I can only go off of past history. There have been two prime examples (more than one interaction, but who's counting
) where you refused to look at evidence that conflicted with your point of view. The ironic thing is, we agree more than we disagree. I think if you actually engaged and at least humored an opposing view, you would be quite effective in making people reconsider their position... you're very intelligent and articulate (from what I've seen so far). I was speaking more matter-of-fact to Kayla. Clearly, neither of you will budge as neither of you think the other is right.
Also, I agree with your point about her video not being "proof" or "evidence". While he makes statements he believes are factual, they aren't substantiated by anything other than what he believes to be true.