from same sex parenting. Child doesn't know if dad A is the leader or dad B. Child can't figure why dad A is more masculine than dad B. Doesn't know if a man is feminine or masculine. And the poor child will not understand how two men could agree to introduce a child whether by adoption or in vetro or who knows how else into such an environment. "So dad, how did you and dad give birth to me? Dad, are you my dad, or is my other dad my dad?"
Just can't imagine the life and daily activities of such a relationship. How there can be romance, tenderness, comfort, security, defined roles . . . it's just not there. It ain't. And most know it ain't.
Just can't imagine the life and daily activities of such a relationship. How there can be romance, tenderness, comfort, security, defined roles . . . it's just not there. It ain't. And most know it ain't.
Let's see, dog's don't have human's rights and children are too young to consent.
I mean, if you really want to play this game... if we allow heterosexual marriage or marriage of any form, then someone will think it's okay to marry children and animals. All marriage is a slippery slope and therefore it should be banned outright. See, slippery slopes are easy.
And seeing as how my last comment was, for the most part, ignored... I suppose I won this debate?
I mean, if you really want to play this game... if we allow heterosexual marriage or marriage of any form, then someone will think it's okay to marry children and animals. All marriage is a slippery slope and therefore it should be banned outright. See, slippery slopes are easy.
And seeing as how my last comment was, for the most part, ignored... I suppose I won this debate?
S
Not yet anyway....give the libs some more time and your pet hamster will have as many "rights" as you.
Ya...functioning marriages the way that God intended for them to be is a slippery slope into sexually transmitted diseases, child porn, rape, sodomy, incest..........................not. Nice try tho.
I'm not really debating you.....Illustrating absurdity almost achieves its end all by itself...... I just like to give it a little nudge. But if it makes you feel better to say that you won something....I'm not gonna stop you.
Ya...functioning marriages the way that God intended for them to be is a slippery slope into sexually transmitted diseases, child porn, rape, sodomy, incest..........................not. Nice try tho.
I'm not really debating you.....Illustrating absurdity almost achieves its end all by itself...... I just like to give it a little nudge. But if it makes you feel better to say that you won something....I'm not gonna stop you.
Nah, two people of different races is in no way equal to two people of the same gender. Race is merely the way you look, gender is one half of both types of human being, man and woman. They are both very different from each other and deal with different issues and have very different expectations on the earth, and missing one of those two people is not the same to having a parent with darker skin than you
Those two things are in no way comparable.
Those two things are in no way comparable.
Okay, so to prevent this from ever happening, you want to treat gays like animals with no rights. Good to know.
Not all homosexuals are diseased, pedophile, rapist, orgy swimming, incest mongers. In fact, most of them aren't. Not only that, but those attributes can be applied to a lot of heterosexuals.
Now you're just being absurd.
Again, if you want to call homosexuality a sin - go for it. But don't make up nonsense.
Not all homosexuals are diseased, pedophile, rapist, orgy swimming, incest mongers. In fact, most of them aren't. Not only that, but those attributes can be applied to a lot of heterosexuals.
Now you're just being absurd.
Again, if you want to call homosexuality a sin - go for it. But don't make up nonsense.
S
"And the maples formed a union, and demanded equal rights. They say the oaks are just to lofty,and they grab up all the light.......now there's no more oak oppression, for they passed a noble law, and the trees are all kept equal, by hatchet, ax and saw".
This is where your line of thinking takes man. Call me stupid if it makes you feel better but I am far from stupid....thank you very much.
This is where your line of thinking takes man. Call me stupid if it makes you feel better but I am far from stupid....thank you very much.
Last edited:
V
I'll deal with the rest of your response when you can tell me how it is "irrelevant" for two "female parents" of a young girl to tell her she "doesn't need a man."
Her biopsychosocial instincts, her God-given self-image, told her that attempted indoctrination was a lie, and she became a wife who is very much loved by her husband., She saw the lie for what it was and chose to act on her God-given identity rather than a false image her lesbian "mommies" attempted to impose on her. She and her husband are raising a beautiful family, one I'm sure is doted on by both her natural parents, and perhaps even her fake "second mommy" too.
That would truly be ironic, given they tried to tell her she was a lesbian, with no need of a man. Such misinformation is directly impactful on her future life as a potential wife and mother. Saying that is "irrelevant" reveals a willful ignorance of what she is saying based on a biased viewpoint. It is itself irrelevant.
Her biopsychosocial instincts, her God-given self-image, told her that attempted indoctrination was a lie, and she became a wife who is very much loved by her husband., She saw the lie for what it was and chose to act on her God-given identity rather than a false image her lesbian "mommies" attempted to impose on her. She and her husband are raising a beautiful family, one I'm sure is doted on by both her natural parents, and perhaps even her fake "second mommy" too.
That would truly be ironic, given they tried to tell her she was a lesbian, with no need of a man. Such misinformation is directly impactful on her future life as a potential wife and mother. Saying that is "irrelevant" reveals a willful ignorance of what she is saying based on a biased viewpoint. It is itself irrelevant.
Was she told she didn't need a man or were the people saying this talking about how they, themselves, didn't need a man? Regardless, lesbians aren't necessarily man hating feminists. So if this woman was around a bunch of feminists, that sucks - but not all lesbians are idio...er... feminists.
Her father left her, creating separation anxiety. This is normal when parents stop becoming a part of their children's lives.
It sounds to me like she was around women who talked about how THEY didn't need men. I they were telling her that SHE didn't need a man - I would 100% agree with you. But not all gay parents try to force their sexuality onto their children. In fact, I'm willing to bet most don't - especially when you consider how children raised by gay parents are just as likely to be gay/straight as those raised by heterosexual parents.
Oh, and what about all the heterosexual parents who tell their children that they aren't gay - that they're straight and that they're just "confused"? I'm not excusing gay parents who do this with their children as you mentioned, but it's wrong in both instances.
You're judging all gay marriages based on a single stereotype.
Her father left her, creating separation anxiety. This is normal when parents stop becoming a part of their children's lives.
It sounds to me like she was around women who talked about how THEY didn't need men. I they were telling her that SHE didn't need a man - I would 100% agree with you. But not all gay parents try to force their sexuality onto their children. In fact, I'm willing to bet most don't - especially when you consider how children raised by gay parents are just as likely to be gay/straight as those raised by heterosexual parents.
Oh, and what about all the heterosexual parents who tell their children that they aren't gay - that they're straight and that they're just "confused"? I'm not excusing gay parents who do this with their children as you mentioned, but it's wrong in both instances.
You're judging all gay marriages based on a single stereotype.
A gay man is still a man and would obviously use the men's changing room...
Do you know what homosexuality is?
More importantly, you're still acting like all homosexuals are rapist, pedophile, orgy swimming, incest mongers... ignoring all the straight rapist, pedophile, orgy swimming, incest mongers...
There are homosexuals who are pedophiles and rapists. But this doesn't mean all homosexuals rapist pedophiles. This is in the same exact way in which not all heterosexuals are rapist pedophiles, even though some heterosexuals are pedophiles and rapists.
Do you know what homosexuality is?
More importantly, you're still acting like all homosexuals are rapist, pedophile, orgy swimming, incest mongers... ignoring all the straight rapist, pedophile, orgy swimming, incest mongers...
There are homosexuals who are pedophiles and rapists. But this doesn't mean all homosexuals rapist pedophiles. This is in the same exact way in which not all heterosexuals are rapist pedophiles, even though some heterosexuals are pedophiles and rapists.
S
now you're changing the subject and muddying the waters again. You asserted that the gay agenda is not a slippery slope into more and more devious behaviors..,and you are wrong, "transgenders" are being allowed to use whatever locker room they "feel" like they should use. All of it started with the "gay pride" movement. Next we will have men claiming minority status in that they should be able to have sex with young boys.....wait, we already do, it's called nambla and if it keeps going down the road it's going, someday they'll be able too without repercussion.