-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
A
I do not believe they want Harris in office. Harris is impeachment insurance for Biden. 
The joke used to be that Biden was impeachment insurance for Obama. What goes around I guess.
Harris is not capable of very much other than muddling up wherever she goes. Frankly I don't see the point in speculating as I don't think we have the info we would need on the whole White House shenanigans in order to be able to come to some sort of logical or believable conclusion to the whole fiasco.
One thing we do know though and that would be the deception and dangerous games being played by the government.
The joke used to be that Biden was impeachment insurance for Obama. What goes around I guess.Harris is not capable of very much other than muddling up wherever she goes. Frankly I don't see the point in speculating as I don't think we have the info we would need on the whole White House shenanigans in order to be able to come to some sort of logical or believable conclusion to the whole fiasco.
One thing we do know though and that would be the deception and dangerous games being played by the government.
-
2
- Show all
A
I think what JTB is saying is, NewTwitter is going to be THE PLACE for lies and confusion from both sides... Just look at how we argue among ourselves HERE...
Twitter is a killing field for truth or rather was under Dorsey. Instead of shooting down a plane that has not even taken off yet, why can't people wait and see.
A
Musk did not attribute that to Lord Acton. What Musk actually did attribute to Lord Acton was 'Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely.'
Listen to the video again.
historian Lord Acton
The quote Power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely comes from the nineteenth-century English historian Lord Acton (1834–1902) in a letter to Bishop Mandell Creighton about how historians should judge the abuse of power by past rulers, especially popes.
Listen to the video again.
historian Lord Acton
The quote Power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely comes from the nineteenth-century English historian Lord Acton (1834–1902) in a letter to Bishop Mandell Creighton about how historians should judge the abuse of power by past rulers, especially popes.
The question is if Twitter is a platform or a publisher. If they are a publisher they have the right to have editorial review, but then they also are liable for every post made just as the NY Times is liable to anything they publish in their paper.
If on the other hand they are a platform they can have lines that cannot be crossed, just as a track has lines for the lanes or a basketball court has lines showing what is out of bounds. The lines need to be transparent to all and you can blow the whistle if someone fouls another person. If you are a platform you can referee, you cannot decide who can and cannot play.
What Twitter has done and the evidence is now coming out is that they created algorithms that allowed them to "turn up the volume" on posts they liked. They could have phony bots subscribing and liking and commenting which gave those posts much more prominence and made them appear much more popular. Not only so but they could turn down the volume on posts they didn't like. They could make it seem these posts had far fewer subscribers, fewer likes and fewer views. Since people have a financial interest in this you can call that robbery and no doubt if the evidence comes out there will be lawsuits (the sequel to the movie "There will be blood").
This explains the meltdown when he bought the company because all the employees knew what they were doing. They knew they were taking the weirdest 1% of the world and making them appear to be 20% and taking those who represent 65% of the world and making it appear they represent 35%. They knew they could influence elections, and push their corrupt agenda and now it will all be exposed.
If on the other hand they are a platform they can have lines that cannot be crossed, just as a track has lines for the lanes or a basketball court has lines showing what is out of bounds. The lines need to be transparent to all and you can blow the whistle if someone fouls another person. If you are a platform you can referee, you cannot decide who can and cannot play.
What Twitter has done and the evidence is now coming out is that they created algorithms that allowed them to "turn up the volume" on posts they liked. They could have phony bots subscribing and liking and commenting which gave those posts much more prominence and made them appear much more popular. Not only so but they could turn down the volume on posts they didn't like. They could make it seem these posts had far fewer subscribers, fewer likes and fewer views. Since people have a financial interest in this you can call that robbery and no doubt if the evidence comes out there will be lawsuits (the sequel to the movie "There will be blood").
This explains the meltdown when he bought the company because all the employees knew what they were doing. They knew they were taking the weirdest 1% of the world and making them appear to be 20% and taking those who represent 65% of the world and making it appear they represent 35%. They knew they could influence elections, and push their corrupt agenda and now it will all be exposed.
-
1
- Show all
J
I think I understand what you're trying to say but not for the way you said it...
-
1
- Show all
A
Go ahead lol...
Well, you can say it as many times as you care to. Free speech and all that you know.
As for the arguments here, many seem to be caused by people with a view on the Bible that does not line up with what the Bible actually says. As I read earlier today in another thread, people with viewpoints that are s t r a n g e and no one accepts what they say so they go to a forum and jump on a soapbox until they are shown the door. (not exact words but same idea)Why would you compare this forum (there are many Christian forums out there and I have been on a few and they are all different) to Twitter? Twitter is actually lies and confusion right up to Musk buying the thing and that is with only one side contributing because the actual ability to express a different viewpoint has been hiding behind the Passenger Pigeon. I don't even use Twitter; and speaking of the forum again, we would not have 'arguments' if it was as censored as Twitter has been. (Light bulb hopefully goes on at this point?)
-
1
- Show all
