Thats your view, if your own justice could not found and proof a false election. It must be correct.
Our Supreme Court refused to hear any cases involving voter fraud in Texas, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Arizona, Georgia...How can the truth be revealed if those with authority refuse to even look at the evidence? It is much easier to spin a "no voter fraud" story when the courts refuse to do their job.
Voter's addresses and names are public knowledge. There have been folks, Steven Crowder and his team on youtube are some, that have tracked down addresses of so-called "registered voters" that led them to random spots in the middle of the highway. In one instance, they knocked on a voter's door and asked to talk to the man associated with the voter's registration. Come to find out, that person had never lived there and, in fact, the current occupant had been there for something like ten years. They also discovered several people with the same name/address had voted a myriad of times. And this was just in Detroit.
If regular citizens can track down this much voter fraud it makes one wonder how much more is out there that's being hidden.
Here, we have "poll watchers". Both sides (Republican and Democrat) are allowed to stand and watch and keep those counting votes accountable. But this last vote, the conservative poll watchers were refused access. Does that not sound suspicious to you? Where is the accountability if only one party is watching the vote count?
In another instance, vote counting stopped because a water main broke. The counters sent the poll watchers home with the intention of returning in the morning to continue counting but as soon as everyone was gone, the continued counting! Later it was discovered there was no broken water pipes! Why the deception?
There certainly was fraud but the Democratic side has hidden it well. And now that they control so much of our government, they will never give up their position of power. To say our government "is correct" on this matter is just ignorant.
- 2
- 1
- Show all